Activity Stream

Your inability to comprehend English would make you the one with the sub-80 IQ. Feel free to shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.

If anyone is interested in the truth (that wouldn't be warriorfan) I've said that Beal's contract turned out fine for Washington becaude they managed to get rid of it and get some assets out of it. I have never said that Beal is worth paying the supermax worth a no-trade clause.

You have an iq of sub 80. I literally can’t understand anything you say 75% of the time or more.

Not just Tucker, all of them. Even people like Arby and 1987. They call us "Israel first" but really they're the ones fixated on Israel. That's the #1 and most important issue to them. Where you stand on Israel is the litmus test that defines their worldview. You could be 99% on board with the MAGA agenda but if you don't think Israel is the...

Imagine being stupid enough to think I'm defending Beal's contract. Good news... you don't have to.

For the record the only 3 people on planet earth who think Beal’s contact isn’t insanely toxic. Dmavs Kblaze That green chode No one else. No one. Lmao

Imagine playing semantics trying to defend one of the most obviously toxic contracts in NBA History. Lol. Most disingenuous dude I swear. It’s quite scary.

I'm sure lots of folks nowadays wish they could be 'expats' at a young age.

The time stamp on the criticism has nothing to do with whether or not the trade or signing was good. You're commenting on irrelevant details.

What's confusing you?

I'm referring to MTG types, acting like it's some crime against humanity. "In debt forever! In debt for life!" Her own words. She's trying to scare people. Nobody owns their home for 50 years anymore. It's just a means to help more people get in the door. The price of real estate has nothing to do with asset managers and companies buying up...

Kblaze you are being kinda cringe Stop having lil dick syndrom and just admit you were wrong. It’s not even a big deal. You being weird.

Those people were saying how bad the Beal deal was from day 1. lol. Terrible comparison. And the problem with the Paul George trade is that Kawhi allegedly wasn't coming if they didn't get George. So it was only SGA + picks for George on a very surface level.

With kessler out he has an argument as their 2nd best player already

Is no one gonna point to how fukked up it is for Candace to show Charlie's private texts to the world like this? How is that okay? Because he's dead? That gives you the right to air his personal business? I could understand if you were trying to clear his name or something, but to prove that what? That he may have talked shit about Ben Shapiro??...

How good or bad a trade is should always be judged by the quality of the assets. It's a bit of a contradiction that in this thread we have people talking about what a bad signing Beal was for Washington and using the Phoenix failure as justification but somehow can't discredit the Clipper side of the George trade when the immediate return was...

Did you even read the thread? :lol

Wow you would think Trump is forcing people to take a 50 year loan with a gun to their head. It's just another option. I have news for you, most buyers are going to consider this if it comes to fruition. The average person is only going to own their home for about 10-13 years before selling or moving. The length of the loan never mattered. ...

Another thing to keep in mind that Kawhi wanted PG13 so it was kind of a package deal. Obviously it's been a disaster but i dont remember people at the time making a big deal about SGA being part of it.

The discussion is clearly about the logic behind the trade when it happened. Obviously, the SGA trade is catastrophic in hindsight, but at the time, trying to lock up a guy in contention as the best in the world and coming off a FMVP run in Kawhi while also adding another two way player coming off a career year and an All-NBA 1st Team nod in PG...

Well hopefully as the Mavs continue to suck they will still cheer to fire Nico, even though he's already been fired.

He missed his 3s but was good outside of that. 3 steals, 7 rebounds, 4-6 on 2s.

No. People were talking about how that trade was bad at the time but there weren't AS MANY people saying it was the worst trade in NBA history. That's what we're talking about. It didn't even require hindsight. It didn't require waiting. Everyone knew how atrociously bad it was in the moment. That's what makes it the worst. Long term...

Your premise, that the actual results of the trade don't matter, is completely wrong.

Well deserved! Does anyone else believe that the threat of a trade could have done just as much as the trade itself in motivating Luka to get in shape?

That's not how that works at all. You're talking about with the benefit of 100% hindsight. Proctor is without question directly addressing what it obviously was in the moment, which was pure stupidity. Speculation wasn't needed. We didn't need a year or 5 to see how it would play out. It was just immediately bad.

SGA plus picks and assets for Paul George will always be worse.

It was, and will continue to be the worst trade in NBA history he made...out of shape Luka or not. I don't care to go too far re-hashing this point again but it is worth noting that the team was expertly crafted around Luka and was in every position to contend at the highest level (not to mention a year removed from just doing so). It wasn't...