PDA

View Full Version : Shawn Kemp; Derrick Coleman; Larry Johnson



L.Kizzle
12-07-2011, 02:06 AM
These 3 young men ushered in a new era of basketball for the 90s.


All 3 being drafted in consecutive years. First, Kemp in 89 for the Sonics, Coleman to the Nets in 90 and Johnson by the Hornets in 1991. By the start of the new millennium, these should have been hall of famers were either washed up, out the league or moving from team to team their last few seasons.

Everything started off all so well for them. Some quicker than others (Johnson and Coleman.) They were a new breed of every power forward that you see today. They were all a part of Dream Team II in 1994. They were All-Stars, All-NBA team members and some of the best forwards in the early to mid 1990s.



http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_A3Rar9PD2w4/SAA30x4XtvI/AAAAAAAAALc/lu8FAjgrLfY/s400/kemp_254_901209.jpg
-Kemp was the first of those athletic super forwards that we see today. Throwing it down on anyone in sight. He was 6'10 with a frame had power of Dominique but the agility of Clyde Drexler.


http://www.basketusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/derrick-coleman.jpg
-Coleman was one of he first forwards to really put in on the floor, take you outside for a jumper with range and still play close to the basket.


http://counterkicks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/larry-johnson-grandmama-converse.jpg
-Johnson, was a little of both Coleman and Kemp, but about 5 inches shorter than both. Yet he was much stronger than them and most of his opponents.

By the end of the decade, they had all left their original teams and while Kemp still made one final All-Star appearance in 1998 for the Cavs, his boys Johnson (now for the Knicks) was a shell of his former self but sill came up big with the 4-point play heard round the world. Coleman was on his 3rd team by that point and had probably fallen off the worse of the three, yet stuck around in the league longer than all of them.

Coleman seemed to have the most potential of the three, Johnson was more hyped coming out of college yet Shawn Kemp had the best career out of all of them.



Still, they could have been much, much more. I need to find my NBA Remix VHS that featured all three in music video segments ... memories.

Smoke117
12-07-2011, 02:47 AM
Definitely all players that could have been more than they were. Coleman frankly just fell into the Antoine Walker syndrome...he thought he was a perimeter player and the more years that went on the further away from the basket his game moved. He actually rebounded played good defense before the injuries, but not so much after after defensively and he just became a guy who wanted to shoot jump shots. Injuries or not, he should have been playing more in the post.

Shawn Kemp. This guy is hard to rate. He was an athletic freak which gave him an extreme natural advantage of every single PF of his era, but fundamentally he was not a particularly good player. Defensively he was EXTREMELY PRONE to foul trouble. That's why his mpg are never really low. In 10 of the seasons he played he averaged 4.0PF or near it and led the league in total PF's three times. He could definitely protect the paint at the very least at a "good" rate but he was no excellent defensive player. He is one of the very many reasons Payton shouldn't have won DPOY though as he had Kemp behind him who while still extremely foul prone could protect the paint.

Offensively I don't think he was really anything special. He was most dangerous in the open court as he is one of the greatest finishers ever, period. His post game was never anything anyone really feared. He was never a "go to guy" though he did step up big time vs the bulls that 96 finals, schooling Rodman and everything, but in general and throughout his career You can't rate someone when they were just playing at their peak. Generally he really was just an okay post player and nothing special. It was the athleticism that made him great.

As far as Larry Johnson goes...he's kind the poor man's Charles Barkley of his era. He was good scorer and rebounder before injuries took him down, but frankly LJ was always A PISS POOR DEFENSIVE PLAYER even before his injuries who was lucky to play next to Alonzo Mourning and than Patrick Ewing.

G.O.A.T
12-07-2011, 03:25 AM
The beginning of the entitlement generation. Too much money too quickly. Most of the stars of that generation including these guys were well past their prime before 30. A big part of why guys like Jordan, Barkley, Olajuwon, Ewing, Robinson, Stockton, Malone etc. stayed dominant for so long.

