Let s be real: Jordan s bulls were way more stacked than Lebron s Miami

[livinglegend]

Bulls:
Great Coach
Good defensive big man
Rebounding
Great shooters
Stars
Excellent 6th man
55 wins without their star

Heat:
mediocre pgs
no rebounding
bad post defender
Lewis/Battier/Haslem starting:facepalm

Lebron has to cover so many flaws of that team, it s unbelievable.

[Magic731]

Bulls:
Great Coach
Good defensive big man
Rebounding
Great shooters
Stars
Excellent 5th man
55 wins without their star

Heat:
mediocre pgs
no rebounding
bad post defender
Lewis/Battier/Haslem starting:facepalm

Lebron has to cover so many flaws of that team, it s unbelievable.
You fcking imbecile. All that shit you say with the Bulls can easily be applied to the Heat.

Great coach - Spoelstra has 2 rings
Good defensive big man - Chris Anderson
Great shooters - Chalmers, Lewis, Jones, Allen (yeah the dude who saved brans career)
Stars - Lebron, Wade, Bosh
5th/6th man (wtf?) - Ray Allen

See I can say whatever the fck I want to fit my agenda as well, I suggest you stick to making bets you can't honour, a coward just like the supposed 'leader' of your team who ran away from his hometown and a real challenge for the easy path.

[livinglegend]

You fcking imbecile. All that shit you say with the Bulls can easily be applied to the Heat.

Great coach - Spoelstra has 2 rings
Good defensive big man - Chris Anderson
Great shooters - Chalmers, Lewis, Jones, Allen (yeah the dude who saved brans career)
Stars - Lebron, Wade, Bosh
5th/6th man (wtf?) - Ray Allen

See I can say whatever the fck I want to fit my agenda as well, I suggest you stick to making bets you can't honour, a coward just like the supposed 'leader' of your team who ran away from his hometown and a real challenge for the easy path.

:facepalm
Spobot is not a great coach. He s certainly not on Phil s level.
Chris Anderson is an energy player off the bench. He is not great defensively. He s nowhere near Rodman ( the best rebounder of all-time and one of the most versatile defenders of all-time).
Lewis and Chalmers are not good shooters. Jones doesnt even play.

[NBAplayoffs2001]

You fcking imbecile. All that shit you say with the Bulls can easily be applied to the Heat.

Great coach - Spoelstra has 2 rings
Good defensive big man - Chris Anderson
Great shooters - Chalmers, Lewis, Jones, Allen (yeah the dude who saved brans career)
Stars - Lebron, Wade, Bosh
5th/6th man (wtf?) - Ray Allen

See I can say whatever the fck I want to fit my agenda as well, I suggest you stick to making bets you can't honour, a coward just like the supposed 'leader' of your team who ran away from his hometown and a real challenge for the easy path.

:biggums: :biggums: :biggums: :biggums: :biggums: :biggums:
Dude just sits on the coach's seat pacing back and forth probably wondering what he should get for dinner and when he looks confused on the court I always just assume he's gotta take a sheitt.

(yeah the dude who saved brans career) :applause: :applause: :applause:
:rockon:

[TheCorporation]

You fcking imbecile. All that shit you say with the Bulls can easily be applied to the Heat.

Great coach - Spoelstra has 2 rings
Good defensive big man - Chris Anderson
Great shooters - Chalmers, Lewis, Jones, Allen (yeah the dude who saved brans career)
Stars - Lebron, Wade, Bosh
5th/6th man (wtf?) - Ray Allen

See I can say whatever the fck I want to fit my agenda as well, I suggest you stick to making bets you can't honour, a coward just like the supposed 'leader' of your team who ran away from his hometown and a real challenge for the easy path.

Did this nicca just compare:

Phil Jackson to Spoelstra
Dennis Rodman to Chris Anderson
Toni Kukoc 6th man winner to old man Ray?

:biggums:

[NBAplayoffs2001]

Bulls:
Great Coach
Good defensive big man
Rebounding
Great shooters
Stars
Excellent 6th man
55 wins without their star

Heat:
mediocre pgs
no rebounding
bad post defender
Lewis/Battier/Haslem starting:facepalm

Lebron has to cover so many flaws of that team, it s unbelievable.

