Foreskin> No Foreskin?

[SourPatchKids]

In my opinion, yes.

[ihoopallday]

I didn't have a choice at birth. :lol I hope we're on the same subject.

[Mr Clutch Melo]

No foreskin easily.

Enjoy your dirty *****:lol but seriously, its looks much nicier without foreskin.

wow..that sounds gay :lol

[dunksby]

...

[Just2McFly]

No foreskin easily.

Enjoy your dirty *****:lol but seriously, its looks much nicier without foreskin.

wow..that sounds gay :lol
Why do circumcised dudes act like foreskins don't retract? wtf?

[El Kabong]

Why do circumcised dudes act like foreskins don't retract? wtf?
Probably because they have no idea how it works with a foreskin.

[winwin]

95% of girls prefer No Foreskin

they think Foreskin is a turn off

[millwad]

Haha, SourPatch, you really need a girlfriend.

First the thread about your brother's virginity and now now a thread abut foreskin or no foreskin? You're about the age when people pop their first *****, I wish you the best,young soldier!

Without telling the status of my own dick I can say that it really doesn't matter that much, girls don't really care that much and guys tend to make a too big deal out of it. Some people have foreskin, others don't, what females care about is the size and how wide the dick is.

[AlphaWolf24]

95% of girls prefer No Foreskin

they think Foreskin is a turn off


real talk...


- Foreskin actually helps stimulate the cl!toris during ***...

- It also helps keep your stuff (clears throat) ummm...more dense and helps fight infections/STD's.

- We are born with it for a reason...

- Circumsision is just a social disfigurement surgery based on wacked out religous zealots.....it has no benifit what so ever.

- I would never want any Knife near my stuff.......go watch a video of a circumsision.....then ask yourself why you would do that to a baby..

- Women who say they get "turned off" by it.....are prolly just saying that to make thier man feel happy with his tiny skinned ****:confusedshrug:

[TheMan]

real talk...


- Foreskin actually helps stimulate the cl!toris during ***...

- It also helps keep your stuff (clears throat) ummm...more dense and helps fight infections/STD's.

- We are born with it for a reason...

- Circumsision is just a social disfigurement surgery based on wacked out religous zealots.....it has no benifit what so ever.

- I would never want any Knife near my stuff.......go watch a video of a circumsision.....then ask yourself why you would do that to a baby..


- Women who say they get "turned off" by it.....are prolly just saying that to make thier man feel happy with his tiny skinned ****:confusedshrug:
This

Most of the world except for Jews and Americans leave their son's foreskin alone. I also read that those of us with foreskins have more sensitivity down there around the head area so BJs
are much more enjoyable :lol

A big thank you to my parents, they didn't maim me:bowdown:

[Take Your Lumps]

This

Most of the world except for Jews and Americans leave their son's foreskin alone. I also read that those of us with foreskins have more sensitivity down there around the head area so BJs
are much more enjoyable :lol

A big thank you to my parents, they didn't maim me:bowdown:

Makes for easier fapping too. Whenever I hear about dudes having to use lotion and tube socks and I'm like

http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/yao+ming+meme+cowboy+laughing.+yao+ming+meme+cowbo y+laughing_04d36d_3638880.gif

[LJJ]

I don't care what people do to their own *****, but the mutilation of babies definitely needs to stop. If people really want to cut their dick to make sex less enjoyable because that brings them closer to god, they should be able to decide it for themselves.

It's funny how we call female circumcision "genital mutilation" in the western world and we all think it's a disgusting misogynist practice. While the female version is obviously more severe, male circumcision is based on the same principle.

[TheMan]

Makes for easier fapping too. Whenever I hear about dudes having to use lotion and tube socks and I'm like

http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/yao+ming+meme+cowboy+laughing.+yao+ming+meme+cowbo y+laughing_04d36d_3638880.gif
yea it does, never needed that shit when I fapped.

and that junk about foreskins being dirty, that is just BS, foreskins retract and you can scrub just the same as without...I also never ran into a girl who had an issue with my hoodie, they wouldn't even notice it until it was in it's natural state :oldlol:

[rufuspaul]

I don't care what people do to their own *****, but the mutilation of babies definitely needs to stop. If people really want to cut their dick to make sex less enjoyable because that brings them closer to god, they should be able to decide it for themselves.

It's funny how we call female circumcision "genital mutilation" in the western world and we all think it's a disgusting misogynist practice. While the female version is obviously more severe, male circumcision is based on the same principle.


Oh come on man. It's plastic surgery. No different than fixing an ugly nose.

[TheMan]

They aren't gonna say your dick is gross to your face.
Well, I've only had a one night stand in my life and it was because I never called her, if they didn't like my ****, it didn't stop them from asking for more.

[TheMan]

They liked your good looks and charm. And you're really sweet.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdjaukQsHM1r1mom5o1_1280.jpg

[LJJ]

Oh come on man. It's plastic surgery. No different than fixing an ugly nose.

Nonsense, it diminishes the sensitivity of your primary sexual organ.

But if parents decided to cut off a baby's nostrils because some pastors tell them it's a thing to do that would also be offensive to me.

[LamarOdom]

Oh come on man. It's plastic surgery. No different than fixing an ugly nose.

Did the little baby ask for the plastic surgery? If you as a 18 yr old go and circumcise your dick then that's ok, your choice but don't cut of the foreskin of a damn baby, should be counted as assault. My parents left me the option and I'm helluva happy they did and I will leave the option for my kid.

Stupid ass parents that fukcin cuts of a part of the dick.

Foreskin > NF

[Quizno]

i'm circumcised but if i have a boy i won't have him circumcised

[-p.tiddy-]

I've never met a girl in my life that stated she prefered a forskin

that being said I have trouble thinking that nature actually got something wrong on the human body


but nature did get wisdom teeth wrong...so, yeah...that's my argument, wisdom teeth

[Just2McFly]

I never in my life asked a girl what her preferences for dick were. I guess I was too busy being secure and non-creepy.

[Money 23]

Never heard of a chick yearning for foreskin.

Plus all that extra work and potential for diseases. Gross as hell.

Streamlined is the way to go. Less is more.

[rufuspaul]

Nonsense, it diminishes the sensitivity of your primary sexual organ.

But if parents decided to cut off a baby's nostrils because some pastors tell them it's a thing to do that would also be offensive to me.


You don't go walking around with your dick hanging out do you? Ridiculous comparison.

Here's a question for the circumcised: Do you feel that you were mutilated? Do you suffer from PTSD? Do you wish you had a foreskin?

[red1]

Did the little baby ask for the plastic surgery? If you as a 18 yr old go and circumcise your dick then that's ok, your choice but don't cut of the foreskin of a damn baby, should be counted as assault. My parents left me the option and I'm helluva happy they did and I will leave the option for my kid.

Stupid ass parents that fukcin cuts of a part of the dick.

Foreskin > NF
negged for being a f*ggot

[Fudge]

Some people still have elephant trunks? Good god. :oldlol:

[Blue&Orange]

If everyone do a Google search, they will find two things, first the propaganda, and second, people that ACTUALLY were circumcised even as adults and they all say they are better.

When i hear people say that foreskin prevents sexual diseases i can only facepalm.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.
http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/index.html


Why instead of the propaganda, a simple study about who uses more those last longer condoms, i'm circumcised and i used them. :confusedshrug:

[Money 23]

When i hear people say that foreskin prevents sexual diseases i can only facepalm.
:biggums:

Who says that? If anything it's the EXACT opposite.

[LJJ]

You don't go walking around with your dick hanging out do you? Ridiculous comparison.

Here's a question for the circumcised: Do you feel that you were mutilated? Do you suffer from PTSD? Do you wish you had a foreskin?

Ridiculous comparison? You are the one who made it in the first place. Calling circumcision a minor plastic procedure similar to a nosejob.

The thing is, even if it was just a minor plastic procedure that had no impact at all, does that make it right? You condone of parents putting babies through plastic surgery? Maybe I don't like the ears of the baby, or the skin color, or whatever. It's perfectly fine to do minor medical procedures to alter those things then?

You also think that circumcision for girls is a minor medical procedure that should be 100% the parent's right to perform? I'm sure the girls who grow up that way don't know what they are missing either.

[red1]

Noooo please don't neg me, your soooo big dick will hurt me.

Retard.

Negged for being a faqgot
:facepalm the f*ck?

[-p.tiddy-]

Ridiculous comparison? You are the one who made it in the first place. Calling circumcision a minor plastic procedure similar to a nosejob.

The thing is, even if it was just a minor plastic procedure that had no impact at all, does that make it right? You condone of parents putting babies through plastic surgery? Maybe I don't like the ears of the baby, or the skin color, or whatever. It's perfectly fine to do minor medical procedures to alter those things then?

You also think that circumcision for girls is a minor medical procedure that should be 100% the parent's right to perform? I'm sure the girls who grow up that way don't know what they are missing either.
it would be different if there were thousands, or even hundreds of circumcised men wishing they had their foreskin

but there really aren't any...I'm sure you can find a couple out there but for the most part men who are circumcised are very happy to be that way.

[red1]

Negged for being a faqgot

Edit: I made you lose a bar
[/IMG]
:lol I can honestly say IDGAF. I was wondering how you negged me twice, just realized that it must be because you have multiple accounts. So not only are you the little b*tch who goes around negging people while posing as other posters, you also go around repping yourself while having conversations and agreeing with yourself.

Lmao just pathetic

[red1]

Noooo please don't neg me, your soooo big dick will hurt me.

Retard.

Negged for being a faqgot

Edit: I made you lose a bar

http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/smitea/smitea0509/smitea050900062/241547-isolated-woman-sticking-out-tounge-with-big-eyes.jpg

LMAO the green bar is back bitch! And you still have an anteater
http://i.imgur.com/uZYOq.gif

[-p.tiddy-]

found a study for what women prefer...