Add to the list Kenny Anderson, Vin Baker, Isiah Rider, Jimmy Jackson etc.

But the three you mentioned were the best examples. What great starts. Johnson broke down physically, Coleman mentally and Kemp psychologically, but they all broke down. I'd agree that Coleman seemed the most destined for stardom. It seemed only a matter of time before he, not Kemp joined Barkley and Malone as the games best power forwards.

Perhaps their choices of shoe contracts should have clued us in. Kemp signed with Reebok, thus he had staying power and peaked pretty high, but was never the best. Johnson, a converse star, peaked with the company and faded from the market just as fast. And Coleman...he signed with British Knights. The cycle of bad choices had begun before we even realized it.

senelcoolidge
12-07-2011, 04:56 AM
Underachievers. I remember the smirk Coleman often wore on his face. Lazy ass. Johnson broke apart. He wore a beard and was a shadow of his former self in those Knick teams. He than disappeared. Kemp great athlete and the best in game dunker I've seen. Drugs are bad for you kids.

dirkdiggler41
12-07-2011, 05:01 AM
Shawn Kemp - The Reignman (a documentary)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vi1fkMUJJ1s&feature=BFa&list=PL03C9A3C4657C4F12&lf=results_main

JohnnySic
12-07-2011, 07:06 AM
Coleman could have been an all time great, but got lazy. Kemp could have been somewhat less great, and also go lazy. LJ wasn't quite on that level, and succumbed to injuries.

Webber belongs in this group as well.

9512
12-07-2011, 07:33 AM
Coleman could have been an all time great, but got lazy. Kemp could have been somewhat less great, and also go lazy. LJ wasn't quite on that level, and succumbed to injuries.

Webber belongs in this group as well.

All were 1st overall picks except Kemp.

Only Shaq (also 1st pick in 92) managed to have a great career. he was lazy too but his skillset of plowing people and dunking was enough to win 4 titles, win popular votes for over 14 ASGs, and still marketable enough to earn endorsements well past his prime.

ILLsmak
12-07-2011, 08:20 AM
lol @ shaq hate.

Yea man I miss the 90s. Whenever I watch those classic 90s games on nbatv I'm like OH remember (that guy!) There was another guy that I was thinking of. I'll have to look up who it was.

Oh yeah, Laphonso Ellis whatever happened to him? Did he get injured or something? I forgot. That dude was a stud for a second. I know his stats don't reflect it but, he was always one of those guys that was just beast mode. I remember I used to live in Illinois and I'd always watch the bulls (cuz every game would be televised) and I'd always be cheering against them (lol), but I remember certain people that just did the Bulls like Damon Stoudamire. I always liked watching Laphonso play.

And if you don't remember dude check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoTGDam-06I sorry to highjack your thread lol...

-Smak

JohnnySic
12-07-2011, 09:12 AM
^LaPhonso Ellis would have been a big star if he never got injured. And I agree that his stats dont tell the story.

Aussie Dunker
12-07-2011, 10:05 AM
If Kemp stayed at the Sonics with GP, I think he might of had a very, very good career.

Also the lockout hurt him, ate too many burgers in those lost months

Gotterdammerung
12-07-2011, 12:59 PM
I remember them all.

I remember Derrick Coleman begging out of games vs the Utah Jazz because he did not want any piece of Karl Malone's thuggery. :oldlol:

I couldn't figure out why he didn't play harder (had all the skills) until much later.

I enjoyed watching Kemp the most of the three, because he did play hard and all-out, but after 1997, he was no longer the same guy. :facepalm

I remember a specific game -- the Sonics vs the Rockets in the regular season, in 1994. The Sonics easily held a 10 point lead until the Rockets stormed back. Kemp had the ball right under the rim once, and Hakeem went up with him, lightly blocking his shot. Then Kemp got it back and gathered himself, and Hakeem went up again, but this time, rejecting it with authority - all the way out to the 3 point land. Kendall Gill got it and swooped down for a dunk over Hakeem, but got called for charging. Rockets won the game. :oldlol: Youtube anyone?

