Heat, Pacers, Thunder records vs. teams above 500

[J Shuttlesworth]

Pacers: 11-8
Thunder: 17-7
Heat: 15-4 :eek: Also, the Heat are 17-4 against the West.

Just look at this:
http://i.imgur.com/nflfIqF.png

The Heat are the only team with only 4 losses or less against .500 and above. After them, it's Pacers w/ 8 losses, and then the Bulls w/ 11 losses

:biggums: The Heat are secretly having the best season. They are literally coasting against the scrub teams and only show up to games against decent teams

[Smook A.]

Pacers are fake. 11-8 vs .500 and above

[TheMarkMadsen]

15-4 gets a :eek:

17-7 is meh

:oldlol:

[AnaheimLakers24]

Pacers are fake. 11-8 vs .500 and above
look at their records from last season. this team is built for the playoffs not regular season

[kamil]

15-4 gets a :eek:

17-7 is meh

:oldlol:

Dat Miami Heat fan logic!

[J Shuttlesworth]

15-4 gets a :eek:

17-7 is meh

:oldlol:
Nah nothing against 17-7. It's a solid record, but they have the best record in the league so it should surprise nobody. The Indy to Miami disparity is huge though.... same with the Indy to OKC

[Jetballer24]

Most insane thing to me on that entire chart is the Pacers have only played in 3 games decided by 3 points or less.

[AnaheimLakers24]

how the hell are the queens still last. fu.ck those guys

[Inferno]

I thought the Pacers were more stacked than the Heat?

[J Shuttlesworth]

Most insane think to me on that entire chart is the Pacers have only played in 3 games decided by 3 points or less.
Best in the league at blowing out scrub teams. They're average at playing against playoff teams.

[Jetballer24]

Pacers are fake. 11-8 vs .500 and above

11-8 is not bad that is more to be expected the Heat have just been really good against the best competition this year. They would be fake if they were below .500 vs winning teams.

[J Shuttlesworth]

Dat Miami Heat fan logic!
:facepalm Kobe stan logic. Show me where I said 17-7 is meh?

[Smook A.]

look at their records from last season. this team is built for the playoffs not regular season
They beat a decent Hawks team, a good Knicks team and almost beat a very good Miami team. They went to 7 games with the Heat. idk how they had a 6 game series vs the Hawks. With the way they played vs Heat, they shoulda swept Atlanta

[Jetballer24]

Best in the league at blowing out scrub teams. They're average at playing against playoff teams.

11-8 is not average that is still better than most teams fair against that type of competition.

[J Shuttlesworth]

Also, Miami - 19-10 on the road, Indy is 15-10. Indy has played 5 more home games than Miami so far this season. The 1 and 2 seed could be an awesome race

[LeBron 06]

The most impressive thing for the heat, is that they are 10-2 vs top 8 in the west, including 6-0 on the road!

[Legends66NBA7]

Miami has a great team. This isn't news.

[jzek]

Wow, didn't realize the Pacers are such PRETENDERS!

I'm jumping off the Indy bandwagon for now...

[Hamtaro CP3KDKG]

A team becomes over or under 0.500 every 2 days in east:lol :lol

[Lamar Odumbb]

Pacers: 11-8
Thunder: 17-7
Heat: 15-4 :eek: Also, the Heat are 17-4 against the West.

Just look at this:
http://i.imgur.com/nflfIqF.png

The Heat are the only team with only 4 losses or less against .500 and above. After them, it's Pacers w/ 8 losses, and then the Bulls w/ 11 losses

:biggums: The Heat are secretly having the best season. They are literally coasting against the scrub teams and only show up to games against decent teams

They are exactly like the 2000-2002 Lakers. Those Lakers teams sucked vs bad teams and whooped the top 4 teams which is why the Lakers rarely had the best record.

[J Shuttlesworth]

A team becomes over or under 0.500 every 2 days in east:lol :lol
:facepalm Only 3-4 teams in the east are above .500 at a time, indicating that the Heat's 15-4 record is mostly against the West. I didn't realize you were too stupid to figure out that's what this thread is implying. The Heat's 17-5 record against the West, and 10-2 record against top 8 in the west should reflect these numbers.

B..bb.bbb.bb..uut the Heat can't beat the superior west teams right? They can only beat shitty eastern conference teams? right?

[pegasus]

Is that based on those teams' records at the time of the games or now? Either way, Brooklyn is a good team, better than some above .500 teams and beat Miami twice, so Miami actually lost 6 games. Chicago was also below .500 when the two teams played last time.

[Jetballer24]

Wow, didn't realize the Pacers are such PRETENDERS!

I'm jumping off the Indy bandwagon for now...

Now I am going to assume that you are bandwagon Seahawks fan based on this comment.

[J Shuttlesworth]

Is that based on those teams' records at the time of the games or now? Either way, Brooklyn is a good team, better than some above .500 teams and beat Miami twice, so Miami actually lost 6 games. Chicago was also below .500 when the two teams played last time.
Either way, it balances out because it wouldn't account for West teams beating the Nets when they were sub .500, or Indy

[SilkkTheShocker]

Wow, didn't realize the Pacers are such PRETENDERS!

I'm jumping off the Indy bandwagon for now...

You would.

[SilkkTheShocker]

I thought the Pacers were more stacked than the Heat?

They are stacked. Doesn't mean they will beat Miami though. No matter how hard you want them to.

[Illuminati]

As every one said, they coasting.

[Hoopz2332]

:facepalm Only 3-4 teams in the east are above .500 at a time, indicating that the Heat's 15-4 record is mostly against the West. I didn't realize you were too stupid to figure out that's what this thread is implying. The Heat's 17-5 record against the West, and 10-2 record against top 8 in the west should reflect these numbers.

