Your Top 5 greatest teams of all time?

[Micku]

It might be appropriate seeing how Miami Heat are doing something unique at this time. What do you consider to be the top 5 teams of all time?

1. 1986 Celtics: Almost no weakness. Probably the GOAT front court, great fast break team, Bird and Mchale in their prime, great bench with sixth man of the year, and good defense. And one of the best passing teams of all time. 40-1 home record too.

2. 1996 Bulls: Great versatile defensive team. Very solid bench. Elite coaching. Even when they have Jordan they play great as a team with guys knowing their roles. Having the best record in NBA history is legendary. They were the best offensive team and best defensive team in their season. They destroyed their competition by beating them on a average of 12.3ppg in the regular season. Plus Rodman, Jordan, and Pippen were first All Defense Team. Ron Harper was a pretty good defender as well.

3. 87 Lakers: It might be the best Showtime team. Magic, Worthy, and Scott in their prime. Michael Cooper being the DPOY. Kareem, even though was old, he was still elite as a center. A great scoring option. And a great coach with Pat Riley.

4. 72 Lakers: Seemed like they finally lived up to their potential with West, Wilt, and Goodrich. They hold the 33 win streak. Wilt being great at defense, West playing a more disturber role, and Goodrich being the scorer. Won 69 wins of the season.

5. 71 Bucks: A young Kareem in his prime, being a force of nature and Oscar Robinson being more of a playmaker with solid role players. They also destroyed their competition. They beat teams on the average of 12.2ppg. But they destroyed in the playoffs by beating teams on the average of 14.5ppg.

Honorable mentions:

85 and 87 Celtics and 85 Lakers: Magic and Kareem were closer as the 1a and 1b type. Great team, probably underrated and should belong in there somewhere. Might be better than 87 team. And that 85 Celtics team was really stacked. The 87 Celts was great but got consumed by injuries in the end. Mchale was at his peak that year before the injury.

83 76ers: Like the 1996 Bulls, they had three players in the All Defense Team. Moses Malone, Mo Cheeks, and Bobby Jones. Plus they had Dr. J. and Andrew Toney. Playoff record was 12-1. Second best playoff record.

01 Lakers: Probably the best one and two punch option. Not as stacked as the other teams, but they dominated the competition in the playoffs. Best playoff record with 15-1.

97 Bulls and the first threepeat Bulls: 97 Bulls were pretty much the same team with the 96 Bulls. 69 wins and could've won more if Rodman played a little bit more games. And the first threepeat Bulls were great because Jordan was more at his best and Pippen and H.Grant were coming to their own.

2002 Kings: Probably the the best team to never win a title IMO, and one of the most entertaining teams. I may be a little bias with this one.

[1987_Lakers]

Only mentioning 1977-present teams since I havent seen much from the older teams.

1. 1986 Celtics - Greatest mix of talent & chemistry the league has ever seen. This team pretty much had no weaknesses, elite offense, elite defense, they would beat you up on the boards, and they even used the 3 point shot to their favor at times. Greatest front court in NBA History as well, adding Walton to that team was almost criminal.

2. 1996 Bulls - An amazing team known for their consistency and defense. Probably the greatest defensive back court the league has ever seen, and a top notch offense. Only knock on this team was lack of post scoring from their bigs.

3. 1987 Lakers - One of the most efficient offenses the league has ever seen, known for their fast break. Defense was solid as well. Weakness would probably be rebounding, they struggled on the boards at times, especially vs Eastern teams.

4. 1983 Sixers - Team full of all-stars, only lost 1 game in the postseason. It was a top heavy team, lack of depth and the PF position was a weak spot.

5. 1992 Bulls or 1985 Lakers - Can't decide.

[jongib369]

1.http://oi49.tinypic.com/29mncd0.jpg
2.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8WDb1CdcbNU/TPDI9EgeCbI/AAAAAAABYCI/KlQVCFIOwDs/s1600/espndb_1997nbachamp_576.jpg

3.http://www.theboobirds.com/images/67Sixers_crop_650x440.jpg

4.http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2007/1218/nba_g_85celtics_600.jpg

5.http://www.latimes.com/includes/projects/img/lakers/season_photos/season_1986_1987.jpg

*Edit, might re order this...That damn 86 celtic team is nuts.

