PDA

View Full Version : Was Lebron's game last night the most efficient loss in nba finals history?



rule1223
06-11-2014, 02:47 PM
Minimum 20 points to eliminate scrub games, has anyone had a more efficient loss before, 22 points on 64% shooting

IncarceratedBob
06-11-2014, 02:48 PM
LeBron would rather have an efficient loss rather than a inefficient win, it's why I personally will never respect him.

riseagainst
06-11-2014, 02:50 PM
check his stats doe. Dem stats.

Only stat anyone should be worried about is the W.

ThePhantomCreep
06-11-2014, 02:54 PM
Game 2, 1984 Finals

Magic Johnson: 27 points (10-14 FG), 71.4%
James Worthy: 29 points (11-12 FG), 91.7%

fpliii
06-11-2014, 03:00 PM
MJ's Finals Losses

1991
36 on .583 shooting

1992
39 on .500 shooting
32 on .423 shooting

1993
44 on .442 shooting
41 on .552 shooting

1996
23 on .316 shooting
26 on .500 shooting

1997
26 on .409 shooting
22 on .407 shooting

1998
33 on .448 shooting
28 on .346 shooting

Shaq's Finals Losses

1994
26 on .625 shooting
33 on .545 shooting
28 on .647 shooting
25 on .579 shooting

2000
33 on .625 shooting
35 on .630 shooting

2001
44 on .607 shooting

2002
(no losses)

2004
34 on .813 shooting
14 on .500 shooting
36 on .762 shooting
20 on .538 shooting

2006
17 on .727 shooting
5 on .400 shooting

Cactus-Sack
06-11-2014, 03:02 PM
He had like 10 to's. Very inefficient.

JohnMax
06-11-2014, 03:06 PM
Game 3 (https://sports.yahoo.com/nba/san-antonio-spurs-miami-heat-2014061014/)

Lebron 9-14 22 pts

fpliii
06-11-2014, 03:11 PM
Hakeem's Finals Losses

1986
33 on .609 shooting
21 on .500 shooting
20 on .381 shooting
19 on .429 shooting

1994
25 on .476 shooting
32 on .700 shooting
27 on .571 shooting

1995
(no losses)

Kareem's Finals Losses

1971
(no losses)

1974
35 on .500 shooting
26 on .500 shooting
37 on .516 shooting
26 on .476 shooting

1980
38 on .613 shooting
23 on .407 shooting

1982
23 on .500 shooting
6 on .500 shooting

1983
20 on .533 shooting
23 on .647 shooting
23 on .400 shooting
28 on .667 shooting

1984
20 on .409 shooting
32 on .480 shooting
19 on .280 shooting
29 on .545 shooting

1985
12 on .545 shooting
21 on .583 shooting

1987
27 on .563 shooting
18 on .381 shooting

1988
8 on .308 shooting
13 on .500 shooting
26 on .571 shooting

1989
8 on .571 shooting
11 on .333 shooting
24 on .526 shooting
7 on .250 shooting

fpliii
06-11-2014, 03:20 PM
Wilt's Finals Losses

1964
22 on .450 shooting
32 on .519 shooting
27 on .522 shooting
30 on .429 shooting

1967
26 on .522 shooting
20 on .600 shooting

1969
16 on .545 shooting
8 on .375 shooting
8 on .200 shooting
18 on .875 shooting

1970
17 on .571 shooting
21 on .700 shooting
22 on .750 shooting
21 on .625 shooting

1972
12 on .455 shooting

1973
5 on .500 shooting
5 on .667 shooting
13 on .500 shooting
23 on .563 shooting

Bird's Finals Losses

1981
19 on .444 shooting
8 on .273 shooting

1984
24 on .412 shooting
30 on .563 shooting
28 on .727 shooting

1985
30 on .429 shooting
20 on .381 shooting
20 on .471 shooting
28 on .414 shooting

1986
25 on .385 shooting
17 on .462 shooting

1987
32 on .560 shooting
23 on .529 shooting
21 on .368 shooting
16 on .375 shooting

Jlamb47
06-11-2014, 03:26 PM
might be pretty efficient but if he wasnt worried about his stats he would of tried bringing his team back and shoot more. If your so good at shooting and scoring then why not take alot of shots? the point of basketball is to score and win. He dosnt play that way.

fpliii
06-11-2014, 03:28 PM
We actually have a file up on nbastats.net:

http://nbastats.net/01NBA/01records/03finals/10-Fin-FGpctBest.xls

for the all-time FG% leaders Finals games.

Calabis
06-11-2014, 04:11 PM
Didnt see that efficiency toward the end of the game...saw a ton of turnovers and missed shots.

Roundball_Rock
06-11-2014, 04:19 PM
Game 2, 1984 Finals

Magic Johnson: 27 points (10-14 FG), 71.4%
James Worthy: 29 points (11-12 FG), 91.7%

14 FGA (the same as LeBron last night)? 12 FGA? Why didn't Magic take 30 shots and Worthy 25? Betas! :mad:

Magic 32
06-11-2014, 04:24 PM
14 FGA (the same as LeBron last night)? 12 FGA? Why didn't Magic take 30 shots and Worthy 25? Betas! :mad:

1984>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2011

HurricaneKid
06-11-2014, 04:49 PM
might be pretty efficient but if he wasnt worried about his stats he would of tried bringing his team back and shoot more. If your so good at shooting and scoring then why not take alot of shots? the point of basketball is to score and win. He dosnt play that way.

You don't bring your team back by shooting. You bring your team back by getting the best shots you can. Anyone with a Spurs Av should understand this.

The Heat had NO problems scoring. Their TS% of .596 was pretty outstanding really. It was the TOs and the defense.

riseagainst
06-11-2014, 04:55 PM
14 FGA (the same as LeBron last night)? 12 FGA? Why didn't Magic take 30 shots and Worthy 25? Betas! :mad:

Except Magic is not or ever known to be a scorer..... idiot...

aj1987
06-11-2014, 04:59 PM
You don't bring your team back by shooting. You bring your team back by getting the best shots you can. Anyone with a Spurs Av should understand this.

The Heat had NO problems scoring. Their TS% of .596 was pretty outstanding really. It was the TOs and the defense.
You're posting on ISH. You can't expect posters to understand all that.

Hey Yo
06-11-2014, 05:00 PM
Except Magic is not or ever known to be a scorer..... idiot...
Because he had a stacked team full of scorers. Just another reason why he's overrated.

riseagainst
06-11-2014, 05:04 PM
Because he had a stacked team full of scorers. Just another reason why he's overrated.

what this is supposed to help your cause how?

:oldlol:

Hey Yo
06-11-2014, 05:09 PM
what this is supposed to help your cause how?

:oldlol:
Magic's job was to distribute. James' is to that and everything else. LOL @ comparing Bosh to KAJ.

riseagainst
06-11-2014, 05:13 PM
Magic's job was to distribute. James' is to that and everything else. LOL @ comparing Bosh to KAJ.

:biggums:
:wtf:

what are you even talking about?

BigBoss
06-11-2014, 06:04 PM
check his stats doe. Dem stats.

Only stat anyone should be worried about is the W.

2 for 5 =40 percent :roll:

ThePhantomCreep
06-11-2014, 06:16 PM
Because he had a stacked team full of scorers. Just another reason why he's overrated.

He also faced stacked teams full over scorers. Lol @ LeBron forming a super team in the 2010's and still bitching that he lacks a supporting cast.