Would you rather have a 52pt triple double or a 62pt game with 0 assists???

[GoranDragon]

Player A: 52pt 11ast 10reb

Player B: 62pt 0ast 13reb

Which player would you choose?


For me, NO QUESTION I go with the more dominant triple double. Having 11ast also equates to adding 22pt making it a 74pt contribution to the team.

Player A for me.:cheers:

[Uncle Drew]

I'd go with Player A also. Too bad no one ever managed to get that statline.

[SexSymbol]

Since the 52 point triple double never happened we don't know. I believe Larry Bird was the closest to it.

And I would take 62, if you are hot you're not supposed to pass, if you're passing when you're that hot, you're detrimental to the team = selfish.

[GoranDragon]

Spoiler alert: Player A actually happened.:cheers:

[b1imtf]

52-9-11*

[SexSymbol]

Spoiler alert: Player A actually happened (in my wet dream).:cheers:
fix'd

[Budadiiii]

Simply put... you lack the charisma to be a serviceable troll.

You will never be considered good at what you do.

You haven't made a single person laugh.

You put in a ton of effort and nobody really cares. :lol

[SHAQisGOAT]

Player A: fictional

Player B: Carmelo

Am I right?

[Marlo_Stanfield]

Since the 52 point triple double never happened we don't know. I believe Larry Bird was the closest to it.

And I would take 62, if you are hot you're not supposed to pass, if you're passing when you're that hot, you're detrimental to the team = selfish.
LEBron was 1 rebound away that they cheated away from him:facepalm

[GoranDragon]

Stop saying Player A didn't happen, it did!:banghead:


We all know it happened. That's not the topic of the thread. Point of the thread is Player A vs Player B.

[GoranDragon]

LEBron was 1 rebound away that they cheated away from him:facepalm
This. They CHEATED Lebron in the official records. Us Lebron fans knows it happened.

[SHAQisGOAT]

Since the 52 point triple double never happened we don't know. I believe Larry Bird was the closest to it.

And I would take 62, if you are hot you're not supposed to pass, if you're passing when you're that hot, you're detrimental to the team = selfish.

Larry Bird in 1992 as a shell vs the Blazers: 49 points, 14 rebounds, 12 assists :bowdown:

That's the type of stuff that should be mentioned here, not ficitional stuff, not tales.

[SHAQisGOAT]

Stop saying Player A didn't happen, it did!:banghead:


We all know it happened. That's not the topic of the thread. Point of the thread is Player A vs Player B.

If you're going with fictional stuff why not go for 60 points triple-double? Poor Melo though, having to "compete" against a ficitional stat-line.

[GoranDragon]

Larry Bird in 1992 as a shell vs the Blazers: 49 points, 14 rebounds, 12 assists :bowdown:
:eek: Larry Legend.:bowdown: :bowdown:

[SexSymbol]

Larry Bird in 1992 as a shell vs the Blazers: 49 points, 14 rebounds, 12 assists :bowdown:

That's the type of stuff that should be mentioned here, not ficitional stuff, not tales.
Told you he was the closest.

And GoranDragon, just quit, you are a very, very terrible troll.
Troll should make the side which you are supposedly on laugh and the other mad, but all you do is make both sides cringe at your hopeless effort

[imdaman99]

Told you he was the closest.

And GoranDragon, just quit, you are a very, very terrible troll.
Troll should make the side which you are supposedly on laugh and the other mad, but all you do is make both sides cringe at your hopeless effort
:lol This. A '14er shitting on a 12'er :roll:

Although I am pretty sure that 12er is an alt. Likely another moe

[leMVP]

11 assist = 22 pts min.

52 + 22= 74

74 > 62

you're welcome.

[CelticBaller]

Larry Bird in 1992 as a shell vs the Blazers: 49 points, 14 rebounds, 12 assists :bowdown:

That's the type of stuff that should be mentioned here, not ficitional stuff, not tales.
Bird>>>LeBron

only a delusional fan would make up statlines

[nathanjizzle]

Player A: 52pt 11ast 10reb

Player B: 62pt 0ast 13reb

Which player would you choose?


For me, NO QUESTION I go with the more dominant triple double. Having 11ast also equates to adding 22pt making it a 74pt contribution to the team.

Player A for me.:cheers:


11 assist = 22 pts min.

52 + 22= 74

74 > 62

you're welcome.


your logic is retarded since who ever assisted the 52 points should redeem 2 points for every assist and wouldnt count for the scorer.

id take the one that broke the madison square garden record.

[GoranDragon]

11 assist = 22 pts min.