Grandmamma had the best shtick -- too bad that back injury just about wiped out his game and left him on the perimeter chucking shots.

Kevin_Gamble
12-07-2011, 01:09 PM
Larry Johnson = Blake Griffin beta version.

9512
12-07-2011, 01:55 PM
I remember them all.

I remember Derrick Coleman begging out of games vs the Utah Jazz because he did not want any piece of Karl Malone's thuggery. :oldlol:

I couldn't figure out why he didn't play harder (had all the skills) until much later.

I enjoyed watching Kemp the most of the three, because he did play hard and all-out, but after 1997, he was no longer the same guy. :facepalm

I remember a specific game -- the Sonics vs the Rockets in the regular season, in 1994. The Sonics easily held a 10 point lead until the Rockets stormed back. Kemp had the ball right under the rim once, and Hakeem went up with him, lightly blocking his shot. Then Kemp got it back and gathered himself, and Hakeem went up again, but this time, rejecting it with authority - all the way out to the 3 point land. Kendall Gill got it and swooped down for a dunk over Hakeem, but got called for charging. Rockets won the game. :oldlol: Youtube anyone?

Grandmama had the best shtick -- too bad that back injury just about wiped out his game and left him on the perimeter chucking shots.

I think Kemp's drinking became a problem during the 96-97 season. It was frustrating to watch as a Sonics fan. I remember he had the "audacity" to get wasted on powerful shots on whatever alcoholic drinks until the wee hours when the Bulls were in town to play them the next day. MJ did put on a magnificent show that day. Here is the Youtube upload of it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdHprs15wS4

And those Grandmama Converse shoe commercials were the shiznit! "THAT WAS A LUCKY SHOT GRANDMA!"

This is the 1st LJ commercial I ever saw (circa 1992):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwGnE3bnYkA

vert48
12-07-2011, 02:48 PM
Add Glenn Robinson to the list.

Definitely the beginning of the entitlement generation. Bunch of of morons.

9512
12-07-2011, 02:55 PM
Add Glenn Robinson to the list.

Definitely the beginning of the entitlement generation. Bunch of of morons.

His class (94 draft) was the last draft to have been allowed to sign a lucrative contract before even playing a single minute of an NBA game.

Didn't they institute the new rookie contract for the 95 draft class (3 year at 2-4 mill/year)?

Smoke117
12-07-2011, 02:57 PM
I think Kemp's drinking became a problem during the 96-97 season. It was frustrating to watch as a Sonics fan. I remember he had the "audacity" to get wasted on powerful shots on whatever alcoholic drinks until the wee hours when the Bulls were in town to play them the next day. MJ did put on a magnificent show that day.

And those Grandmama Converse shoe commercials were the shiznit! "THAT WAS A LUCKY SHOT GRANDMA!"

This is the 1st LJ commercial I ever saw (circa 1992):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwGnE3bnYkA

Pretty sure that's about the time his cocaine problem started to get out of control too.

Gotterdammerung
12-07-2011, 03:37 PM
And those Grandmama Converse shoe commercials were the shiznit! "THAT WAS A LUCKY SHOT GRANDMA!"

This is the 1st LJ commercial I ever saw (circa 1992):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwGnE3bnYkA:cheers:

Munchkin: Welcome to three-point land!
Grandmamma: I gotta have an inside game!

The Irony is rich. :oldlol:

bwink23
12-07-2011, 04:02 PM
All good points....seems like alot of the future stars from the 90's broke down physically, going down with injuries and never returning to prior form......can this be attributed to the physicality of 90's basketball??

vert48
12-07-2011, 04:15 PM
All good points....seems like alot of the future stars from the 90's broke down physically, going down with injuries and never returning to prior form......can this be attributed to the physicality of 90's basketball??I think it is due to the players having a total lack of commitment to anything resembling a work ethic. Those guys cared more about grabbing their Johnsons and styling after a dunk than working on their games or their fitness.