[TylerOO]

2013 Heat

[TheMan]

2013 Heat
:roll:

Seriously though...
1. 1996 Chicago Bulls
2. 1991 Chicago Bulls
3. 1997 Chicago Bulls
4. 1992 Chicago Bulls
5. 1998 Chicago Bulls

Honorable mention...1993 Chicago Bulls

[KOBE143]

02 Lakers
01 Lakers
09 Lakers
10 Laker
00 Lakers

[Budadiiii]

02 Lakers
01 Lakers
09 Lakers
10 Laker
00 Lakers
Pretty good list, I wold argue 00 Lakers over 10 but... can't really argue with it too much

[The Choken One]

:roll:

Seriously though...
1. 1996 Chicago Bulls
2. 1991 Chicago Bulls
3. 1997 Chicago Bulls
4. 1992 Chicago Bulls
5. 1998 Chicago Bulls

Honorable mention...1993 Chicago Bulls
/thread

MJ >

[Breezy]

71 Bucks - Destroyed the Regular season and playoffs
96 Bulls - Pretty much never challenged the whole season.
86 Celtics - Only lost one home game all season
87 Lakers - Maybe the stiffest competition
67 Sixers - Awesome regular season (66 wins) but also wiped the floor with Russell's Celtics.

[Scholar]

I'm clearly biased here, and I will ONLY list the teams I actually watched (so from ~1996+) because the others are just teams I heard more of than actually watched.

1. 1995-96 Bulls

2. 2000-01 Lakers

3. 2009-10 Lakers

4. 2007-08 Celtics

5. 2006-07 Spurs
I expect negs for this one.

[atljonesbro]

:roll:

Seriously though...
1. 1996 Chicago Bulls
2. 1991 Chicago Bulls
3. 1997 Chicago Bulls
4. 1992 Chicago Bulls
5. 1998 Chicago Bulls

Honorable mention...1993 Chicago Bulls
Homer have some dignity you coward.

[BIZARRO]

From teams that I've seen (in order):

1. 1987 Lakers
2. 1996 Bulls
3. 1983 Sixers
4. 1986 Celtics
5. 1989 Pistons

All legendary, and you could make a case for each one, and all had their run in probably the best NBA era from '80-98, especially from '80-93.

Such truly great teams.

[3LiftHeatCurse]

1996 Chicago Bulls

1986 Boston Celtics

2013 Miami Heat

2008 Boston Celtics

1972 Los Angeles Lakers

[KOBE143]

Pretty good list, I wold argue 00 Lakers over 10 but... can't really argue with it too much
2000 Kobe was still young and the only championship that people can tell that he's a 2nd option.. In 2001 Kobe was a legitimate 1b to Shaq.. By 2002 Kobe was already equal to Shaq.. 2009 and 2010 version of Kobe was better than 3peat Kobe.. His 09 and 10 PO run was one of the best of all time.. So this is how I rank them..

2002 - Kobe = SHaq.. Imagine a team with 2 equal best player in the league
2001 - Shaq1a, Kobe1b almost same as the above but Shaq was slightly better here
2009 - Kobe had one of the best PO run of all time comparable to 1st peat Jordan
2010 - same as 2009 but they struggle beating one of the best defensive team of all time in the finals
2000 - Kobe was still too young and the only championship year that Kobe was a 2nd option

Non Lakers team

Base on how they dominate their competition:
86 Boston - because people rank them that high.. But any current team would probably shit on them..
96 Bulls - 72-10 in a watered down era.. The record was the only impressive but the competition sucks..
2004 Piston - they beat the lakers who were on pace to be the best team of all time.. Its quite sad that injuries, chemistry issue and Shaq out of shape prevent them from doing it..
2003 Spurs - they beat the 3peat Lakers in the 2nd round
2011 Mavs - they beat the defending champs for their quest to their 2nd nba finals trip and beat one of the most stacked team of all time to win the title.. This include the most epic disappearing act in the finals by the losing team best player..

[jongib369]

http://oi46.tinypic.com/311km07.jpg

[Odinn]

Top candidates;
1964-65 Celtics
1966-67 Sixers
1970-71 Bucks
1971-72 Lakers
1982-83 Sixers
1984-85 Lakers (IMO, this team has a case over 1986-87 Lakers)
1985-86 Celtics
1986-87 Lakers
1989-90 Pistons
1991-92 Bulls
1995-96 Bulls
1996-97 Bulls
1998-99 Spurs
2000-01 Lakers
2004-05 Spurs
2007-08 Celtics
2008-09 Lakers

---

1. 1985-86 Celtics
2. 1982-83 Sixers
3. 1995-96 Bulls
4. 1966-67 Sixers
5. 1970-71 Bucks

But it was too hard to rank. I can rank them differently a week later. The only absolute thing for me the '86 Celtics being the best.

