Undercover cop pleads NOT GUILTY in motorcycle SUV attack from a few weeks back...

[Hoodlum Science]

An undercover New York police detective seen on video smashing the back window of an SUV during an attack by a pack of angry motorcyclists pleaded not guilty in a Manhattan courtroom

Undercover Cop helps by assisting in SUV attack (http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10/09/20884831-charges-upgraded-against-undercover-cop-in-suv-assault?lite)

So because he didn't smash in the driver/passenger windows, he's exempt from potential charges of riot and criminal mischief? He smashed out the back windows, and somehow that's OK.

:rolleyes:

He's an undercover cop and not only did he do nothing to stop the attack, he participated.

I'm so sick of cops thinking they're beyond the law simply because they have a badge. **** the police, and **** crooked cops.

He's "not guilty" ... yeah OK. Asshole.

[Hoodlum Science]

Alright, here's a separate yet similar question to the subject above: should cops be allowed to overstep their boundaries and be given a pass b/c of the heightened stress their roles requires, and in return they're "let off" in specific circumstances? ... or ... should they be held to a higher standard and looked at in a more responsible regard yielding a more harsh punishment?

IMO, it's a no-brainer.

[Theoo]

he pleadin not guilty u fk** retart

[Draz]

he pleadin not guilty u fk** retart
:roll:

[CanYouDigIt]

Someone pleads Not Guilty on a crime they commited?!?!

Shocker... Welcome to America, sir. :D