PDA

View Full Version : Duncan > Malone Chuck Dirk KG Mchale



Jlamb47
05-21-2014, 01:16 PM
Duncan is the best PF EVER. The end.

CelticBaller
05-21-2014, 01:20 PM
Who

imdaman99
05-21-2014, 01:23 PM
I will wait for Robert Shaw to bless this thread before I confirm that you are right :bowdown:

Jlamb47
05-21-2014, 01:24 PM
I will wait for Robert Shaw to bless this thread before I confirm that you are right :bowdown:

Robert Shaw dont know basketball though. He should be on tennis forums

Jlamb47
05-21-2014, 01:25 PM
Who

your secretly favorite player

Marchesk
05-21-2014, 01:29 PM
Bob Petit has no case? Obviously on longevity, Tim has him.

But, Petit does have 2 MVPs, a championship (over Russell's Celtics), 10X all-NBA first team, slightly higher PER (25.3 - 24.6), without blocks/steals factored in for Bob. And slightly higher WS/48 (.213 -.211).

I think old Bob has a case here.

Fiddlesticks
05-21-2014, 01:31 PM
Elvin Hayes is the greatest Power Forward of all time. What other Power Forward has a scoring title in his rookie season? Definitely overlooked because we are all prisoners of the current moment.

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 01:32 PM
Bob Petit has no case? Obviously on longevity, Tim has him.

But, Petit does have 2 MVPs, a championship (over Russell's Celtics), 10X all-NBA first team, slightly higher PER (25.3 - 24.6) without blocks/steals factored in for Bob. And slightly higher WS/48 (.213 -.211).

I think old Bob has a case here.

Their Playoff PERs are much different though (24.7-22.6), and WS/48 (.195-.159). And Petit only played 88 Playoff games total.

I do agree that Petit should be high on top PF lists. I obviously didn't watch him play but he did some incredible, incredible stuff. I just can't put him in the same tier as Tim (although I definitely don't get the sense from your post that you'd put Petit ahead of Tim, right?)

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 01:34 PM
Elvin Hayes is the greatest Power Forward of all time. What other Power Forward has a scoring title in his rookie season? Definitely overlooked because we are all prisoners of the current moment.

Playoff career: 23/13/2/1/3, .501 TS%, in 45 minutes of play, over the span of 96 games.

GOAT PF. :bowdown:

Marchesk
05-21-2014, 01:35 PM
(although I definitely don't get the sense from your post that you'd put Petit ahead of Tim, right?)

No, I just a thought a discussion could be had. Petit did also lead the league in scoring twice, and he was a very good rebounder.

I'm fine with Duncan being higher. I think Petit doesn't get much mention on ISH, though. He's probably top 15 all-time.

Fiddlesticks
05-21-2014, 01:37 PM
Playoff career: 23/13/2/1/3, .501 TS%, in 45 minutes of play, over the span of 96 games.

GOAT PF. :bowdown:
shooting % and all that stuff are nerd numbers, I only care about per game averages and 23/13/2/1/3 are truly GOAT PF numbers.

Jlamb47
05-21-2014, 01:37 PM
No, I just a thought a discussion could be had. Petit did also lead the league in scoring twice, and he was a very good rebounder.

I'm fine with Duncan being higher. I think Petit doesn't get much mention on ISH, though. He's probably top 15 all-time.


yeah but put duncan in that era and hes doing alot more then petit.

Duncan numbers are stupid in playoffs

Rocketswin2013
05-21-2014, 01:38 PM
Bob Petit has no case? Obviously on longevity, Tim has him.

But, Petit does have 2 MVPs, a championship (over Russell's Celtics), 10X all-NBA first team, slightly higher PER (25.3 - 24.6), without blocks/steals factored in for Bob. And slightly higher WS/48 (.213 -.211).

I think old Bob has a case here.
Stats don't matter. Imaginary impact does matter though.


Intangibles> Talent

Dave Cowens> Kareem

Joakim Noah > Duncan

Marchesk
05-21-2014, 01:39 PM
yeah but put duncan in that era and hes doing alot more then petit.

But then Duncan has to grow up in that era. It's really not a fair argument to say, "If rookie Duncan time-traveled to 1954 ...". When making all-time lists, the only fair thing to do is to consider player's overall careers. You can't put them in different eras, on different teams, with different coaches.

Otherwise, I'm going to claim Oscar > Magic if Oscar gets to play with Kareem his first 8 years.

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 01:41 PM
shooting % and all that stuff are nerd numbers, I only care about per game averages and 23/13/2/1/3 are truly GOAT PF numbers.