So is that why he's losing hair left and right? Covers up the flaws with his hairline? :banana: :banana:

[iBandwagon]

Did this nicca just compare:

Phil Jackson to Spoelstra
Dennis Rodman to Chris Anderson
Toni Kukoc 6th man winner to old man Ray?

:biggums:

Ray Allen and Kukoc are different types of players, but Ray and Kukoc are pretty comparable.

The problem is that the OP is downplaying the important of a stretch, many time all-star in Chris Bosh, and a sidekick star player that was able to win a championship without the team's current star.

The Heat have all the same things listed except for a good rebounding team (which by itself is partially LeBron's responsibility since he plays a good amount of PF) and a good coach.

Great Coach - Heat don't have
Good defensive big man - Heat do have (Bosh is a very versatile defensive player with some clutch blocks last year)
Rebounding - Heat don't have (But LeBron plays a bunch of PF, so this is also partially his fault directly)
Great shooters - Heat do have
Stars - Heat do have
Excellent 6th man - Heat do have
55 wins without their star - We don't know, but the sidekick does have a championship as the leading man, something Pippen never did with plenty of opportunity

[played0ut]

I agree that the bulls were a better team (at least the starting 5)-- they complemented each other MUCH better than the heat IMO. The heat has more first option players but their play overlaps a bit.


And the heat were stacked 'relative' to the rest of the league, and particularly in '11.

[Dragonyeuw]

There are 2 Jordan 3peat teams. It seems like you're referring mainly to second threepeat. What about the 91-93 bulls? Were they stacked compared to the other top tier teams( suns, blazers,sonics,knicks,cavs) during their first run?

[ILLsmak]

Bulls:
Great Coach
Good defensive big man
Rebounding
Great shooters
Stars
Excellent 6th man
55 wins without their star

Heat:
mediocre pgs
no rebounding
bad post defender
Lewis/Battier/Haslem starting:facepalm

Lebron has to cover so many flaws of that team, it s unbelievable.

not compared to the comp.

-Smak

[diamenz]

There are 2 Jordan 3peat teams. It seems like you're referring mainly to second threepeat. What about the 91-93 bulls? Were they stacked compared to the other top tier teams( suns, blazers,sonics,knicks,cavs) during their first run?

this.

put it into context if you want a discussion, op. and don't start with the tired & silly 'weak era', 'blazers were shit', 'danny aingie guarding jordan' arguments.

[Marlo_Stanfield]

i have to agree with OP here.
LeBron threepeating would easily be the biggest accomplishment in Basketball history:confusedshrug:

[brantonli]

The Spoelstra-Jackson argument is quite weak. The 1994 Phil Jackson isn't the same Phil Jackson that ended up with 11 rings, just like the 1999 version of Popvich is much less experienced and tough as the current version. If anything, the comparison is quite apt, both being promoted to head coach to coach a superstar without previous HC exerpience.

[diamenz]

i have to agree with OP here.


that's no surprise. you either are the op, or are just trying to get a circle jerk going.

[Mr Feeny]

that's no surprise. you either are the op, or are just trying to get a circle jerk going.
:oldlol:

[Just2McFly]

You fcking imbecile. All that shit you say with the Bulls can easily be applied to the Heat.

Great coach - Spoelstra has 2 rings
Good defensive big man - Chris Anderson
Great shooters - Chalmers, Lewis, Jones, Allen (yeah the dude who saved brans career)
Stars - Lebron, Wade, Bosh
5th/6th man (wtf?) - Ray Allen

See I can say whatever the fck I want to fit my agenda as well, I suggest you stick to making bets you can't honour, a coward just like the supposed 'leader' of your team who ran away from his hometown and a real challenge for the easy path.
http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/social_assets/nba/7_18_2013/wade%20laugh.gif

http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/kobe-laugh.gif

http://niketalk.com/content/type/61/id/58989/width/500/height/1000/flags/LL

[Marlo_Stanfield]

http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/social_assets/nba/7_18_2013/wade%20laugh.gif

http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/kobe-laugh.gif

http://niketalk.com/content/type/61/id/58989/width/500/height/1000/flags/LL
http://cdn.niketalk.com/2/2f/350x700px-LL-2ff5111e_michael-jordan-laughing.gif

[NumberSix]

How many games did the Bulls win without Jordan?

[TheMan]

You fcking imbecile. All that shit you say with the Bulls can easily be applied to the Heat.

Great coach - Spoelstra has 2 rings
Good defensive big man - Chris Anderson
Great shooters - Chalmers, Lewis, Jones, Allen (yeah the dude who saved brans career)
Stars - Lebron, Wade, Bosh
5th/6th man (wtf?) - Ray Allen

See I can say whatever the fck I want to fit my agenda as well, I suggest you stick to making bets you can't honour, a coward just like the supposed 'leader' of your team who ran away from his hometown and a real challenge for the easy path.
OP just got bitchslapped

[TheMan]

How many games did the Bulls win without Jordan?
Fvck wins, did they even get to the Finals without MJ? No. ECFs even? No.
Regular season wins are way too overrated, you know this. Rose Bulls had the best record a couple of times and we got jackshit to show for it.

Stick to bitching about the refs, you're the ISH expert in that.

[Andrei89]

Are gonna ignore that the Bulls won 55 games without Jordan?

[TheMan]

Are gonna ignore that the Bulls won 55 games without Jordan?
55 wins =/= NBA title

MJ on that 94 Bulls = NBA title (fourpeat)
MJ-less Bulls = out in the second round

MJ GOAT :bowdown:

[FLDFSU]

I agree that the bulls were a better team (at least the starting 5)-- they complemented each other MUCH better than the heat IMO. The heat has more first option players but their play overlaps a bit.


And the heat were stacked 'relative' to the rest of the league, and particularly in '11.

so funny how people love to say the Heat are stacked relative to competition then say the Heat would lose to every Western Conference team in a 7 game series :roll:

[Quickening]

Yes bulls were stacked as fck, win 55 games the year after MJ leaves, holy fck! Pippen, top ten player in the league, rodman arguably best defensive player ever

[LeBird]

Yes bulls were stacked as fck, win 55 games the year after MJ leaves, holy fck! Pippen, top ten player in the league, romantic arguably best defensive player ever

It's actually really funny. There are 3-4 teams right now comparable to the Heat in talent and it's taken some gruelling series/standout performances to get past them. When the Bulls had comfortably the most stacked team of their winning era somehow it was more difficult then when they weren't even needing to go to game 7s?

Delusional doesn't begin to explain it.

[Real14]

you still on dat crack mane?:biggums:

[Real14]

Are gonna ignore that the Bulls won 55 games without Jordan?
how far they made it?:coleman:

[TheMan]

It's actually really funny. There are 3-4 teams right now comparable to the Heat in talent and it's taken some gruelling series/standout performances to get past them. When the Bulls had comfortably the most stacked team of their winning era somehow it was more difficult then when they weren't even needing to go to game 7s?

Delusional doesn't begin to explain it.
Bitter :oldlol:

MJ > LBJ
MJ > Bird

deal with it and just move on, chappy

Oh and if you want your Heat to avoid GM 7, you might want to ask James to stop sucking for 5 3/4 games :pimp:

[LeBird]

Bitter :oldlol:

MJ > LBJ
MJ > Bird

deal with it and just move on, chappy

Exhibit A: Delusional Jordan Stan #34

Didn't have to wait long did we?

[TheMan]

Exhibit A: Delusional Jordan Stan #34

Didn't have to wait long did we?
Delusional how?

MJ is the consensus GOAT, yes over Bird and easily over LeBron too:confusedshrug:

stay salty :oldlol:

I understand you want to be in the 'cool kids' section that doesn't want to believe that but the Earth is flat and UFOs don't exist...keep on keeping on doe:applause:

[Prometheus]

Both three-peat versions of Jordan's Bulls were better than the Miami Heat.

Miami is not as stacked as people like to pretend. Wade's production is very inconsistent and Bosh can't deal with any half-decent big man. If you truly believe they are stacked to a legendary extent, then you are probably brainwashed by ESPN "superstar" propaganda and/or still thinking it's 2010 and Wade can score consistently.

None of this has much impact on the Jordan/LeBron comparisons though. Jordan was still a way better basketball player.

[Roundball_Rock]

Good thread, OP. While the Heat's top 3 is comparable to the Bull's top 3 (in either threepeat), the Bulls have the edge in coaching and the rest of the rotation.


how far they made it?:coleman:

How far did the other superstar teams make it? The 94' Bulls took the Knicks--generally acknowledged as the Bulls' "toughest" competitor of the 90's--to 7 games and were a phantom foul away from a 3-2 lead heading to Chicago. In other words, the Bulls acknowledged top competition could barely beat the Bulls without MJ. What does that say?

1994 superstar teams

Knicks with Ewing 57 wins (Finals)
Spurs with Robinson 55 wins (lost first round)
Suns with Barkley 56 wins (WCSF)
Magic with Shaq 50 wins (lost first round)
Rockets with Hakeem 58 wins (champs)
Jazz with Malone 53 wins (WCF)
Bulls without Jordan 55 wins (ECSF)

Which one is not like the others? That is the point: they were so stacked even without MJ they were a top team. They were similar to the other teams listed, which generally had one superstar and a few other good players. What gave the Bulls a huge advantage over the decade was they were the only team to have two superstars for an extended period (the Magic did for 2 seasons).

Also, if Lebron retired 2 days before training camp and was replaced by a D-Leaguer next year would the Heat win 55 games and fight for the top seed in the East with just Wade and Bosh? Did the Cavs even win 20 games after he left Cleveland?




It's actually really funny. There are 3-4 teams right now comparable to the Heat in talent and it's taken some gruelling series/standout performances to get past them. When the Bulls had comfortably the most stacked team of their winning era somehow it was more difficult then when they weren't even needing to go to game 7s?

Exactly. Moreover:

*The Heat are so stacked they would lose to any of the top 4-5 Western teams.
*The Heat are so stacked they would lose to every other multiple championship team in NBA history.

Get the story straight...

Let's face it, deep down even LeBron haters know the truth: the Heat are similar to other championship teams (2 superstars, 1 other good all-star caliber player and a couple solid role players) but not dominant and it is King James who consistently pushes them over the team.

[livinglegend]

Fvck wins, did they even get to the Finals without MJ? No. ECFs even? No.
Regular season wins are way too overrated, you know this. Rose Bulls had the best record a couple of times and we got jackshit to show for it.

Stick to bitching about the refs, you're the ISH expert in that.

Are we gonna act like the refs didnt give the Knicks that 2nd round series?
That Bulls team was a championship contender without their best player. That s how stacked they were.

[livinglegend]

It's actually really funny. There are 3-4 teams right now comparable to the Heat in talent and it's taken some gruelling series/standout performances to get past them. When the Bulls had comfortably the most stacked team of their winning era somehow it was more difficult then when they weren't even needing to go to game 7s?

Delusional doesn't begin to explain it.

This. Bulls were way more stacked compare to their competition. No other team came close to them.

[livinglegend]

Good thread, OP. While the Heat's top 3 is comparable to the Bull's top 3 (in either threepeat), the Bulls have the edge in coaching and the rest of the rotation.



How far did the other superstar teams make it? The 94' Bulls took the Knicks--generally acknowledged as the Bulls' "toughest" competitor of the 90's--to 7 games and were a phantom foul away from a 3-2 lead heading to Chicago. In other words, the Bulls acknowledged top competition could barely beat the Bulls without MJ. What does that say?

1994 superstar teams

Knicks with Ewing 57 wins (Finals)
Spurs with Robinson 55 wins (lost first round)
Suns with Barkley 56 wins (WCSF)
Magic with Shaq 50 wins (lost first round)
Rockets with Hakeem 58 wins (champs)
Jazz with Malone 53 wins (WCF)
Bulls without Jordan 55 wins (ECSF)

Which one is not like the others? That is the point: they were so stacked even without MJ they were a top team. They were similar to the other teams listed, which generally had one superstar and a few other good players. What gave the Bulls a huge advantage over the decade was they were the only team to have two superstars for an extended period (the Magic did for 2 seasons).

Also, if Lebron retired 2 days before training camp and was replaced by a D-Leaguer next year would the Heat win 55 games and fight for the top seed in the East with just Wade and Bosh? Did the Cavs even win 20 games after he left Cleveland?





Exactly. Moreover:

*The Heat are so stacked they would lose to any of the top 4-5 Western teams.
*The Heat are so stacked they would lose to every other multiple championship team in NBA history.

Get the story straight...

Let's face it, deep down even LeBron haters know the truth: the Heat are similar to other championship teams (2 superstars, 1 other good all-star caliber player and a couple solid role players) but not dominant and it is King James who consistently pushes them over the team.

Bulls without their best player were almost as good as the other great teams in the league. They were so stacked that they were title contenders without their best player. With their best player, the other teams didnt have any chance. 90s Bulls were wayyyy more stacked relative to their competition than Miami Heat team is right now.

[Dengness9]

Fvck wins, did they even get to the Finals without MJ? No. ECFs even? No.
Regular season wins are way too overrated, you know this. Rose Bulls had the best record a couple of times and we got jackshit to show for it.

Stick to bitching about the refs, you're the ISH expert in that.

http://sernaiotto.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/The-Rock-Clapping-Reaction-Gif.gif

[livinglegend]

Good thread, OP. While the Heat's top 3 is comparable to the Bull's top 3 (in either threepeat), the Bulls have the edge in coaching and the rest of the rotation.



How far did the other superstar teams make it? The 94' Bulls took the Knicks--generally acknowledged as the Bulls' "toughest" competitor of the 90's--to 7 games and were a phantom foul away from a 3-2 lead heading to Chicago. In other words, the Bulls acknowledged top competition could barely beat the Bulls without MJ. What does that say?

1994 superstar teams

Knicks with Ewing 57 wins (Finals)
Spurs with Robinson 55 wins (lost first round)
Suns with Barkley 56 wins (WCSF)
Magic with Shaq 50 wins (lost first round)
Rockets with Hakeem 58 wins (champs)
Jazz with Malone 53 wins (WCF)
Bulls without Jordan 55 wins (ECSF)

Which one is not like the others? That is the point: they were so stacked even without MJ they were a top team. They were similar to the other teams listed, which generally had one superstar and a few other good players. What gave the Bulls a huge advantage over the decade was they were the only team to have two superstars for an extended period (the Magic did for 2 seasons).

Also, if Lebron retired 2 days before training camp and was replaced by a D-Leaguer next year would the Heat win 55 games and fight for the top seed in the East with just Wade and Bosh? Did the Cavs even win 20 games after he left Cleveland?





Exactly. Moreover:

*The Heat are so stacked they would lose to any of the top 4-5 Western teams.
*The Heat are so stacked they would lose to every other multiple championship team in NBA history.

Get the story straight...

Let's face it, deep down even LeBron haters know the truth: the Heat are similar to other championship teams (2 superstars, 1 other good all-star caliber player and a couple solid role players) but not dominant and it is King James who consistently pushes them over the team.

http://sernaiotto.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/The-Rock-Clapping-Reaction-Gif.gif

[Dengness9]

Nice narrative roundball, you will never win the impossible fight you are fighting:oldlol:


94 Bulls didn't make the conf finals. Just stop. Your reaching is sad.

[Dengness9]

Roundball and livinglegend think 94 Bulls won the title! :lol


No MJ no Conf Finals or Chip! Sorry boys, can't change history.

[senelcoolidge]

The people posting here did they actually watch both teams play..the 91-93, 96-98 Bulls and the current Heat? I did and those Bulls team even the 91-93 teams in my opinion would beat these Heat teams.

[Real14]

http://sernaiotto.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/The-Rock-Clapping-Reaction-Gif.gif
Roundball iz simply retarded with his analysis and its a no brainer on how your retarded self agree with him.

[livinglegend]

Roundball iz simply retarded with his analysis and its a no brainer on how your retarded self agree with him.

Insults mean you lost the debate and the battle

next

[livinglegend]

Roundball and livinglegend think 94 Bulls won the title! :lol


No MJ no Conf Finals or Chip! Sorry boys, can't change history.

Where did we say that Bulls won in 94, quote us!

[Dengness9]

Where did we say that Bulls won in 94, quote us!


Your misuse of the Rock clapping gif is unforgivable. Roundball's hypothetical and opinionated shit narrative means jack shit.

You two are pushing an agenda that the 94 Bulls were legendary and true title contenders. They weren't and the playoffs proved it.

[stalkerforlife]

0/10.

[Real14]

Roundball and livinglegend think 94 Bulls won the title! :lol


No MJ no Conf Finals or Chip! Sorry boys, can't change history.
I agree. I been ask them how far did they made it and roundfall wanna talk paragraphs of bullshit that absolutely destroys himself in the argument.

[livinglegend]

Your misuse of the Rock clapping gif is unforgivable. Roundball's hypothetical and opinionated shit narrative means jack shit.

You two are pushing an agenda that the 94 Bulls were legendary and true title contenders. They weren't and the playoffs proved it.

Yeah, that s what i thought. You didnt find any quote. Your delusional ass was making up things once again.

next

[Real14]

0/10.
:applause:

[livinglegend]

I agree. I been ask them how far did they made it and roundfall wanna talk paragraphs of bullshit that absolutely destroys himself in the argument.

they were title contender without their best player ( something that Knicks havent been for more than a decade) and should have won 2nd round, but the refs changed the outcome of the game.

[Real14]

The people posting here did they actually watch both teams play..the 91-93, 96-98 Bulls and the current Heat? I did and those Bulls team even the 91-93 teams in my opinion would beat these Heat teams.
They would beat them but tha heat are definitely more stacked.

[Real14]

Insults mean you lost the debate and the battle

next
Insults mean that you and roundfall are acting dumb az hell just like your thread title.

[livinglegend]

Insults mean that you and roundfall are acting dumb az hell just like your thread title.

You are acting dumb and immature. Roundball posted facts and only facts.

[Roundball_Rock]

Roundball's hypothetical and opinionated shit narrative means jack shit.

This is factual, not hypothetical:


1994 superstar teams

Knicks with Ewing 57 wins (Finals)
Spurs with Robinson 55 wins (lost first round)
Suns with Barkley 56 wins (WCSF)
Magic with Shaq 50 wins (lost first round)
Rockets with Hakeem 58 wins (champs)
Jazz with Malone 53 wins (WCF)
Bulls without Jordan 55 wins (ECSF)

Which one is not like the others?

As LivingLegend has noted, once you add MJ to the mix the Bulls were unbeatable. That is the argument. :oldlol: at some thinking we are saying MJ had no impact. What we are saying is his team was so good they were a top team without him; with him they were dominant.

If LeBron retired 2 days before training camp and was replaced by a D-Leaguer would the Heat win 55 games and spend all season fighting for the top seed (the Bulls actually were in 1st place at the all-star break)? The Bulls were more stacked than the current Heat--and by quite a margin.

Just look at that list. What if you took Hakeem or Ewing off their teams? We saw what happened to the Spurs without Robinson: 21 wins.

[Real14]

You are acting dumb and immature. Roundball posted facts and only facts.
posted bullshit to me.

[Real14]

This is factual, not hypothetical:



As LivingLegend has noted, once you add MJ to the mix the Bulls were unbeatable. That is the argument. :oldlol: at some thinking we are saying MJ had no impact. What we are saying is his team was so good they were a top team without him; with him they were dominant.

If LeBron retired 2 days before training camp and was replaced by a D-Leaguer would the Heat win 55 games and spend all season fighting for the top seed (the Bulls actually were in 1st place at the all-star break)? The Bulls were more stacked than the current Heat--and by quite a margin.

Just look at that list. What if you took Hakeem or Ewing off their teams? We saw what happened to the Spurs without Robinson: 21 wins.
Take Lebron off heat, that team would still win a lot of games and you know that shit:no: and what I just highlighted iz your brain on drugs.

[livinglegend]

Take Lebron off heat, that team would still win a lot of games and you know that shit:no:

now that s hypothetical.

[stalkerforlife]

My nicca Real14 smashing kids in this thread.

[livinglegend]

posted bullshit to me.

Facts are facts. You may find them bullshit, but that wont change the reality.

[j3lademaster]

Jordan's Bulls were extremely stacked. Having the GOAT would do that for you :confusedshrug:

[livinglegend]

Jordan's Bulls were extremely stacked. Having the GOAT would do that for you :confusedshrug:

even without him that team was a title contender

[j3lademaster]

even without him that team was a title contenderOkay. What part of my post was this statement supposed to argue with?

[livinglegend]

Okay. What part of my post was this statement supposed to argue with?

i didnt argue, just added information

[Real14]

even without him that team was a title contender
were knicks a title contender last year mr. hypocrite?:coleman:

[Real14]

My nicca Real14 smashing kids in this thread.
yea bro gotta teach em:cheers:

[Real14]

Jordan's Bulls were extremely stacked. Having the GOAT would do that for you :confusedshrug:
not more stacked than tha cheat:no:

[livinglegend]

were knicks a title contender last year mr. hypocrite?:coleman:
:oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol:

[Andrei89]

how far they made it?:coleman:


Invalid argument. How many games will Miami win without Lebron and how far would they make it?

Indiana loses to the Heat without Lebron? Do the Brooklyn Nets lose to the Heat without Lebron?

Do the 2012 Celtics lose? The 2011 Bulls? OKC? San Antonio?

Stop with the stupid arguments, you are embarassing yourselves.

[Real14]

Facts are facts. You may find them bullshit, but that wont change the reality.
its doesn't match on what we are talking about which automatically makes it useless and invalid argument points.

[Real14]

:oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol:
I rest my damn case:coleman:

[Real14]

Invalid argument. How many games will Miami win without Lebron and how far would they make it?

Indiana loses to the Heat without Lebron? Do the Brooklyn Nets lose to the Heat without Lebron?

Do the 2012 Celtics lose? The 2011 Bulls? OKC? San Antonio?

Stop with the stupid arguments, you are embarassing yourselves.
Don't make me laugh with this idiotic question:coleman:

[livinglegend]

its doesn't match on what we are talking about which automatically makes it useless and invalid argument points.

it does match. It showed how stacked the bulls were.

[Odinn]

The time has come.
http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/profile.php?do=addlist&userlist=ignore&u=262823

[Real14]

The time has come.
http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/profile.php?do=addlist&userlist=ignore&u=262823
:lol

[Real14]

it does match. It showed how stacked the bulls were.
:coleman: I don't think you can comprehend man unless you have that LeBron souvenir stuck way up your ass:lol

[livinglegend]

My nicca Real14 smashing kids in this thread.
reported for racism

[Real14]

reported for racism
:biggums:

[livinglegend]

:biggums:

it s racist for white guys to use that word, especially in the context in which he used it

[Real14]

it s racist for white guys to use that word, especially in the context in which he used it
how u know hes white?:lol

[NumberSix]

how u know hes white?:lol
He's articulate? :confusedshrug:

[livinglegend]

how u know hes white?:lol

He s trying to sound too black

[Real14]

He's articulate? :confusedshrug:
REPORTED.

[Real14]

He s trying to sound too black
but that still don't mean he white tho :facepalm

[mark henson 123]

Jordan couldn't guard wade at 35,he could blow past Jordan anytime he wanted!
pippen would get complety dominated by LeBron.
the birdman would dunk all over rodman,
bosh and lewis would shoot threes,wide open:coleman:
Jordan would be double team,and start turning the ball over.
the heat would crush the bulls in SIX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[GODbe]

I agree. Heat are a close second though.