View Full Version : I am NOT impressed by this Spurs win streak
ChrisKreager
03-31-2014, 03:59 AM
Only 3 of their 17 straight wins have come against real competition.
Outside of Miami, an Aldridge-less Blazers, and Golden State, the Spurs have basically done what they've done all year- fattened up on cupcakes.
It's amazing how the Spurs 0-6 record against the Thunder/Rockets is swept under the rug.
Yet we always give the Spurs the benefit of the doubt FOR A TEAM THAT HASN'T WON A TITLE IN SEVEN FREAKING YEARS!
IncarceratedBob
03-31-2014, 04:02 AM
I didn't even know the spurs were on a winning streak. Nap city lol
2 Final appearances and 2 Conf Finals in the last 7 years are not that bad considering how stacked the west is.
I don't see anybody here making a big deal out of this winning streak.
CarlosBoozer
03-31-2014, 04:20 AM
who?!
JohnMax
03-31-2014, 04:20 AM
Heat MVP (right), Lebron James (left)
http://cdn3.sbnation.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/18128613/170991850.0_standard_730.0.jpg
bdreason
03-31-2014, 04:21 AM
The real impressive part of this win streak is that they aren't even trying. Pop continues to rest key players and limit minutes... but they just keep winning. Even fukcing Tiago Splitter is getting nights off. :oldlol:
All Net
03-31-2014, 04:33 AM
The real impressive part of this win streak is that they aren't even trying. Pop continues to rest key players and limit minutes... but they just keep winning. Even fukcing Tiago Splitter is getting nights off. :oldlol:
Well yeah their depth is underrated.
Black Mamba's B
03-31-2014, 04:50 AM
Great coaching. Of course if Miami does the same thing it's headline news
Purch
03-31-2014, 05:17 AM
Only 3 of their 17 straight wins have come against real competition.
Outside of Miami, an Aldridge-less Blazers, and Golden State, the Spurs have basically done what they've done all year- fattened up on cupcakes.
It's amazing how the Spurs 0-6 record against the Thunder/Rockets is swept under the rug.
Yet we always give the Spurs the benefit of the doubt FOR A TEAM THAT HASN'T WON A TITLE IN SEVEN FREAKING YEARS!
When's the last time Indy, Okc, Lac or Houston has won a title?
See it's easy to classify a team that hasn't had a down year in 17 seaons as having playoff failures, because you don't hold other teams to the same standard.
See if we hold every team to your standard, we shouldn't give anyone the benefit of the doubt , outside of Miami, Boston, Dallas and La. The teams that have won titles in the past 6 years. Now how does that sound?
L.A. Jazz
03-31-2014, 05:57 AM
they dont want your praise for the streak.
they think about the playoffs and the title.
just getting in rythym and stay healthy.
Nuff Said
03-31-2014, 08:00 AM
When's the last time Indy, Okc, Lac or Houston has won a title?
See it's easy to classify a team that hasn't had a down year in 17 seaons as having playoff failures, because you don't hold other teams to the same standard.
See if we hold every team to your standard, we shouldn't give anyone the benefit of the doubt , outside of Miami, Boston, Dallas and La. The teams that have won titles in the past 6 years. Now how does that sound?
But they don't want to hear that though. How does one of the most successful teams in the playoffs this past couple decades get shat on so much I don't know? They certainly have had more success than clippers, warriors, rockets, and thunder (all who are considered contenders) even in the most recent years.
sketchy
03-31-2014, 10:21 AM
Only on ISH is winning 17 games straight in the NBA "not-impressive." :facepalm
We get it, they haven't played the most astounding teams over this stretch, but 17 for 17 against other pros is pretty awesome. That's the longest in the league so far this season and they're winning by like 13-14 points per game.
sketchy
03-31-2014, 10:24 AM
The real impressive part of this win streak is that they aren't even trying. Pop continues to rest key players and limit minutes... but they just keep winning. Even fukcing Tiago Splitter is getting nights off. :oldlol:
^^This.
Also no one is even hyping this up. No one ever seems to care about or be impressed by the Spurs.
And in regards to not winning in 7 years... I'd rather at least be in serious contention for 7 straight years than nowhere to be found.
ninephive
03-31-2014, 12:13 PM
Only 3 of their 17 straight wins have come against real competition.
Outside of Miami, an Aldridge-less Blazers, and Golden State, the Spurs have basically done what they've done all year- fattened up on cupcakes.
It's amazing how the Spurs 0-6 record against the Thunder/Rockets is swept under the rug.
Yet we always give the Spurs the benefit of the doubt FOR A TEAM THAT HASN'T WON A TITLE IN SEVEN FREAKING YEARS!
