EFFICIENT night by Lebron tonight.....

[9erempiree]

17/14/6 is a very efficient night. Got some rebounds and scored just enough points to make it into the box scores.

His team lost by 6 points and he failed to hit his average in points.

While very efficient, he can't take over games. Only down by a few points and he airballs a 3 pointer.

Did he dominate? No.

Clutch? Not a damn chance.

But efficient enough to make it look like a 5 on 5 game.

[Trollsmasher]

Do you know the meaning of the word efficient?

[ripthekik]

Whose stats mean more, Kevin Love or Lebron James?

[LEFT4DEAD]

Not this sh!t again! :facepalm

[CelticBaller]

He wasn't' even efficient :oldlol:

[LoneyROY7]

Do you know what efficiency actually means? :lol

[SpecialQue]

You're a garbage poster and it's disgusting that you align yourself with my favorite team's fanbase. Please stop posting.

[moe94]

I was already laughing at the thread title and your username. You got the GOAT gimmick.

[9erempiree]

Do you know the meaning of the word efficient?

Please tell me.

[9erempiree]

Do you know what efficiency actually means? :lol

Please tell me the criteria.

[red1]

I was already laughing at the thread title and your username. You got the GOAT gimmick.
:facepalm you're giving him too much credit

[AintNoSunshine]

His shooting number was Kobe-esque tonight, not efficient at all

[TheReal Kendall]

17/14/6 is a very efficient night. Got some rebounds and scored just enough points to make it into the box scores.

His team lost by 6 points and he failed to hit his average in points.

While very efficient, he can't take over games. Only down by a few points and he airballs a 3 pointer.

Did he dominate? No.

Clutch? Not a damn chance.

But efficient enough to make it look like a 5 on 5 game.


:roll:

[LoneyROY7]

Please tell me the criteria.

Efficient - achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense.

[9erempiree]

Efficient - achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense.

So how is 17/14/6...not efficient?

I'll be waiting.

[Magic 32]

His shooting number was Kobe-tonight, not efficient at all

Or Lebron finals-esque.

[LoneyROY7]

So how is 17/14/6...not efficient?

I'll be waiting.

Because he scoring 17 points on 37.5 percent shooting is not doing so with minimum wasted effort.

[9erempiree]

His shooting number was Kobe-esque tonight, not efficient at all

Kobe-esque?

I think Kobe is more clutch and dominant than Lebron. He would have carried the team on his back.

The Heat weren't down a few points and it was time for Lebron to run off 5 straight buckets or 10 plus points. Just get on fire and take over.

The stage was set. It has been set at least 5 times this year in which he kept passing to teammates.:facepalm

[9erempiree]

Because he scoring 17 points on 37.5 percent shooting is not doing so with minimum wasted effort.

:oldlol:

Fool. Bringing up percentages again. I didn't know there was a magical percentage that one must reach before they can be called efficient.

We'll just say Lebron stopped putting "effort."

[LoneyROY7]

:oldlol:

Fool. Bringing up percentages again. I didn't know there was a magical percentage that one must reach before they can be called efficient.

We'll just say Lebron stopped putting "effort."

:facepalm

[Purch]

I was already laughing at the thread title and your username. You got the GOAT gimmick.
You obviously missed Prime Rocketsgreatness and Prime Pleezebelieve , 07-09 had some of the greatest trolls ever

[9erempiree]

:facepalm

Where in the handbook does it say you have to hit a certain percentage to be considered "maximum production with little effort" or efficient?

17/14/6 is pretty damn efficient to me but when you watch the game, Lebron is his usual un-clutch and deferring to teammate mode again.

[OJ SIMPSON 2.0]

5-16 isn't efficient. He stat pads every game but he went full on statpad mode tonight grabbing 14 rebounds :facepalm

13 out of his 14 rebounds are defensive rebounds, he had little to no impact on this game.

[edrick]

:oldlol:

Fool. Bringing up percentages again. I didn't know there was a magical percentage that one must reach before they can be called efficient.

We'll just say Lebron stopped putting "effort."

Seriously? Please look up the word efficient.

[LoneyROY7]

Where in the handbook does it say you have to hit a certain percentage to be considered "maximum production with little effort" or efficient?

17/14/6 is pretty damn efficient to me but when you watch the game, Lebron is his usual un-clutch and deferring to teammate mode again.

You misquoted the definition. It's "maximum production with little WASTED effort". Wasted effort would be akin to volume shooting. If you take a shot but you miss it, it's a wasted effort.

It's not rocket science, bud.

[russwest0]

5-16 isn't efficient. He stat pads every game but he went full on statpad mode tonight grabbing 14 rebounds :facepalm

13 out of his 14 rebounds are defensive rebounds, he had little to no impact on this game.

Agreed, it's hilarious tho watching people downplay this shit

[edrick]

Agreed, it's hilarious tho watching people downplay this shit

Are you going to downplay it if the Heat win at home next week against them? Probably.

[Random_Guy]

can you post in the same thread?

[Kingwillball]

who is downplaying it ? Lebron was bad tonight no other way to slice it..

[9erempiree]

You misquoted the definition. It's "maximum production with little WASTED effort". Wasted effort would be akin to volume shooting. If you take a shot but you miss it, it's a wasted effort.

It's not rocket science, bud.

:facepalm

When did 17/14/6 considered wasted effort? Granted the team lost but that's a pretty good game.

[HoopsFanNumero1]

So this whole time, OP didn't even know what efficient means? :facepalm

[LoneyROY7]

:facepalm

When did 17/14/6 considered wasted effort? Granted the team lost but that's a pretty good game.

:lol

You didn't address a single thing in regards to what efficiency actually means. It's ok, everyone else gets it.

[unbreakable]

OP I love the efficient schtick.. keep it up :applause:

kids wanna call lebron dominant for stat padding on a stacked team.. NOPE. Kobe and MJ were dominant.. Lebron is Lefficient. .. big difference.

[9erempiree]

So this whole time, OP didn't even know what efficient means? :facepalm

I don't think Lebron fans know.

I like how fans judge a player's efficiency based on FG% when there are other aspects of the game like rebounds and assists.

I don't expect many on here to grasp the bigger picture that I am trying to paint here.

[LoneyROY7]

OP I love the efficient schtick.. keep it up :applause:

I thought the schtick was funny, until I realized he didn't even know what efficient meant. :oldlol:

[LoneyROY7]

I don't think Lebron fans know.

I like how fans judge a player's efficiency based on FG% when there are other aspects of the game like rebounds and assists.

I don't expect many on here to grasp the bigger picture that I am trying to paint here.

You have to crawl before you can walk. You can't paint a bigger picture, if you can't grasp this simple concept.

[9erempiree]

You have to crawl before you can walk. You can't paint a bigger picture, if you can't grasp this simple concept.

Sorry but even the stupid PER rating system includes everything that I mentioned and even more. I don't agree with that system on judging a player's efficiency but at least they are not exclusive to one category like FG% that people are trying to argue with me about.

I don't go by PER but 17/14/6 is a pretty efficient night. He just wasn't dominant or clutch as usual.

Lebron has been having a lot of efficient nights this year and there is just one game I can remember where he did dominated and won.

Other times he was efficient but fortunately for him, his team is very good to win without him dominating.

[RRR3]

OP:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pXVO0j-RUAY&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DpXVO0j-RUAY

[Genaro]

Not efficient, not dominant. He shoot poorly and had a lot of turnovers

[Inactive]

He was inefficient, and unclutch. 5 TOs, poor shooting percentage, obviously bothered by Hibbert. He was dominant for short stretches with his passing, but overall had a bad game.

[scm5]

He did play great defense on Paul George, but the combination of George and Hibbert really hurt Lebron down the stretch.

[pegasus]

He did play great defense on Paul George, but the combination of George and Hibbert really hurt Lebron down the stretch.

PG blew by him whenever Lebron tried to play him 1-on-1. PG was shut down in the first half by being double teamed the second he touched the ball and by his stubbornness to dribble through/around it instead of immediately finding an open teammate. His coach must have gotten in his ear during halftime, because he made the necessary adjustments in the second half and he and his team played much better as a result.

[HoopsFanNumero1]

PG blew by him whenever Lebron tried to play him 1-on-1. PG was shut down in the first half by being double teamed the second he touched the ball and by his stubbornness to dribble through/around it instead of immediately finding an open teammate. His coach must have gotten in his ear during halftime, because he made the necessary adjustments in the second half and he and his team played much better as a result.

He played better because he was being guarded by Ray Allen and was being left wide open.

[Eric Cartman]

Sad to see Lebron shoot so poorly when he plays real defenses like San Antonio, Chicago and Indiana.

My advise to his fans is to watch Heat games only when they play the Bucks, Bobcats and Cavaliers.

Then you will be sure that while he may not be "dominant" he will be efficient shooting 60%.

[kuniva_dAMiGhTy]

He played better because he was being guarded by Ray Allen and was being left wide open.

AND that's because LeBron couldn't defend him without getting into foul trouble. PG would've had dude sitting on the sidelines in the 4th. :oldlol:

[dr.hee]

Kobe-esque?

I think Kobe is more clutch and dominant than Lebron. He would have carried the team on his back.

The Heat weren't down a few points and it was time for Lebron to run off 5 straight buckets or 10 plus points. Just get on fire and take over.

The stage was set. It has been set at least 5 times this year in which he kept passing to teammates.:facepalm

http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/2013/12/10/062539/83724477/rondo-reaction-contest.gif

[ralph_i_el]

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to 9erempiree again.

[joeysms55]

Your saying the stats of a B2B FMVP and 4 time MVP are all empty stats? You gotta be in drugs man

[9erempiree]

Sorry but even the stupid PER rating system includes everything that I mentioned and even more. I don't agree with that system on judging a player's efficiency but at least they are not exclusive to one category like FG% that people are trying to argue with me about.

I don't go by PER but 17/14/6 is a pretty efficient night. He just wasn't dominant or clutch as usual.

Lebron has been having a lot of efficient nights this year and there is just one game I can remember where he did dominated and won.

Other times he was efficient but fortunately for him, his team is very good to win without him dominating.

this.

[STATUTORY]

http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/2013/12/10/062539/83724477/rondo-reaction-contest.gif
this mofo looks like a black Piccolo