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/showthread.php?15637-Another-Study-Women-Prefer-Circumcision


TABLE ONE

Activity ***** Type

Circumcised (%) Uncircumcised (%) Either (%)
Sexual Intercourse

71 6 23

Looking at to Achieve sexual arousal
76 4 20


Giving manual

penile stimulation
75 5 20

Giving Fellatio
83 2 15

looks like blow jobs side heavy without foreskin the most...

[Just2McFly]

Circumcised dudes are trying so hard to validate their situation. As long as you wash your dick and have safe sex, you aren't going to get any diseases plus sex feels better. These are facts.

[Stuckey]

not gonna lie, as a non circumcised guy, sometimes the skin gets in the way even at full capacity; having said that, I do prefer more sensitivity

[rufuspaul]

Ridiculous comparison? You are the one who made it in the first place. Calling circumcision a minor plastic procedure similar to a nosejob.

The thing is, even if it was just a minor plastic procedure that had no impact at all, does that make it right? You condone of parents putting babies through plastic surgery? Maybe I don't like the ears of the baby, or the skin color, or whatever. It's perfectly fine to do minor medical procedures to alter those things then?

You also think that circumcision for girls is a minor medical procedure that should be 100% the parent's right to perform? I'm sure the girls who grow up that way don't know what they are missing either.


Why do you keep comparing a piece of skin around the head of your dick to a major body part connected to one's head? :oldlol:

Anyway I'm glad I was circumcised but if I wasn't it wouldn't be all that big a deal. Kind of like an appendix. Pretty useless and innocuous as long as it doesn't get infected.

[LJJ]

it would be different if there were thousands, or even hundreds of circumcised men wishing they had their foreskin

but there really aren't any...I'm sure you can find a couple out there but for the most part men who are circumcised are very happy to be that way.

Why not argue the other way and say it would be different if there were billions of men getting circumcisions in adulthood because of all the great benefits like desensitized genitalia. The fact is the adults around the world getting circumcisions for anything other than religious or medical reasons remain virtually nonexistent.

But that said, what's the reason for making this decision for your infant? Why make this irreversible decision for babies? Why do people have the right? I consider my dick to be pretty important, if anyone is going to make a decision to cut my dick it's going to be me.



Why do you keep comparing a piece of skin around the head of your dick to a major body part connected to one's head? :oldlol:

Anyway I'm glad I was circumcised but if I wasn't it wouldn't be all that big a deal. Kind of like an appendix. Pretty useless and innocuous as long as it doesn't get infected.

Read back the thread. You are the one who started the comparison of circumcision to a nosejob, not me. You said there is no difference between the two.

[bmulls]

You can tell with 100% accuracy who is circumcised and who is rocking the elephant trunk in this thread.

[LamarOdom]

:lol I can honestly say IDGAF. I was wondering how you negged me twice, just realized that it must be because you have multiple accounts. So not only are you the little b*tch who goes around negging people while posing as other posters, you also go around repping yourself while having conversations and agreeing with yourself.

Lmao just pathetic

Nah brah I only got one account but tbh I've been tryin to get another but Jeff never verified that acc. And why got negged twice is because you are retarded.

[Money 23]

Circumcised dudes are trying so hard to validate their situation. As long as you wash your dick and have safe sex, you aren't going to get any diseases plus sex feels better. These are facts.
Why go through all that work, and just get it circumcised?

The thing looks like an alien when stuff gets peeled back. Hideous.

Never see guys in porn with un-cut pecker woods.

[TheMan]

found a study for what women prefer...

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/showthread.php?15637-Another-Study-Women-Prefer-Circumcision



looks like blow jobs side heavy without foreskin the most...
That study was done in the US where until recently the cultural norm was to circumcize, so obviously women's opinions would go along those lines. Only 10% of European men and 20 % in general worldwide are circumcized. Do a study of European women and you'll get way different numbers.

Circumcisions are rapidly dropping in the US btw...



New research about a steep drop in circumcisions made headlines this past week. According to one federal researcher, circumcision rates in U.S. hospitals slid from 56 percent in 2006 to fewer than a third of boys born last year.

Doctors caution that those numbers aren't definitive -- for instance, they don't include circumcisions not covered by insurance policies or circumcisions performed in religious settings.

But Dr. Douglas Diekema, a pediatrics bioethicist at the University of Washington, tells NPR's Audie Cornish there's no doubt about the overall trend.

"I think all of us agree there probably is a decrease in the number of circumcisions over time, and that's probably a result of a number of factors," Diekema says.

"About 10 years ago, the American Academy of Pediatrics came out with a policy statement that was fairly neutral on whether circumcisions should be recommended for newborns or not," says Diekema. "And that probably changed the way physicians were talking to their families."

In many states, Medicaid stopped covering the procedure as a result of that policy statement. And many insurance companies followed suit, meaning that more and more families might have decided to forgo circumcision just because of the expense.

"It's also worth pointing out that our population is becoming increasingly Hispanic," says Diekema, "And that's a population that has not traditionally circumcised their babies."

'Intactivists'

Another possible explanation for the decrease might be the anti-circumcision advocates known as "intactivists." They've lobbied forcefully against circumcision for years now, and some people compare them to anti-vaccination advocates. But Diekema criticizes their tactics.

"Their arguments are largely emotional," says Diekema. "Just the fact that they insist on referring to this as 'genital mutilation' tells you that they're refusing to recognize whether there may be any medical benefit to the procedure."

And the benefits are large, he says.

"There is a fairly substantial, important reduction in the risk of contracting many sexually transmitted infections," says Diekema. "In newborns, there is a decreased likelihood of getting a urinary tract infection, which for a newborn baby can be a very significant illness."

And, he says, "at least three well-done, randomized control trials in Africa show a substantial decrease in the transmission of HIV [due to circumcision]."

Ultimately, in spite of arguments on both sides of the issue, Diekema says that male circumcision is a decision that families should make on their own. He says a doctor's role is to make sure the family is aware of the risks and benefits of the procedure.

But, he says, "the risks of circumcision are considerably lower in the newborn population than they are if that child is older." [Copyright 2012 National Public Radio]

[red1]

Nah brah I only got one account but tbh I've been tryin to get another but Jeff never verified that acc. And why got negged twice is because you are retarded.
Why you lying for? This ain't the first time you negged twice using different accounts. Then again what would you expect from a bitch who reps and agrees with himself using multiple accounts.

lmao pathetic, going through all that effort

[-p.tiddy-]

Why not argue the other way and say it would be different if there were billions of men getting circumcisions in adulthood because of all the great benefits like desensitized genitalia. The fact is the adults around the world getting circumcisions for anything other than religious or medical reasons remain virtually nonexistent.

But that said, what's the reason for making this decision for your infant? Why make this irreversible decision for babies? Why do people have the right? I consider my dick to be pretty important, if anyone is going to make a decision to cut my dick it's going to be me.

it's because it is 100x easier to do as an infant than a full grown adult who gets erections that would gush mas amounts of blood...

[-p.tiddy-]

That study was done in the US where until recently the cultural norm was to circumcize, so obviously women's opinions would go along those lines. Only 10% of European men and 20 % in general worldwide are circumcized. Do a study of European women and you'll get way different numbers.

Circumcisions are rapidly dropping in the US btw...
doctors saying it is beneficial says a lot imo

And the benefits are large, he says.

"There is a fairly substantial, important reduction in the risk of contracting many sexually transmitted infections," says Diekema. "In newborns, there is a decreased likelihood of getting a urinary tract infection, which for a newborn baby can be a very significant illness."

And, he says, "at least three well-done, randomized control trials in Africa show a substantial decrease in the transmission of HIV [due to circumcision]."


I am betting that the % drop of procedures in the US is right in line with the % drop of white people :oldlol:

[LJJ]

it's because it is 100x easier to do as an infant than a full grown adult who gets erections that would gush mas amounts of blood...

You are completely wrong, they give you pills for that.

Stop trying to rationalize why it should be a parent's right to mutilate their child. You want a circumcision? You can get it. As far as medical procedures go it's not a big thing.

[-p.tiddy-]

That study was done in the US where until recently the cultural norm was to circumcize, so obviously women's opinions would go along those lines. Only 10% of European men and 20 % in general worldwide are circumcized. Do a study of European women and you'll get way different numbers.

can you find a study?

do most european women prefer foreskin?...and if so why?

[-p.tiddy-]

You are completely wrong, they give you pills for that.

Stop trying to rationalize why it should be a parent's right to mutilate their child. You want a circumcision? You can get it. As far as medical procedures go it's not a big thing.
I'm not wrong at all...I JUST had a son, it is MUCH easier to do as an infant than as an adult, this is fact

[LJJ]

I'm not wrong at all...I JUST had a son, it is MUCH easier to do as an infant than as an adult, this is fact

No it's not. It doesn't hurt or cause any discomfort at all as an adult. Easy procedure.

I'm still waiting for a convincing argument why parent's should be allowed to make this decision for their children.

[rufuspaul]

Read back the thread. You are the one who started the comparison of circumcision to a nosejob, not me. You said there is no difference between the two.


Guilty :D


And congrats Prime! :cheers:

[-p.tiddy-]

No it's not. It doesn't hurt or cause any discomfort at all as an adult. Easy procedure.

I'm still waiting for a convincing argument why parent's should be allowed to make this decision for their children.
If I thought there was the slightest chance my son would be upset with my choice, even a 1% chance...then I wouldn't have done it

the difference between me getting it done for him now, while an infant who will never remember, and later in life, as a child or adult who would perhaps see it as a major ordeal, was big enough for me.

[-p.tiddy-]

Guilty :D


And congrats Prime! :cheers:
ty sir :cheers:

[Just2McFly]

Prime has a kid?

Sweet jesus, bless this kids heart.

[LJJ]

If I thought there was the slightest chance my son would be upset with my choice, even a 1% chance...then I wouldn't have done it

the difference between me getting it done for him now, while an infant who will never remember, and later in life, as a child or adult who would perhaps see it as a major ordeal, was big enough for me.

