PDA

View Full Version : Where would this road to the championship rank in terms of toughness?



russwest0
04-22-2014, 02:23 PM
Grizzlies
Clippers
Spurs
Heat

If OKC wins it all this year, would this be the toughest road to the championship of all time? All 50 win teams, 3 teams considered to be contenders and a 4th team that has played like one whenever full strength. No HCA vs the 60 win Spurs, playing the Heat going for a 3peat, playing the Clippers who are rolling and just won a playoff game by 40 pts, etc.

Where would it rank?

LeFraud James
04-22-2014, 02:24 PM
Sorry to break it to you, but OKC ain't winning diddly-squat this year.

/thread

Demitri98
04-22-2014, 02:25 PM
Would be a hell of a run, but I don't see it stacking up against the run by '69 Boston. That was remarkable, the team barely made the playoffs IIRC.

Kiddlovesnets
04-22-2014, 02:30 PM
It would be a very tough road, but you dont need to worry about that since they have little chance getting past Memphis. Even if they played against the odds and made it to WCF, Spurs would make sure they aint going any further than that.

inclinerator
04-22-2014, 02:33 PM
no especially when u always clown the clippers and say thunder easily owns the spurs

DMAVS41
04-22-2014, 02:35 PM
one of the toughest roads I can remember. more difficult than even the 11 Mavs road to the title...

K Xerxes
04-22-2014, 02:37 PM
1995 Houston Rockets playoffs:

Utah: 60-22 (Stockton + Malone)
Phoenix: 59-23 (Barkley)
San Antonio: 62-20 (Robinson)
Orlando: 57-25 (Shaq + Penny)

They faced the top 4 seeds in the entire league (Orlando tied with Seattle for fourth best).

Kiddlovesnets
04-22-2014, 02:38 PM
one of the toughest roads I can remember. more difficult than even the 11 Mavs road to the title...

Mavs road to title could've been more difficult if the Spurs made it to WCF and if the Lakers could at least make it a series. Sometimes a team underperforms and you have no idea why it happens. But if it benefits your team, thats good news isnt it?

DMAVS41
04-22-2014, 02:41 PM
Mavs road to title could've been more difficult if the Spurs made it to WCF and if the Lakers could at least make it a series. Sometimes a team underperforms and you have no idea why it happens. But if it benefits your team, thats good news isnt it?

Yea, that is why this road will be one of the toughest i can remember...

DMAVS41
04-22-2014, 02:41 PM
1995 Houston Rockets playoffs:

Utah: 60-22 (Stockton + Malone)
Phoenix: 59-23 (Barkley)
San Antonio: 62-20 (Robinson)
Orlando: 57-25 (Shaq + Penny)

They faced the top 4 seeds in the entire league (Orlando tied with Seattle for fourth best).


Was just about to post this...saved me the time...

:cheers:

Demitri98
04-22-2014, 02:45 PM
1995 Houston Rockets playoffs:

Utah: 60-22 (Stockton + Malone)
Phoenix: 59-23 (Barkley)
San Antonio: 62-20 (Robinson)
Orlando: 57-25 (Shaq + Penny)

They faced the top 4 seeds in the entire league (Orlando tied with Seattle for fourth best).
Holy sh** :biggums:

Milbuck
04-22-2014, 02:46 PM
1995 Houston Rockets playoffs:

Utah: 60-22 (Stockton + Malone)
Phoenix: 59-23 (Barkley)
San Antonio: 62-20 (Robinson)
Orlando: 57-25 (Shaq + Penny)

They faced the top 4 seeds in the entire league (Orlando tied with Seattle for fourth best).
:lebronamazed:

:bowdown: :bowdown: Hakeem the ****ing Dream :bowdown: :bowdown:

moe94
04-22-2014, 02:50 PM
1995 Houston Rockets playoffs:

Utah: 60-22 (Stockton + Malone)
Phoenix: 59-23 (Barkley)
San Antonio: 62-20 (Robinson)
Orlando: 57-25 (Shaq + Penny)

They faced the top 4 seeds in the entire league (Orlando tied with Seattle for fourth best).

bbbut Dream is overrated

oarabbus
04-22-2014, 02:52 PM
1995 Houston Rockets playoffs:

Utah: 60-22 (Stockton + Malone)
Phoenix: 59-23 (Barkley)
San Antonio: 62-20 (Robinson)
Orlando: 57-25 (Shaq + Penny)

They faced the top 4 seeds in the entire league (Orlando tied with Seattle for fourth best).


Hakeem :eek:

dunksby
04-22-2014, 02:53 PM
1995 Houston Rockets playoffs:

Utah: 60-22 (Stockton + Malone)
Phoenix: 59-23 (Barkley)
San Antonio: 62-20 (Robinson)
Orlando: 57-25 (Shaq + Penny)

They faced the top 4 seeds in the entire league (Orlando tied with Seattle for fourth best).
Yep, that's a Dream run to the title.

tmacattack33
04-22-2014, 02:54 PM
1995 Houston Rockets playoffs:

Utah: 60-22 (Stockton + Malone)
Phoenix: 59-23 (Barkley)
San Antonio: 62-20 (Robinson)
Orlando: 57-25 (Shaq + Penny)

They faced the top 4 seeds in the entire league (Orlando tied with Seattle for fourth best).

Damn, i totally forgot about that.

That's four of the best teams of the mid 90's, period. All rolled into one playoff run. :applause:

LoneyROY7
04-22-2014, 03:06 PM
http://i42.tinypic.com/iyg75e.gif

http://25.media.tumblr.com/585a4414ad3f58b7108c2408401db309/tumblr_mrbv94Vtpa1r3t64do1_500.gif

Hakeem Da Dream. :bowdown:

AnaheimLakers24
04-22-2014, 03:07 PM
tougher than anything gay bran can dream of

jlip
04-22-2014, 03:15 PM
How is it considered so "tough" when you are favored against each team not named Spurs? Also, what if they either sweep or win a series 4-1? That doesn't display difficulty at all. Honestly that would reveal that the team's regular season record was not indicative of the actual level of competition.

Solefade
04-22-2014, 03:16 PM
tougher than anything gay bran can dream of


this dude has to insert a negative comment about lebron in literally every thread



dude is so shook :oldlol:


lebron >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kobe

fpliii
04-22-2014, 03:21 PM
Probably missing some, but off the top of my head:

95 Rockets
01 Lakers
11 Mavs

were all tough.

DMAVS41
04-22-2014, 03:24 PM
How is it considered so "tough" when you are favored against each team not named Spurs? Also, what if they either sweep or win a series 4-1? That doesn't display difficulty at all. Honestly that would reveal that the team's regular season record was not indicative of the actual level of competition.

Uhhhh...because the teams you are playing are good as well.

The Grizzlies are built for the playoffs and with a healthy Gasol would have been a 56 win team.

Having to play 4 teams over 55 wins is always going to be tough...unless you just have an all time stacked team...which the Thunder simply don't have.

This road is probably the hardest of this era...the hypothetical one in the OP...assuming health for the teams of course.

Going in reverse, way harder than the Heat in 12/13
Harder than the 11 Mavs...although not by a huge amount
Definitely harder than the 09/10 Lakers
Easily harder than the 08 Celtics
Not even comparable to 07
Way harder than the Heat in 06
Harder than the Spurs in 05...although this was a tough road
Way harder than the 04 Pistons
Harder than the 03 Spurs
Harder than the 02 Lakers, but damn...those Kings were amazing
Way harder than 00/01 Lakers
Way harder than the 99 Spurs

DMAVS41
04-22-2014, 03:27 PM
Probably missing some, but off the top of my head:

95 Rockets
01 Lakers
11 Mavs

were all tough.

I actually thought the Lakers 02 competition was better because of how great the Kings were...

01 was tough as well, but the issue with those 01/02 Lakers is that they were such better teams than the current Thunder...

Shaq was better than Durant and Kobe way better than WB...and PJ coaching over Brooks...

So you kind of have to factor that in as well...

fpliii
04-22-2014, 03:30 PM
I actually thought the Lakers 02 competition was better because of how great the Kings were...

01 was tough as well, but the issue with those 01/02 Lakers is that they were such better teams than the current Thunder...

Shaq was better than Durant and Kobe way better than WB...and PJ coaching over Brooks...

So you kind of have to factor that in as well...
Perhaps, but half of the people here don't count the 02 championship. :pimp:

I think looking at relative difficulty is tough, because it's a very inexact science. Valid point, though.

tpols
04-22-2014, 03:32 PM
toughest in a long time.. the spurs if they win this year will face a similar road tho

fpliii
04-22-2014, 03:33 PM
toughest in a long time.. the spurs if they win this year will face a similar road tho
3 years is a long time?

tpols
04-22-2014, 03:38 PM
3 years is a long time?