[TheMan]

Homer have some dignity you coward.
No Homer, you rimjobbing ******. This is about stating your opinion so there obviously no "correct" answers.:confusedshrug:

U MAD MJ >
:hammertime:

[Ne 1]

http://lakers-edge.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/lakers2000.jpg

http://i.usatoday.net/sports/basketball/nba/phil%20jackson/phil8-pg-horizontal.JPG

Most unstoppable duo ever. 15-1 and a .938 winning percentage, the best playoff run in NBA history including a sweep over the Spurs, the best team of the regular season. The '01 Lakers lost their only game in OT and won the Conference Finals by an average of almost 22 ppg.

[Gotterdammerung]

My old posts:

1971 Bucks (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showpost.php?p=3421962&postcount=26)

1972 Lakers (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5067349&postcount=201)

1967 Sixers
1992 Bulls
1996 Bulls
1987 Lakers
1984 Celtics
2001 Lakers

I thought I wrote summaries for the others, but I can't find them. :rolleyes:

[1987_Lakers]

How can a person believe that the '84 Celtics were better than the '86 team? Players who were with both teams have said that the '86 team was the best team they played on, even Larry Bird. Red Auerbach has said that the '86 team was the best team he had been associated with.

[rmt]

I'm clearly biased here, and I will ONLY list the teams I actually watched (so from ~1996+) because the others are just teams I heard more of than actually watched.

1. 1995-96 Bulls

2. 2000-01 Lakers

3. 2009-10 Lakers

4. 2007-08 Celtics

5. 2006-07 Spurs
I expect negs for this one.

(Only since 1996), I would change #3 from 2009-10 Lakers to 2004-05 Spurs. A prime Bowen to put on Kobe, a prime TD (albeit with sprained ankles), a prime Manu, a not yet prime TP and great role players (Barry, Horry, Nazr, Rasho, Udrih, Glenn Robinson) is a bad matchup for 09-10 LAL.

[Gotterdammerung]

How can a person believe that the '84 Celtics were better than the '86 team? Players who were with both teams have said that the '86 team was the best team they played on, even Larry Bird. Red Auerbach has said that the '86 team was the best team he had been associated with.
:lebronamazed:
My old post. (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4834083&postcount=103)

[Just2McFly]

:roll:

Seriously though...
1. 1996 Chicago Bulls
2. 1991 Chicago Bulls
3. 1997 Chicago Bulls
4. 1992 Chicago Bulls
5. 1998 Chicago Bulls

Honorable mention...1993 Chicago Bulls
:biggums:

my god

[1987_Lakers]

in 1984 it took Boston 7 games to defeat a 47 win New York team, the Lakers were physically better than the Celtics that year, Boston was just more physical and mentally tougher.

Bird and McHale were better in '86, they had a more lethal frontcourt, and they were a much better jump shooting team. You might not remember this, but outside shooting was a major weakness for the Celtics in '84 with a DJ/Henderson backcourt, by '86 they were one of the better outside shooting teams in the league with Ainge (much better shooter than Henderson) improving & now starting, Wedman got more minutes, & the Sichting addition who was automatic from mid-range also helped out. Parish was better in '84, but the Walton addition made the '86 team better at the center position.

[Scholar]

http://oi46.tinypic.com/311km07.jpg

What a terrible photoshop job. Wilt is practically attached to MJ's back. Where are Wilt's legs? Is he just randomly popping out of MJ's asshole?



(Only since 1996), I would change #3 from 2009-10 Lakers to 2004-05 Spurs. A prime Bowen to put on Kobe, a prime TD (albeit with sprained ankles), a prime Manu, a not yet prime TP and great role players (Barry, Horry, Nazr, Rasho, Udrih, Glenn Robinson) is a bad matchup for 09-10 LAL.

Good point, but like I said, "I'm clearly biased here. . ." I think maybe that 2004-05 Spurs would be over the 2006-07 Spurs, but that's when TD was still in his prime, Tony Parker took the reigns, Manu was still in his prime, and the bench was arguably the best in the league.
Plus, they were the first team to expose LeBron James as a season-only player (at least, at the time; he's obviously changed that since last year).

