Derek Fishers .4 second gamewinner is the biggest BS in NBA HISTORY

[unbreakable]

brb catch, turn around, fadeaway, shoot all in .4 seconds :facepalm

You realize Timmy should have 5 rings already ,right? :bowdown:

[IncarceratedBob]

what's your point you little fairy

[unbreakable]

what's your point you little fairy

my second sentence , scrub

[Bibby4Three]

what's your point you little fairy

are you incarcerated fraud from twitter?

[Deuce Bigalow]

"One lucky shot deserves another"

[IncarceratedBob]

my second sentence , scrub
Were you even alive back then?

Look dude, stop using your dads *** as mouthwash and go brush up on your history

[unbreakable]

"One lucky shot deserves another"

Tim Duncans amazing shot was LEGIT. No shotclock violation, no time violation, etc...

Fishers was CLEARLY illegal and took longer than .4 :facepalm

[Deuce Bigalow]

Tim Duncans amazing shot was LEGIT. No shotclock violation, no time violation, etc...

Fishers was CLEARLY illegal and took longer than .4 :facepalm
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Dqd1Rx82bno

Clearly got off in time though.

[unbreakable]

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Dqd1Rx82bno

Clearly got off in time though.

brb clock didnt start until fish was already turning around

[Odinn]

Duncan and the Spurs could have 5-peated in that span.
2003 - Title
2004 - Fisher's illegal shot. But let's not act like that was the only reason. Lakers-Spurs series in 2004 is the closest thing to a chokejob in Duncan's prime.
2005 - Title
2006 - It was a bigger bs than Fisher's shot, Ginobili fouling Nowitzki in the last seconds of the game 7. It was one of the most single idiotic fouls I've ever seen.
2007 - Title

[tazb]

brb clock didnt start until fish was already turning around

Word.

[Deuce Bigalow]

brb clock didnt start until fish was already turning around
Doesn't look like that to me. Unless you can find a slow-mo video of the play that clearly shows the clock starting late.

[MVBallin2K]

brb clock didnt start until fish was already turning around


Why are you brbing when you type that? If you were actually doing that, this would probably be a non issue since you would miss the shot even worse than you just missed a troll attempt.

[Deuce Bigalow]

Duncan and the Spurs could have 5-peated in that span.
2003 - Title
2004 - Fisher's illegal shot. But let's not act like that was the only reason. Lakers-Spurs series in 2004 is the closest thing to a chokejob in Duncan's prime.
2005 - Title
2006 - It was a bigger bs than Fisher's shot, Ginobili fouling Nowitzki in the last seconds of the game 7. It was one of the most single idiotic fouls I've ever seen.
2007 - Title
:roll:

They couldn't even repeat once, but they could have 5peated... :oldlol:

[unbreakable]

Why are you brbing when you type that? If you were actually doing that, this would probably be a non issue since you would miss the shot even worse than you just missed a troll attempt.

im making a valid point , scrub. saying brb does not make someone a troll.

brb you fail

[Deuce Bigalow]

They couldn't even make it to the Finals back to back years, but they "could have 5peated" :facepalm

Just admit that Lakers and Kobe owns the Spurs soul.

[unbreakable]

Just admit that Lakers and Kobe owns the Spurs soul.

you really gonna make me post the picture of Tim Duncan making the Lakers cry?

http://img.youtube.com/vi/Ck9nyiwaTIg/0.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1032/1418770594_2370f2e356.jpg

http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/slides/photos/000/599/230/kobe-crying1_display_image.jpg

:roll: :roll: :roll:

[bence23]

Duncan and the Spurs could have 5-peated in that span.
2003 - Title
2004 - Fisher's illegal shot. But let's not act like that was the only reason. Lakers-Spurs series in 2004 is the closest thing to a chokejob in Duncan's prime.
2005 - Title
2006 - It was a bigger bs than Fisher's shot, Ginobili fouling Nowitzki in the last seconds of the game 7. It was one of the most single idiotic fouls I've ever seen.
2007 - Title
f that 07 title. horry cheapshotting nash..

spurs are wack

[Killbot]

It is BS because in Ray's prime, his jumpshot speed (at least the fastest shown) was 0.65 seconds and he has arguably the fastest speed to get off a jumper. Derek Fisher's jumpshot form is slower plus the fact that he had to turn around and gave up a last second prayer from beyond the arc

[Droid101]

Tim Duncans amazing shot was LEGIT. No shotclock violation, no time violation, etc...