52 + 22= 74

74 > 62

you're welcome.
thanks.:cheers:

[TMT]

Well, since it was only 9 rebounds and not officially a triple-double... I'll go with B. gotcha Lebron fans ;)

[cos88]

11 more assists = at least 22 points ( between 22 and 33 )



this isn't even debatable. it's like asking what to you want: a cheeseburger vs a hamburger with fries and soda

[brantonli]

One of them is in the history books as a franchise record, the other will be mentioned as 'oh wow he did it' and promptly forgotten in 5 minutes. I'll take the 62.

[GOATbe]

I'd rather have 81 points.:djparty

[jlip]

Why can't people just enjoy these historic moments without trying to belittle them?:confusedshrug:

[leMVP]

One of them is in the history books as a franchise record, the other will be mentioned as 'oh wow he did it' and promptly forgotten in 5 minutes. I'll take the 62.

:facepalm

MJ's 56 > Lebron's 52 "almost triple double" > Kobe's 61 > Melo's 62.

That's how it's gonna be remembered.

[J Shuttlesworth]

LMAO. Anyone who thinks missing one rebound on a triple double is a bad thing is an idiot.

People think "LOL it wasn't even a triple double"

It's a damn 52-11-9 game :coleman:

[J Shuttlesworth]

Well, since it was only 9 rebounds and not officially a triple-double... I'll go with B. gotcha Lebron fans ;)
Here come the idiots, right on cue.

"ONLY 9 REBOUNDS? LOL THATS NOT EVEN A TRIPLE DOUBLE"

[GoranDragon]

:facepalm

MJ's 56 > Lebron's 52 "almost triple double" > Kobe's 61 > Melo's 62.

That's how it's gonna be remembered.
:applause: :applause: :applause:

[GOATbe]

Here come the idiots, right on cue.

"ONLY 9 REBOUNDS? LOL THATS NOT EVEN A TRIPLE DOUBLE"
So? They're right. Are you saying that it is? :roll:

[J Shuttlesworth]

Honestly, I think a lot of people's logic here would be this, sadly. Many people would take A over B, because one isn't a triple double:

Player A: 52 pts, 10 reb, 11 assists
Player B: 52 pts, 9 reb, 20 assists

Because B isn't a triple double, all you Laker idiots would take player A over B

[SavageMode]

11 assist = 22 pts min.

52 + 22= 74

74 > 62

you're welcome.
:bowdown:

[J Shuttlesworth]

So? They're right. Are you saying that it is? :roll:
It's not a triple double, but people act like sniffing a triple double is a bad thing, especially when it's accompanied by 52 pts. See my post above

[hops and stops]

I'd go with Player A also. Too bad no one ever managed to get that statline.

this


Simply put... you lack the charisma to be a serviceable troll.

You will never be considered good at what you do.

You haven't made a single person laugh.

You put in a ton of effort and nobody really cares. :lol

this

[NoGunzJustSkillz]

Simply put... you lack the charisma to be a serviceable troll.

You will never be considered good at what you do.

You haven't made a single person laugh.

You put in a ton of effort and nobody really cares. :lol
:applause:

[ArbitraryWater]

Honestly, I think a lot of people's logic here would be this, sadly. Many people would take A over B, because one isn't a triple double:

Player A: 52 pts, 10 reb, 11 assists
Player B: 52 pts, 9 reb, 20 assists

Because B isn't a triple double, all you Laker idiots would take player A over B


Um, now. Pretty sure EVERYBODY in this whole damn world would take Player B here...

[longtime lurker]

I'd take the statline that actually exists 62 and 13 thank you.

[AnaheimLakers24]

op is a fgt

[SpecialQue]

OP = TonyMontana = Hank = Heat007 = f@gg0t

[jimmy77x]

OP = TonyMontana = Hank = Heat007 = f@gg0t

Heat007 is 100% one of Silks accounts, its hilarious how that account went inactive never to see the light of day again, the day the heat lost to the mavs :roll: :roll:

[annbafan]

i would always choose to watch a higher scoring game. for me, triple-doubles and other large statlines only look impressive in the boxscores, but not during the game watching it.

[TMT]

Here come the idiots, right on cue.

"ONLY 9 REBOUNDS? LOL THATS NOT EVEN A TRIPLE DOUBLE"

Lebron stan getting trolled hard by white text. :oldlol:

[Cleverness]

Player A: 52pt 11ast 10reb

Player B: 62pt 0ast 13reb

Which player would you choose?


For me, NO QUESTION I go with the more dominant triple double. Having 11ast also equates to adding 22pt making it a 74pt contribution to the team.