B..bb.bbb.bb..uut the Heat can't beat the superior west teams right? They can only beat shitty eastern conference teams? right?


:applause:



heat would have a crazy (best record easily) record if they didn't coast against bad teams:coleman:

[Lebron23]

The most impressive thing for the heat, is that they are 10-2 vs top 8 in the west, including 6-0 on the road!


This

[Prometheus]

My favorite thing about all this is how there are STILL people who insist that the Pacers have the #1 seed in the East locked up. :roll:

[NumberSix]

15-4 gets a :eek:

17-7 is meh

:oldlol:
15-4 is a better record than 17-7. :hammerhead:

[hitmanyr2k]

Regular season records don't really mean shit to be honest. Who knows which team is injured at the time? Are you catching them on a back to back? A 4th game in 5 nights on a long road trip? Regular season games are much different than having a series where the coaching staff can focus on ONE team and make adjustments. And the 2011 Heat could hardly beat any elite/playoff teams in the regular season and still ended up making the Finals.

[Lebron23]

Regular season records don't really mean shit to be honest. Who knows which team is injured at the time? Are you catching them on a back to back? A 4th game in 5 nights on a long road trip? Regular season games are much different than having a series where the coaching staff can focus on ONE team and make adjustments. And the 2011 Heat could hardly beat any elite/playoff teams in the regular season and still ended up making the Finals.


You are still hating on Lebron. That's why the 2012 and 2013 Heat won back to back NBA titles. They also had a great record againts the 0.500 and above NBA teams.

2014 Miami Heat would be a better team than the 2012 Heat in the playoffs.

[Fudge]

Told y'all Miami's stacked.

[All Net]

As I said before those the Pacers may not have an amazing record over 500 teams as a whole but against the main teams they are

1-0 vs Spurs
1-1 vs Heat
2-0 vs Clippers
1-0 vs Rockets

So against the 2nd,3rd and 4th seeds in the west and 2nd seed in the east they have a 4-1 record against these top teams.

They are however 0-1 vs Thunder and 0-2 vs Suns which hurts their record.

[All Net]

15-4 is a better record than 17-7. :hammerhead:

OKC also play these tougher teams more than Miami do. Having to face the top west teams more than 2 times plays a big factor.

[T_L_P]

:biggums: The Heat are secretly having the best season. They are literally coasting against the scrub teams and only show up to games against decent teams

Of course. They have three All-Stars, 3 franchise changing players.

[Illuminati]

In the Pacers defense, they played like 4-5 of these teams on the second night of a back to back. With that being said, Heat in 6.

[All Net]

Miami have obviously gotten up for these top teams and out of those 4 losses 2 were at home.

Miami just coast against bad teams. L.A did this alot too.

[JohnFreeman]

how the hell are the queens still last. fu.ck those guys
Embiid is ours

[russwest0]

And the Heat have the worst record of the 3 :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

[J Shuttlesworth]

And the Heat have the worst record of the 3 :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Because they coast against shitty teams so they can rest for the playoffs. It's better to beat good teams than to lose to beat shitty teams. Congrats to OKC and Indiana for only being able to win against scrub teams :applause:

[MichaelCorleone]

Lebron and co.:bowdown:

[russwest0]

Winning against good teams and bad teams < Winning only against good teams

Heat fans logic :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

[arifgokcen]

Winning against good teams and bad teams < Winning only against good teams

Heat fans logic :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
if you werent trolling all the time you would realize this is what happens when you are going for 4 straight finals.LA was exactly the same.Even 98 bulls didnt get up to play bad teams.

[Dro]

Regular season records don't really mean shit to be honest. Who knows which team is injured at the time? Are you catching them on a back to back? A 4th game in 5 nights on a long road trip? Regular season games are much different than having a series where the coaching staff can focus on ONE team and make adjustments. And the 2011 Heat could hardly beat any elite/playoff teams in the regular season and still ended up making the Finals.
Careful. A little too much logic here....

[Dro]

In the Pacers defense, they played like 4-5 of these teams on the second night of a back to back. With that being said, Heat in 6.
No point in telling anyone this. They don't watch the Pacers...

[hitmanyr2k]

You are still hating on Lebron. That's why the 2012 and 2013 Heat won back to back NBA titles. They also had a great record againts the 0.500 and above NBA teams.

2014 Miami Heat would be a better team than the 2012 Heat in the playoffs.

So using a relevant example that the Miami Heat team struggled to beat teams over .500 throughout the 2010-11 regular season (but still made the Finals regardless) is somehow hating on Lebron? Somehow you just found a way to make this about Lebron?

Ok, let me give another example. The 2013 Pacers struggled to beat teams above .500 but still made it to the ECF and gave Miami a tough 7 game series regardless. Using your dipshit logic that must mean I'm hating on Paul George.

[RedMax]

Pacers: 11-8
Thunder: 17-7
Heat: 15-4 :eek: Also, the Heat are 17-4 against the West.

Just look at this:
http://i.imgur.com/nflfIqF.png

The Heat are the only team with only 4 losses or less against .500 and above. After them, it's Pacers w/ 8 losses, and then the Bulls w/ 11 losses

:biggums: The Heat are secretly having the best season. They are literally coasting against the scrub teams and only show up to games against decent teams
Can you give me a link to this? I'm trying to find their records vs teams below 500.

[Rik Smits' Hair]

No point in telling anyone this. They don't watch the Pacers...

No need to watch when you can blindly hate.
Like the Granger trade. All season ISH talks about how Indy needs to blow it up and make trades. The trade happens. ISH say lulz pacers scurred of Miami

[RedMax]

Never mind. Found it.