Fishers was CLEARLY illegal and took longer than .4 :facepalm
Shot was not legit. Lucky as ****.

[Deuce Bigalow]

you really gonna make me post the picture of Tim Duncan making the Lakers cry?

http://img.youtube.com/vi/Ck9nyiwaTIg/0.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1032/1418770594_2370f2e356.jpg

http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/slides/photos/000/599/230/kobe-crying1_display_image.jpg

:roll: :roll: :roll:
That is after they won 3 consecutive championships while sweeping SA in 01 and beating them 4-1 in 02.

[Orlando Magic]

Yes, the clock did not start until after he caught it. It started late. There's no denying it. He didn't actually get the shot off in 0.4 of a second.

However... the clock stopped late on the other end after Duncan's made shot. The ball was through the hoop and had cleared the net by over a foot with 0.8 on the clock. So either way... Fisher made that shot in the amount of time that should have been given to them.

You can't complain about the Fisher play while not acknowledging that the refs should have given the Lakers at least 0.8 seconds total back on the clock.

http://s24.postimg.org/n3v89sohh/pic.jpg

[Young X]

http://i46.tinypic.com/2h56z6c.gif

[qrich]

Speaking about sweeps

http://www.everyjoe.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/tim-duncan-deal-with-it.gif

[(e)]

Most insane shot ever. I remember watching that game, and was just speechless after it went in.

[qrich]

Yes, the clock did not start until after he caught it. It started late. There's no denying it. He didn't actually get the shot off in 0.4 of a second.

However... the clock stopped late on the other end after Duncan's made shot. The ball was through the hoop and had cleared the net by over a foot with 0.8 on the clock. So either way... Fisher made that shot in the amount of time that should have been given to them.

You can't complain about the Fisher play while not acknowledging that the refs should have given the Lakers at least 0.8 seconds total back on the clock.

Can we go back to earlier point in the games where I'm really damn sure seconds were lost and say San Antonio should also have had one more chance to hit another shot with 1.5 left?

[Deuce Bigalow]

http://i46.tinypic.com/2h56z6c.gif
:roll: :roll: :roll: Love this gif every time I see it.

[kuniva_dAMiGhTy]

Quality thread, bro.

[Orlando Magic]

Can we go back to earlier point in the games where I'm really damn sure seconds were lost and say San Antonio should also have had one more chance to hit another shot with 1.5 left?

That's reaching. We're talking less than 5 seconds with the game on the line with a point difference.

If you really wanted to do what you're saying, yeah, it could be done... but it's unrealistic. On top of that if every play in the game was watched that closely it might have been the Lakers or it might have been the Spurs with the advantage. Impossible to say without re-examining the entire game. Don't just assume that it gives the Spurs the edge numb nuts.

What I'm saying is perfectly realistic considering they were both the last possession for each team of the entire game.

Eat a dick bro. I don't even like the Lakers. **** them. And **** you too for being a Spurs ******.

[DFish24]

.4 still causing butthurt nearly 10 years later:lol

[qrich]

That's reaching. We're talking less than 5 seconds with the game on the line with a point difference.

If you really wanted to do what you're saying, yeah, it could be done... but it's unrealistic.

What I'm saying is perfectly realistic considering they were both the last possession for each team of the entire game.

Eat a dick bro. I don't even like the Lakers. **** them. And **** you too for being a Spurs ******.

How is it reaching? If it applies in that situation, it should apply throughout the entire game, should it not?

Why so salty though?

[Orlando Magic]

How is it reaching? If it applies in that situation, it should apply throughout the entire game, should it not?

Why so salty though?

Because you're a dumb ******. That's why.

You're talking about clock management, essentially, saying Fisher's shout shouldn't have counted.