Current memphis >11 portland
Current Clippers >11 Lakers
Current Spurs >=11 OKC
Current Heat < 11 Heat

Id say this one is slightly harder

swagga
04-22-2014, 03:48 PM
that dream run is insane

BUT

if we consider the strength of the team we need to consider 99 new york run. Barely made the playoffs with a record equivalent to 42-40, ewing didn't play.

Went throgh:
54-28 miami (brown, hardaway, mourning, strikland, majerle) and rivals
50-32 atlanta (mutombo, smith)
54-28 indiana ( dale, mark jackson, r miller, rik smiths, chris mullin) and rivals
lost to 61-19 san antonio (duncan, robinson, ellie,kerr)

that's the most ridiculuos run in my memory, sprewell god bless him went apeshit that year, sure it was a thug team with interior talent BUT that team had heart. no question about that.

swagga
04-22-2014, 03:52 PM
Current memphis >11 portland
Current Clippers >11 Lakers
Current Spurs >=11 OKC
Current Heat < 11 Heat

Id say this one is slightly harder

I disagree. Talent wise the big three declined for sure, wade has really dropped and bosh is more pussified then ever, but miami now has better role players, lebron is a better shooter AND the team actually plays a decent organized offense.

As in current spo >>> that spo, and this is the game changer.

Current miami would of beat 2011 mavs, that loss is on spo for running an iso only offense were players took turns and din't collaborate at all. Look at miami now: horns, double screen for lebron pop, pinch post, etc ... night and day

red1
04-22-2014, 04:05 PM
That is a legendary run. I am rooting against okc this year but if they pull it off I wont even hate

DMAVS41
04-22-2014, 04:06 PM
Current memphis >11 portland
Current Clippers >11 Lakers
Current Spurs >=11 OKC
Current Heat < 11 Heat

Id say this one is slightly harder

Agreed. This one is tougher. The Grizzlies are way better than the Blazers...and I actually think the Lakers vs Clippers is closer than you do, but I also think the current Spurs are clearly better than the 11 Thunder (although those Thunder are really under-rated actually)

DMAVS41
04-22-2014, 04:08 PM
I disagree. Talent wise the big three declined for sure, wade has really dropped and bosh is more pussified then ever, but miami now has better role players, lebron is a better shooter AND the team actually plays a decent organized offense.

As in current spo >>> that spo, and this is the game changer.

Current miami would of beat 2011 mavs, that loss is on spo for running an iso only offense were players took turns and din't collaborate at all. Look at miami now: horns, double screen for lebron pop, pinch post, etc ... night and day

It may change in the playoffs, but the current Heat are playing way worse defense than they did in 11. Also, it all depends on how Wade plays. If he plays healthy and can defend and give you 21/5/5...then this Heat team might be as good or better.

But we need to see it first. Their defense this year individually and as a team has fallen off dramatically since the 11 days.

livinglegend
04-22-2014, 04:41 PM
People still using regular season record to determine the strength of an opponent. :facepalm The 2007 Mavs would have liked to face a higher seeded team than the 8th seeded warriors.

Black and White
04-22-2014, 04:46 PM
People still using regular season record to determine the strength of an opponent. :facepalm The 2007 Mavs would have liked to face a higher seeded team than the 8th seeded warriors.

You saying Hakeems run wasn't legendary?

ArbitraryWater
04-22-2014, 04:54 PM
Probably missing some, but off the top of my head:

95 Rockets
01 Lakers
11 Mavs

were all tough.

Its CRAZY that 2001 Lakers would actually make sense opponent wise... and thats all it should be.

This shouldnt be based on playoff record. Or what you say 2008 Celtics had the toughest? No, they just underperformed...

Purely opponent wise the 2001 Lakers could perhaps be in contention.

And then to have the best playoff record on top... :wtf:

ArbitraryWater
04-22-2014, 04:55 PM
BTW: Its all about Matchups...


And this "toughest" doesnt make much sense in Hakeems case...

Why wasnt he on one of the leagues top 4 teams? They just underperformed in the regular season... they still were retaining champs and had a roster of one.

97 bulls
04-22-2014, 05:03 PM
1996-97 Chicago Bulls

44 win Wizards
56 win Hawks
61 win Heat
64 win Jazz