View Full Version : Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
jongib369
01-26-2014, 12:23 AM
Wilt as far as the eyeball test goes, is the TRUE Ironman of the NBA- Not Kareem, or the mailman
I WISH he came back....I want a poster of Jordan dunking on Wilt, with one of Wilt blocking the shit out of him right next to it
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-fgF2UTkYk4I/UuR-b-JG3hI/AAAAAAAAE6Q/w8hk0jPA1Hg/s400/Sequence%252001.Still015.jpg
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-EFVpvsSUCuo/UuR-cU-q5II/AAAAAAAAE6M/lbigvSh2SHc/s400/Sequence%252001.Still016.jpg
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-ZSS4UHjiUHw/UuSAVKY4Q6I/AAAAAAAAE7I/QJe2E8SWkRU/s400/Sequence%252001.Still017.jpg
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-kf1oH-0whOs/UuR-cdmKiFI/AAAAAAAAE6U/KD3ax8zaR84/s400/Sequence%252001.Still009.jpg
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-eG1BkGUxBJQ/UuR-dQzu_EI/AAAAAAAAE60/rWaTkdmA2Yw/s400/Sequence%252001.Still011.jpg
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-sVBcUqDhw3Q/UuR-dDmczSI/AAAAAAAAE7E/kSgXolqiReo/s400/Sequence%252001.Still012.jpg
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-hV0d7sP6YaU/UuR-dcmQBkI/AAAAAAAAE64/eTAaHfZeZq4/s400/Sequence%252001.Still014.jpg
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-_RbM5tlSNEg/UuR-cxdfoJI/AAAAAAAAE6w/RG6aMUSjykE/s400/Sequence%252001.Still013.jpg
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-IdFmlyfG5w4/UuR-c3rYN1I/AAAAAAAAE6s/6EYPgJs5XrE/s400/Sequence%252001.Still010.jpg
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/--sSMUAeTTMs/UuSGZQfi_nI/AAAAAAAAE7c/9Fq6OusxpqY/s400/Sequence%252001.Still018.jpg
jongib369
01-26-2014, 12:23 AM
http://mit.zenfs.com/207/2011/05/WiltKAJ.jpg
It looks like Kareems the one that retired in the 70s
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 12:27 AM
he would get BULLIED by tougher bodies like Shaq and Dwight it would be a travesty to his 2 rings.
LAZERUSS
01-26-2014, 12:31 AM
he would get BULLIED by tougher bodies like Shaq and Dwight it would be a travesty to his 2 rings.
Dwight??? The 6-9 265 lb Dwight...against a near 7-2 Wilt, who weighed between 290-310 for much of his career, and who bullied the likes of 6-11 265 lb. Bob Lanier?
As for Shaq...
How do you explain this...
http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=curryed01&p2=onealsh01
jongib369
01-26-2014, 12:31 AM
he would get BULLIED by tougher bodies like Shaq and Dwight it would be a travesty to his 2 rings.
Are Bullies the smaller ones where you're from?
CelticBaller
01-26-2014, 12:32 AM
hes dead
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 12:33 AM
Wilt was USED TO having no competition in his era. The sudden influx of tougher man at the center position would shock him so bad he will cry. Dwight, Shaq, Hakeem, Ewing, even Demarcus Cousins would eat Wilt alive.
LAZERUSS
01-26-2014, 12:34 AM
hes dead
And prop up his corpse under the basket, and 90% of today's centers would not score a point on him...
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 12:35 AM
This is the guy that choked in multiple playoffs and ended up with only 2 rings in an era where Bill Russell dominated for 11 rings. I think it's obvious what today's center will do to Wilt, it's gonna be sad to see Shaq abuse him.
jongib369
01-26-2014, 12:36 AM
Wilt was USED TO having no competition in his era. The sudden influx of tougher man at the center position would shock him so bad he will cry. Dwight, Shaq, Hakeem, Ewing, even Demarcus Cousins would eat Wilt alive.