Take away basketball, and they end up selling crack on the corner.

9512
12-07-2011, 04:47 PM
I think it is due to the players having a total lack of commitment to anything resembling a work ethic. Those guys cared more about grabbing their Johnsons and styling after a dunk than working on their games or their fitness.

Take away basketball, and they end up selling crack on the corner.

http://hightimes.com/news/ht_admin/1262

G-train
12-07-2011, 06:34 PM
Love LJ, even on the knicks.
It was like watching a soap opera.
Who could ever forgot the imaginary foul and 4 point play.

L.Kizzle
12-07-2011, 11:51 PM
I didn't forget about LaPhonso Ellis, Baker, Anderson, ect and especially Chris Webber. I was just listing the first of the new age power forwards. The guards I will save for a different thread. Webber was actually birthed from these guys as he came into the league whe they were becoming stars.

Lebron23
02-23-2012, 02:58 AM
Larry Johnson could have been the next Charles Barkley. I still remember his 4 point play in the 1999 NBA playoffs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xlCbpPN8rs

Sarcastic
02-23-2012, 03:01 AM
If Larry Johnson didn't hurt his back, he would be an all time power forward. The other guys, not so much.

Xiao Yao You
02-23-2012, 04:44 AM
I remember Derrick Coleman begging out of games vs the Utah Jazz because he did not want any piece of Karl Malone's thuggery.

That's the best part of the recent Karl interview where he went off on the Sloan/Jazz parting. He said Coleman was his favorite to play against and Derrick was the most afraid to play him.

RonySeikalyFTL
02-23-2012, 11:10 AM
That's the best part of the recent Karl interview where he went off on the Sloan/Jazz parting. He said Coleman was his favorite to play against and Derrick was the most afraid to play him.

Probably because Karl epitomized everything Coleman was not. The hardest worker in the history of the game IMO, and I'm a biased TD fan. Guy doesn't get near enough respect these days.

Oh, and he's also the author of what is IMO the greatest statistical game in the history of the NBA: 33 minutes, 21/26 from the field, 19/23, 61 points and 18 rebounds. Take a second to think about how insane those numbers are. Jazz won by 48 points btw, hence the relatively low number of minutes.

Sorry to hijack this thread with some random Karl Malone n*thugging. Carry on.

KevinNYC
02-23-2012, 11:43 AM
To this day, I think the best dunk I ever saw was Shawn Kemp in the McDonald's All American game. I would love to see if anyone has video on that to see if it was as good as I remember. He was at the three point line took one step and slammed it. This was in a regular half court set and i remember the lane being somewhat crowded.

JohnnySic
02-23-2012, 11:47 AM
If Larry Johnson didn't hurt his back, he would be an all time power forward. The other guys, not so much.
No, Coleman was the really special one. Had a complete inside/outside game and all the skills. At his very short peak he was the most complete 4 I ever saw, better than Barkley, Malone, TD, or KG.

Kemp I'd rank #2 is this group. More of a textbook 4 with freak athleticism, but also some offensive limitations.

Johnson was good, but not quite on that level. A bit of a tweener, lacked height and unlike Barkley didn't have the huge wingspan or freakish athleticism to make up for it.

SilkkTheShocker
02-23-2012, 11:58 AM
Larry Johnson could have been the next Charles Barkley. I still remember his 4 point play in the 1999 NBA playoffs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xlCbpPN8rs

You didn't see him play.

ProfessorMurder
02-23-2012, 11:59 AM
Oh, and he's also the author of what is IMO the greatest statistical game in the history of the NBA: 33 minutes, 21/26 from the field, 19/23, 61 points and 18 rebounds. Take a second to think about how insane those numbers are. Jazz won by 48 points btw, hence the relatively low number of minutes.

Sorry to hijack this thread with some random Karl Malone n*thugging. Carry on.

