PDA

View Full Version : Better overall player: Terrence Ross or Dion Waiters?



hawkfan
11-28-2013, 04:34 PM
Better overall player: Terrence Ross or Dion Waiters?

moe94
11-28-2013, 04:35 PM
Ross is certainly way more exciting to watch.

A Roc 23
11-28-2013, 04:42 PM
Ross is mostly defense and three point shooting at this point. He needs to work on using the dribble to get free. His teardrop shot has potential to be a dangerous weapon.

I'd take Ross right now because he has a better attitude and is playing a great defense.

Waiters has a much better shot at being a star if he can ever pull it together.

Ross is going to be a career role player, but he has the chance to be a very solid one.

gyu
11-28-2013, 06:56 PM
Is this a joke?

Dion Waiters is the NEXT GREAT SHOOTING GUARD :facepalm ...











































































http://i1105.photobucket.com/albums/h341/net0ranger/mj-laughing.gif

RedBlackAttack
11-28-2013, 06:57 PM
I find it interesting that people on this board dislike Dion Waiters because PB made an attention whoring thread one time.

He's actually a pretty good young player.

andremiller07
11-28-2013, 07:05 PM
I find it interesting that people on this board dislike Dion Waiters because PB made an attention whoring thread one time.

He's actually a pretty good young player.
This, imo he's not in a position to maximise his talents in Cleveland atm, he's far more talented than Ross that's not even a question imo.

outbreak
11-28-2013, 07:12 PM
I find it interesting that people on this board dislike Dion Waiters because PB made an attention whoring thread one time.

He's actually a pretty good young player.

It happens all the time on this forum, the main reason some players get hated is because one person makes a thread vastly over rating them and suddenly everyone is against that player forever and brings up threads any time they struggle.

Waiters isn't going to be the best in the league but he's a very solid player already and he will only improve as he grows older and matures. If Waiters were on the lakers/heat he'd be getting a lot more respect right now.

RoundMoundOfReb
11-28-2013, 07:13 PM
waiters

moe94
11-28-2013, 07:15 PM
he's far more talented than Ross that's not even a question imo.

What does that even mean? Skill wise? Ross is extremely long and athletic. He's in the highest tier of athletes in the league.

andremiller07
11-28-2013, 07:19 PM
What does that even mean? Skill wise? Ross is extremely long and athletic. He's in the highest tier of athletes in the league.
Yeah skill wise and Waiters is a above average athlete himself, plus Waiters got better natural instincts for the game as well. His ability to get into the lane you simply can't teach.

SilkkTheShocker
11-28-2013, 07:27 PM
Ross sucks

KyrieTheFuture
11-28-2013, 08:34 PM
I'm legitimately appalled at this thread.

brandonislegend
11-28-2013, 08:49 PM
Obvious answer is Bradley Beal.

leMVP
11-28-2013, 08:56 PM
Waiters playing in a system that doesn't fit him well, he nneds the ball in his hand, so basically he's not improving.

Waiters got more potential, But right now i would take Ross. Ross is more like Norris cole type, he's gonna give you good minutes but you can't count on him when the game is close.

Qwyjibo
11-28-2013, 09:21 PM
Neither is a good player. Waiters has more talent but Ross plays more within his game and seems to know how limited he is. Waiters is definitely the better long term prospect though. I'm not sure if there was a guy with a lower ceiling than Ross picked in the top 10 of that draft.

B-Easy8
11-29-2013, 11:39 AM
Neither is a good player. Waiters has more talent but Ross plays more within his game and seems to know how limited he is. Waiters is definitely the better long term prospect though. I'm not sure if there was a guy with a lower ceiling than Ross picked in the top 10 of that draft.

Bingo

Da KO King
11-29-2013, 02:25 PM
Neither is a good player. Waiters has more talent but Ross plays more within his game and seems to know how limited he is. Waiters is definitely the better long term prospect though. I'm not sure if there was a guy with a lower ceiling than Ross picked in the top 10 of that draft.
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist

RoundMoundOfReb
11-29-2013, 02:29 PM
Neither is a good player. Waiters has more talent but Ross plays more within his game and seems to know how limited he is. Waiters is definitely the better long term prospect though. I'm not sure if there was a guy with a lower ceiling than Ross picked in the top 10 of that draft.
Pretty much