WILT
Russell- 142
Bellamy- 108
reed 74
Nate- 64
Kareem- 28
unseld- 20
Lanier 16
Totat= 452
SHAQ
Duncan 62
Robinson- 40
Mutombo-29
Hakeem- 28
Ewing- 26
Ming 18
Mourning 16
Total Games= 219
Wilt played more than twice the amount of games against his top 7 piers than shaq
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 12:37 AM
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
LAZERUSS
01-26-2014, 12:40 AM
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
Probably the same reason that MJ didn't win any rings from '85 to '90. Or Shaq not winning rings in 16 of his 20 seasons. Or Duncan "failing" in 13 of his. Or KAJ "losing" in 14 of his. And Hakeem...hell he couldn't get past the first round in the majority of his 18 seasons. What about him? Were Eaton, Thompson, AC Green, etc. etc, just too much for him?
Please...
jongib369
01-26-2014, 12:41 AM
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
His teams were far superior more than most of the time, and most of his teammates were healthy and or able to play. But I know you're trolling because the arguments have been destroyed in the past by posters who know a lot more than myself. But even my simple arguments shit on your bullshit. My shit trumps your shit
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 12:42 AM
Probably the same reason that MJ didn't win any rings from '85 to '90. Or Shaq not winning rings in 16 of his 20 seasons. Or Duncan "failing" in 13 of his. Or KAJ "losing" in 14 of his. And Hakeem...hell he couldn't get past the first round in the majority of his 18 seasons. What about him? Were Eaton, Thompson, AC Green, etc. etc, just too much for him?
Please...
His main rival got more than 5x the amount of rings he has. That is just pathetic and speaks a lot about how overrated his stats are compared to actually winning.
Milbuck
01-26-2014, 12:42 AM
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
Same reason why Lebron only has 2 in a decade.
LAZERUSS
01-26-2014, 12:44 AM
I always like this one...
In Chamberlain's last season, at age 36, he battled the 6-11 265 lb HOFer Bob Lanier six times, and averaged 20 ppg on ...get this.. an .836 FG%.
And if you combine his 71-72 season, with that 72-73 season, he faced Lanier a total of 11 games, and averaged 24 ppg on a .784 FG%.
BTW, Lanier's career best season came in that 71-72 season. And he would go on to be among the best centers in the league until the early 80's.
jongib369
01-26-2014, 12:45 AM
His main rival got more than 5x the amount of rings he has. That is just pathetic and speaks a lot about how overrated his stats are compared to actually winning.
Honestly, posters like this who are so simple minded should just get perma banned
:roll:
I don't mind legitimate criticisms but this is just silly nonsense that lowers the quality of the board
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 12:46 AM
http://www.espn.go.com/photo/2007/0304/nba_dime2_395.jpg
Just look at that. Wilt's "competition". That is a joke. All skinny short white guys. Wilt could've gotten 10+ rings and he underachieved with 2, while his rival got 11.
LAZERUSS
01-26-2014, 12:48 AM
http://www.espn.go.com/photo/2007/0304/nba_dime2_395.jpg
Just look at that. Wilt's "competition". That is a joke. All skinny short white guys. Wilt could've gotten 10+ rings and he underachieved with 2, while his rival got 11.
I don't see Russell, Hondo, or Sam Jones in that photo, do you?
Marchesk
01-26-2014, 12:51 AM
Same reason why Lebron only has 2 in a decade.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
CavaliersFTW
01-26-2014, 12:52 AM
Dwight??? The 6-9 265 lb Dwight...against a near 7-2 Wilt, who weighed between 290-310 for much of his career, and who bullied the likes of 6-11 265 lb. Bob Lanier?
As for Shaq...