Damn.

ProfessorMurder
02-23-2012, 12:08 PM
No, Coleman was the really special one. Had a complete inside/outside game and all the skills. At his very short peak he was the most complete 4 I ever saw, better than Barkley, Malone, TD, or KG.

Kemp I'd rank #2 is this group. More of a textbook 4 with freak athleticism, but also some offensive limitations.

Johnson was good, but not quite on that level. A bit of a tweener, lacked height and unlike Barkley didn't have the huge wingspan or freakish athleticism to make up for it.

Yeah but LJ had the attitude and work ethic that the others needed. If he hadn't messed up his back and the other two had their same career, LJ would've been the best. He wanted to be the man, worked out like crazy, changed his game, and was tough as hell.

Xiao Yao You
02-23-2012, 09:20 PM
The hardest worker in the history of the game

Stockton worked just as hard. They competed each fall to see who showed up to camp with the lowest % of body fat. LOL!

CLTHornets4eva
02-23-2012, 09:33 PM
Yeah but LJ had the attitude and work ethic that the others needed. If he hadn't messed up his back and the other two had their same career, LJ would've been the best. He wanted to be the man, worked out like crazy, changed his game, and was tough as hell.

He really could have gone down as one the best ever. I think he tops this list. Most dynamic ofthe bunch. Really was the Lebron style player before Lebron. Not as good obviously but he had a similar style.

Sad story about LJ great hornet. :(

irondarts
02-23-2012, 09:39 PM
DC was an insanely special player. He could've been an all time great, a legendary player, but he's lazy and didn't seem to care.

eliteballer
02-23-2012, 10:43 PM
No, Coleman was the really special one. Had a complete inside/outside game and all the skills. At his very short peak he was the most complete 4 I ever saw, better than Barkley, Malone, TD, or KG.

Kemp I'd rank #2 is this group. More of a textbook 4 with freak athleticism, but also some offensive limitations.

Johnson was good, but not quite on that level. A bit of a tweener, lacked height and unlike Barkley didn't have the huge wingspan or freakish athleticism to make up for it.

What a ridiculous post all around. Coleman had the skills but he NEVER had the mental aspect, in terms of work ethic and passion for the game.

and LJ didnt have freakish athleticism? uuhh.......................

bizil
02-23-2012, 11:42 PM
All three of these guys looked to be the next great PF's on the horizon to join Barkley and Malone. And all three were amongst the premier PF's in the game. Kemp and Coleman really looked liked they were going to redefine the PF position. Kemp to this day is still (well Blake looks like he may have him beat) arguably the most freakish athlete the PF spot has seen. On top of it he had a nice midrange J and he had a very nice handle for a 6'10 PF. Kemp was even pretty damn good on the boards and defense.

Coleman for skill for skill offensively was as complete as any PF ever. At 6'10 he could score from anywhere on the floor. But at the same time he was still a beast on the block. He was an excellent passer and had a very nice handle for a 6'10 PF. DC was a beast on the boards as well.

LJ in my opinion was next in line for that Barkley type undersized PF. He was never as good as Chuck but he was capable of playing SF and PF like Chuck. And LJ had a nice handle like Chuck as well. I do think LJ had more consistent three ball range on his jumper. And both men were beasts on the block. LJ had tremendous footwork on the block. I think LJ had many attributes that Barkley had. It's just that Barkley was the better version.

In any event all three of these guys had HOF type material. But they didn't get to exploit it for a long time. Kemp got to enjoy it the most, but even at 29 or 30 he was already falling off due to other shit. But all three of these gave a look to the future of what was to come at PF. It was really the guys like Webber, KG, Dirk, Duncan, and Sheed who ultimately revolutionized the PF spot and were beasts for very good-great periods of time. But Coleman, Kemp, LJ, and even Mcdyess should have been right there with those five guys along with an aging but still great Malone in the late 90's to 2000s.

knickswin
02-23-2012, 11:47 PM
I really like Larry Johnson's game from before he got injured.

bizil
02-23-2012, 11:51 PM
I really like Larry Johnson's game from before he got injured.