Duncan puts up 22/12/4/1/2, over more than twice as many games.

GOAT PF numbers for Tim indeed.

Shooting numbers are hardly nerdy though. You've just said 29 PPG on .101 shooting is better than 28 PPG on .902 shooting (by definition).

:roll:

Marchesk
05-21-2014, 01:41 PM
Stats don't matter. Imaginary impact does matter though.


Intangibles> Talent

Dave Cowens> Kareem

Joakim Noah > Duncan

You forgot the eye test, bro. And aesthetics.

MJ/Dr J > Kobe/Hakeem > Kareem > Wilt > Lebron

Aesthetically speaking.

MrC1991
05-21-2014, 01:44 PM
Do yall realize that robert_shaww by himself and his hard on for Tim Duncan has this board talking about Tim Duncan as much as LeBron/Kobe/KD.

Fiddlesticks
05-21-2014, 01:47 PM
Duncan puts up 22/12/4/1/2, over more than twice as many games.

GOAT PF numbers for Tim indeed.

Shooting numbers are hardly nerdy though. You've just said 29 PPG on .101 shooting is better than 28 PPG on .902 shooting (by definition).

:roll:
yes the point of the game is to get more points, it doesn't matter how many shots you take as long as you score more points. Also it isn't Hayes' fault that Tim Duncan has Parker, Ginobili, and Pop

Jlamb47
05-21-2014, 01:50 PM
Do yall realize that robert_shaww by himself and his hard on for Tim Duncan has this board talking about Tim Duncan as much as LeBron/Kobe/KD.


TD should be talked about just as much or even more then them.
Durant got 0 and Lebron is 2/2 in the finals Duncan is 4/5
U act like TD not on there level

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 01:52 PM
yes the point of the game is to get more points, it doesn't matter how many shots you take as long as you score more points. Also it isn't Hayes' fault that Tim Duncan has Parker, Ginobili, and Pop

Yeah, it's just about points.

So defense doesn't matter?

What a tool. :lol

No, Hayes had a 20/7/5 player in Bob Dandridge.

MrC1991
05-21-2014, 01:54 PM
TD should be talked about just as much or even more then them.
Durant got 0 and Lebron is 2/2 in the finals Duncan is 4/5
U act like TD not on there level

I never said he was on there level. I think hes the greatest PF and is in my top 10 of all time. People always talked about the LeBrons and the Kobes of the world more than him. :confusedshrug: don't get all sensitive n shit.

Fiddlesticks
05-21-2014, 01:54 PM
Yeah, it's just about points.

So defense doesn't matter?

What a tool. :lol

No, Hayes had a 20/7/5 player in Bob Dandridge.
Bob Dandridge vs Parker, Ginobili, and Pop. Gee I wonder who I would rather have? Also scoring wins basketball games.

Jlamb47
05-21-2014, 01:55 PM
I never said he was on there level. I think hes the greatest PF and is in my top 10 of all time. People always talked about the LeBrons and the Kobes of the world more than him. :confusedshrug: don't get all sensitive n shit.


yeah cuz there perimeter players. Ppl enjoy watching them play more. and not sensitive at all homie. but i feels ya

Jlamb47
05-21-2014, 01:56 PM
yes the point of the game is to get more points, it doesn't matter how many shots you take as long as you score more points. Also it isn't Hayes' fault that Tim Duncan has Parker, Ginobili, and Pop


the point is to score to win and the other half is to stop them from scoring to win. Duncan plays defense like no other. thats half the game

stop team from scoring and out scoring them

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 01:58 PM
Bob Dandridge vs Parker, Ginobili, and Pop. Gee I wonder who I would rather have? Also scoring wins basketball games.

And Wes Unseld.

Damn, so many legends. :applause:

Duncan > Hayes though. Hayes isn't even a top five PF.

Fiddlesticks
05-21-2014, 02:00 PM
And Wes Unseld.

Damn, so many legends. :applause:

Duncan > Hayes though. Hayes isn't even a top five PF.
Elvin Hayes is atleast better than Karl Malone. He has a championship.

MrC1991
05-21-2014, 02:00 PM
And Wes Unseld.

Damn, so many legends. :applause:

Duncan > Hayes though. Hayes isn't even a top five PF.

Is it possible that robert_shaww, Milbuck, Euroleague, etc man of many personalities is on a personal mission to get Tim Duncan as talked about as Michael Jordan, LeBron, Kobe, etc? He seems to be doing an incredible job at it.