How do you explain this...
http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=curryed01&p2=onealsh01
Lanier was 286lbs when he went up against Wilt
CavaliersFTW
01-26-2014, 12:53 AM
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-IlubSSwQ0yY/UPzbjLxgbzI/AAAAAAAAEA8/Lz0OunkNBbQ/s800/Nate%2520Thurmond1.jpg
short white guys
LAZERUSS
01-26-2014, 12:53 AM
Lanier was 286lbs when he went up against Wilt
I tend to exaggerate to make Wilt look better...(oh wait, I blew that one...)
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 12:58 AM
Nate Thurmond is a ringless nobody that poses no threat in today's league, sure he gave Wilt some much needed "competition" but majority of his peers are still skinny short white guys.
2 rings to your rival's 11 is just sad.:facepalm
LAZERUSS
01-26-2014, 01:07 AM
Nate Thurmond is a ringless nobody that poses no threat in today's league, sure he gave Wilt some much needed "competition" but majority of his peers are still skinny short white guys.
2 rings to your rival's 11 is just sad.:facepalm
Just curious...how do you think a peak Kareem would have fared in today's NBA?
jongib369
01-26-2014, 01:07 AM
Nate Thurmond is a ringless nobody that poses no threat in today's league, sure he gave Wilt some much needed "competition" but majority of his peers are still skinny short white guys.
2 rings to your rival's 11 is just sad.:facepalm
So is Kareem a Joke too? Considering Thurmond defended him better than anyone
jongib369
01-26-2014, 01:07 AM
Just curious...how do you think a peak Kareem would have fared in today's NBA?
Lmao beat me to it
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 01:08 AM
Just curious...how do you think a peak Kareem would have fared in today's NBA?
Peak Kareem would be a top 6 big man behind Anthony Davis, Kevin Love, LMA, Dwight Howard and Cousins.
He wouldn't win a ring though, he needed a rookie Magic to carry him.
jongib369
01-26-2014, 01:10 AM
Peak Kareem would be a top 6 big man behind Anthony Davis, Kevin Love, LMA, Dwight Howard and Cousins.
He wouldn't win a ring though, he needed a rookie Magic to carry him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OZ40fPvhjk
Marchesk
01-26-2014, 01:10 AM
Peak Kareem would be a top 6 big man behind Anthony Davis, Kevin Love, LMA, Dwight Howard and Cousins.
He wouldn't win a ring though, he needed a rookie Magic to carry him.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/media/photo/2010-09/56393672.jpg
LAZERUSS
01-26-2014, 01:11 AM
Peak Kareem would be a top 6 big man behind Anthony Davis, Kevin Love, LMA, Dwight Howard and Cousins.
He wouldn't win a ring though, he needed a rookie Magic to carry him.
So you also think that Hakeem and Ewing would be pure crap in today's NBA, as well?
GoranDragon
01-26-2014, 01:12 AM
So you also think that Hakeem and Ewing would be pure crap in today's NBA, as well?
No, Hakeem and Ewing played in a FAR FAR FAR more competitive and tough era. That's fact. The 60s is baby version of NBA compared to the 80s and 90s. Don't get me started on the 00s.
jongib369
01-26-2014, 01:13 AM
No, Hakeem and Ewing played in a FAR FAR FAR more competitive and tough era. That's fact. The 60s is baby version of NBA compared to the 80s and 90s. Don't get me started on the 00s.
You might want to look up the box scores of Kareem VS Hakeem and Ewing
CavaliersFTW
01-26-2014, 01:14 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OZ40fPvhjk
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Deuce Bigalow
01-26-2014, 01:16 AM
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
Please explain why Lebron James won 0 rings before joining 2 allstars during free agency. Please do explain that.
jongib369
01-26-2014, 01:18 AM
Please explain why Lebron James won 0 rings before joining 2 allstars during free agency. Please do explain that.
I think this is worthy of your thread "Dumbest things said..."
"Peak Kareem would be a top 6 big man behind Anthony Davis, Kevin Love, LMA, Dwight Howard and Cousins.
He wouldn't win a ring though, he needed a rookie Magic to carry him."
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.