Player A for me.:cheers:

52pt 11ast 10reb >>> 62pt 0 ast 13reb >>>>>>>>> 52pt 11ast 9reb

:rockon:

[pauk]

Honestly, I think a lot of people's logic here would be this, sadly. Many people would take A over B, because one isn't a triple double:

Player A: 52 pts, 10 reb, 11 assists
Player B: 52 pts, 9 reb, 20 assists

Because B isn't a triple double, all you Laker idiots would take player A over B

52 + 20 assists? lol, did somebody actually do this? Thats being accountable for between 40-60 points by way of only assists... + 52 you are looking at 92 - 112 points of the teams boxscore that night which you had a hand on.... not bad..

[L8kersfan222]

Here come the idiots, right on cue.

"ONLY 9 REBOUNDS? LOL THATS NOT EVEN A TRIPLE DOUBLE"

Jan 2014 getting white texted, come on rook. :facepalm

[Milbuck]

Carmelo could've easily gotten 70+ if he had kept playing and his team blew out the opponent. 62 for me. Plus I checked everywhere and couldn't find any 52 point triple double in NBA history.

[IncarceratedBob]

In 100 years, Melo's game will be in the record books

LeBrons game will be lost with time. Nice stat line against a terrible team. Couldn't even manage a triple double.

[no pun intended]

The game where they won by nearly 30 points.

[jcsrplumply]

52 points 9 rebs 11 ass .515 FG .285 3FG% .842 FT% 3 TOs 2blks 44 mins W(+5) +/-(+7) .629 TS% .545 eFG%
62 points 13 rebs 0 ass .657 FG% .545 3FG% 1.00 FT% 0 TOs 0 blk 38 mins W(+29) +/-(+34) .787 TS% .743 eFG%

I like Melo's stats but that's just me.

[DavisWarriorsFan]

Who is the bigger ball hogger? Melo or Allen Iverson?

[CelticBaller]

In 100 years, Melo's game will be in the record books

LeBrons game will be lost with time. Nice stat line against a terrible team. Couldn't even manage a triple double.
this
no one would give a shit about lebron's game in a few years, shit only his fanclub kept track of that

[eeeeeebro]

the efficiency of melo's 62 points was rediculous

[oarabbus]

I would rather score 62 points :confusedshrug: people will be talking about that one for a while. Carmelo is inspiring some young ballers right now :applause:

[GoranDragon]

I would rather score 62 points :confusedshrug:
no.

[coin24]

OP sad f@ggot posted like 300 times in the last 2 days..
Get a life you unfunny dipshit.

[Ancient Legend]

I love ISH, the silly arguments will never die.

[riseagainst]

I pick the one that's real.

[Blue&Orange]

Player A: 52pt 11ast 10reb

Player B: 62pt 0ast 13reb

Which player would you choose?


For me, NO QUESTION I go with the more dominant triple double. Having 11ast also equates to adding 22pt making it a 74pt contribution to the team.

Player A for me.:cheers:
I take Melo's 42\19\6 while playing with Toney Douglas, Jared Jeffries, Ronny Turiaf and Landry Fields in the playoffs, away, over that fictional triple double any day... as anyone with a brain will.

[ImKobe]

52 points 9 rebs 11 ass .515 FG .285 3FG% .842 FT% 3 TOs 2blks 44 mins W(+5) +/-(+7) .629 TS% .545 eFG%
62 points 13 rebs 0 ass .657 FG% .545 3FG% 1.00 FT% 0 TOs 0 blk 38 mins W(+29) +/-(+34) .787 TS% .743 eFG%

I like Melo's stats but that's just me.

Melo almost better in every area but assists and blocks :bowdown:

[dr.hee]

@OP

Would you rather have a 52pt triple double or Lebron's d!ck deep inside you?

[Blue&Orange]

@OP

Would you rather have a 52pt triple double or Lebron's d!ck deep inside you?
OP is right now having a sex change operation so that he can DP by both at the same time.

[Milbuck]

Still can't find any records of a 52 point triple double. Anyone know what OP's talking about?

[IMObjective]

@OP

Would you rather have a 52pt triple double or Lebron's d!ck deep inside you?
:roll: we all know the answer to that one!

[riseagainst]

:oldlol:
:roll:

[Dragic4Life]

Your point of bumping this thread?

[dubeta]

Bran had 61 points in this time frame

With Bran you dont have to choose he can give you both

[305Baller]

It should have been a triple-double. Why didnt they count the last rebound?

[BlkMambaGOAT]

I'd rather have 81 points. In fact, I'd rather have 5 rings.