I dug LJ's game to big time. He had great handle for PF. He had a great post game as well. He had the midrange game down as well. And he had three point range as well. Was a beast on the boards, especially for a guy 6'6. And he was a freak athlete as well in terms of his combo of power, speed, and hops for a guy 6'6 and 250 pounds. When he had the serious injuries, he played more SF in addition to the PF. LJ was so skilled that he was able to adapt and be a very valuable contributor for those Knick teams. Other than great defense, LJ seemed to have it all in terms for what u look for in a PF. The fact he could swing to SF made him unique.

Burgz
02-24-2012, 12:33 AM
lol @ shaq hate.

Yea man I miss the 90s. Whenever I watch those classic 90s games on nbatv I'm like OH remember (that guy!) There was another guy that I was thinking of. I'll have to look up who it was.

Oh yeah, Laphonso Ellis whatever happened to him? Did he get injured or something? I forgot. That dude was a stud for a second. I know his stats don't reflect it but, he was always one of those guys that was just beast mode. I remember I used to live in Illinois and I'd always watch the bulls (cuz every game would be televised) and I'd always be cheering against them (lol), but I remember certain people that just did the Bulls like Damon Stoudamire. I always liked watching Laphonso play.

And if you don't remember dude check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoTGDam-06I sorry to highjack your thread lol...

-Smak

Ellis had too many injuries, and i heard he was a nut case in the locker room too

probably a little too intense

AngelEyes
02-24-2012, 12:36 AM
All three of these guys looked to be the next great PF's on the horizon to join Barkley and Malone. And all three were amongst the premier PF's in the game. Kemp and Coleman really looked liked they were going to redefine the PF position. Kemp to this day is still (well Blake looks like he may have him beat) arguably the most freakish athlete the PF spot has seen. On top of it he had a nice midrange J and he had a very nice handle for a 6'10 PF. Kemp was even pretty damn good on the boards and defense.

Coleman for skill for skill offensively was as complete as any PF ever. At 6'10 he could score from anywhere on the floor. But at the same time he was still a beast on the block. He was an excellent passer and had a very nice handle for a 6'10 PF. DC was a beast on the boards as well.

LJ in my opinion was next in line for that Barkley type undersized PF. He was never as good as Chuck but he was capable of playing SF and PF like Chuck. And LJ had a nice handle like Chuck as well. I do think LJ had more consistent three ball range on his jumper. And both men were beasts on the block. LJ had tremendous footwork on the block. I think LJ had many attributes that Barkley had. It's just that Barkley was the better version.

In any event all three of these guys had HOF type material. But they didn't get to exploit it for a long time. Kemp got to enjoy it the most, but even at 29 or 30 he was already falling off due to other shit. But all three of these gave a look to the future of what was to come at PF. It was really the guys like Webber, KG, Dirk, Duncan, and Sheed who ultimately revolutionized the PF spot and were beasts for very good-great periods of time. But Coleman, Kemp, LJ, and even Mcdyess should have been right there with those five guys along with an aging but still great Malone in the late 90's to 2000s.

No, he doesn't have Kemp beat.

bizil
02-24-2012, 12:52 AM
No, he doesn't have Kemp beat.

Blake hasn't done it as long as Kemp so u r right in that sense. But in terms of sheer jumping ability and strength as a combo, Blake is at the worst on par with Kemp. But Kemp had a certain style and swagger with his shit that makes him unique to EVERY PF to this day!

AngelEyes
02-24-2012, 12:57 AM
Blake hasn't done it as long as Kemp so u r right in that sense. But in terms of sheer jumping ability and strength as a combo, Blake is at the worst on par with Kemp. But Kemp had a certain style and swagger with his shit that makes him unique to EVERY PF to this day!

