Mr. Jabbars urban NBA dictionary

[Mr. Jabbar]

unbiased fan: closet hater/stan. he hates and/or loves a player but is too afraid to admit, usually lacks a spine.

guy 1: "lebron completely choked away 2011 finals"
guy 2: "every player has good and bad series, you need to be unbiased"
guy 1: "jesus christ what a closet stan"

1 piece away: useless catchphrase that can be used everywhere and tells you nothing.

guy 1: "fk, my team went fishing 1st round.."
guy 2: "relax, they are 1 piece away from contending next year"
guy 1: "no shit idiot, almost every team is.."

team ball: beta player adaptation under the rules of darwinism, its makes up for lack of clutch abilities such as killer instinct in order to survive.

guy 1: "omg, can our best player drive the ball to the basket during crunch time ffs!?"
guy 2: "whats wrong with you? he is playing great team ball"
guy 1: "more like hes shitting the bed"

fg%: inversely proportional to ppg, its a stat that has contributed to cherry picking shots and boredom, killing the showtime era.

guy 1: "can you believe player x had a 35 ppg season?"
guy 2: "not impressed, take a look at his fg%"
guy 2: "you there?"
guy 1: "zzzzz"

* ill be updating my dictionary periodically

http://s7.postimg.org/smka6vtuj/urbandic.png

[Heavincent]

I do love it when obvious homers/detractors claim to be "unbiased observers of the game" You see that on ISH all the time.

[Mr. Jabbar]

I do love it when obvious homers/detractors claim to be "unbiased observers of the game" You see that on ISH all the time.

yeah, they're the worst breed of em all :applause:

[KirbyPls]

How cute, Kobetards deflecting and projecting onto knowledgeable basketball fans.

[Jameerthefear]

OP is a f*g

[ArbitraryWater]

http://images.rapgenius.com/3mdzmjemm9q0hb7reukvi2d4r.640x645x1.jpg

[Hamtaro CP3KDKG]

Always great learning new things. Subscribed:applause: :applause: :applause:

[Dr Hawk]

Looking forward to buy it on amazon when it becomes available

[AnaheimLakers24]

5*

[Theoo]

how you do define prude ? i well use it in sentence : nauruprude is a fk** retart

[Mr. Jabbar]

how you do define prude ? i well use it in sentence : nauruprude is a fk** retart

u should start your own dictionary theoo :bowdown: :bowdown:

[sejoon101]

Sub'd

[CelticBaller]

:applause:

[robert de niro]

thanks for sharing your knowledge with us mortals

[Mr Feeny]

unbiased fan: closet hater/stan. he hates and/or loves a player but is too afraid to admit, usually lacks a spine.

guy 1: "lebron completely choked away 2011 finals"
guy 2: "every player has good and bad series, you need to be unbiased"
guy 1: "jesus christ what a closet stan"

1 piece away: useless catchphrase that can be used everywhere and tells you nothing.

guy 1: "fk, my team went fishing 1st round.."
guy 2: "relax, they are 1 piece away from contending next year"
guy 1: "no shit idiot, almost every team is.."


* ill be updating my dictionary periodically

http://s7.postimg.org/smka6vtuj/urbandic.png

:oldlol:

[moe94]

eye test

Disregard objectivity or any sense of sanity in order to rationalize your otherwise garbage opinion

guy 1: "As you can see here, player x is simply better than player y due to similar circumstances but different production"
guy 2: "the eye test tells me player y is better"

[robert de niro]

petition to make this a sticky post

[Mr. Jabbar]

eye test

Disregard objectivity or any sense of sanity in order to rationalize your otherwise garbage opinion

guy 1: "As you can see here, player x is simply a better than player y due to similar circumstances but different production"
guy 2: "the eye test tells me player y is better"

http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/295/7/0/there_is_no_need_to_be_upset_by_pearlcom123-d6rgogo.gif

[gts]

eye test

Disregard objectivity or any sense of sanity in order to rationalize your otherwise garbage opinion

guy 1: "As you can see here, player x is simply a better than player y due to similar circumstances but different production"
guy 2: "the eye test tells me player y is better"

eye test guy version 2

guy1: I don't believe in analytics to break down games, i know everything i can from watching the games

guy2: If you're watching games and using your brain to think about what you watched, you're also using analytics.

Guy1::mad:

[moe94]

http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/295/7/0/there_is_no_need_to_be_upset_by_pearlcom123-d6rgogo.gif

I thought we were piling on. This thread has potential. Great job.