But to be honest, I don't think the 2004-05 Spurs were that much better than the 2009-10 Lakers. That Lakers squad had a prime Kobe and a prime Gasol with a great bench that saw Lamar Odom as a great 6th man. MWP, though being far below his career averages in most categories; would've easily demolished Bruce Bowen; prime Kobe would've been a lot for Manu to handle in a 7 game series; TD & Gasol would've been an incredible match-up imo, though I'm sure Timmy D would've gotten the edge over Gasol in almost every game; assuming Bynum wasn't injured for the series, Muhammed would've had a hard time containing him in the post; and the Lakers shooters, like Shannon Brown, Jordan Farmar & Sasha Vujacic, would have/could have/should scored more from the perimeter than the Spurs' bench shooters, such as Barry & a very old Robert Horry.



Again, I might be biased here, so... :confusedshrug: All I know is that I watched every game that year and there's no denying it was among the top 3 greatest Lakers teams of the 2000's.

[Gotterdammerung]

http://oi46.tinypic.com/311km07.jpg

I remember that magazine, but I don't remember the contents of the article. :banghead:

What did it say, or claim, or argue?

[rmt]

Good point, but like I said, "I'm clearly biased here. . ." I think maybe that 2004-05 Spurs would be over the 2006-07 Spurs, but that's when TD was still in his prime, Tony Parker took the reigns, Manu was still in his prime, and the bench was arguably the best in the league.
Plus, they were the first team to expose LeBron James as a season-only player (at least, at the time; he's obviously changed that since last year).

But to be honest, I don't think the 2004-05 Spurs were that much better than the 2009-10 Lakers. That Lakers squad had a prime Kobe and a prime Gasol with a great bench that saw Lamar Odom as a great 6th man. MWP, though being far below his career averages in most categories; would've easily demolished Bruce Bowen; prime Kobe would've been a lot for Manu to handle in a 7 game series; TD & Gasol would've been an incredible match-up imo, though I'm sure Timmy D would've gotten the edge over Gasol in almost every game; assuming Bynum wasn't injured for the series, Muhammed would've had a hard time containing him in the post; and the Lakers shooters, like Shannon Brown, Jordan Farmar & Sasha Vujacic, would have/could have/should scored more from the perimeter than the Spurs' bench shooters, such as Barry & a very old Robert Horry.

Again, I might be biased here, so... :confusedshrug: All I know is that I watched every game that year and there's no denying it was among the top 3 greatest Lakers teams of the 2000's.

Artest would be on Manu and Bowen would be on Kobe. IMO, 05 Spurs > 07 Spurs - much deeper and more versatile. And yes, Horry was 35 but 21 pts, 7 reb, 2 asst, 58.3%FG, 5/6 3pters made in 32 mins. - his game 5 was magnificent.

04-05 Playoffs 3PT% 3PT Made
#24 Horry 44.7% 38
#25 Manu 43.8% 42
#26 Bowen 43.3% 29
#27 Devin Brown 42.9% 3
#29 B. Barry 42.4% 28
#70 Glenn Robinson 30% 1
#78 Udrih 27% 10

09-10 Playoffs
#31 Farmar 40% 20
#31 Vujacic 40% 6
#49 Kobe 37.4% 49
#52 Fisher 36% 27
#84 Artest 29.1% 34
#88 Shannon Brown 28.1% 9

I think your memory is off in regards to LAL's 09-10 3pt shooting. SAS' shooters are better.

http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/player/_/stat/3-points/sort/threePointFieldGoalPct/year/2010/seasontype/3/qualified/false

[1_BAD_TIGER]

Anyone old enough to remember the 83 Sixers will tell you that team would beat any team the NBA has ever put on the court. In almost sure that there were four hall of famers on that team. 8 of there 17 loses came in the last 16 games when they were playing mostly second string because they had home court already wrapped up. Totally out classed a very good Lakers team in the finals.:bowdown: 83 Philadelphia 76ers

[willds09]

1996 bulls, 1999 knicks, 1994 knicks, 1997 bulls, 1998 bulls

[Whoah10115]

The Pistons were better in 89 than they were in 90.

[ProfessorMurder]

What a terrible photoshop job. Wilt is practically attached to MJ's back. Where are Wilt's legs? Is he just randomly popping out of MJ's asshole?