Kemp in his prime (circa 1996) is taller, longer and every bit as explosive. He was also as strong as Blake in this time.

bizil
02-24-2012, 01:10 AM
Kemp in his prime (circa 1996) is taller, longer and every bit as explosive. He was also as strong as Blake in this time.

He wasn't taller. He might be lankier, but he ain't stronger in my book. I said it could be considered that Kemp is the greatest freak athlete ever at PF. But Blake is already doing shit on par with Kemp. But he doesn't have the catalog that Kemp does. But Blake has the brute force Karl Malone type strength. Kemp while strong wasn't quite as strong as Malone. It took Kemp a while to fill out his body in the L. Blake and Karl came in strong as an ox from day one.

eliteballer
02-24-2012, 01:46 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQC5g7yezgs

^every bit as athletic as Griffin

OldSchoolBBall
02-24-2012, 09:35 AM
Larry Johnson wasn't athletic? Errr...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQSd0V5_iUo

JohnnySic
02-24-2012, 09:43 AM
What a ridiculous post all around. Coleman had the skills but he NEVER had the mental aspect, in terms of work ethic and passion for the game.

and LJ didnt have freakish athleticism? uuhh.......................
Basically what I said on Coleman. Had the skills, was special in that area, probably the best I've ever seen (only Webber at the 4 had close to the all-around skill set) . Didn't have the mental part, so he wasted it way.

Johnson was not really a freakish athlete. People compare him to Barkley because of the height similarity, but its not there. Even overwieght Barkely was freakishly athletic. Johnson was strong and athletic but no to that level - his game was more skill-based.

AnSnow47
06-02-2020, 07:34 PM
You really need to read this Hemplucid oil review (https://cbdoilforpain.reviews/reviews/hemplucid-review) to get the facts straight. Anyway, it is useful to learn something new, especially if it can be good for you.

Jasper
06-02-2020, 08:17 PM
many will go with Kemp / but I will take Johnson in a second.

He was a complete player , and exceptional athlete.
I miss watching him , he was that good.

Whoah10115
06-02-2020, 08:30 PM
On LJ, two things.

His back may have ended his elite status early, but what hurt him more was coming to New York. We played that same hideous offense, Mason was the guy traded for LJ (and Mase was an actual tweening point power forward), plus we stupidly let Derek Harper go to bring in Chris Childs (who was 29, at that).

He moved to the 3, in that offense, post-bad back. Barkley played SF his last three seasons in Philadelphia, but he was in his prime. And the guy. LJ came to a team with Patrick Ewing, to move down after losing his athleticism. He was going out of his way to defer, and it never worked. Moving a playmaker like Starks for Allan Houston also worked against Johnson.

And in his first season with the Knicks he played great defense. The team were considering him their best defender, tho I wouldn't go that far. He played pretty good defense after, but he was great that year.

newmancarl24
06-09-2020, 05:50 AM
I’ve read several canadian writings review reddit (https://www.writingpapersucks.com/canadianwritings-com-reviews/) in the past and I haven’t been happy with the quality of the writing. But edubir has definitely been the best. The prices are good, turnaround is fast and I loved the paper I received.

RogueBorg
06-09-2020, 09:45 AM
Larry Johnson's Converse Destroyer in 1994 is still my favorite shoe of all-time.

https://images.complex.com/complex/image/upload/c_fill,dpr_auto,q_90,w_920/fl_lossy,pg_1/iinm7ulsjf6p0uzfdztb.jpg

ArbitraryWater
06-09-2020, 09:52 AM
Definitely all players that could have been more than they were. Coleman frankly just fell into the Antoine Walker syndrome...he thought he was a perimeter player and the more years that went on the further away from the basket his game moved. He actually rebounded played good defense before the injuries, but not so much after after defensively and he just became a guy who wanted to shoot jump shots. Injuries or not, he should have been playing more in the post.