[AnaheimLakers24]

oh look the first butthurt canadian showed up.

[PickernRoller]

LeStans and JaQueer trying to derail OP's informative post...:oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol: FAIL!

:applause:

[PickernRoller]

eye test

Disregard objectivity or any sense of sanity in order to rationalize your otherwise garbage opinion

guy 1: "As you can see here, player x is simply a better than player y due to similar circumstances but different production"
guy 2: "the eye test tells me player y is better"

Theories without facts are opinions. Facts without theories are meaningless.

Lebron stans run away from context all the freaking time.

Guy 1: Lebron is the worst final performer of all time among similar peers.
Guy 2: Kobe 6/24
Guy 1: How does that make Lebron "NOT" the worst Finals performer of all time among similar peers?
Guy 2: Game 7 of the 2014 Finals.

Sometimes they run away from both facts and theories.

[Im so nba'd out]

http://images.rapgenius.com/3mdzmjemm9q0hb7reukvi2d4r.640x645x1.jpg
:lol

[moe94]

oh look the first butthurt canadian showed up.

How is it that Kobe stans caught feelings over eye test post? Hmmmm.

[AlphaWolf24]

petition to make this a sticky post


2nd...


also...



FG% - feeble attempt to bring down a great scorer that poster hates on.

example

poster #1 - Damn player _________ went for 40 tonight!!!

poster #2 - yeah but he only shot 43%....that's low.

poster #1 - he took 23 shots and made 10 FG....:confusedshrug: ...if he only made 1 more shot ...then it's nearly 50%.....

poster #2 - 43% is low FG%....

poster #1 - no it is not....FG% means nothing when looking at the context ofthe game...shots that the player wanted and if the game was close or not....just because a player shoots a high FG% doesn't mean they are great shooters...Tyson Chandler is not a great shooter...

and in this case the difference is only 1 shot from 43% - 50%....

poster #2- (crickets)

[ArbitraryWater]

2nd...


also...



FG% - feeble attempt to bring down a great scorer that poster hates on.

example

poster #1 - Damn player _________ went for 40 tonight!!!

poster #2 - yeah but he only shot 43%....that's low.

poster #1 - he took 23 shots and made 10 FG....:confusedshrug: ...if he only made 1 more shot ...then it's nearly 50%.....

poster #2 - 43% is low FG%....

poster #1 - no it is not....FG% means nothing when looking at the context ofthe game...shots that the player wanted and if the game was close or not....just because a player shoots a high FG% doesn't mean they are great shooters...Tyson Chandler is not a great shooter...

and in this case the difference is only 1 shot from 43% - 50%....

poster #2- (crickets)

:roll: :roll:

no its not :lol lol at nearly.... kobetards for ya

[PickernRoller]

2nd...


also...



FG% - feeble attempt to bring down a great scorer that poster hates on.

example

poster #1 - Damn player _________ went for 40 tonight!!!

poster #2 - yeah but he only shot 43%....that's low.

poster #1 - he took 23 shots and made 10 FG....:confusedshrug: ...if he only made 1 more shot ...then it's nearly 50%.....

poster #2 - 43% is low FG%....

poster #1 - no it is not....FG% means nothing when looking at the context ofthe game...shots that the player wanted and if the game was close or not....just because a player shoots a high FG% doesn't mean they are great shooters...Tyson Chandler is not a great shooter...

and in this case the difference is only 1 shot from 43% - 50%....

poster #2- (crickets)

Noun: the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed. Goes back to what I previously said: Facts without theories are meaningless.

Ignorance is the main trait of those that cheer for a manufactured fraud like Lebron. Can't expect much from them I am afraid.

[AlphaWolf24]

:roll: :roll:

no its not :lol lol at nearly.... kobetards for ya


43% of 23 is 9.8 ( basically 10) player shoots 10 / 23 is 43% :confusedshrug:

50% of 23 is 11.5....basically 1.5 shots....


even if it was 2....still minimal :confusedshrug:



basketball illiterate Miami fair weather fans non showing up for games.


Fan up....next

[Mr. Jabbar]

2nd...


also...



