99 Robinson, 03 Duncan, 05 Ginobili, 07 Parker, 14 Leonard

[robert_shaww]

And GOAT coach. Thats why Duncan is at most between 11-15 ever.

[T_L_P]

Hah, how many times are you gonna repeat this drivel?

I've asked you countless times to explain why 99 is Robinson and 07 is Parker, and every time you've skipped over it, because that's what trolls do.

You are honestly the dumbest poster on this board. You claim to be a Spurs fan, yet all you try to do is shoot down our greatest ever player? It's honestly pathetic. :oldlol:

[robert_shaww]

Hah, how many times are you gonna repeat this drivel?

I've asked you countless times to explain why 99 is Robinson and 07 is Parker, and every time you've skipped over it, because that's what trolls do.

You are honestly the dumbest poster on this board. You claim to be a Spurs fan, yet all you try to do is shoot down our greatest ever player? It's honestly pathetic. :oldlol:

im happy right now, very happy with this title, but duncan was the 3rd best player in the playoffs for the spurs, just saying.

[T_L_P]

im happy right now, very happy with this title, but duncan was the 3rd best player in the playoffs for the spurs, just saying.

You did it again. Please, address the 99 and 07 points, troll.

You're not happy at all though. This shit is eating you up. :roll:

[robert_shaww]

You did it again. Please, address the 99 and 07 points, troll.

You're not happy at all though. This shit is eating you up. :roll:

you are wrong, im a happy man.

i told you before, duncan needed robinson in 99 and parker in 07 to win that championship...he needed even more ginobili in 05 and leonard in 14.

the only year he could have done it was in 03 (and still I dont forget game 6 in dallas)


but the point is duncan had always been in a great great stacked team as ANY other superstar ever (the only case is lakers and celtics in the 80

[robert_shaww]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAWnbcCPXKs

dont forget that shit in 14 finals. (6-22.....and....)

[T_L_P]

[QUOTE=robert_shaww]you are wrong, im a happy man.

i told you before, duncan needed robinson in 99 and parker in 07 to win that championship...he needed even more ginobili in 05 and leonard in 14.

the only year he could have done it was in 03 (and still I dont forget game 6 in dallas)


but the point is duncan had always been in a great great stacked team as ANY other superstar ever (the only case is lakers and celtics in the 80

[kamil]

And GOAT coach. Thats why Duncan is at most between 11-15 ever.

2/5

[davehos]

http://i59.tinypic.com/sv12d0.png

Click here! (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/profile.php?do=addlist&userlist=ignore&u=302657)

[kamil]

Kobe needed Shaq in 00, 01, and 02...and Gasol in 09 and 10. Magic needed Kareem for every title. Jordan needed Pippen.

What the **** is your point? :oldlol:

I think he just can't handle the fact that LeBron* needed Wade, Bosh and Allen and still couldn't get it done.

[hangintheair]

http://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aM1MRAX_460sa_v1.gif

[SamuraiSWISH]

I don't disagree

[T_L_P]

I don't disagree

:facepalm

[pastis]

He is right. you can argue 99, but all in all im with him.

[kNicKz]

Duncan owns brons soul

#lolumad

[robert_shaww]

He is right. you can argue 99, but all in all im with him.

thanks. i knew it

[pastis]

what i dont understand is this: for duncan stans, duncan is the real mvp in 07, but ginobili in 05 or robinson in 99 of course didnt have a shot for the mvp. i just dont understand.:confusedshrug:

[T_L_P]

what i dont understand is this: for duncan stans, duncan is the real mvp in 07, but ginobili in 05 or robinson in 99 of course didnt have a shot for the mvp. i just dont understand.:confusedshrug:

Manu has a very real shot for 05, I just personally wouldn't pick him.

But if you look past who won the award, 07 very clearly becomes Duncan, as does 99.

He averaged like 5 more points, 2 more rebounds, 1 more assists, and 1 more steal/block than D. Rob, and I think he had better shooting numbers. Duncan also had a much better statline than Parker too, and he was still the anchor of the offense and the defense.

Just compare their numbers that year. Duncan averaged like 22/12/3/3 on very good shooting numbers, whilst Parker averaged 20/3/5/1 on mediocre shooting...and the disparity on defense shouldn't even need mentioning.

You Duncan haters, however, just spew random conjecture without any real argument. I asked the idiotic OP about 99 and 07 and he brought up 14...what else needs to be said?

[TheReal Kendall]

http://media.giphy.com/media/lCJGfqtJzSv1C/giphy.gif