PDA

View Full Version : 5 on 5 Full Court-Who would win?



jlip
07-17-2011, 11:24 PM
NBA's Shortest Players Ever
Mugsy Bogues - 5'3"
Earl Boykins - 5'5"
Spud Webb - 5'7"
Nate Robinson - 5'9"
Michael Adams- 5'10"

vs

NBA's Tallest Players Ever
Manute Bol- Height: 7'7"
Gheorghe Muresan- Height: 7'7"
Shawn Bradley- 7'6"
Yao Ming -Height: 7'6"
Chuck Nevitt- 7'5"

Who would win a game of full court basketball?

L.Kizzle
07-17-2011, 11:25 PM
Calvin Murphy is 5'9.

ThaSwagg3r
07-17-2011, 11:26 PM
7 footers if they aren't stupid. All they would have to do is have two or three guys play defense and two or three guys play offense and throw really high full court passes. It would be like high school gym basketball. :oldlol:

NastaMaverick
07-17-2011, 11:26 PM
the short team. mainly because I feel the tall team would have a hard ass time getting the ball up the court

bluechox2
07-17-2011, 11:26 PM
http://allstar.kg/uploads/posts/2009-11/1257094882_nate-robinson-packing-yao.jpg

shorties got skillz

az00m
07-17-2011, 11:27 PM
the tall ones. because 3 of them can seriously just play offense while two just stay back and play defense hahaha

jlip
07-17-2011, 11:28 PM
Calvin Murphy is 5'9.

Good catch. I forgot about him.

EnoughSaid
07-17-2011, 11:28 PM
Well, considering that the short guys are better shooters and are much quicker, I think they can score easier. They wouldn't be able to defend whatsoever and the tall guys would waste absolutely no energy in scoring.

Papaya Petee
07-17-2011, 11:29 PM
Big guys, they can score on every single possesion.

Stuckey
07-17-2011, 11:40 PM
what kind of dumb question is this

bluechox2
07-17-2011, 11:43 PM
at least 3 of them tall guys probably cant shoot for life
and all of them cannot dribble the ball up the court without them little folks runing trough their legs

PistonsFan#21
07-18-2011, 12:05 AM
at least 3 of them tall guys probably cant shoot for life
and all of them cannot dribble the ball up the court without them little folks runing trough their legs

they could get the ball upcourt without even using a single dribble. All they have to do is inbound the ball and do lob passes to each other all the way until they get under the rim

yobore
07-18-2011, 12:29 AM
they could get the ball upcourt without even using a single dribble. All they have to do is inbound the ball and do lob passes to each other all the way until they get under the rim

The problem there is that these little guys can jump and would be intercepting any passes that aren't perfect. And Muggsy will scoop up any ball that comes near the floor before a big can even lock his eyes on it.

Although as a whole the bigs are better players, this would not be a contest the little guys would wear them down and shoot open J after open J while creating turnovers on half of the other possessions

bluechox2
07-18-2011, 12:48 AM
they could get the ball upcourt without even using a single dribble. All they have to do is inbound the ball and do lob passes to each other all the way until they get under the rim
:lol

iamgine
07-18-2011, 01:15 AM
Tall players can dribble...and shorties aren't stealing the ball unless they double team. In which case somebody else is open for a pass.

pauk
07-18-2011, 02:11 AM
NBA's Shortest Players Ever
Mugsy Bogues - 5'3"
Earl Boykins - 5'5"
Spud Webb - 5'7"
Nate Robinson - 5'9"
Michael Adams- 5'10"

vs

NBA's Tallest Players Ever
Manute Bol- Height: 7'7"
Gheorghe Muresan- Height: 7'7"
Shawn Bradley- 7'6"
Yao Ming -Height: 7'6"
Chuck Nevitt- 7'5"

Who would win a game of full court basketball?

the shortest guys.......... because none of those 7 footer could possibly manage to play PG... to bring the ball up without turning it over............ :oldlol: especially not when somebody so small and fast is fullcourt pressin you....

Boston C's
07-18-2011, 02:16 AM
The team that has a giraffe as an escort to the beach will win

Suckafree
07-18-2011, 02:23 AM
I think ima go with the short guys. unless the bigs play incredibly smart they dont stand a chance

32MJ32
07-18-2011, 02:30 AM
The big guys wouldn't need to dribble - take the ball out of the basket, throw a lob, throw a lob, throw a lob, dunk. The ball wouldn't touch the floor.

The only thing that would save the little guys is endurance. If the game went for a full 48 minutes with no subs, they'd have a chance to score a lot of points in the 4th quarter when the big guys were spent.

If I had $100, I'd bet on the big guys.

Soothing Layup
07-18-2011, 02:41 AM
Bringing it up past the halfcourt wouldn't be a problem for the bigs because they can throw lob passes. Dribbling doesn't even need to be in there game. Plus the small people would never get a rebound so they'd have to be shooting lights out.

imlmf
07-18-2011, 04:25 AM
Well, considering that the short guys are better shooters and are much quicker, I think they can score easier. They wouldn't be able to defend whatsoever and the tall guys would waste absolutely no energy in scoring.

you're contradicting yourself dude, how can one team "score easier" while the other "waste absolutely no energy in scoring, because the short team won't be able to defend at all"?

iamgine
07-18-2011, 04:55 AM
There seems to be this false thinking that the tall guys won't be able to dribble at all. They can, maybe not straight up all the time, but certainly they can dribble back to basket very easily without getting the ball stolen.