FG% - feeble attempt to bring down a great scorer that poster hates on.

example

poster #1 - Damn player _________ went for 40 tonight!!!

poster #2 - yeah but he only shot 43%....that's low.

poster #1 - he took 23 shots and made 10 FG....:confusedshrug: ...if he only made 1 more shot ...then it's nearly 50%.....

poster #2 - 43% is low FG%....

poster #1 - no it is not....FG% means nothing when looking at the context ofthe game...shots that the player wanted and if the game was close or not....just because a player shoots a high FG% doesn't mean they are great shooters...Tyson Chandler is not a great shooter...

and in this case the difference is only 1 shot from 43% - 50%....

poster #2- (crickets)

updated :applause: :applause: :applause:

[Andrei89]

How is it that Kobe stans caught feelings over eye test post? Hmmmm.


Precisely what I was thinking.

This post gets overlooked. Moe said nothing about Kobe or anybody else for that matter. However, as soon as he said something about the eye test, boom!....Kirby fans foaming at the mouth like stray dogs.

:roll: :roll:

Oh , and, Jabbar is a closet ph4g

Good night

[Mr. Jabbar]

Precisely what I was thinking.

This post gets overlooked. Moe said nothing about Kobe or anybody else for that matter. However, as soon as he said something about the eye test, boom!....Kirby fans foaming at the mouth like stray dogs.

:roll: :roll:

Oh , and, Jabbar is a closet ph4g

Good night

we gonna act like moe wasn't the first one catching feelings here :lol

[moe94]

updated :applause: :applause: :applause:

Stop being biased. :coleman:

[moe94]

we gonna act like moe wasn't the first one catching feelings here :lol

Nah. I wanted to add onto your thread. Is that so hard to believe? :biggums:

[Droid101]

we gonna act like moe wasn't the first one catching feelings here :lol
Dressed him down for sure. Moe is slippin'. Step ya game up Moe. I know you have it in you.

[moe94]

Y'all some clowns sometimes.

[PickernRoller]

Dressed him down for sure. Moe is slippin'. Step ya game up Moe. I know you have it in you.

When has he?

[Spaulding]

http://i.imgur.com/HDdHa.gif
good stuff man, quite creative

[Droid101]

When has he?
He does fine work in the gif thread. He needs to stick to that.

[moe94]

He does fine work in the gif thread. He needs to stick to that.

:coleman:

Let's be real, Kobe stans unite, huh?

[Droid101]

:coleman:

Let's be real, Kobe stans unite, huh?
Uh, you can be a fan and not a "stan." People who flat out ignore Kobe's greatness (or LeBron's) are stupid as ****.

Don't fall into that category bro. You have potential to reach Jabbar/Theoo like poster quality.

[Hamtaro CP3KDKG]

Got back from work and opened my subscribed threads. Great to see this one updated but i wish more posters contributed. Oh well just the 1st day heres to learning:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:

[HOoopCityJones]

This is some legendary shit

[Micku]

Thread should be sticky. Best of the season. Take a bow Mr. Jabbar and relive the past and have some Kobe cookies:
http://payload.cargocollective.com/1/0/17050/184905/one_04.jpg

[Connor B]

I respect OP but he's quickly coming off as a 14 year old try hard.

[MMM]

2nd...


also...



FG% - feeble attempt to bring down a great scorer that poster hates on.

example

poster #1 - Damn player _________ went for 40 tonight!!!

poster #2 - yeah but he only shot 43%....that's low.

poster #1 - he took 23 shots and made 10 FG....:confusedshrug: ...if he only made 1 more shot ...then it's nearly 50%.....

poster #2 - 43% is low FG%....

poster #1 - no it is not....FG% means nothing when looking at the context ofthe game...shots that the player wanted and if the game was close or not....just because a player shoots a high FG% doesn't mean they are great shooters...Tyson Chandler is not a great shooter...

and in this case the difference is only 1 shot from 43% - 50%....

poster #2- (crickets)

it aint the 10-23 games that people have issue with. Its the 8-27 nights, 3-21, etc. We know the unmentioned player is a great talent but when he doesn't have it why doesn't he impact the game more so with his other great skills????

Not like he isn't capable of that or his scoring was that necessary as he played on some very talented teams throughout his career.

[Mr Feeny]

it aint the 10-23 games that people have issue with. Its the 8-27 nights, 3-21, etc. We know the unmentioned player is a great talent but when he doesn't have it why doesn't he impact the game more so with his other great skills????

Not like he isn't capable of that or his scoring was that necessary as he played on some very talented teams throughout his career.

Shhhh go easy on the Kobetards.

[Hamtaro CP3KDKG]

We want an update:applause: :applause: :applause: