View Full Version : Duncan and LeBron both playing for a spot in the top 5 all time.
atljonesbro
06-01-2014, 12:24 PM
With a championship and finals MVP I think both of these players move into the top 5. This NBA Finals could really shake up a lot of people's lists.
no, being a top 5 is more than a ring count.
SexSymbol
06-01-2014, 12:27 PM
none of those players would have a case for top5 after winning this year's finals.
avonbarksdale
06-01-2014, 12:27 PM
how would lebron be top 5
So Kobe can be a Top 10 All-Time via 5 > __ ? That's really all his dickriders can say. MVPs? 1. F-MVPs? 2.
But LeBron and Duncan can't move up by winning more rings? :lol
Mr Feeny
06-01-2014, 12:31 PM
no, being a top 5 is more than a ring count.
That's right. That's why he said 'finals mvp':cheers:
It's the same reason Kobe > Lebron.
Glad you're beginning to understand:D
Mr Feeny
06-01-2014, 12:32 PM
none of those players would have a case for top5 after winning this year's finals.
They both would though:cheers:
You mad?
T_L_P
06-01-2014, 12:36 PM
none of those players would have a case for top5 after winning this year's finals.
Not having a case is absurd. If Duncan has 5 rings and 4 Finals MVPs, I don't see what case, say, Bird would have over him. And Bird is unanimously considered top 5.
TheCorporation
06-01-2014, 12:39 PM
Education time:
For those that say LeBron would not move to top 5 with another chip
He would be a 4x MVP, 3x Champion, with 3x FMVP, and have the coveted 3-peat. Oh, what's that? How many players have 3-peated with 3 straight FMVP?
Jordan
Shaq
LeBron (For sake of the argument)
Oh, that's it? Well okay, then we can look at MVP totals
Jordan 5
LeBron 4
Shaq 1
So you're asking me why should someone be in the top 5 all time when he accomplished something that only two other players have ever done, and, the player in question (LBJ) only has 1 less MVP than the GOAT? Shaq is sitting light with 1 MVP, of course.
Of course, if we also consider LBJ led his team to 4 consecutive NBA Finals appearances, it makes the ranking even easier.
I can only think of a few other players that ever did it.
Birds' Celtics
Magic/Kareem's Lakers
Russell's Celtics
Hmm, don't see Shaq or Jordan on that list...
Mr Feeny
06-01-2014, 12:42 PM
Education time:
For those that say LeBron would not move to top 5 with another chip
He would be a 4x MVP, 3x Champion, with 3x FMVP, and have the coveted 3-peat. Oh, what's that? How many players have 3-peated with 3 straight FMVP?
Jordan
Shaq
LeBron (For sake of the argument)
Oh, that's it? Well okay, then we can look at MVP totals
Jordan 5
LeBron 4
Shaq 1
So you're asking me why should someone be in the top 5 all time when he accomplished something that only two other players have ever done, and, the player in question (LBJ) only has 1 less MVP than the GOAT? Shaq is sitting light with 1 MVP, of course.
Of course, if we also consider LBJ led his team to 4 consecutive NBA Finals appearances, it makes the ranking even easier.
I can only think of a few other players that ever did it.
Birds' Celtics
Magic/Kareem's Lakers
Russell's Celtics
Hmm, don't see Shaq or Jordan on that list...
Fully agreed. Lebron would unquestionably be top 5 if he wins a title and finals mvp this year.
Education time:
For those that say LeBron would not move to top 5 with another chip
He would be a 4x MVP, 3x Champion, with 3x FMVP, and have the coveted 3-peat. Oh, what's that? How many players have 3-peated with 3 straight FMVP?
Jordan
Shaq
LeBron (For sake of the argument)
Oh, that's it? Well okay, then we can look at MVP totals
Jordan 5
LeBron 4
Shaq 1
So you're asking me why should someone be in the top 5 all time when he accomplished something that only two other players have ever done, and, the player in question (LBJ) only has 1 less MVP than the GOAT? Shaq is sitting light with 1 MVP, of course.
Of course, if we also consider LBJ led his team to 4 consecutive NBA Finals appearances, it makes the ranking even easier.
I can only think of a few other players that ever did it.
Birds' Celtics
Magic/Kareem's Lakers
Russell's Celtics
Hmm, don't see Shaq or Jordan on that list...
Who cares....
3-4 F-MVP > 2 F-MVP
2-4 MVP > 1 MVP
Akrazotile
06-01-2014, 01:20 PM
So Kobe can be a Top 10 All-Time via 5 > __ ? That's really all his dickriders can say. MVPs? 1. F-MVPs? 2.
But LeBron and Duncan can't move up by winning more rings? :lol
Shiiiiiit man, go easy on em! They sensitive bout their Kobe. Don't kill em like that man. :oldlol:
konex
06-01-2014, 01:34 PM
I don't feel Spurs can win if Duncan is their best player this series.
SexSymbol
06-01-2014, 01:34 PM
They both would though:cheers:
You mad?
No, I'm not mad, and I don't know why would you make that assumption.
Your gimmick is pathetic and sad, be yourself, you're not funny, nor a good troll
To T_L_P,
While I consider Duncan's resume to be worthy of top 5 if he wins a ring this year, I still think that you have to put Bird ahead due to the competition he faced.
I mean, he went to the finals against the best point guard of all time and probably the best center of all time. Winnings 3 rings in such an era and in a relatively short time has to be accounted for, it's not just amount, it's context.
I could see why you'd want to have Duncain top 5, and you'd probably have a case. I may have been wrong about him not having a case, but it still wouldn't do it for me.
nightprowler10
06-01-2014, 01:43 PM
I don't think this would vault either LBJ or TD ahead of any of these guys; MJ, Russell, Wilt, Magic, Bird, Kareem...IMO. TD would be close though.
Kvnzhangyay
06-01-2014, 01:48 PM
Not having a case is absurd. If Duncan has 5 rings and 4 Finals MVPs, I don't see what case, say, Bird would have over him. And Bird is unanimously considered top 5.
Bird is not even the GOAT SF anymore...
TheCorporation
06-01-2014, 02:10 PM
I don't think this would vault either LBJ or TD ahead of any of these guys; MJ, Russell, Wilt, Magic, Bird, Kareem...IMO. TD would be close though.
:biggums: :biggums:
atljonesbro
06-01-2014, 02:11 PM
I don't think this would vault either LBJ or TD ahead of any of these guys; MJ, Russell, Wilt, Magic, Bird, Kareem...IMO. TD would be close though.
They both definitely jump over Wilt and Bird
lilgodfather1
06-01-2014, 02:36 PM
I think only three players would bave a case over James.
My current list
Jordan
Magic
Kaj
Wilt
Russ
Shaq
Duncan/Bird
James
Bryant
With 3 straight fmvps
Jordan
Magic
Kaj
James
That's it. Maybe not even KAJ.
And i think it would be safe to put Duncan over Russell imo if he wins it. He isn't supposed to win a fmvp at his age.
inclinerator
06-01-2014, 02:37 PM
No, I'm not mad, and I don't know why would you make that assumption.
Your gimmick is pathetic and sad, be yourself, you're not funny, nor a good troll
To T_L_P,
While I consider Duncan's resume to be worthy of top 5 if he wins a ring this year, I still think that you have to put Bird ahead due to the competition he faced.
I mean, he went to the finals against the best point guard of all time and probably the best center of all time. Winnings 3 rings in such an era and in a relatively short time has to be accounted for, it's not just amount, it's context.
I could see why you'd want to have Duncain top 5, and you'd probably have a case. I may have been wrong about him not having a case, but it still wouldn't do it for me.
bird's team is way more stacked tho
SexSymbol
06-01-2014, 02:40 PM
I think only three players would bave a case over James.
My current list
Jordan
Magic
Kaj
Wilt
Russ
Shaq
Duncan/Bird
James
Bryant
With 3 straight fmvps
Jordan
Magic
Kaj
James
That's it. Maybe not even KAJ.
And i think it would be safe to put Duncan over Russell imo if he wins it. He isn't supposed to win a fmvp at his age.
Russell wasn't supposed to win 11 rings too :)
Unbiased_one
06-01-2014, 02:40 PM
No, I'm not mad, and I don't know why would you make that assumption.
Your gimmick is pathetic and sad, be yourself, you're not funny, nor a good troll
To T_L_P,
While I consider Duncan's resume to be worthy of top 5 if he wins a ring this year, I still think that you have to put Bird ahead due to the competition he faced.
I mean, he went to the finals against the best point guard of all time and probably the best center of all time. Winnings 3 rings in such an era and in a relatively short time has to be accounted for, it's not just amount, it's context.
I could see why you'd want to have Duncain top 5, and you'd probably have a case. I may have been wrong about him not having a case, but it still wouldn't do it for me.
Do you even know who was on bird's teams at that time?
Mr Feeny
06-01-2014, 02:42 PM
Do you even know who was on bird's teams at that time?
Why would he? He's absolutely clueless. ...
lilgodfather1
06-01-2014, 02:53 PM
Russell wasn't supposed to win 11 rings too :)
True, but playing with a team of HOF players, and in an era with no real competition it is far less surprising than Duncan being an actual all star level player at his age. I can't believe how good he has been. If LeBron ages like this you can forget about Jordan.
4-Peat(on both rings & F-MVP), 6 MVPs and LeBron can be GOAT.
Everything else won't even matter.
lilgodfather1
06-01-2014, 03:08 PM
4-Peat(on both rings & F-MVP), 6 MVPs and LeBron can be GOAT.
Everything else won't even matter.
Pretty much the way i see it too. A 30 year old GOAT.
SexSymbol
06-01-2014, 03:09 PM
True, but playing with a team of HOF players, and in an era with no real competition it is far less surprising than Duncan being an actual all star level player at his age. I can't believe how good he has been. If LeBron ages like this you can forget about Jordan.
You don't know too much about Jordan's career do you?
SexSymbol
06-01-2014, 03:12 PM
Why would he? He's absolutely clueless. ...
Your continuing attempts at discrediting me or any other Lakers/Kobe fan is weak.
Yes, I am very aware of what was on Bird's C's teams, but that still was in no way a match to greatest point guard and greatest center of all time, while they had top 3 defensive player and a player that could've been a superstar on any other team alongside them.
Btw, C's dealt with A LOT of injuries too, so the sole fact that Bird has three rings is amazing in itself when the competition was so vastly superior to what LBJ has today. I don't think that's even a discussion, that's just a fact.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.