Toizumi
07-18-2011, 05:09 AM
There seems to be this false thinking that the tall guys won't be able to dribble at all. They can, maybe not straight up all the time, but certainly they can dribble back to basket very easily without getting the ball stolen.

These players have been playing ball all their life, yet people think they can't dribble a ball up the court without getting it stolen/or them dribbling it off their foot.
The short guys don't stand a chance here. Scoring would be too easy for the bigs. Even if you double team, they'd be able to get the ball deep in the post and just rise up or hook it up over the small team. Getting the ball up the court would be somewhat of an issue, but with good passes and some dribbling, they'd get there.
The small team would get crushed on defensive and on offense, they'd have to rely on their shooting, fastbreaks mostly. Driving inside for the finish would be hella tough and getting shots up over somebody a foot taller isn't easy either, doesn't matter how much quicker/faster you are. Height matters in this game...

Laimbeer_Rodman
07-18-2011, 05:25 AM
Short team

yobore
07-18-2011, 09:10 AM
There seems to be this false thinking that the tall guys won't be able to dribble at all. They can, maybe not straight up all the time, but certainly they can dribble back to basket very easily without getting the ball stolen.
You seem to be thinking of star 7 footers against regular combo guard. This is not the case in the matchup. There is no chance of any of these bigs dribbling face up and not getting swiped. It's possible for Yao to dribble while backing down one on one but considering none of the other bigs can space the floor the small guys will easily be able to double team all of them. And that's assuming that the bigs pass it to each perfectly enough to avoid get the ball down the court.

This is simply no contest. You have five of the most skilled and athletic players (there's no way these guys make the league otherwise) ever against some of the least skilled and coordinated players ever. Muggsy Bogues probably sees everything in half speed compared to Manute. Besides Yao, these big guys roles were just protecting the paint. It's somewhat like asking if a team of 11 goalies can beat a team of 11 midfielders in soccer.

iamgine
07-18-2011, 09:17 AM
You seem to be thinking of star 7 footers against regular combo guard. This is not the case in the matchup. There is no chance of any of these bigs dribbling face up and not getting swiped. It's possible for Yao to dribble while backing down one on one but considering none of the other bigs can space the floor the small guys will easily be able to double team all of them. And that's assuming that the bigs pass it to each perfectly enough to avoid get the ball down the court.

This is simply no contest. You have five of the most skilled and athletic players (there's no way these guys make the league otherwise) ever against some of the least skilled and coordinated players ever. Muggsy Bogues probably sees everything in half speed compared to Manute. Besides Yao, these big guys roles were just protecting the paint. It's somewhat like asking if a team of 11 goalies can beat a team of 11 midfielders in soccer.
I see you're not gonna change your opinion so I won't bother.

rule1223
07-18-2011, 11:55 AM
LOL at anyone thinking the tall team couldnt get the ball up court, im betting anyone of the tall guys can back any of the short players from his own basket to the other basket with ease. Theyd score every single time up the court.

Eat Like A Bosh
07-18-2011, 12:18 PM
J.J Barea is listed as 6'0", but he very well could be on the short list. Seen him in RL once, and there's no way he could be taller than 5'9".

Anyways back to the question, I'd say the Tall Guys would take this, if they're not stupid. You're acting like these tall guys all have terrible handles, I'm pretty sure someone who has played basketball all their life can dribble the ball up court, without getting it stolen easily. They could just play their back against the basket the whole time. The short guys would have a hard time stealing the ball in that case, unless they double team, which leaves someone else open.

Not to mention, the tall dudes could just have 3 guys on one side of the court, 2 guys on the other, seal the paint and bait them to take outside jumpers, which is rather ineffective for the long term. The short guys will have a tough time shooting over the tall dudes. And then the tall guys get the rebound, throw a long lob on the other end, easy 2 points.

Tall guys win easily, would be like high schoolers vs elementary schoolers. Given that the tall guys aren't retarded.

az00m
07-18-2011, 12:24 PM
All they have to do is back down the court from basket to basket, or just pass it to each other while standing there all the way down court. You must be a mental midget if you believe a bunch of shorter guys can beat people who are two foot taller.

kNIOKAS
07-18-2011, 12:24 PM
i think deciding factor would be how many threes the short team would dare to take. because bigs are scoring on every possesion with ease. and they can semi protect the paint as well.

wally_world
07-18-2011, 01:25 PM
Tall guys. They have the best player and the mismatch they can create is far more effective than the other way around.

BarberSchool
07-18-2011, 02:35 PM
7 footers if they aren't stupid. All they would have to do is have two or three guys play defense and two or three guys play offense and throw really high full court passes. It would be like high school gym basketball. :oldlol:This. :cheers: :roll:

Eat Like A Bosh
07-18-2011, 09:37 PM
Tall guys win easily. They have the best player on their team, Yao Ming.

Kevin_Gamble
07-18-2011, 09:46 PM
Tall guys can form a human chain about 10 feet apart. Then once you hand the ball off, you just walk to the end of the line and wait for your hand off. So,

Yao (inbound) -> Bol -> Muresan -> Bradley -> Nevit - > Yao -> Bol -> Muresan -> Nevit -> Yao (dunk)

Then repeat.

jlip
09-05-2014, 05:38 PM
gratuitous bump