:facepalm There was no photoshop in 1992 dumb ass. These people had to find the right images, x-acto knife precisely around the negatives, combine them, and print copies. It's nearly impossible to get a perfect image that way. You can't manipulate anything other than magnification.

That's nearly flawless, especially considering they probably cut around another player that Wilt was actually defending.

[Big#50]

2005 Spurs
2004 Pistons
2001 Lakers
2011 Mavs
1999 Spurs

[bdreason]

My top 5 would probably be the same as OP.

[Greg Oden 50]

2013 Heat

joke :roll:

[elementally morale]

87 Lakers
96 Bulls
86 Celtics
01 Lakers
92 Bulls

Pre 1980 teams are not listed.

[LEFT4DEAD]

Im wondering why people act like this Miami team will not end up like one of the all time great? :confusedshrug:

[InspiredLebowski]

Indy's brawl team. **** YOU MOTHER****ERS THAT TEAM WAS WINNING 70!

[elementally morale]

Im wondering why people act like this Miami team will not end up like one of the all time great? :confusedshrug:


Because we probably saw more teams than you did. This Miami team is very good in this year's league, but it can't hold a candle to the 87 Lakers, 86 Celtics or 96 Bulls teams. Watching experience helps a lot.

[LEFT4DEAD]

Because we probably saw more teams than you did. This Miami team is very good in this year's league, but it can't hold a candle to the 87 Lakers, 86 Celtics or 96 Bulls teams. Watching experience helps a lot.
Its more because you are all blind haters who dont want to accept any success this team achieve.
You have not seen half the teams I have. Be sure about that. Nobody is saying that this team is the best ever. Better than 86'Celtics, 96' Bulls etc. But they will end up being top 10 at least. And even better if they manage to win 3+ championship in a row. And there is nothing that you can do about it also.

[elementally morale]

Its more because you are all blind haters who dont want to accept any success this team achieve.
You have not seen half the teams I have. Be sure about that. Nobody is saying that this team is the best ever. Better than 86'Celtics, 96' Bulls etc. But they will end up being top 10 at least. And even better if they manage to win 3+ championship in a row. And there is nothing that you can do about it also.

Why would I want to do anything about it? If they win a lot, they will be remembred as great. Until now, they have only won 1 ring though and were actually close to being eliminated on their way last year by Boston. They have put together a nice streak as of late, sure. That alone won't make me shit my pants though.

BTW, how is your argument "they will end up top 10 at least" proof that someone thinking they are not top 5 is a hater?

[LEFT4DEAD]

Why would I want to do anything about it? If they win a lot, they will be remembred as great. Until now, they have only won 1 ring though and were actually close to being eliminated on their way last year by Boston. They have put together a nice streak as of late, sure. That alone won't make me shit my pants though.

BTW, how is your argument "they will end up top 10 at least" proof that someone thinking they are not top 5 is a hater?
Do you see anywhere that I said they are top 5 right now? I said there is a big chance they will be and that its laughable how some of you are acting like this team has no chance to be among all time best one day.

[elementally morale]

Do you see anywhere that I said they are top 5 right now? I said there is a big chance they will be and that its laughable how some of you are acting like this team has no chance to be among all time best one day.

Was this a question? What WILL happen one day? I thought the question was about the here and now.

[SacJB Shady]

Baron Davis (prime)
James Harden
Kevin Durant
LaMarcus Aldridge
Roy Hibbert

[Micku]

Im wondering why people act like this Miami team will not end up like one of the all time great? :confusedshrug:

To me it depends on what they do in the playoffs. I think they are one of the best teams in a while atm. They'll probably be remembered as all time great team if they win the championship regardless. If they dominant in the playoffs then that would only mean great things for their ranking as a team.

The season isn't over yet. But this is about top 5 greatest teams, not top 10. This Heat team haven't played in the playoffs yet.

[willds09]

2013 Heat
:lol :oldlol: :roll:

[LBJFTW]

2000 Kobe was still young and the only championship that people can tell that he's a 2nd option.. In 2001 Kobe was a legitimate 1b to Shaq.. By 2002 Kobe was already equal to Shaq.. 2009 and 2010 version of Kobe was better than 3peat Kobe.. His 09 and 10 PO run was one of the best of all time.. So this is how I rank them..