So even though it's well established that a circumcision makes your dick less sensitive, you really think there is no chance at all that your son would prefer a whole dick?

That's a silly position imo. Just the fact that there are billions of people around the world who prefer to keep their foreskin should give you an idea there is at least a tiny possibility your son would have been one of them.




That said, congratulations on your son!

[-p.tiddy-]

1) Foreskin is fun to play with? :confusedshrug: Plus, it feels so good when it retracts behind the head.

2) I guess it looks that way when you're not used to it.

3) Because the foreskin actually retracts during erection. Not all but retract, some do some don't. Noticeable uncut men in porn: John Holmes, Manual Ferraro, Steve Holmes, Mark Davis, to name a few.

Mine only retracts 3/4th of the way back, which actually makes it look "cute," I've been told.
you can tell who is cut or uncut in porn regardless...from what I have seen porn is pretty much dominated by men who are cut

not sure why or what that means, but just saying

[Just2McFly]

You know....I think mine could mustard out half an inch or so longer if not for the foreskin.

I got a 5-incher, so it ain't like even matters to get that extra 1/2 inch. :lol
http://i42.tinypic.com/34e46ip.gif

[rufuspaul]

I'm still waiting for a convincing argument why parent's should be allowed to make this decision for their children.


Why should parents make any decision for their children?

[LJJ]

you can tell who is cut or uncut in porn regardless...from what I have seen porn is pretty much dominated by men who are cut

not sure why or what that means, but just saying

It means the porn you watch is American porn.

[red1]

Why should parents make any decision for their children?
didn't you know? human infants are fully autonomous and independant the moment they pop out of their mothers cooz. you leave an infant in the jungle and that n*gga gonna run that shit like king kong

[Fudge]

http://i42.tinypic.com/34e46ip.gif
:lol This was me when i first read that.

[LJJ]

Why should parents make any decision for their children?

Certain things parents can or even have to decide for their kids. Certain things parent aren't allowed to decide for their kids.

What is a good reason why circumcision should be the former?

[TheMan]

can you find a study?

do most european women prefer foreskin?...and if so why?
I have no study to back it up but since 90% of European men are not circumcised, it's not hard to come to the conclusion that their preferences would be different than American women since.being uncut is the norm over there. Keep in mind that women are also involved in the decision to circumcize or not the baby, I doubt European men are forcing their women to go along with their decision against their will. I have no proof (there might be a study but too lazy to look it up, honestly:lol).

[Money 23]

http://i42.tinypic.com/34e46ip.gif
Concur

:oldlol:

[eliteballer]

Why are all of you asking what women prefer when you should be asking which one is better for YOUR pleasure and sensitivity? That is very much a question of debate.

[-p.tiddy-]

Why are all of you asking what women prefer when you should be asking which one is better for YOUR pleasure and sensitivity? That is very much a question of debate.
no body can answer that unless they had the change as an adult...


all I know is that my orgasms feel great to me! lol...perhaps it takes me a little longer to achieve orgasm than it would if I had never been cut, but I'm not sure I would want that anyway...it's just impossible to know

[RidonKs]

Why are all of you asking what women prefer when you should be asking which one is better for YOUR pleasure and sensitivity? That is very much a question of debate.
exactly.

it's not like a chick's gonna change her mind at the last minute and run away because she happens to encounter foreskin. maybe if you've got a super picky and shallow gf, she goes down on you just a little less often. but then she isn't worth your time in the first place.

for the record i'm cut and not exactly pissed off about it... but i reckon based on what i know (or at least what i've heard), if i had the option, i'd hang on to my membrane

the double standard between male and female 'mutilation' is pretty silly. the effect is a matter of degree, that's it. on principle most people should be against circumcision for non-medical reasons.



anyone know any details about the origins of circumcision? seems to me there's a quick and easy connection to be made between the attitude judaism and christianity have historically had towards sex and the effects of peeling your banana... maybe lol

[LamarOdom]

Why you lying for? This ain't the first time you negged twice using different accounts. Then again what would you expect from a bitch who reps and agrees with himself using multiple accounts.

lmao pathetic, going through all that effort

lol this is pathetic making up lies to try to prove me wrong:applause:

I never even seen you around this forum to neg you before.

[-p.tiddy-]

exactly.

it's not like a chick's gonna change her mind at the last minute and run away because she happens to encounter foreskin. maybe if you've got a super picky and shallow gf, she goes down on you just a little less often. but then she isn't worth your time in the first place.

they wouldn't leave last minute but I have heard more than a few girl friends tell me that the few times they came across and foreskin they were turned off, perhaps they are biased living in the US or perhaps they were just telling me what I want to hear but they did in fact say that.

and obviously sexual attraction is huge at the start of a relationship...it's pretty much everything, it doesn't matter how well your personalities mesh if one person has no attraction


for the record i'm cut and not exactly pissed off about it... but i reckon based on what i know (or at least what i've heard), if i had the option, i'd hang on to my membrane

the double standard between male and female 'mutilation' is pretty silly. the effect is a matter of degree, that's it. on principle most people should be against circumcision for non-medical reasons.



anyone know any details about the origins of circumcision? seems to me there's a quick and easy connection to be made between the attitude judaism and christianity have historically had towards sex and the effects of peeling your banana... maybe lol

I'll say this, due to the fact that it is the norm in the US, it can be hard on a child to grow up being "different"...kids are mean, they make fun up people that are different than them without hesitation, and shun them out of their groups...I can remember in school kids making fun of uncut kids, and I can imagine that might have done some mental harm to some

[-p.tiddy-]

People are passionate about their *****
it ranks #2 right below "love" on the "important things in life" list

1. love
2. my cawk

[RidonKs]

and obviously sexual attraction is huge at the start of a relationship...it's pretty much everything, it doesn't matter how well your personalities mesh if one person has no attraction
iunno, you've got experience on your side so i'll grant you your anecdotes. but obviously if the guy's managed to unzip and present, there was already some measure of sexual attraction to begin with... i have a hard time seeing foreskin tipping that scale the majority of the time.


I'll say this, due to the fact that it is the norm in the US, it can be hard on a child to grow up being "different"...kids are mean, they make fun up people that are different than them without hesitation, and shun them out of their groups...I can remember in school kids making fun of uncut kids, and I can imagine that might have done some mental harm to some
but that's just a bad argument against broad cultural change. by using that logic, you're pretty much stuck with the status quo regardless of the topic. difference needs to be accepted, not hidden or assimilated. that's been the general trend here in the west and it's one we should be proud of. perhaps accepting foreskin into our lives is just the next evolutionary step...

[red1]

lol this is pathetic making up lies to try to prove me wrong:applause:

I never even seen you around this forum to neg you before.
multiple accounts to rep and agree with yourself. miserable

[Remix]

i'm glad my parents chopped off my turtle neck. hangin free.


i will do the same if i have a son.

[rufuspaul]

A Ridonks sighting? :eek:

[-p.tiddy-]

iunno, you've got experience on your side so i'll grant you your anecdotes. but obviously if the guy's managed to unzip and present, there was already some measure of sexual attraction to begin with... i have a hard time seeing foreskin tipping that scale the majority of the time.
Getting a girl in bed is just the start, being sexually compatible is only seen AFTER having sex. Have you ever gotten a girl to make out with you and then realized her breath smelled bad and you don't want to go back?

but that's just a bad argument against broad cultural change. by using that logic, you're pretty much stuck with the status quo regardless of the topic. difference needs to be accepted, not hidden or assimilated. that's been the general trend here in the west and it's one we should be proud of. perhaps accepting foreskin into our lives is just the next evolutionary step...
but we ARE stuck with what society says is good or bad...yes...that doesn't mean we have to play along, but it does dictate if others accepted us or not. I wouldn't want my son to be gay, not because I have a problem with gay people, but because I know his life would likely be much harder on him if he was.

and differences do need to be accepted, but they aren't...esp at childhood

and yes, perhaps in the future circumcision will be faded out, but for right now it is the norm in the US

[tomtucker]

http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/02/71/17/d4/5-inches-for-the-price.jpg



:biggums:

[Dictator]

Circumcision is one of the stupidest things I've heard. I believe they translated the text wrong. Why would God want you to cut the skin around your dck? Let alone the fact that there's a law in the bible against cutting your body.

[Blue&Orange]

So even though it's well established that a circumcision makes your dick less sensitive, you really think there is no chance at all that your son would prefer a whole dick?
lol that is just a bold face lie. Please show me any data that proves what you say. There is none. The only credible medical studies that you will find states the opposite. Find me an adult that did a circumcision that doesn't say he improved sensibility.

Why should be parents allowed to decide? What's next? Vaccination only for adults?



The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says the benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks. However, the AAP doesn't recommend routine circumcision for all male newborns. The AAP leaves the circumcision decision up to parents — and supports use of anesthetics for infants who have the procedure.




WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.

There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe

http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/index.html



Compiling the data, the researchers found that both groups of men, circumcised and uncircumcised, were the same. All came from similar cultural and socio-economic backgrounds, "there were no significant differences between groups with respect to age, education, income, culture, language, place of birth, or religion."

http://arstechnica.com/science/2007/08/study-shows-circumcision-results-in-no-loss-of-sexual-sensation/

You are no circumcised, good for you, now stop with the lies.

[millwad]

Haha, this thread is on fire.

I promise you guys, what matters is the size of the ***** and the shape of it. Sure, then we have females who prefer no foreskin or foreskin but I can guarantee you that extremely few would say no to sex due to a foreskin or a lack of foreskin but I am more than sure that alot would say no if the guy has a small *****.

[magic chiongson]

so circumcised folks here had your foreskins removed when you were babies? for me it was when i was around 10..and i barely had anaesthesia..it was painful as ****. the 'doctor' used something that looked like a soldering iron to stop the bleeding (it was smoking a bit). 3rd world country luxury

[millwad]

By the way, is there anyone who got circumcised as a grown-up? It's pretty meaningless to read a discussion between guy's with foreskin or no foreskin, haha, who have been the same since birth. If you got circumcised as a grown, what difference do you feel? Is your ***** less sensitive?

[Dictator]

I've never heard of a girl disliking foreskin. I'm pretty sure it's more common to have foreskin than to not have it. Must be different in other countries.

[-p.tiddy-]

so circumcised folks here had your foreskins removed when you were babies? for me it was when i was around 10..and i barely had anaesthesia..it was painful as ****. the 'doctor' used something that looked like a soldering iron to stop the bleeding (it was smoking a bit). 3rd world country luxury
got damn...:biggums:



do you regret doing it at all?

[BrickingStar]

I've never heard of a girl disliking foreskin. I'm pretty sure it's more common to have foreskin than to not have it. Must be different in other countries.
This Website = American Server = America is mostly non forskined = LeBron GOAT.

[LJJ]

lol that is just a bold face lie. Please show me any data that proves what you say. There is none. The only credible medical studies that you will find states the opposite. Find me an adult that did a circumcision that doesn't say he improved sensibility.

Why should be parents allowed to decide? What's next? Vaccination only for adults?


You are no circumcised, good for you, now stop with the lies.

http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

Boom. A whole collection of studies for your reading pleasure.


And why are you (or primetime for that matter) using the fact that circumcision can prevent HIV infection during sex as a reason to circumcise babies? :roll: Ridiculous. Babies shouldn't be having sex in the first place. By the time this becomes an issue they should be able to decide for themselves, why take away that right?

[magic chiongson]

got damn...:biggums:



do you regret doing it at all?

naww..dick seems pretty normal these days..from what i could tell :D i would have prefered to have it done when i was a baby though..i had trouble peeing & walking for over a week after i was circumcised

[TheMan]

I've never heard of a girl disliking foreskin. I'm pretty sure it's more common to have foreskin than to not have it. Must be different in other countries.
About 80%-20% in favor of hoodies worldwide. Basically the USA, Jews and Muslims circumcise...

[niko]

We have topics like this now and then on the board and i always wonder why. I've had girls tell me they didn't think many guys had foreskin (i do) but i've never had it brought up more than that if at all and its inconcievable to me a girl would see that and change her mind. If your ***** is out and she's looking at it i'm thinking things won't move backwards. :lol

Stupid topic.

[BrickingStar]

http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

Boom. A whole collection of studies for your reading pleasure.


And why are you (or primetime for that matter) using the fact that circumcision can prevent HIV infection during sex as a reason to circumcise babies? :roll: Ridiculous. Babies shouldn't be having sex in the first place. By the time this becomes an issue they should be able to decide for themselves, why take away that right?
Guilty :(

[SevereUpInHere]

My mate snapped his banjo string when he was banging this girl. Didn't heal properly and ended up having to have the snip at the age of 28ish.

Said the pain during recovery was unbearable. Ended up having 3 weeks off work or something stupid like that.

When he gets back from the UK I'll have to ask him if sex is better now he's rocking the helmet. Might even facebook message him now :oldlol:

[-p.tiddy-]

http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

Boom. A whole collection of studies for your reading pleasure.


And why are you (or primetime for that matter) using the fact that circumcision can prevent HIV infection during sex as a reason to circumcise babies? :roll: Ridiculous. Babies shouldn't be having sex in the first place. By the time this becomes an issue they should be able to decide for themselves, why take away that right?
again, because it is just 100x easier to do it as an infant...you have trouble accepting that I see, but it is what it is

read magic chiongson's posts

I am quite certain the odds are that my son would be more upset at me NOT doing it while he was an infant and forcing him to do while he is an adult vs. doing it and giving him no say

also like I said earlier, those childhood years can be rough for kids that have glaring differences...I really don't want to hear a "Why does my ***** look different than everyone else's daddy? Why didn't you do what everyone else did? etc"

[-p.tiddy-]

My mate snapped his banjo string when he was banging this girl. Didn't heal properly and ended up having to have the snip at the age of 28ish.

Said the pain during recovery was unbearable. Ended up having 3 weeks off work or something stupid like that.

so circumcised folks here had your foreskins removed when you were babies? for me it was when i was around 10..and i barely had anaesthesia..it was painful as ****. the 'doctor' used something that looked like a soldering iron to stop the bleeding (it was smoking a bit). 3rd world country luxury

naww..dick seems pretty normal these days..from what i could tell i would have prefered to have it done when i was a baby though..i had trouble peeing & walking for over a week after i was circumcised


you reading these LJJ?

[Just2McFly]

Prime, what is your point again? I'm lost. Are you basically going on for pages to prove that LJJ is wrong?

[LJJ]

again, because it is just 100x easier to do it as an infant...you have trouble accepting that I see, but it is what it is

read magic chiongson's posts

I am quite certain the odds are that my son would be more upset at me NOT doing it while he was an infant and forcing him to do while he is an adult vs. doing it and giving him no say

also like I said earlier, those childhood years can be rough for kids that have glaring differences...I really don't want to hear a "Why does my ***** look different than everyone else's daddy? Why didn't you do what everyone else did? etc"

Magic chiongson said they did in a third world country where they toasted his dick with a waffle iron. Again, work your google magic as you always do and you'll find out in most cases it's a relatively painless procedure. They cut off part of your dick, you take some tablets so you don't get hard a couple of days, bam, done.

And I don't know how they do in America during showering after sports, but apparently a lot of time is spent checking out each others *****. We didn't do that after soccer practice, I can tell you that. So maybe there is something to that, I don't know.



And even in the worst case scenario? A week of incovenience (after a procedure that most likely will not be undertaken anyway) is worth making the decision for your kid in regards to genital mutilation? Lol. I'd had to have you as a dad.

[-p.tiddy-]

Prime, what is your point again? I'm lost. Are you basically going on for pages to prove that LJJ is wrong?
yes, exactly, fck LJJ lol ;)

well, and to explain why you would do it to an infant vs. adult

[LamarOdom]

also like I said earlier, those childhood years can be rough for kids that have glaring differences...I really don't want to hear a "Why does my ***** look different than everyone else's daddy? Why didn't you do what everyone else did? etc"

If your kid isn't gonna attend a Jewish or Muslim school he shouldn't have a dick that's different from other kids, three year old study show that circumcision in US is just above 50% down from 65%+ in 1999 and 57% in 2006.

People are slowly realizing that circumcision is crazy, soon there will be more newborn babies with foreskin.

And if your kid wants to circumcise his dick than I think that should be his own decision later on in life, but that's just my opinion.

[LJJ]

By the way.

Countries where the consensus is "circumcision has clear benefits proven by science and we should do it to our babies as soon as possible": North America, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Morocco, Egypt, Algeria, Sudan, Congo, etc

Countries where the general consensus is "Let's not cut off part of the dick of our son, it's his own dick and eventually he can do what he wants with it": France, Spain, Germany, Japan, Australia, Italy, UK, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, etc and basically every free country not listed in column A.

[miller-time]

again, because it is just 100x easier to do it as an infant...you have trouble accepting that I see, but it is what it is

it is 100x easier to do anything to an infant. they have no concept of what is going on and they aren't able to form complex permanent memories. but that doesn't make it more right.

[zizozain]

http://www.riversideonline.com/source/images/image_popup/pr7_circumcision.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cdnUBVphvmc/Ty1dx8em8sI/AAAAAAAAAKE/rcWA2s1B4Ik/s1600/side+by+side.png

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Long_foreskin.JPG

[LJJ]

Correction on North America: United States 3/4 to 2/3 cut (slowly going to 1/2). Canadians are 50/50 and most Mexicans aren't cut.

But why is the trend that circumcision is becoming less prevalent?

Circumcision prevents disease, children won't remember it happened and it's been proven that cutting off one of the most stimulating parts of the ***** doesn't impact sexual enjoyment at all!

[niko]

again, because it is just 100x easier to do it as an infant...you have trouble accepting that I see, but it is what it is

read magic chiongson's posts

I am quite certain the odds are that my son would be more upset at me NOT doing it while he was an infant and forcing him to do while he is an adult vs. doing it and giving him no say

also like I said earlier, those childhood years can be rough for kids that have glaring differences...I really don't want to hear a "Why does my ***** look different than everyone else's daddy? Why didn't you do what everyone else did? etc"

You are really seriously overthinking it if you think a reason to do this is because your kid and his friends will be comparing *****. If your son is alone with a lot of young boys and they are all checking out each other shlongs and making him an outcase because of it im thinking some other weird shit is goign on... :lol

[Dictator]

http://www.riversideonline.com/source/images/image_popup/pr7_circumcision.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cdnUBVphvmc/Ty1dx8em8sI/AAAAAAAAAKE/rcWA2s1B4Ik/s1600/side by side.png

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Long_foreskin.JPG


delete this chit. Also foreskin doesn't look like that.

[ace23]

You are really seriously overthinking it if you think a reason to do this is because your kid and his friends will be comparing *****. If your son is alone with a lot of young boys and they are all checking out each other shlongs and making him an outcase because of it im thinking some other weird shit is goign on... :lol
This :roll: :roll:

[LamarOdom]

Seems like most of Europe circumcision is illegal on babies.

Germany: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18793842
'
Of course Jews being funny.


"perhaps the most serious attack on Jewish life in Europe since the Holocaust*

Yes mr Rabbi not allowing you to assault your children and cut of their ***** is the most serious attack on Jews since the holocaust.


The following countries have a circumcision rate of less than 20%: Iceland,[17] United Kingdom,[17][49] Ireland, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Spain, France, Switzerland, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, Slovakia, Germany,[50] Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Serbia[17], Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova, Ukraine, Austria, Belarus, Cyprus, Georgia.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision#Europe

Interesting that developed countries have less circumcision.