Well I brought up something else relating to clock management and you want to discredit it.

Why? Because you have an agenda and you are a biased ****. Run into traffic and die.

[DuMa]

Maybe bad from the Spurs' side but It got the Lakers on the NBA Finals stage and exposed Kobe's ballhogging ways for everyone to see. That was best for everyone to see

[qrich]

Because you're a dumb ******. That's why.

Alright bud.

Don't worry though, maybe this time around, Nikola & Noel both won't bail as soon as they can.

[Doranku]

Alright bud.

Don't worry though, maybe this time around, Nikola & Noel both won't bail as soon as they can.

And maybe eventually the Clippers will get past the 2nd round you flaming f@ggot.

[qrich]

And maybe eventually the Clippers will get past the 2nd round you flaming f@ggot.

Alright you raging homo

[Deuce Bigalow]

Speaking about sweeps

http://www.everyjoe.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/tim-duncan-deal-with-it.gif
Congrats..you beat a 7th seed without their best player?

[qrich]

Congrats..you beat a 7th seed without their best player?

Really?

I mean, really?

Quality is really reaching the levels of the ESPN Message boards :facepalm

[Doranku]

Speaking about sweeps

http://www.everyjoe.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/tim-duncan-deal-with-it.gif


Hmm, what's worse? Getting swept w/o HCA and your best player, or losing in the first round, w/ HCA, and your team fully healthy?


:roll:

[qrich]

Hmm, what's worse? Getting swept w/o HCA and your best player, or losing in the first round, w/ HCA, and your team fully healthy?


:roll:

So much butt hurt in a post also reeking with ignorance.

Only by insecure little bitches.

[kuniva_dAMiGhTy]

And maybe eventually the Clippers will get past the 2nd round you flaming f@ggot.

Damn Doranku. Why are you always so angry bro? :oldlol:

[Doranku]

Damn Doranku. Why are you always so angry bro? :oldlol:

It makes me angry when a fan of the worst franchise in sports tries to criticize one of the most winning-est franchises in basketball (and all of sports for that matter) for being swept when their best player doesn't play a single second in the series.

Meanwhile, their team also loses in the first round despite having a top 3 PF, the best PG in the game, and probably the best bench in the league.

The audacity of that is mindblowing.

[qrich]

It makes me angry when a fan of the worst franchise in sports tries to criticize one of the most winning-est franchises in basketball (and all of sports for that matter) for being swept when their best player doesn't play a single second in the series.

Meanwhile, their team also loses in the first round despite having a top 3 PF, the best PG in the game, and probably the best bench in the league.

The audacity of that is mindblowing.

You need some of this shit, will make you feel better.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mB9obYGnGgQ/TOH90tKXX1I/AAAAAAAADYc/c2jQI_JLw-8/s1600/305732868103.jpg

[caliman]

:roll:

They couldn't even repeat once, but they could have 5peated... :oldlol:


Same thing I was thinking. Forget repeating, they never made consecutive trips to the Finals. Some "dynasty".

[lebeast666]

Why did you have to post this? Kobetards don't wanna be reminded about all the times hes gotten bailed out Lol

[Nero Tulip]

I'm a Spurs fan, but I don't complain about it, for many reasons:

1) We choked anyway; there's no excuse for losing that series against a much weaker team

2) The clock started later, but it also stopped later on the previous play. And anyway they can't be that precise

3) I made peace with the fact that we get screwed consistently. At least that one wasn't really done on purpose IMO. Hey, we're not the Lakers, we actually have to deserve our wins, and be a lot better than the opponent.

[Magic 32]

Hey, we're not the Lakers, we actually have to deserve our wins, and be a lot better than the opponent.


http://www.espn.go.com/photo/2007/0514/nba_dime_395.jpg

[Orlando Magic]

I'm a Spurs fan, but I don't complain about it, for many reasons:

2) The clock started later, but it also stopped later on the previous play. And anyway they can't be that precise


:applause:

[LAZERUSS]

I'l give Duncan credit, he hit the shot to put SA ahead, but it was pure luck, and was as well defended as could be. Even he was shocked that it went in.