2002 - Kobe = SHaq.. Imagine a team with 2 equal best player in the league
2001 - Shaq1a, Kobe1b almost same as the above but Shaq was slightly better here
2009 - Kobe had one of the best PO run of all time comparable to 1st peat Jordan
2010 - same as 2009 but they struggle beating one of the best defensive team of all time in the finals
2000 - Kobe was still too young and the only championship year that Kobe was a 2nd option

Non Lakers team

Base on how they dominate their competition:
86 Boston - because people rank them that high.. But any current team would probably shit on them..
96 Bulls - 72-10 in a watered down era.. The record was the only impressive but the competition sucks..
2004 Piston - they beat the lakers who were on pace to be the best team of all time.. Its quite sad that injuries, chemistry issue and Shaq out of shape prevent them from doing it..
2003 Spurs - they beat the 3peat Lakers in the 2nd round
2011 Mavs - they beat the defending champs for their quest to their 2nd nba finals trip and beat one of the most stacked team of all time to win the title.. This include the most epic disappearing act in the finals by the losing team best player..

Good call. There isn't a single person that shouldn't bow down before this team. Not a single superstar and wins it all. Are you kidding me?! IDGAF how weak the trip to the finals were, BOW DOWN to a team that got it done using TEAM fundamentals because they had NO superstar, only all-stars. :bowdown:

[Micku]

Good call. There isn't a single person that shouldn't bow down before this team. Not a single superstar and wins it all. Are you kidding me?! IDGAF how weak the trip to the finals were, BOW DOWN to a team that got it done using TEAM fundamentals because they had NO superstar, only all-stars. :bowdown:

Hmm...it's hard for me to rate that team. That team was good, but I think ppl overrate the team because they just pulled an upset against the heavy favorite Lakers. It was the same team who went to 7 games against the Nets. Everyone thought it was going to be a cake walk.

But they were still great and were bullied the East for a while on how good they were as a team.

[LongLiveTheKing]

2000 Kobe was still young and the only championship that people can tell that he's a 2nd option.. In 2001 Kobe was a legitimate 1b to Shaq.. By 2002 Kobe was already equal to Shaq.. 2009 and 2010 version of Kobe was better than 3peat Kobe.. His 09 and 10 PO run was one of the best of all time.. So this is how I rank them..

2002 - Kobe = SHaq.. Imagine a team with 2 equal best player in the league
2001 - Shaq1a, Kobe1b almost same as the above but Shaq was slightly better here
2009 - Kobe had one of the best PO run of all time comparable to 1st peat Jordan
2010 - same as 2009 but they struggle beating one of the best defensive team of all time in the finals
2000 - Kobe was still too young and the only championship year that Kobe was a 2nd option

Non Lakers team

Base on how they dominate their competition:
86 Boston - because people rank them that high.. But any current team would probably shit on them..
96 Bulls - 72-10 in a watered down era.. The record was the only impressive but the competition sucks..
2004 Piston - they beat the lakers who were on pace to be the best team of all time.. Its quite sad that injuries, chemistry issue and Shaq out of shape prevent them from doing it..
2003 Spurs - they beat the 3peat Lakers in the 2nd round
2011 Mavs - they beat the defending champs for their quest to their 2nd nba finals trip and beat one of the most stacked team of all time to win the title.. This include the most epic disappearing act in the finals by the losing team best player..
Lol I knew he had to throw LeBron in somewhere. :roll:

[NumberSix]

2004 Pistons were somewhat just in the right place at the right time. Vegas odds HEAVILY favoured the Lakers. Detroit winning was the biggest finals upset in NBA history according to betting odds. (not hyperbole. Literally true)

Nobody likes to hear this about there team, but that was more of a Lakers loss than a Pistons win.

[TheBigVeto]

02 Lakers
01 Lakers
09 Lakers
10 Laker
00 Lakers

:roll:

http://oi53.tinypic.com/34rtwyh.jpg


http://i1253.photobucket.com/albums/hh600/Rodman2124/kobeclutch.gif


U Mad Kobetards?
Kobetards are phaggits
Kobe isn't a great player, FACT

[willds09]

Lol I knew he had to throw LeBron in somewhere. :roll:
Cuz hes right :roll:

[Round Mound]

1-1986 Boston Celtics
2-1987 L.A Lakers
3-1960s Any of the Late 60s Celtics but 1968
4-1968 Sixers
5-1983 Sixers