Hahahahaha way to cherry-pick 2 of the 3 teams in the league the Spurs have a losing record against! In other words, the Spurs aren't good because they literally don't have a winning record against every single team in the league.
imdaman99
03-31-2014, 12:16 PM
Shades of 2 years ago if you ask me. I'm sure this team's a much better defensive team than that one though.
ninephive
03-31-2014, 12:16 PM
Only 3 of their 17 straight wins have come against real competition.
Outside of Miami, an Aldridge-less Blazers, and Golden State, the Spurs have basically done what they've done all year- fattened up on cupcakes.
It's amazing how the Spurs 0-6 record against the Thunder/Rockets is swept under the rug.
Yet we always give the Spurs the benefit of the doubt FOR A TEAM THAT HASN'T WON A TITLE IN SEVEN FREAKING YEARS!
When this is the worst that can be said about your team, they're doing something right.
ninephive
03-31-2014, 12:18 PM
Only 3 of their 17 straight wins have come against real competition.
Outside of Miami, an Aldridge-less Blazers, and Golden State, the Spurs have basically done what they've done all year- fattened up on cupcakes.
It's amazing how the Spurs 0-6 record against the Thunder/Rockets is swept under the rug.
Yet we always give the Spurs the benefit of the doubt FOR A TEAM THAT HASN'T WON A TITLE IN SEVEN FREAKING YEARS!
In other words, unless you beat every single contender (and it only counts if every single player on those teams is healthy), then it's not an impressive win streak.
davehos
03-31-2014, 12:40 PM
Shades of 2 years ago if you ask me. I'm sure this team's a much better defensive team than that one though.
I think that's in the back of every fan's mind BUT this bench is better.
Splitter and Green were in their first year (I think) with the Spurs and Leonard was a rookie. Neal was a fantastic player but I think Mills has yet to peak. This doesn't even account for the upgraded LENGTH the Spurs now have .. Ayers, Baynes, and Daye.
Any of the "big 3" are capable of a 20/10 game on any given night. What more can you ask for?
I've been following the Spurs since my high school days (D. Robinson was still going strong) and I can confidently say this is the best Spurs team they've had in over 10 years. I don't like to brag too much because I'm afraid I'm going to jinx my team. It's going to take every player they've got being healthy to make it out of the West. The West is a beast this year.
SsKSpurs21
03-31-2014, 01:00 PM
I agree that the Spurs are "fattening up on cupcakes". for a team that is considered a title contender, they are doing what they are suppose to be doing which is beating teams that they are suppose to.
that probably is not impressive, but what is impressive is the way they are winning. Noone is averaging more than 30 minutes a game. There are nights where either Manu, Duncan, or Parker, if not all 3, are out of the game. Spurs are not relying on the big 3 anymore. they are relying on a complete team effort (69% of their baskets come from assists) and their margin of victory has been over 15 points, so they are just stomping teams.
That is what is impressive.
toooo
03-31-2014, 01:31 PM
They aren't even "deep". When you hear analysts talking about deep teams you never hear the spurs pop up. Pop just knows how to use his guys. Most of these guys are just role players who pop knows how to use. Great coach. GOAT coach (arguably)
toxicxr6
03-31-2014, 09:25 PM
Does blowing out the best home team in the league by 26 help??
ninephive
03-31-2014, 09:49 PM
Does blowing out the best home team in the league by 26 help??
No, this guy won't be impressed until the Spurs win 34 in a row and that streak includes every team in the league and 2 times against all the top competitors. And they have to win by 20+ every game and also none of these other teams can have any injuries.
Milbuck
03-31-2014, 09:53 PM
No, this guy won't be impressed until the Spurs win 34 in a row and that streak includes every team in the league and 2 times against all the top competitors. And they have to win by 20+ every game and also none of these other teams can have any injuries.
And Timmy, Manu, and TP have to play less than 25mpg every game or else they're trying too hard.
InfiniteBaskets
03-31-2014, 09:54 PM
And Timmy, Manu, and TP have to play less than 25mpg every game or else they're trying too hard.
And Pop takes off weekends to let assistant coaches do work.
InfiniteBaskets
03-31-2014, 09:55 PM
Actually nvm, that would be the only legit barrier to the Spurs winning games...
It's crazy that the gap between Pop and the next best coach is bigger than the gap between a guy like Durant and Reggie Jackson (imo).
the wise man
03-31-2014, 10:00 PM
Is the same shit every year. They won't win shit people. They will loose badly this year, the Spurs fans will put a lot of excuses, then they will be suhcking their dyks again next year.
:banana: :banana: :banana:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.