Log in

View Full Version : About Lebron's playoff record vs 50 win teams



JT123
05-10-2014, 11:38 PM
Only 4 series wins seems strange at first glance, but if you do a little research you will realize in actuality he has twice as many. The 2012 Pacers, Celtics, and Thunder would all have won 50 games if not for the lockout. So that makes 7 teams right there. Also last year's Pacers would have won 50 games if their road game against Boston hadn't been canceled by the league because of the bombings. That's EIGHT 50 win teams Bron has beaten biatches! :banana:

BigBoss
05-10-2014, 11:39 PM
Only 4 series wins seems strange at first glance, but if you do a little research you will realize in actuality he has twice as many. The 2012 Pacers, Celtics, and Thunder would all have won 50 games if not for the lockout. So that makes 7 teams right there. Also last year's Pacers would have won 50 games if their road game against Boston hadn't been canceled by the league because of the bombings. That's EIGHT 50 win teams Bron has beaten biatches! :banana:

Nope a 50 win team means they have to win 50 games.

LeAsterik.

moe94
05-10-2014, 11:40 PM
Nope a 50 win team means they have to win 50 games.

LeAsterik.
http://mediocritycomplex.com/uploads/headphones.gif

Heavincent
05-10-2014, 11:41 PM
Kobe faced 11 teams with 50+ wins between 08 and 10.

Milbuck
05-10-2014, 11:42 PM
Let's be honest, this year's Bobcats were tougher than any team Kevin Durant has ever faced. Including Miami.

AnaheimLakers24
05-10-2014, 11:42 PM
damage control

Uncle Drew
05-10-2014, 11:45 PM
Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Ok.

ThePhantomCreep
05-10-2014, 11:45 PM
Yeah, and the Nets would have won 50 if Pierce and KG weren't old and fat. Get lost.

JT123
05-10-2014, 11:45 PM
Let's be honest, this year's Bobcats were tougher than any team Kevin Durant has ever faced. Including Miami.
True. Durant struggled against a top 7 defense in Memphis. If he had to go up against a top 5 defense in the Bobcats he would be lucky to average 14 ppg.

Budadiiii
05-10-2014, 11:46 PM
True. Durant struggled against a top 7 defense in Memphis. If he had to go up against a top 5 defense in the Bobcats he would be lucky to average 14 ppg.
or 32 on 55%

livinglegend
05-10-2014, 11:49 PM
Boston wouldnt have been a 50 win team in 2012

They still gave Miami a tougher series than the stacked OKC Thunder with 3 superstars.

Budadiiii
05-10-2014, 11:49 PM
Boston wouldnt have been a 50 win team in 2012
But the Lakers would have.

Chalk another one up for Durant.

TheMagicMan
05-10-2014, 11:50 PM
Kobe has 23, Shaq has 17, and Duncan has 14. LolBran.

Milbuck
05-10-2014, 11:50 PM
True. Durant struggled against a top 7 defense in Memphis. If he had to go up against a top 5 defense in the Bobcats he would be lucky to average 14 ppg.
You...you cheeseheaded cornhole licking dipshit!

Alright, I got angry and responded to your trolling. Rep?

Yankstar
05-10-2014, 11:50 PM
Kobe has 23, Shaq has 17, and Duncan has 14. LolBran.
:applause:

Black and White
05-10-2014, 11:51 PM
They still gave Miami a tougher series than the stacked OKC Thunder with 3 superstars.

Who is the third superstar that you speak of?

livinglegend
05-10-2014, 11:53 PM
Who is the third superstar that you speak of?

Harden:lol

Black and White
05-10-2014, 11:53 PM
Harden

Harden superstar??? :roll: :roll: :roll:

Budadiiii
05-10-2014, 11:54 PM
Kobe has 23, Shaq has 17, and Duncan has 14. LolBran.
LeBron scored more points in game 4 of the 2011 NBA finals than he has victories over 50 win teams. Even if you factor in the hypotheticals. :oldlol:

livinglegend
05-10-2014, 11:54 PM
Harden superstar??? :roll: :roll: :roll:

i was just joking. Still, Thunder who had much more wins than the Celtics was much easier for Heat. That means that opponent record dont mean anything. It s about matchups.

ArbitraryWater
05-10-2014, 11:56 PM
True, except for the Celtics... They werent at 50 win pace.


And obviously, 50 Win counts, as it is for a 82 GAME SEASON.... So if the Lenght is changed, so will the amount of Games... 50 of 82 is 61%, if we adjust, obviously the 2012 Pacers/Thunder make the cut.

livinglegend
05-10-2014, 11:58 PM
True, except for the Celtics... They werent at 50 win pace.


And obviously, 50 Win counts, as it is for a 82 GAME SEASON.... So if the Lenght is changed, so will the amount of Games... 50 of 82 is 61%, if we adjust, obviously the 2012 Pacers/Thunder make the cut.

Does the number of wins matter?
Isnt it all about matchups?
Just look at the spurs right now. THey had much tougher series against 8 seeded Mavs than 4 seeded Blazers.
Heat had tougher time with Celtics who had much less wins than OKC.

Black and White
05-10-2014, 11:58 PM
i was just joking. Still, Thunder who had much more wins than the Celtics was much easier for Heat. That means that opponent record dont mean anything. It s about matchups.

Yea its obviously about matchups, the Celtics would always be a tougher matchup because they play to the Heats weaknesses. I see your point :cheers:

TheMagicMan
05-11-2014, 12:00 AM
LeBron scored more points in game 4 of the 2011 NBA finals than he has victories over 50 win teams. Even if you factor in the hypotheticals. :oldlol:

http://static.gamespot.com/uploads/original/1512/15127450/2453837-1351298125-0323_.gif

guy
05-11-2014, 12:17 AM
Only 4 series wins seems strange at first glance, but if you do a little research you will realize in actuality he has twice as many. The 2012 Pacers, Celtics, and Thunder would all have won 50 games if not for the lockout. So that makes 7 teams right there. Also last year's Pacers would have won 50 games if their road game against Boston hadn't been canceled by the league because of the bombings. That's EIGHT 50 win teams Bron has beaten biatches! :banana:

2012 Celtics weren't on pace to win 50 games. And there's a good chance the 2013 Pacers still lose that game against the Celtics. They actually had a below .500 record on the road. So its more like 6 teams.

ArbitraryWater
05-11-2014, 12:20 AM
2012 Celtics weren't on pace to win 50 games. And there's a good chance the 2013 Pacers still lose that game against the Celtics. They actually had a below .500 record on the road. So its more like 6 teams.

Gotta add Indy.

JT123
05-11-2014, 01:44 AM
2012 Celtics weren't on pace to win 50 games. And there's a good chance the 2013 Pacers still lose that game against the Celtics. They actually had a below .500 record on the road. So its more like 6 teams.
Fair point about the 2013 Pacers, but I still think Boston would have won 50 games in a normal season. Those 3 games in 3 nights really damage an aging team. So I guess we can say 7 teams. :cheers:

Kiddlovesnets
05-11-2014, 01:53 AM
True, the OP makes a decent post.

guy
05-11-2014, 02:24 AM
Fair point about the 2013 Pacers, but I still think Boston would have won 50 games in a normal season. Those 3 games in 3 nights really damage an aging team. So I guess we can say 7 teams. :cheers:

Well, I don't know. I guess because of the Pacers situation we'll say 7 teams.

So with that said, I looked up the series W-L records vs 50+win teams and 60+ win teams for Jordan, Hakeem, Shaq, Kobe, Duncan, and Shaq.

vs. 50+ win teams:
Jordan 20-7
Hakeem 10-9
Shaq 18-9
Kobe 25-10
Duncan 18-10
Lebron 7-6

vs. 60+ win teams:
Jordan 7-2
Hakeem 3-5
Shaq 4-5
Kobe 2-6
Duncan 3-3
Lebron 1-2

dubeta
05-11-2014, 02:43 AM
How many 50 win teams has Kobe beaten the last 3 years? :confusedshrug:

Just wondering

bballnoob1192
05-11-2014, 02:55 AM
no one is gonna remember all this BS when it's all said and done. ony thing people will remember is lebron has two chips (so far) the heat have 3 as a franchise. all this stupid stuff will only be remember by you sour bitches. you guys bag on wilt stans for bringing up irrelevant shit. well you will be the new wilt stans in 20 years bringing up irrelevant shit like 50 win teams.

TheMagicMan
05-11-2014, 03:01 AM
no one is gonna remember all this BS when it's all said and done. ony thing people will remember is lebron has two chips (so far) the heat have 3 as a franchise. all this stupid stuff will only be remember by you sour bitches. you guys bag on wilt stans for bringing up irrelevant shit. well you will be the new wilt stans in 20 years bringing up irrelevant shit like 50 win teams.

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/198/470/didntreadlol.png

[GR]
05-11-2014, 03:05 AM
They still gave Miami a tougher series than the stacked OKC Thunder with 3 superstars.
Because Bosh missed the first part of the series

dude77
05-11-2014, 03:08 AM
Harden superstar??? :roll: :roll: :roll:

so now you haters wanna act like okc wasn't being picked by people to beat miami ? 'real finals is in da wess ' .. :lol

The-Legend-24
05-11-2014, 03:08 AM
Only 4 series wins seems strange at first glance, but if you do a little research you will realize in actuality he has twice as many. The 2012 Pacers, Celtics, and Thunder would all have won 50 games if not for the lockout. So that makes 7 teams right there. Also last year's Pacers would have won 50 games if their road game against Boston hadn't been canceled by the league because of the bombings. That's EIGHT 50 win teams Bron has beaten biatches! :banana:
Try to spin it any way u want, fakkit. :oldlol:

Still don't change that over 10 years, this nikka has only beaten 4 50 win teams. :oldlol: :oldlol:

JT123
05-11-2014, 03:10 AM
Well, I don't know. I guess because of the Pacers situation we'll say 7 teams.

So with that said, I looked up the series W-L records vs 50+win teams and 60+ win teams for Jordan, Hakeem, Shaq, Kobe, Duncan, and Shaq.

vs. 50+ win teams:
Jordan 20-7
Hakeem 10-9
Shaq 18-9
Kobe 25-10
Duncan 18-10
Lebron 7-6

vs. 60+ win teams:
Jordan 7-2
Hakeem 3-5
Shaq 4-5
Kobe 2-6
Duncan 3-3
Lebron 1-2
But Lebron only has 4 official playoff series wins against 50 win teams, unless you are counting the additional 3 he would have if not for the lockout.
Why would you include both Shaq and Kobe? :lol Sidekicks shouldn't get credit for beating 50 win teams. Kobe didn't become the man in LA until the 2004 playoffs, so I would be interested to see what his record against 50 win teams is from that point on. Shaq stopped being the man after 2003, so any wins or loses after that point shouldn't count.

JT123
05-11-2014, 03:14 AM
Try to spin any way u want, fakkit. :oldlol:

Still don't change that over 10 years, this nikka has only beaten 4 50 win teams. :oldlol: :oldlol:
LOL at this fool trying to hide his anger with a smily face! Calling someone a fakkit means you aren't really laughing, you are actually filled with rage that I exposed another playoff myth about Lebron. I got your ass SHOOK worse than Michael J Fox! :roll: :roll:

dubeta
05-11-2014, 03:24 AM
LOL at this fool trying to hide his anger with a smily face! Calling someone a fakkit means you aren't really laughing, you are actually filled with rage that I exposed another playoff myth about Lebron. I got your ass SHOOK worse than Michael J Fox! :roll: :roll:

LOL true, kobe stans on suicide watch, Kobe is finished so his stans are relegated to full time Bran trolls now, nothinig else they can do. :lol :lol :lol

Bran living rent free on all your heads:

http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/lelbron%20kobe.jpg

Keep trolling while Bran keeps winning chips