PDA

View Full Version : Replace 2011 Rose with 2011 Wade



Jameerthefear
03-26-2014, 01:08 AM
Both of them switch places. How far does Chicago go?

Warfan
03-26-2014, 01:10 AM
Lose in the ecf

TheReal Kendall
03-26-2014, 01:14 AM
Lose in the ecf

This. No pg

JohnMax
03-26-2014, 06:55 AM
2011 Wade outplayed Dirk. He got injured in game 5 and that effected his game.

nathanjizzle
03-26-2014, 06:58 AM
Bulls would finish 3rd or 4th seed, and possible make it to the ecf

JohnFreeman
03-26-2014, 07:06 AM
2011 Wade was so damn good

The_Yearning
03-26-2014, 07:26 AM
2011 Wade was so damn good

You must be confusing with 2009 Wade.

2011 Wade put up numbers but dude was awful.

Smook A.
03-26-2014, 07:28 AM
You must be confusing with 2009 Wade.

2011 Wade put up numbers but dude was awful.
He wasn't awful at all

JohnFreeman
03-26-2014, 07:33 AM
You must be confusing with 2009 Wade.

2011 Wade put up numbers but dude was awful.
In what way?

HiphopRelated
03-26-2014, 08:17 AM
Wade was better than Rose in 2011, series goes 7

Jameerthefear
03-26-2014, 08:59 AM
You must be confusing with 2009 Wade.

2011 Wade put up numbers but dude was awful.
Stop posting.
Wade in 2011 was literally better than Rose at every aspect of basketball :roll:

Basketbolero
03-26-2014, 09:13 AM
Stop posting.
Wade in 2011 was literally better than Rose at every aspect of basketball :roll:
From the author of:

http://i62.tinypic.com/2cdhd08.jpg

:bowdown:

Akhenaten
03-26-2014, 09:54 AM
You must be confusing with 2009 Wade.

2011 Wade put up numbers but dude was awful.

http://www.gifsforum.com/images/gif/wtf/grand/Whatcha%20talkin%20bout%20arnold.gif

STATUTORY
03-26-2014, 09:57 AM
2011 wade was inconsistent as hell, there were stretches of regular season where he was struggling bad. chicago would been a low seeded playoff team with Wade, probably gets bounced by hawks

Basketbolero
03-26-2014, 10:09 AM
I know this is a troll thread but let's just say Chicago desn't get rid of Hinrich in order to make room for the possibility of 2 max players.

They wouldn't be able to afford Watson+Korver+Brewer but they would go with:

Hinrich/min PG
Wade/Bogans
Deng/James Johnson (they would probably replace him for a shooter)
Boozer/Gibson
Noah/Asik

That team is strong at all positions. Would probably win less regular season games depending on Wade's health but solid contender.

fpliii
03-26-2014, 10:13 AM
You must be confusing with 2009 Wade.

2011 Wade put up numbers but dude was awful.
He was the same player in 09, 10, 11 really. Just had to share a ball with LeBron in his final year. :confusedshrug:

Dresta
03-26-2014, 10:19 AM
Wade was inconsistent in 11 partially because he was adjusting to playing with Bron and not being the teams primary ballhandler. That Chicago team was stacked and a defensive juggernaut and would have allowed Wade to maintain his role as primary playmaker/scorer - something he did better than Rose. I can't see how the team would not be better with Wade than with Rose.

Think how good defensively a lineup of Hinrich/Wade/Deng/Gibson/Noah or Asik would have been.

Basketbolero
03-26-2014, 10:24 AM
Wade was inconsistent in 11 partially because he was adjusting to playing with Bron and not being the teams primary ballhandler. That Chicago team was stacked and a defensive juggernaut and would have allowed Wade to maintain his role as primary playmaker/scorer - something he did better than Rose. I can't see how the team would not be better with Wade than with Rose.

Think how good defensively a lineup of Hinrich/Wade/Deng/Gibson/Noah or Asik would have been.
Hinrich wasn't there though. If we just switched Rose and Wade the Bulls starting PG would be CJ Watson, not a pretty sight.

red1
03-26-2014, 10:41 AM
2011 wade was inconsistent as hell, there were stretches of regular season where he was struggling bad. chicago would been a low seeded playoff team with Wade, probably gets bounced by hawks
no

red1
03-26-2014, 10:43 AM
they would have been a much better team. especially in the playoffs

Mass Debator
03-26-2014, 10:46 AM
No one on the Heat could've stopped Wade. Mike Miller? Eddie House? Bibby? Rose? Imagine Lebron trying to guard Wade's nasty pick in roll game getting picked all over the place. Tiring.

Bulls defense would be better and more explosive as well. Wade and Rose's point skills are interchangeable. They would've had a greater chance at winning it all with Wade than Rose.

nathanjizzle
03-26-2014, 10:46 AM
NOPE. people here claiming that the 11' team would win more games with wade than rose are delusional. bulls were first place team in the league that team, and somehow wade is suppose to carry that team beyond that?

i agree the bulls would have done better in the playoffs, because rose just was inefficient in round 1 and 2, and just sucked in the ecf.