Shawn Kemp. This guy is hard to rate. He was an athletic freak which gave him an extreme natural advantage of every single PF of his era, but fundamentally he was not a particularly good player. Defensively he was EXTREMELY PRONE to foul trouble. That's why his mpg are never really low. In 10 of the seasons he played he averaged 4.0PF or near it and led the league in total PF's three times. He could definitely protect the paint at the very least at a "good" rate but he was no excellent defensive player. He is one of the very many reasons Payton shouldn't have won DPOY though as he had Kemp behind him who while still extremely foul prone could protect the paint.

Offensively I don't think he was really anything special. He was most dangerous in the open court as he is one of the greatest finishers ever, period. His post game was never anything anyone really feared. He was never a "go to guy" though he did step up big time vs the bulls that 96 finals, schooling Rodman and everything, but in general and throughout his career You can't rate someone when they were just playing at their peak. Generally he really was just an okay post player and nothing special. It was the athleticism that made him great.

As far as Larry Johnson goes...he's kind the poor man's Charles Barkley of his era. He was good scorer and rebounder before injuries took him down, but frankly LJ was always A PISS POOR DEFENSIVE PLAYER even before his injuries who was lucky to play next to Alonzo Mourning and than Patrick Ewing.

How do you rate them against each other?

dejaolsone
09-21-2020, 02:31 AM
Gazing at the stars so bright
Holding you until the sunrise the impossible quiz (https://theimpossible-quizbest.com)

Lebron23
09-22-2020, 03:20 PM
Larry Johnson's Converse Destroyer in 1994 is still my favorite shoe of all-time.

https://images.complex.com/complex/image/upload/c_fill,dpr_auto,q_90,w_920/fl_lossy,pg_1/iinm7ulsjf6p0uzfdztb.jpg

Those shoes were heavy.

leschrapid
10-27-2020, 12:51 AM
Feelin' hypnotized by the words that you said Don't lie to me, just get in my head When the morning comes you're still in my bed. But it's so, so cold. 1v1 lol (https://1v1lol.online) slope unblocked (https://slopeunblocked.online)

Mauzah
10-27-2020, 07:54 PM
Laphonso Ellis still has one of the best blocks I have ever seen. You know the one.

Can anyone remember what the deal was with Kendall Gill? I always felt like he should have been a lot better. Size, athleticism, decent enough shot, solid drive to the hoop.

imdaman99
10-27-2020, 09:22 PM
Derrick Coleman was the worst. Just look at how nonchalant he was as Smart hits the game winner. The dude just walks over to inbound the ball, wasting a good 2 seconds. Not to mention he bricked the FT before that. I'm sorry but that guy is a loser and unrootable. Where is your attempt to win?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dgkmikdVM8

I will take LJ over the other 2 no-heart dudes. 1 ate his way out of the league, the other never gave a damn.

William_Kane
09-23-2021, 03:00 PM
One of the best players to my mind....

Thenameless
09-23-2021, 11:43 PM
I think all of them relied too much on raw talent to some degree. It works when you are young and in your prime, but as you age you need to have basketball skills and a head for the game.

dankok8
09-24-2021, 02:00 AM
Shawn Kemp was such a basketball god when he was locked in... but he just wasn't that committed to basketball. Imagine a skinnier even quicker Blake Griffin. Kemp should have dominated the league.

Coleman was the real deal who also didn't pan out like Kemp but for different reasons. Less athletic but also more naturally coordinated and had skills. He should have been at least a perennial all-star.

Johnson was just a boring player. I don't know. I vaguely even remember him. He could play in the post but I don't think his ceiling was nearly as high as the other two.

Another worthwhile mention among talented underachievers in the last 20+ years is Rasheed Wallace. He ended up with a decent career but should have been an all-timer with his size, defensive instincts, post skills and a really good jumper. He really had it all. I remember I watched a recent KG interview. He too said young Sheed was such a beast and could straight up embarrass you.

William_Kane
09-26-2021, 08:47 PM
Yes, i agree with you Shawn exactly was god.


viplikes.net (http://viplikes.net/)