[magic chiongson]

hey anyone can decide whats best for himself (or his son's)

i did it because everyone else did it, i was talked into doing it during summer when we visited my grabdfather's in a pretty remote place, some kinda coming of age ceremony thing and i was the only uncircumcised among the kids my age. if i hadn't done it there..i would've done it sooner somewhere else where there's real doctors with real surgical tools :D

and the main benefit that i can see now is that its easier to clean your dick while taking a bath. main disadvantage? you need to **** shaved/trimmed chicks or else it will hurt a bit when you hit the bush :D

[NuggetsFan]

You are really seriously overthinking it if you think a reason to do this is because your kid and his friends will be comparing *****. If your son is alone with a lot of young boys and they are all checking out each other shlongs and making him an outcase because of it im thinking some other weird shit is goign on... :lol

It doesn't happen like that. I actually remember first year of high school a dude got made fun of for it. Pretty sure a girl just told everybody his dick was weird, obviously as people get older you realize some are cut\uncut. I'm cut and I've never really put much thought into it. Sex is one of the greatest feelings, if not the greatest so I haven't really worried myself about losing sensitivity or whatever. If you're cut and worried about the feeling of sex you've probably got a bigger issue than you're dick. Remember randomly hearing if you're uncut it's harder to keep clean and it smells bad, that's probably false but I can honestly say I'm 100% uneducated on the differences of being cut\uncut :oldlol:

I've never heard anybody talk shit about being "cut". A girlfriend has never commented on it, never heard anybody else comment on. Really only heard a few instances about being not cut tho so my conclusion would probably be that in the end nobody really gives a f*ck.

[-p.tiddy-]

niko never played sports as a kid, never been in a locker room

I can remember uncut kids being clowned on a lot

[L.Kizzle]

That shit look like a yam or zucchini.

[miller-time]

hey anyone can decide whats best for himself (or his son's)

how can you decide what is best for yourself when your dad has already decided for you?

[HardwoodLegend]

I wish there was some way to combine foreskin sensation with no foreskin aesthetics.

Then again, I like the feeling of sex enough as it is. Having that extra sensitivity would turn me into some Tiger Woods pu$$y fiend. I couldn't handle having less self control.

[magic chiongson]

how can you decide what is best for yourself when your dad has already decided for you?

obviously i meant if you're still uncut at your age

[HardwoodLegend]

It's really not all that bad.

And, I know this one fine ass woman who gushes about her husband's "beautiful uncut dick".

[magic chiongson]

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5lqEWA_0cCs/TV_lNOMSfPI/AAAAAAAAA2w/KzlERxCDzRo/s1600/woman_screaming.gif

For real that shit is horrifying.


:biggums: you didnt have to quote the whole thing bruh

[JEFFERSON MONEY]

Eh I like the feeling of cutness because the idea that it's easier to concoct fimosis or smegma underneath your hood.

However.

From many anecdotes I've heard from boys who did it later (ages 7-11) It IS THE MOST PAINFUL THING YOU WILL EVER EXPERIENCE.

Let's take a quick list.

Pissing out Kidney Stones
Getting Punched in the Kidneys
Root Extraction
Spinal Tap
Circumcision
Rubbing ginger or lemon or salt in an open wound.

Add circumcision to the list.

[beer]

i'm circumcised, it's kind of a big deal where my family is from.

my wife didn't want to... showed me a bunch of videos of the procedure, i just couldn't do it after watching. it's absolutely terrible.

question, does anyone know why circumcision isn't covered by medical insurance anymore in the US?

[rufuspaul]

I have to laugh at the sensitivity argument. Like I need more sensitivity in my dick! Shit the first time I had actual intercourse I came in like 3 minutes. The last thing I need is more sensitivity in my fukcing dick. :oldlol: Fukc give me less sensitivity so I don't have to keep remembering sports statistics.

[magic chiongson]

so I don't have to keep remembering sports statistics.

how bout rosie o'donnel?

[beer]

i'm circumcised, it's kind of a big deal where my family is from.

my wife didn't want to... showed me a bunch of videos of the procedure, i just couldn't do it after watching. it's absolutely terrible.

question, does anyone know why circumcision isn't covered by medical insurance anymore in the US?

that's why you proof read...
my wife didn't want to with our son.

[Blackisbig]

Hahaha, circumcision should be illegal, but abortions should be paid for by the government. Awesome world we live in.

[longhornfan1234]

Circumcision violates the baby's rights . Every human is born with rights. And rights to a whole, intact body is one of them.

[TheMan]

niko never played sports as a kid, never been in a locker room

I can remember uncut kids being clowned on a lot
I grew up in Chicago in the 80s, went to a Catholic HS where most of the kids were from Irish, Polish, German, Croatian/Serbian and Mexican ancestary and most were uncut. It depends on were you live also...

The pic of the ***** with the extra long foreskin is an aberration, that is not a normal foreskin, just like when a girl has extra long flappy ******l lips...poor dude prolly should get cut:oldlol:

[niko]

niko never played sports as a kid, never been in a locker room

I can remember uncut kids being clowned on a lot

Played soccer and baseball in high school. Played basketball and baseball in JHS. Showered. Didn't stare at the other naked guys and we didn't discuss each other's peckers. Got tons of shit for a lot of things but never for not being circumsized. Literally never. Staring at another guy's ***** and commenting is gay. The act of discussing each other's *****'s would probably get people more shit. Did you all really stand in a circle and compare *****? :lol

[niko]

Eh I like the feeling of cutness because the idea that it's easier to concoct fimosis or smegma underneath your hood.

However.

From many anecdotes I've heard from boys who did it later (ages 7-11) It IS THE MOST PAINFUL THING YOU WILL EVER EXPERIENCE.

Let's take a quick list.

Pissing out Kidney Stones
Getting Punched in the Kidneys
Root Extraction
Spinal Tap
Circumcision
Rubbing ginger or lemon or salt in an open wound.

Add circumcision to the list.

I had a staph infection in my colon. That makes my list.

[TheMan]

Played soccer and baseball in high school. Played basketball and baseball in JHS. Showered. Didn't stare at the other naked guys and we didn't discuss each other's peckers. Got tons of shit for a lot of things but never for not being circumsized. Literally never. Staring at another guy's ***** and commenting is gay. The act of discussing each other's *****'s would probably get people more shit. Did you all really stand in a circle and compare *****? :lol
lol, truth

I also played baseball in HS and no one talked about cokcs , that is just so gay.

Tiddy prolly grew up in Frisco were that shit is common...not that there's anything wrong with it:oldlol:

[rufuspaul]

Is it gay to talk about cocks on the internet?


On a scale of 1 to Freddy Mercury it's about a Clay Aiken.

[TheMan]

Is it gay to talk about cocks on the internet?
Yea, it is, now that you mention it.

Not that there's anything wrong with it:lol

[AlphaWolf24]

Getting a girl in bed is just the start, being sexually compatible is only seen AFTER having sex. Have you ever gotten a girl to make out with you and then realized her breath smelled bad and you don't want to go back?

but we ARE stuck with what society says is good or bad...yes...that doesn't mean we have to play along, but it does dictate if others accepted us or not. I wouldn't want my son to be gay, not because I have a problem with gay people, but because I know his life would likely be much harder on him if he was.

and differences do need to be accepted, but they aren't...esp at childhood

and yes, perhaps in the future circumcision will be faded out, but for right now it is the norm in the US


- This as nothing to do ith $exual preference or pleasure.....since we are born with 4skin.....and most of the world is not circumsized.Humans have been ****ing since the dawn of time....men who are not cut produce more offspring then men who got skinned.

- It's clearly just a social mutilation act...based on relious beliefs...
Imagine how stupid you would sound if Circumsission never existed.....and all of a sudden someone came to you telling you you should cut off part of your D!k...and then all baby boys should do it when they are just born!!!!

people would think you are crazy and it would be barbaric.....Circ rates have been drastically falling over the past few decades....once people in America realize how dumb it really is...it will probably go away for the mjority.

- sounds more like you are just sying.." everyone did it on my street.....I'm scared that they will laughat me if I don't do it...."

congrats.....your dad was an idiot who wasn't smart enough or brave enough to think on his own 2 feet....

sounds like he passed his weakness ion to you also.



" we must all cut off part of our ****!!! to stop whacking off!....GOD said so!":facepalm


bahhhhaahhahhah......little sheep.

[Blue&Orange]

http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

Boom. A whole collection of studies for your reading pleasure.


That seemed like a scam site, but after searching 4 or 5 studies on google, it seems legit. Probably bias, though, for sure that are more studies that the one that i gave you that point to the opposite. But yeah that site made me rethink my position.

Personally i was circumcised under anesthesia though, i had no trauma, did it with 6-8 years old, i had some problem retracting the skin or something, it was a little snip, i have like 2-3mm of head without foreskin. And if you told i could have more sensation on my ***** i would say thanks but no, i'm having trouble as it is controlling my excitement. :lol

[alenleomessi]

Eh I like the feeling of cutness because the idea that it's easier to concoct fimosis or smegma underneath your hood.

However.

From many anecdotes I've heard from boys who did it later (ages 7-11) It IS THE MOST PAINFUL THING YOU WILL EVER EXPERIENCE.

Let's take a quick list.

Pissing out Kidney Stones
Getting Punched in the Kidneys
Root Extraction
Spinal Tap
Circumcision
Rubbing ginger or lemon or salt in an open wound.

Add circumcision to the list.
bs
did it when i was 10 or 11 and basically didnt feel a thing, and its the same for pretty much every relative i know... not sure what kind of stuff they use in the usa

[Just2McFly]

Played soccer and baseball in high school. Played basketball and baseball in JHS. Showered. Didn't stare at the other naked guys and we didn't discuss each other's peckers. Got tons of shit for a lot of things but never for not being circumsized. Literally never. Staring at another guy's ***** and commenting is gay. The act of discussing each other's *****'s would probably get people more shit. Did you all really stand in a circle and compare *****? :lol
Wouldn't doubt it since it's prime.

[-p.tiddy-]

- This as nothing to do ith $exual preference or pleasure.....since we are born with 4skin.....and most of the world is not circumsized.Humans have been ****ing since the dawn of time....men who are not cut produce more offspring then men who got skinned.

- It's clearly just a social mutilation act...based on relious beliefs...
Imagine how stupid you would sound if Circumsission never existed.....and all of a sudden someone came to you telling you you should cut off part of your D!k...and then all baby boys should do it when they are just born!!!!

people would think you are crazy and it would be barbaric.....Circ rates have been drastically falling over the past few decades....once people in America realize how dumb it really is...it will probably go away for the mjority.

- sounds more like you are just sying.." everyone did it on my street.....I'm scared that they will laughat me if I don't do it...."

congrats.....your dad was an idiot who wasn't smart enough or brave enough to think on his own 2 feet....

sounds like he passed his weakness ion to you also.



" we must all cut off part of our ****!!! to stop whacking off!....GOD said so!":facepalm


bahhhhaahhahhah......little sheep.
I don't think many people view it as a religious thing anymore...the way it was presented to me for my son was that it was a cleanliness, a grooming issue...comparable to having your wisdom teeth removed because it is easier to get infections with them.

many here have posted stats showing that odds of certain diseases decrease when circumcised and no one really debates that

the only thing that seems to be an actual debate is weather or not it should be done to an infant or not...and what I was told on that by doctors was that it is just MUCH MUCH easier to do to an infant vs. an adult, it looks like some debate that, but I do not.




All I can say is that I very grateful that my parents had me circumcised AS AN INFANT AND NOT AN ADULT so I am doing the same for my son...and I am 99.9999999999% sure he will have no issues with my choice.

[LJJ]

That seemed like a scam site, but after searching 4 or 5 studies on google, it seems legit. Probably bias, though, for sure that are more studies that the one that i gave you that point to the opposite. But yeah that site made me rethink my position.

Personally i was circumcised under anesthesia though, i had no trauma, did it with 6-8 years old, i had some problem retracting the skin or something, it was a little snip, i have like 2-3mm of head without foreskin. And if you told i could have more sensation on my ***** i would say thanks but no, i'm having trouble as it is controlling my excitement. :lol

Site looks fishy as hell, I'm not going to argue there.

Either way though, it's definitely not my position that one is better or anything. It's a controversial subject and for good reason. You can look at it from any perspective: whether it's scientific studies, prevalence, personal preferences, etc: all that becomes clear is that you can make a case either way. That all makes saying you are 100% sure someone would prefer one over the other and you should make the decision for them a very ignorant position.

That's all I'm saying. I don't care whether or not you get circumcised, but people who feel they should decide wether or not someone else gets a circumcision for non-medical reasons should definitely be legally stopped from doing so. Just like what we all did for our girls.

[-p.tiddy-]

Site looks fishy as hell, I'm not going to argue there.

Either way though, it's definitely not my position that one is better or anything. It's a controversial subject and for good reason. You can look at it from any perspective: whether it's scientific studies, prevalence, personal preferences, etc: all that becomes clear is that you can make a case either way. That all makes saying you are 100% sure someone would prefer one over the other and you should make the decision for them a very ignorant position.

That's all I'm saying. I don't care whether or not you get circumcised, but people who feel they should decide wether or not someone else gets a circumcision for non-medical reasons should definitely be legally stopped from doing so. Just like what we all did for our girls.
I totally understand your point but that fact that virtually no male that was circumcised as an infant complains about it or is upset about it makes it different IMO.

the vast VAST VAST majority are happy about it or fine with it...

If there was some big movement of pissed off circumcised males I think people would be much more open to waiting, but there isn't.

[LJJ]

I totally understand your point but that fact that virtually no male that was circumcised as an infant complains about it or is upset about it makes it different IMO.

the vast VAST VAST majority are happy about it or fine with it...

If there was some big movement of pissed off circumcised males I think people would be much more open to waiting, but there isn't.

That's such a silly thing to state. Asking a man circumcised as a baby if he misses his foreskin is akin to asking a Muslim whether he misses bacon. They don't really know. A Muslim doesn't complain about missing bacon at all, yet we can both easily agree bacon is pretty good and it should not be withheld from everybody simply because the people who don't eat it don't care for it.


However, should you ask people with no foreskin: Would you like sex to feel (even) better? Would you like jacking off to feel better? The majority of them would say yes. And it's abundantly clear there is controversy on this subject. It's abundantly clear that the answer to whether or not having a foreskin has those effects is not a resounding no at the very least.

[-p.tiddy-]

That's such a silly thing to state. Asking a man circumcised as a baby if he misses his foreskin is akin to asking a Muslim whether he misses bacon. They don't really know. A Muslim doesn't complain about missing bacon at all, yet we can both easily agree bacon is pretty good and it should not be withheld from everybody simply because the people who don't eat it don't care for it.


However, should you ask people with no foreskin: Would you like sex to feel (even) better? Would you like jacking off to feel better? The majority of them would say yes. And it's abundantly clear there is controversy on this subject. It's abundantly clear that the answer to whether or not having a foreskin has those effects is not a resounding no at the very least.
weather or not it "feels better" is totally up for debate...please stop acting as though that is a given...and being "more sensitive" is not "feeling better" by the way, that just means you reach the same climax easier...

and the bacon comparison is a bad one...the only thing I can think of that is similar is wisdom teeth but those are not removed at birth...if I could remove wisdom teeth from my kids as infants I would though.

[LJJ]

weather or not it "feels better" is totally up for debate...please stop acting as though that is a given...and being "more sensitive" is not "feeling better" by the way, that just means you reach the same climax easier...
.

I don't act as if it's a given. I say it's controversial and people can prefer one or the other. Which is why people should be able to make their own decision on the matter, and there is no valid reason not to let them make their own decision.


And the bacon comparison is on point. People who never had bacon don't complain about not having bacon. That fact alone says absolutely nothing about bacon, yet you keep bringing up that argument as if it says anything.

[-p.tiddy-]

I don't act as if it's a given. I say it's controversial and people can prefer one or the other. Which is why people should be able to make their own decision on the matter, and there is no valid reason not to let them make their own decision.

And the bacon comparison is on point. People who never had bacon don't complain about not having bacon. That fact alone says absolutely nothing about bacon, yet you keep bringing up that argument as if it says anything.
there IS a valid reason you just don't accept it...how about you call up a US doctor and ask them? After they tell you the same things I do you can then tell them they are wrong, perhaps you will spark a new trend and change cawks in the US forever!

Don't compare it to bacon though when you call them...that would be bad

[Timmy D for MVP]

I have to be honest guys.

This thread is not only retarded, but fairly gay.

[LJJ]

there IS a valid reason you just don't accept it...how about you call up a US doctor and ask them? After they tell you the same things I do you can then tell them they are wrong, perhaps you will spark a new trend and change cawks in the US forever!

I remember the other day you said American kids are on more medicine than European kids because of a shittier healthcare system. But I guess US healthcare is only shittier and more profit-focused when it fits your argument?

The vast majority of doctors in the developed world do absolutely not recommend circumcision for medical reasons.

[-p.tiddy-]

I remember the other day you said American kids are on more medicine than European kids because of a shittier healthcare system. But I guess US healthcare is only shittier and more profit-focused when it fits your argument?

The vast majority of doctors in the developed world do absolutely not recommend circumcision for medical reasons.
link?

[LJJ]

link?

What do you mean link? It's not commonly practiced in most developed countries, so obviously doctors aren't recommending it.

What, you really think every time in Germany a baby is born and the doctor goes up to the parents and say "We really recommend you to have your son circumcised for health reasons" and the parents respond no in overwhelming fashion? Your common sense is failing here.

Even in America your medical professionals don't officially endorse a recommendation. They only say it should be the parent's decision.

[-p.tiddy-]

What do you mean link? It's not commonly practiced in most developed countries, so obviously doctors aren't recommending it.

What, you really think every time in Germany a baby is born and the doctor goes up to the parents and say "We really recommend you to have your son circumcised for health reasons" and the parents respond no in overwhelming fashion? Your common sense is failing here.

Even in America your medical professionals don't officially endorse a recommendation. They only say it should be the parent's decision.
no that isn't obvious at all :facepalm

and there are PLENTY of developed countries that preform it...and there are also plenty of doctors in the US that do endorse it, obviously leaving it up to the parents though.

here is a LINK for you:

http://www.circinfo.net/rates_of_circumcision.html


and here is another link for you, use it please:

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=doctors+that+endorse+circumcisions&oq=doctors+that+endorse+cir&gs_l=serp.1.0.33i29.2418.10904.0.12616.44.29.9.4.4 .1.253.3595.14j14j1.29.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.Spb6Bt URUMw&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=de135a539876fa2b&bpcl=38897761&biw=1598&bih=876

[Loneshot]

I have to be honest guys.

This thread is not only retarded, but fairly gay.

I'm convinced most men are secretly gay and just supress it. You ever go to a forum where posting porn is allowed? Take Joe Rogan board, most of the porn posted (vids or gifs) are of money shots where the guy's junk is the main thing visible on the screen. :facepalm

[-p.tiddy-]

yes, if you talk about penises that means you are gay...obviously

everyone in this thread is gay...if you opened this thread you're gay

[LJJ]

no that isn't obvious at all :facepalm

and there are PLENTY of developed countries that preform it...and there are also plenty of doctors in the US that do endorse it, obviously leaving it up to the parents though.

here is a LINK for you:

http://www.circinfo.net/rates_of_circumcision.html


and here is another link for you, use it please:

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=doctors+that+endorse+circumcisions&oq=doctors+that+endorse+cir&gs_l=serp.1.0.33i29.2418.10904.0.12616.44.29.9.4.4 .1.253.3595.14j14j1.29.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.Spb6Bt URUMw&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=de135a539876fa2b&bpcl=38897761&biw=1598&bih=876


More recent numbers:

"The World Health Organization has estimated that 664,500,000 males aged 15 and over are circumcised (30% global prevalence), with almost 70% of these being Muslim."

In case your math skills aren't keeping up: it's less than 10% if you take out the Muslims and the Jews. Or in your own words: PLENTY.

[-p.tiddy-]

and there are a lot of undeveloped countries out there LJJ, and people without health insurance

it's 90% here in the US, where I live, and yes I know many of our doctors may be to quick to throw out meds, but still better than most of the world.

[LJJ]

and there are a lot of undeveloped countries out there LJJ, and people without health insurance

it's 90% here in the US, where I live, and yes I know many of our doctors may be to quick to throw out meds, but still better than most of the world.

Yet the countries which are front runners when it comes to public health, where in most of them a procedure like this would be completely free, barely practice circumcision.

[-p.tiddy-]

Yet the countries which are front runners when it comes to public health, where in most of them a procedure like this would be completely free, barely practice circumcision.
the reasons that parts of Europe are hailed for having great health care is because it is available to more people...in the US it is hard to get good health care...NOT because the doctors or better, or the schools are better...

[kNIOKAS]

no that isn't obvious at all :facepalm

and there are PLENTY of developed countries that preform it...and there are also plenty of doctors in the US that do endorse it, obviously leaving it up to the parents though.

here is a LINK for you:

http://www.circinfo.net/rates_of_circumcision.html


and here is another link for you, use it please:

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=doctors+that+endorse+circumcisions&oq=doctors+that+endorse+cir&gs_l=serp.1.0.33i29.2418.10904.0.12616.44.29.9.4.4 .1.253.3595.14j14j1.29.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.Spb6Bt URUMw&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=de135a539876fa2b&bpcl=38897761&biw=1598&bih=876
how about this link?

http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

Boom. A whole collection of studies for your reading pleasure.


And why are you (or primetime for that matter) using the fact that circumcision can prevent HIV infection during sex as a reason to circumcise babies? :roll: Ridiculous. Babies shouldn't be having sex in the first place. By the time this becomes an issue they should be able to decide for themselves, why take away that right?

[LJJ]

the reasons that parts of Europe are hailed for having great health care is because it is available to more people...in the US it is hard to get good health care...NOT because the doctors or better, or the schools are better...

Still doesn't explain why when it comes to circumcision France, Germany, Italy, UK, Japan, Sweden etc etc, the medical experts all independently agree with each other, while the US can only really find companions in the likes of Saudi Arabia and Turkey.


But alas. I just know you are going to stick your head in the sand to any other opinion at all regardless of evidence.

Letting a man decide for himself really has no downsides other than maybe a week of discomfort in the absolute worst case scenario. All the supposed health benefits, all the supposed other benefits of circumcision are still perfectly within arms reach for any man with his foreskin. Just like all the supposed benefits of keeping the foreskin remain within arms reach.
But still it's completely unreasonable to say that having two options is better than having only one option. Obviously.

[-p.tiddy-]

how about this link?
^^^

Site looks fishy as hell, I'm not going to argue there.

[-p.tiddy-]

Still doesn't explain why when it comes to circumcision France, Germany, Italy, UK, Japan, Sweden etc etc, the medical experts all independently agree with each other, while the US can only really find companions in the likes of Saudi Arabia and Turkey.


But alas. I just know you are going to stick your head in the sand to any other opinion at all regardless of evidence.

Letting a man decide for himself really has no downsides other than maybe a week of discomfort in the absolute worst case scenario. All the supposed health benefits, all the supposed other benefits of circumcision are still perfectly within arms reach for any man with his foreskin. Just like all the supposed benefits of keeping the foreskin remain within arms reach.
But still it's completely unreasonable to say that having two options is better than having only one option. Obviously.

you don't know this you are just making it up...just because the culture over there doesn't do it does NOT mean the doctors are against it, it just means society over there doesn't do it generally...I guarantee you the majority of them probably don't see it as a big deal either way

and there ARE downsides to letting that wait till adulthood...you are the one being hard headed in not accepting them

[LJJ]

^^^

The site looks fishy, the independent studies the site has collected aren't fishy at all. Just like the guy I quoted said, who actually did keep a somewhat open mind when reading something that didn't conform to his view. Instead of only viciously defending his own preconceptions in the face of mountains of evidence.

[AlphaWolf24]

-[QUOTE]p.tiddy-]I don't think many people view it as a religious thing anymore...the way it was presented to me for my son was that it was a cleanliness, a grooming issue...comparable to having your wisdom teeth removed because it is easier to get infections with them.

many here have posted stats showing that odds of certain diseases decrease when circumcised and no one really debates that

the only thing that seems to be an actual debate is weather or not it should be done to an infant or not...and what I was told on that by doctors was that it is just MUCH MUCH easier to do to an infant vs. an adult, it looks like some debate that, but I do not.


who told you that?......any real health care expert will tell you.....4 Skin will not increase any form of desease...in fact it's just the opposite.





A current argument for circumcision is that it prevents sexually transmitted diseases. The U.S. has the highest population of circumcised males in the industrialized world. The U.S. also has one of the highest rates of STDs. A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that “circumcision does not lead to lower rates of sexually transmitted diseases." In fact: “Circumcised men appeared ‘slightly more likely’ to contract a sexually transmitted disease during their lifetime.” [Perlman] In the survey of 1400 men, “circumcised men reported several cases of the bacterial infection called chlamydia, while the disease did not occur at all among the uncircumcised men. Circumcised men “who had 20 or more sex partners had more than twice the risk of bacterial or viral infections -- most often gonorrhea -- compared to uncircumcised men.” [Perlman]

CIRP Library on Circumcision and STDS


again...we are born with it for a reason.


- and the "wisdom teeth" example.....I had my wisdom teeth coming in for over a decade.....they never got infected....in fact I felt stronger and healthier with them in.

when I did get them removed ( against my will.....but I listened to the wrong person)...I had more problems and have been getting sick more often then when I had them.

Just from my own expierience...having some really strong teeth in the back was much better then getting them removed.

- You are using the scare tactic that many people use.....just because one person got sick from wisdom teeth...or didin't clean his junk and got infected...doesn't mean it will happen to everyone.


That's like saying someone who never washes themselves or abuses drugs/thier body(doesn't take care of themselves) aquired a rare desease....


it doesn't mean I will.....



- Circumsision is a barbaric mutilation act...that serves no purpose beyond social imagary.....

- Cutting part of yo Junk OFF?....think about it!!!

[Stuckey]

holy shi 12 pages

you guys are getting weird

[LJJ]

and there ARE downsides to letting that wait till adulthood...you are the one being hard headed in not accepting them

1. Circumcision surgery done by a good medical specialist might cause some short term discomfort.

2. Kids might make fun of the dick. (lol)

Other "huge downsides" I failed to mention? Again. Keep sticking your head in the sand. What you always do.

[AlphaWolf24]

Survey Finds Circumcision Contributes to ******l Dryness

The impact of male circumcision on ******l dryness during coitus was investigated. We conducted a survey of 35 female sexual partners aged 18 to 69 years who had experienced sexual intercourse with both circumcised and genitally intact men. Women reported they were significantly more likely to have experienced ******l dryness during intercourse with circumcised than with genitally intact men



ether...


/thread

[-p.tiddy-]

1. Circumcision surgery done by a good medical specialist might cause some short term discomfort.

2. Kids might make fun of the dick. (lol)

Other "huge downsides" I failed to mention? Again. Keep sticking your head in the sand. What you always do.
on adult circumcision

Also, for what it's worth, health care providers recommend that after circumcision a man abstains from any kind of sexual activity for four to six weeks to allow for a full recovery. In fact, even having an erection in this period of time after the procedure can cause complications, such as discomfort, pain, and disruption of the sutures. Moreover, some men may find arousal, erection, and/or ejaculation to be so uncomfortable that they may not mind the break from sex.
http://goaskalice.columbia.edu/adult-male-circumcision

and again in the US we are 90% circumcised...and being "different" as a kid can be hard for some...not all kids, but some. Laugh all you want but it is very true and you know it. Also women here prefer circumcised a great deal, the stats on that have been posted.

[-p.tiddy-]

ether...


/thread
women in the US prefer circumcised...but I am not trying to "ether" the uncircumcised posters here...there is really no need to get upset at me uncircumcised posters

I know we are all very over protective of our dcks though and don't want to think anything is wrong down there...lol

[kNIOKAS]

^^^
well yeah.. It's so biased, I wonder who hates circumsticion so much that had urge to make it.

Hey, but it has full name and .org domain. What's not to believe? :biggums:

[AlphaWolf24]

women in the US prefer circumcised...but I am not trying to "ether" the uncircumcised posters here...there is really no need to get upset at me uncircumcised posters

I know we are all very over protective of our dcks though and don't want to think anything is wrong down there...lol


- They do?....every women I ******* says it's more enjoyable ...even the white chicks who never had it say it's better, I must have converted at least 50 white girls.

- I know there is noting wrong down ther for me.....I didn't get a D!k sliced up when I was 10 hours old....

[-p.tiddy-]

yes they do, posted in this thread earlier:


TABLE ONE

Activity ***** Type

Circumcised (%) Uncircumcised (%) Either (%)
Sexual Intercourse

71 6 23

Looking at to Achieve sexual arousal
76 4 20


Giving manual

penile stimulation
75 5 20

Giving Fellatio
83 2 15
http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/showthread.php?15637-Another-Study-Women-Prefer-Circumcision


was noted though that this is the US only and in Europe where it is uncommon the stats are probably different

[AlphaWolf24]

yes they do, posted in this thread earlier:


http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/showthread.php?15637-Another-Study-Women-Prefer-Circumcision


was noted though that this is the US only and in Europe where it is uncommon the stats are probably different


I can find twice as many studys that say just the opposite..


Results

CIRP Note: The results of this survey are somewhat obscurely stated. This survey surveyed 138 women. Of that group 20 (14.5%) preferred non-intact circumcised sexual partners while 118 or (85.5%) preferred intact non-circumcised sexual partners. This means that about 6 out of 7 women preferred intact non-circumcised partners while about 1 out of seven preferred non-intact circumcised partners.


http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/

also...


Just as female circumcision was advocated in some Muslim and African countries to control women's sexuality, so too was male circumcision introduced into English-speaking countries in the late 1800s as a method of treating and preventing *********ion [2]. While there has been debate over whether circumcision affects the sexual sensations of the *****, there have been few relevant studies. Four men circumcised in adulthood reported decreased sensitivity [3]. Writing under a pseudonym, a physician circumcised as an adult argued that the loss of sensitivity he experienced was favourable, as it gave him more control over his orgasms [4]. Another man circumcised as an adult lamented that the decrease in sensation could be equated with seeing in monochrome rather than in colour.

Laumann et al. [5] found that circumcised men had different sexual practices from genitally altered men. Circumcised men were more likely to *********e, to engage in heterosexual **** and oral sex, and to engage in homosexual **** sex. In the male rat, removal of the penile sheath markedly interferes with normal penile reflexes and copulation. When circumcised rats were paired with sexually experienced females, they had more difficulty obtaining an erection, more difficulty inserting the ***** into the ******, and required more mounts to inseminate than did unaltered males [6]. Preputial secretions in mice and rats are a strong attractant for female mice and rats [7-11], and may provoke the onset of oestrus in mature females [12].


:confusedshrug:

I'm taking nature and science on my side.....

Think about it.....we are born with it.....It's part of our Manhood....why cut it off becuase some wacko priest said so?....

[AlphaWolf24]

http://www.modern-notoriety.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/air-jordan-28_02-570x340.jpg

:banana: :banana: :banana:

[Balla_Status]

Circumcised dudes are trying so hard to validate their situation. As long as you wash your dick and have safe sex, you aren't going to get any diseases plus sex feels better. These are facts.

The STD argument only works in places that are unsanitary like Africa.

[Balla_Status]

Why go through all that work, and just get it circumcised?

The thing looks like an alien when stuff gets peeled back. Hideous.

Never see guys in porn with un-cut pecker woods.

Manuel Ferrara...best dude in porn.

[Balla_Status]

I'm not wrong at all...I JUST had a son, it is MUCH easier to do as an infant than as an adult, this is fact

Serious? Congrats my man.

[Balla_Status]

you reading these LJJ?

So what exactly was the reading for getting him circumcised at all then?

Because it would hurt to do it later?

Dumb reason.

[ErhnamDjinn]

well i didnt have a choice either, so i dont have a second opinion, overall it looks cleaner the way it is and easier to clean

[kentatm]

I wonder what the first sales pitch for getting cut was like?

[Smoke117]

Nah, having all that foreskin just means you have to clean that dick cheese regularly.

[atljonesbro]

What happens if you piss and dont pull back the flap

[Go Getter]

Too many classic lines.:roll:

[pauk]

You serious?

There is only benefits with no foreskin... dont try to listen to anything else who tries to say otherwise just because they are uncircumcised...


1 – Protection against local infection in the *****, which may result from the presence of the foreskin, causing tightening of the foreskin, which may lead to retention of urine or infections of the glans (tip) of the ***** – which require circumcision in order to treat these problems. In chronic cases, the child may be exposed to numerous diseases in the future, the most serious of which is cancer of the *****.

2 – Infections of the urethra. All studies have proven that uncircumcised boys are more exposed to infection of the urethra. In some studies the rate was 39 times more among uncircumcised boys. In other studies the rate was ten times more. Other studies showed that 95% of children who suffered from infections of the urethra were uncircumcised, whereas the rate among circumcised children did not exceed 5%.

In children, infection of the urethra is serious in some cases. In the study by Wisewell on 88 children who suffered infections of the urethra, in 36 % of them, the same bacteria was found in the blood also. Three of them contracted meningitis, and two suffered renal failure. Two others died as a result of the spread of the micro-organisms throughout the body.

3 – Protection against cancer of the *****: the studies agree that cancer of the ***** is almost non-existent among circumcised men, whereas the rate among uncircumcised men is not insignificant. In the US the rate of penile cancer among circumcised men is zero, whilst among uncircumcised men it is 2.2 in every 100,000 of the uncircumcised population. As most of the inhabitants of the US are circumcised, the cases of this cancer there are between 750 and 1000 per year. If the population were not circumcised, the number of cases would reach 3000. In countries where boys are not circumcised, such as China, Uganda and Puerto Rico, penile cancer represents between 12-22 % of all cancers found in men; this is a very high percentage.

4 – Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Researchers found that the STDs which are transmitted via sexual contact (usually because of fornication/adultery and homosexuality) spread more among those who are not circumcised, especially herpes, soft chancres, syphilis, candida, gonorrhea and genital warts.

There are numerous modern studies which confirm that circumcision reduces the possibility of contracting AIDS when compared to their uncircumcised counterparts. But that does not rule out the possibility of a circumcised man contracting AIDS as the result of sexual contact with a person who has AIDS. Circumcision is not a protection against it, and there is no real way of protecting oneself against the many sexually transmitted diseases apart from avoiding fornication/adultery, promiscuity, homosexuality and other repugnant practices. (From this we can see the wisdom of Islamic sharee’ah in forbidding fornication/adultery and homosexuality).

5. - Easier to clean and it stays clean much longer.

6. - The ***** glans becomes less sensitive, prolonging sexual intercourse.

7. - It doesnt stink anymore.


Foreskin is the most filthy thing in the human body... you will have to wash a couple of times a day everyday to truly keep it clean from the constant flow of bad pathogens it creates on the glans.

I am circumcised, not because of religious reasons but because of medical reasons... from age 12 to 14 i kept getting foreskin caused symptoms (skin infections/rashes, which would even spread around the *****), i was forced to circumcise... the first 1-2 months was hell as the ***** would swell up & had stitches you had to deal with, but the foreskin symptoms vanished and i got this nice looking ***** :)... The only bad thing really is that its harder to get an equally good fap... :P

[fiddy]

13 pages of people arguing about dick?

ISH is definitely not gay.

[TheMan]

[QUOTE=pauk]You serious?

There is only benefits with no foreskin... dont try to listen to anything else who tries to say otherwise just because they are uncircumcised...


1

[Boomerang]

You drip and pee to the wrong direction if you don't retract the foreskin. Plus, urine will be trapped inside the foreskin, which will cause piss stain on your underwear/boxers.

It's better if you just retract it back when you pee.
why has this been the opposite for me my entire life?
I've always peed without retracting the foreskin. My aim is perfect, it goes whereever i want it to go.

you're right about the piss stain, though. i wanted to do sth about it, so i did tried retracting then peeing, but it was a disaster. Urine flew all over the place. what am i doing wrong, or do i just need more practice?

[SilkkTheShocker]

Studies show that kids that still have their foreskin, grew up in lower-class families.

[lilojmayo]

http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q112/Mets31gkd/NiggaYouGay.jpg

[talkingconch]

circumscision is on its way out

[MetsPackers]

Honestly, this thread is really gay

Idk who "TheMan" is, but you seem to know an awful lot about your fellow mans cawks to be making statements like "yeah everybody by me was uncut, almost everyone, irish, catholic, muslim, whatever. All uncut"

You sure have surveyed cawk from an awful lot of ethnicities bro :roll:



One time i was watchin porn and saw an uncircumsized cawk and was like :biggums:

:biggums: <--- that was literally my reaction. AtLEAST 3 biggums faces. Atleast.

Dat jawn ugly

[lilojmayo]

http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q112/Mets31gkd/NiggaYouGay.jpg

[tomtucker]

http://www.modern-notoriety.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/air-jordan-28_02-570x340.jpg

:banana: :banana: :banana:
:oldlol: :roll:

[hateraid]

My son is of the uncut variety. Because of the little danggly piece at the end he refers to his piece as his aardvark

http://www.zooborns.com/.a/6a010535647bf3970b0105369937c4970b-800wi

[tomtucker]

I love the smell of headcheese in the morning.....it smells like.......victory

[PHX_Phan]

Have mine and never really gave it much thought after HS. Never had a girl say anything about it or act like it mattered. I also have never asked a girl what she prefers (lol?)

I don't think it's really that big of a deal. My ex had a little 'flap' of foreskin in her *****. I was into her and the first time I saw it I didn't really think much of it, nor did I shy away from going down on her cause of it. I imagine this is similar to how most people feel.

Truth be told it was interesting playing with it. Now most girls seem like they're missing something.

[magic chiongson]

i did date a chick that told me she never gives a blowjob on guys with foreskins..unless she washes the dick herself first :D

[tomtucker]

Have mine and never really gave it much thought after HS. Never had a girl say anything about it or act like it mattered. I also have never asked a girl what she prefers (lol?)

I don't think it's really that big of a deal. My ex had a little 'flap' of foreskin in her *****. I was into her and the first time I saw it I didn't really think much of it, nor did I shy away from going down on her cause of it. I imagine this is similar to how most people feel.

Truth be told it was interesting playing with it. Now most girls seem like they're missing something.

i don

[Rysio]

yes unless your a pornstar. /thread.

[TheMan]

Honestly, this thread is really gay

Idk who "TheMan" is, but you seem to know an awful lot about your fellow mans cawks to be making statements like "yeah everybody by me was uncut, almost everyone, irish, catholic, muslim, whatever. All uncut"

You sure have surveyed cawk from an awful lot of ethnicities bro :roll:



One time i was watchin porn and saw an uncircumsized cawk and was like :biggums:

:biggums: <--- that was literally my reaction. AtLEAST 3 biggums faces. Atleast.

Dat jawn ugly
It's called statistics, fakkit, read them once in a while.

[SilkkTheShocker]

Makes for easier fapping too. Whenever I hear about dudes having to use lotion and tube socks and I'm like

http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/yao+ming+meme+cowboy+laughing.+yao+ming+meme+cowbo y+laughing_04d36d_3638880.gif


There are people that have to use those?