Greater dynasty: Duncan's Spurs or Brady's Patriots? [Archive] - Message Board Basketball Forum

RagaZ

03-07-2014, 02:58 PM

KirbyPls

03-07-2014, 02:59 PM

aboss4real24

03-07-2014, 02:59 PM

Spurs.

They didnt Cheat 4 there Rings

davehos

03-07-2014, 03:00 PM

Spurs. No spygate - only skill.

RagaZ

03-07-2014, 03:03 PM

Both teams should have had at least 5 rings.

Spurs in either 2004, 2006 or 2013.

And Pats in both of their Super Bowl trips against Giants.

MavsSuperFan

03-07-2014, 03:04 PM

Spygate is the only knock against the pats.

Spurs werent even the greatest dynasty of their era.

Lakers were better.

I choose the pats, and its harder to win multiple championships in the NFL.

RagaZ

03-07-2014, 03:06 PM

Spygate is the only knock against the pats.

Spurs werent even the greatest dynasty of their era.

Lakers were better.

I choose the pats, and its harder to win multiple championships in the NFL.
Spurs been elite and been a contender almost every year since drafting Duncan.

Where were Lakers in those years between Shaq's departure and the Gasol trade. Or the last 2 years?

Rose'sACL

03-07-2014, 03:07 PM

Spurs

SamuraiSWISH

03-07-2014, 03:09 PM

Very comparable franchises, IMO. I'm going Spurs. No spygate crap. I hate the Spurs though too. Not a fan of Tim Duncan, hate their Euro centric roster and style of play. Can't stand looking at Tony Parker.

RoundMoundOfReb

03-07-2014, 03:10 PM

Brady's patriots. Much harder to have that kind of success in the NFL.

SamuraiSWISH

03-07-2014, 03:12 PM

Brady's patriots. Much harder to have that kind of success in the NFL.
This is very true too. Injuries play such a HUGE role in that violent, collision sport. There is something to be said more for having a dynasty in professional football. Very solid point, bud. Don't like either franchise doe.

Uncle Drew

03-07-2014, 03:14 PM

SamuraiSWISH

03-07-2014, 03:17 PM

You hate team basketball? :confusedshrug:
Yes.

Mass Debator

03-07-2014, 03:38 PM

I'm going to say the Patriots since their roster changes have been so crazy. They had a bunch of nobodys starting last year and still almost reached the Superbowl.

Marlo_Stanfield

03-07-2014, 03:41 PM

Yes.
:biggums: :biggums: :facepalm :coleman:

JohnMax

03-07-2014, 03:58 PM

http://i.imgur.com/m8rBaCZ.gif

Pushxx

03-07-2014, 03:59 PM

Patriots. It's more difficult to accomplish what they did in the NFL especially considering their rosters.

Respect to both for being well-run franchises.

RagaZ

03-07-2014, 04:07 PM

Patriots. It's more difficult to accomplish what they did in the NFL especially considering their rosters.

Respect to both for being well-run franchises.
In NFL you dont have that Big Market and Small market difference.

Spurs cant make big Free Agents signings.

Clyde

03-07-2014, 04:29 PM

Who you got?

Duncan and Pop's Spurs vs Brady and Belichick's Spurs

Spurs dynasty: 1997-present
Patriots dynasty: 2001-present

Spurs:

4 Titles
5 Finals Appearances
16 Playoff appearances
.703 winning percentage

Patriots:

3 Titles
5 Super Bowl Appearances
11 Playoff Appearances
.775 Winning percentage

Patriots by mile.

The difficulty of achieving a "dynasty" in football over basketball is insane.

I almost impossible to remain that good over a decade in football due to the salary cap, free agency, draft, and roster size.

sportjames23

03-07-2014, 04:44 PM

http://i.imgur.com/m8rBaCZ.gif

http://www.awesomelyluvvie.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/CoolWalk3.gif

D.J.

03-07-2014, 04:56 PM

The Spurs dynasty has lasted a little longer as of now and they don't have Spygate against them. People may hate the Spurs for being boring, but they don't hate them for winning a lot. The Patriots have some of the biggest haters in the country even once you get past the winning.

Wally450

03-07-2014, 05:46 PM

Patriots by mile.

The difficulty of achieving a "dynasty" in football over basketball is insane.

I almost impossible to remain that good over a decade in football due to the salary cap, free agency, draft, and roster size.

I was gonna give the Spurs the slight edge just looking at the numbers, but after reading what you posted, I agree with the Patriots. I say its still close though.

NumberSix

03-07-2014, 05:47 PM

I don't recall the spurs cheating.

Vienceslav

03-07-2014, 05:52 PM

I don't recall the spurs cheating.
It's interesting to see what agendas people have in other sports, might turn out somebody who is a Lebron stan could also love Brady and that would bring a whole new dynamic to this otherwise predictable and stale place.

Milbuck

03-07-2014, 06:21 PM

Tiago Splitter

Mr. Jabbar

03-07-2014, 06:23 PM

correction: Pop's spurs.

zoom17

03-07-2014, 06:26 PM

Spurs

T_L_P

03-07-2014, 06:31 PM

correction: Pop's spurs.

Take a look at Pop's record before Duncan arrived. Then look at the amount of titles Pop has won since Duncan's prime.

The OP was correct the first time.

Euroleague

03-07-2014, 10:39 PM

WTF?

Patriots by a country mile.

Are you freaking kidding me?

It's 10x harder to win in the NFL than in the NBA.

Clyde

03-07-2014, 10:47 PM

WTF?

Patriots by a country mile.

Are you freaking kidding me?

It's 10x harder to win in the NFL than in the NBA.

:applause:

I know almost everyone flames you hard but I have to agree with you 100%....

it's pretty obvious actually

Heavincent

03-07-2014, 10:52 PM

At least the Spurs didn't cheat or get the most bogus call in sports history in their favor.

toooo

03-07-2014, 10:53 PM

Spurs.

Clyde

03-07-2014, 10:54 PM

At least the Spurs didn't cheat or get the most bogus call in sports history in their favor.

after the patriots got caught "cheating", the next season they went 18-1 and had the best offense ever(until this years denver)

Losers blame wins and losses on refs. Dont be a loser

Heavincent

03-07-2014, 11:03 PM

18-1

:roll:

CelticBaller

03-07-2014, 11:21 PM

Superbowls are harder to win

Patriots>>>

CelticBaller

03-07-2014, 11:22 PM

after the patriots got caught "cheating", the next season they went 18-1 and had the best offense ever(until this years denver)

Losers blame wins and losses on refs. Dont be a loser
lost a by a fluke catch

and former sb winning coaches have gone on and said that trying to steal signals was a thing everybody did, even belichik caught mangina stealing signals

FKAri

03-07-2014, 11:26 PM

Messi's Barcelona.

JerryWest

03-07-2014, 11:26 PM

The franchise that won legitimately.

Clyde

03-07-2014, 11:28 PM

lost a by a fluke catch

and former sb winning coaches have gone on and said that trying to steal signals was a thing everybody did, even belichik caught mangina stealing signals

Don't bother.....haters going to hate......real sports fans understand what happend

CelticBaller

03-07-2014, 11:28 PM

only idiots with no knowledge of football still bring up spygate like it means shit

we've made the superbowl twice since then idiots

BasedTom

03-08-2014, 12:16 AM

only idiots with no knowledge of football still bring up spygate like it means shits
This is what Boston sports fans actually believe.

Let that sink in a moment :roll:

kennethgriffin

03-08-2014, 02:25 AM

The word dynesty is used too loosly. In my opinion you gotta win atleast 3 in a row or 3 in 4 years

Spurs never even did back to back

Kobe went back to back in 2001, 2002 and 2010

But to say whos better...Its way harder to win 3 super bowls than 4 nba titles due to the competitve balance and turn over being so much better in football

Cold soul

03-08-2014, 02:44 AM

Spurs. But in 2000's era the Lakers were more dominate and had greater success than both franchises, 7 Finals appearances out of ten years while winning five championships is greater than anything Pats or Spurs did overall. But in any event Pats/Spurs have been more relevant post 2010.

davehos

03-08-2014, 03:09 AM

only idiots with no knowledge of football still bring up spygate like it means shit

A durrr knowing what play the team is going to run (by cheating) before they run it doesn't mean shit. Derp duer dure GO CELTICS sdrodasfldf

:cletus:

Cold soul

03-08-2014, 03:12 AM

Also the Spurs never repeated as champs the Lakers and Pats did.

Pacer24

03-08-2014, 03:27 AM

Brady and the Pats. Because the NFL is more popular and Brady is White

CelticBaller

03-08-2014, 11:31 AM

A durrr knowing what play the team is going to run (by cheating) before they run it doesn't mean shit. Derp duer dure GO CELTICS sdrodasfldf

:cletus:
We were caught stealing defensive signals, yet our championship team stopped the best show on turf hur durr
:cletus:

Careful teams also change the signals after the game idiot

Hey? We made the Superbowls twice after that in a span of 5 years without "cheating" what makes you think we cheated our way to 3? Dumbass

CelticBaller

03-08-2014, 11:34 AM

This is what Boston sports fans actually believe.

Let that sink in a moment :roll:
Yeah, because we made it to the Super Bowl twice after that, and belichick caught Mangini stealing, did mangini ever lead the jets to the Super Bowl? No.

I'd take a SB winning coach words over a loser dolphin fan like you