Rocketswin2013
05-21-2014, 02:03 PM
Is it possible that robert_shaww, Milbuck, Euroleague, etc man of many personalities is on a personal mission to get Tim Duncan as talked about as Michael Jordan, LeBron, Kobe, etc? He seems to be doing an incredible job at it.
Robert_Shaww is Milbuck. I don't have the thread link but he was exposed for it and several winesses saw him admit it.

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 02:04 PM
Elvin Hayes is atleast better than Karl Malone. He has a championship.

Yeah, I can live with that. :cheers:

SHAQisGOAT
05-21-2014, 02:09 PM
Agree.

After him you got Malone, KG, Chuck, Pettit, Dirk, Hayes, McHale......

Fiddlesticks
05-21-2014, 02:10 PM
Agree.

After him you got Malone, KG, Chuck, Pettit, Dirk, Hayes, McHale......
Hayes, McHael, KG, Pettit, Dirk, Malone, Chuk

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 02:13 PM
Hayes, McHael, KG, Pettit, Dirk, Malone, Chuk

That's your order?

Fiddlesticks
05-21-2014, 02:15 PM
That's your order?
after Tim Duncan

ArbitraryWater
05-21-2014, 02:25 PM
Bob Petit has no case? Obviously on longevity, Tim has him.

But, Petit does have 2 MVPs, a championship (over Russell's Celtics), 10X all-NBA first team, slightly higher PER (25.3 - 24.6), without blocks/steals factored in for Bob. And slightly higher WS/48 (.213 -.211).

I think old Bob has a case here.

You're so fed up with old players its amazing :oldlol: Soooo delusional...

Duncan >>>>> Pettit

SHAQisGOAT
05-21-2014, 02:39 PM
Hayes, McHael, KG, Pettit, Dirk, Malone, Chuk

McHale can't be above any of those guys.. He won 3 rings, he had a terrific peak/prime also but a short one (due to injuries) and never was the main-man. It's pretty hard to exactly rank Timmy, Malone, KG, Chuck, Pettit, Dirk and Hayes, some more than others, but McHale gotta come after them.

Fiddlesticks
05-21-2014, 02:39 PM
McHale can't be above any of those guys.. He won 3 rings, he had a terrific peak/prime also but a short one (due to injuries) and never was the main-man. It's pretty hard to exactly rank Timmy, Malone, KG, Chuck, Pettit, Dirk and Hayes, some more than others, but McHale gotta come after them.
nah, McHale has the best post game of all time.

r0drig0lac
05-21-2014, 02:49 PM
Do yall realize that robert_shaww by himself and his hard on for Tim Duncan has this board talking about Tim Duncan as much as LeBron/Kobe/KD.
exactly, this is getting ridiculous

Round Mound
05-21-2014, 04:58 PM
The Powerforward Position is Probably The Hardest To Rank.

Milbuck
05-21-2014, 05:01 PM
Robert_Shaww is Milbuck. I don't have the thread link but he was exposed for it and several winesses saw him admit it.
I am not that idiot robert_shaww. It was proven to be a photoshopped picture by Smook attempting to get back at me for trolling the Rockets. I have picture evidence and 12 pages of a thread showing various posters exposing the picture as fake, and Smook admitting to photoshopping pictures.

I have TD as the GOAT PF.

navy
05-21-2014, 05:02 PM
Why is Tim duncan not a center?

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 09:52 PM
Why is Tim duncan not a center?

Interchangeable skillset, spent his most of his career and his best years at the PF position.

He's a PF.

Just2McFly
05-21-2014, 09:54 PM
Interchangeable skillset, spent his most of his career and his best years at the PF position.

He's a PF.
.....

Cone
05-21-2014, 09:54 PM
duncan > dirk >>>> rest

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 09:55 PM
duncan > dirk >>>> rest

I'd put KG right there with Dirk though.

Other than that I agree.

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 09:56 PM
.....

'97-'07, and then again most of the time with Splitter.

Nazr was the PF?

k0kakw0rld
05-21-2014, 10:25 PM
Duncan is the best PF EVER. The end.
This.

Micku
05-21-2014, 10:31 PM
Career wise, yeah.

Peak vs peak? I don't think so. It's pretty much a toss up I think. All of them were beastin.

Although you can argue that Duncan done more with less at his peak. Dirk is another player who done more with less.

T_L_P
05-21-2014, 10:46 PM
Career wise, yeah.

Peak vs peak? I don't think so. It's pretty much a toss up I think. All of them were beastin.

Although you can argue that Duncan done more with less at his peak. Dirk is another player who done more with less.

I agree, but Duncan did prove he could win with very little during his peak, like you said!

Garnett has a case I think. '04 KG was just :wtf: