Your Building a Team And You Need a PG,Who Do You Want:Tony Parker or CP3?

[aboss4real24]

http://zkrainynba.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/elite-daily-chris-paul-tony-parker.jpg



Both Great PGs Who are great leaders

Both very efficient scorers

Both have big cocks

Both get the best out there teammates

Both Good defenders especially Cp3

Who would You Take?


Me personally iLL Take TP Because he's more of a attacker n scorer
Then cp3 and he can also still keep the team involved at the same time jus Like cp3


Who would You take?

[inclinerator]

cp3, parker benefits from pop's system

[red1]

paul is clearly the better player

[ABfor3]

cp3, parker benefits from pop's system
This.

[ForeverHeat]

cp3, parker benefits from pop's system

/thread

[IGOTGAME]

Parker. Paul can't do what Tony Parker does in Pop's system anyway. This version of Paul is clearly past his prime.

[Young X]

Parker's not a good defender, he does almost nothing better than Paul. Not close.

What does Parker do better than Curry?

[TheMarkMadsen]

Paul is overrated & Parker is underrated.


Parker is way more decisive in his decision making and gets his treammates involved better

Parker has consistently been the best player on a team that wins 50-60 wins per year for 5-7 years, yes the system is great, but Parker is a huge reason for that.

Parker is the smarter player in my opinion

[oarabbus]

Parker > CP3

[rhowen4]

cp3

[ninephive]

Is the goal to have deep playoff runs or to not make the playoffs or get bounced early every year?

[aboss4real24]

Paul is overrated & Parker is underrated.


Parker is way more decisive in his decision making and gets his treammates involved better

Parker has consistently been the best player on a team that wins 50-60 wins per year for 5-7 years, yes the system is great, but Parker is a huge reason for that.

Parker is the smarter player in my opinion


paul is far frum overrated :oldlol:

He took a franchise that has been garbage 4 years n made them a championship contender

[Black and White]

The guy who won rings and a FMVP and steps his game up in the playoffs.

[oarabbus]

paul is far frum overrated :oldlol:

He took a franchise that has been garbage 4 years n made them a championship contender

With the help of BG and DJ stepping their games up to an insane level, a great coach, and a lights out shooter...


Parker has been FMVP. He has rings. He is better.

[bizil]

The KEY premium asset at PG is dropping dimes and being a floor general. If u happen to be a great scorer with it then that's even better. I think the PG's that combine those facets the best are the PG's I prefer. Paul falls into that group along with Magic, Big O, Isiah, Nash, Frazier, Tiny, Payton, etc.

But u also have great point guards who are more score first PG's. They have great handles and are very good passers. But they actually kind of see the game like many great SG's do. Parker is one of these kind of PG's like Rose, Westbrook, Arenas, etc. AI was like this as well early in his career. But AI was so devastating at scoring that Larry Brown moved him to SG.

Basically, Paul and Parker are both great HOF kind of PG's. But I would take Paul on my team over Parker. Paul has alpha dog scoring capabilities, is a better pure PG than Parker, and a better defender. But many people prefer a Parker, Rose, or Westbrook style PG so I wouldn't argue too hard against it cause those guys are great players too.

[navy]

The answer is CP3 and it isnt even close. Tony Parker doesnt even get the ball in crunch time. Manu Ginobli does.

[oarabbus]

The answer is CP3 and it isnt even close. Tony Parker doesnt even get the ball in crunch time. Manu Ginobli does.


When Paul gets the FMVP you can say it isn't close

Until then Parker is better

[aboss4real24]

With the help of BG and DJ stepping their games up to an insane level, a great coach, and a lights out shooter...


Parker has been FMVP. He has rings. He is better.


yea ik

The best PF Ever

arguably the best 6th man ever

and arguably the Best coach ever is no help

[navy]

Sure worked out pretty well for the teams that have had Paul so far right :rolleyes:


This is the first year Paul has had real talent around him.

Tony Parker is good, but he has always had Popovich, Duncan, and Manu Ginobli.

Put Chris Paul on the Spurs and Tony Parker on the Hornets(:oldlol: ) and the Clippers. Can you really tell me with a straight face that Chris Paul would be ringless and Tony Parker would consistently make it out the first round?

[ninephive]

The answer is CP3 and it isnt even close. Tony Parker doesnt even get the ball in crunch time. Manu Ginobli does.
OK...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6V__yr_cXo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6AKrqv_Yq0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPxEmxKf0Dc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkm-Bnctm4I

[TheMarkMadsen]

This is the first year Paul has had real talent around him.

Tony Parker is good, but he has always had Popovich, Duncan, and Manu Ginobli.

Put Chris Paul on the Spurs and Tony Parker on the Hornets(:oldlol: ) and the Clippers. Can you really tell me with a straight face that Chris Paul would be ringless and Tony Parker would consistently make it out the first round?

:oldlol: :oldlol:

[davehos]

cp3, parker benefits from pop's system


Parker = role player

Chris Paul = flops like a fish

[russwest0]

can't see the op because he's ignored but it's russell westbrook out of all PG's, tony parker out of him and cp3

[navy]

OK...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6V__yr_cXo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6AKrqv_Yq0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPxEmxKf0Dc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkm-Bnctm4I

Game 7. Do or die.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKDeak5Rkgo

:oldlol:

[Anaximandro1]

I think both teams get worse on a Parker-Paul swap.

Duncan, Parker and Manu have played 800 games together ... at this point, Spurs' strength is their familiarity.

If I'm starting from scratch, I take Paul.

[navy]

:oldlol: :oldlol:
Name a year where Paul as played with anyone close to Manu and Duncan or Popovich.

Chris Paul's best players have been David West, Tyson Candler, and Blake Griffin. Who took a huge step this year. :confusedshrug:

[tpols]

Name a year where Paul as played with anyone close to Manu and Duncan or Popovich.

Chris Paul's best players have been David West, Tyson Candler, and Blake Griffin. Who took a huge step this year. :confusedshrug:
Tyson Chandler and David West? That's better than Indy's big men and was great help defensively w/ a 20 pt scorer for second option and some good outside shooters. More than what Dirk had the years he went to the finals

[navy]

Tyson Chandler and David West? That's better than Indy's big men and was great help defensively w/ a 20 pt scorer for second option and some good outside shooters. More than what Dirk had the years he went to the finals
Indy's big men are in the East and havent won shit. What are you trying to say? They are comparable to the help Tony Parker has had? :oldlol:

I never once claimed Chris Paul was better than Dirk. :confusedshrug:

[IGOTGAME]

I think both teams get worse on a Parker-Paul swap.

Duncan, Parker and Manu have played 800 games together ... at this point, Spurs' strength is their familiarity.

If I'm starting from scratch, I take Paul.

I think the Clippers get better. Parker is better at utilizing big men and wouldnt get in Griffin's way much.

[aboss4real24]

Tony Parker is a better scorer

dont think u can really dispute that

[navy]

I think the Clippers get better. Parker is better at utilizing big men and wouldnt get in Griffin's way much.
Better at utilizing big men how?

How would Tony Parker get in Griffin's way less than Chris Paul?

[navy]

Tony Parker is a better scorer

dont think u can really dispute that
I can agree to this.

[K Xerxes]

I hate saying 'it ain't close'... but it really isn't. The only thing Parker does better is finish layups. Paul is better in every other aspect... shooting, playmaking and defense. Parker gets an absurd amount of credit for the success of his team, while his failures are brushed under the carpet.