PDA

View Full Version : A 1991-1993 Jordan in today's league would be the best player in the game



NBAplayoffs2001
07-01-2014, 09:24 PM
Step aside Durant!

SouBeachTalents
07-01-2014, 09:27 PM
He'd be ight

Prometheus
07-01-2014, 10:51 PM
Step aside Durant!

'91-'93 Jordan would be the best player in the world in ANY era.

And LeBron is still better than Durant by a lot.

Bitch.

GrapeApe
07-01-2014, 10:55 PM
So you're saying the GOAT in his peak years would be the best player?

Oh, LeBron >>> Durant.

KBaller33
07-01-2014, 11:03 PM
91-93 Jordan was the best basketball player ever. So yeah....

And Durant is #2 in today's game behind Bron.

MadSolar
07-01-2014, 11:07 PM
Step aside Durant!

Jordan as a ROOKIE would be the best player in the world in todays leage

NBAplayoffs2001
07-01-2014, 11:22 PM
91-93 Jordan was the best basketball player ever. So yeah....

And Durant is #2 in today's game behind Bron.

In today's weak eastern conference, I can see how that illusion can happen.

Beastmode88
07-01-2014, 11:23 PM
Jordan as a ROOKIE would be the best player in the world in todays leage

Stop it. Probably the best scorer in today's league def not the best player.

Done_And_Done
07-01-2014, 11:35 PM
Cool

Angel Face
07-02-2014, 12:21 AM
Any version of MJ from 1987 - 1993 and from 2nd 3-peat would be the best player in the league, in any era. Rookie MJ would be top 3 and Wizards MJ would be top 5 - 10 in today's league.

SamuraiSWISH
07-02-2014, 12:22 AM
MJ from '88 - '93 is the best player in any league. Of all-time.

russwest0
07-02-2014, 12:23 AM
As in next year?

League rankings would be

Jordan
Durant
LeBron/Davis
Griffin

dubeta
07-02-2014, 12:25 AM
He was scrawny but quick and athletic, he would be a Demar Derozan type player, 23/5/5, you have to remember there was no zone defense so Jordan basically had a layup line to the basket

There were also less possessions in a game, so less opportunities to score

He still would be top 10 IMO :cheers:

Suguru101
07-02-2014, 12:25 AM
MJ from '88 - '93 is the best player in any league. Of all-time.

1971 - 1974 Kareem would be better.

1964 - 1968 Wilt would be better.

2000 Shaq would be better.

MJ would be the best perimeter player and the most acclaimed, but those 3 would have a larger impact.

SouBeachTalents
07-02-2014, 12:28 AM
He was scrawny but quick and athletic, he would be a Demar Derozan type player, 23/5/5, you have to remember there was no zone defense so Jordan basically had a layup line to the basket

There were also less possessions in a game, so less opportunities to score

He still would be top 10 IMO :cheers:

Name 10 players today who would be better than prime Jordan

NBAplayoffs2001
07-02-2014, 12:28 AM
He was scrawny but quick and athletic, he would be a Demar Derozan type player, 23/5/5, you have to remember there was no zone defense so Jordan basically had a layup line to the basket

There were also less possessions in a game, so less opportunities to score

He still would be top 10 IMO :cheers:

This post just gave me fits.:mad: :mad: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

dubeta
07-02-2014, 12:33 AM
This post just gave me fits.:mad: :mad: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6s0fu9fsJ1rpga6zo1_400.jpg

NBAplayoffs2001
07-02-2014, 12:34 AM
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6s0fu9fsJ1rpga6zo1_400.jpg

yeah cause i fear you will be the father of the dumbest kids on the planet.

Beastmode88
07-02-2014, 12:36 AM
yeah cause i fear you will be the father of the dumbest kids on the planet.

:lebronamazed::lebronamazed:

dubeta
07-02-2014, 12:37 AM
yeah cause i fear you will be the father of the dumbest kids on the planet.

In that case I have bad news for you..

LAZERUSS
07-02-2014, 12:39 AM
MJ would be great to be sure, but the question would still have to be, what kind of a supporting cast does he have?

Is he magically transferred to the Bucks, or the Clippers?

Marchesk
07-02-2014, 12:48 AM
1971 - 1974 Kareem would be better.

1964 - 1968 Wilt would be better.

2000 Shaq would be better.

MJ would he the best perimeter and most acclaimed player, but those 3 would have a larger impact.

^This, and maybe add Russell on the right team. Like I don't know. OKC. Or Dallas. Or Indiana (replace Hibbert).

Micku
07-02-2014, 01:00 AM
MJ would be great to be sure, but the question would still have to be, what kind of a supporting cast does he have?

Is he magically transferred to the Bucks, or the Clippers?

You can say that about a bunch of superstars throughout history. You can argue whatever or not if it's easier to build around Jordan compared to other greats tho.

You can also argue once you have a team that fits perfectly with each other, which superstar would have the most intangibles to help the team win it all.

LAZERUSS
07-02-2014, 01:03 AM
You can say that about a bunch of superstars throughout history. You can argue whatever or not if it's easier to build around Jordan compared to other greats tho.

You can also argue once you have a team that fits perfectly with each other, which superstar would have the most intangibles to help the team win it all.

Oh, I agree. We do know that even on a bad team, he would make them dangerous, and in doing so, would be putting up 35+ ppg seasons.

diamenz
07-02-2014, 08:34 AM
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6s0fu9fsJ1rpga6zo1_400.jpg

these lebron face pics mean nothing anymore.

joeyjoejoe
07-02-2014, 08:57 AM
By a good margin, no other wing in history at there peak comes close, you gotta talk bigs when comparing peaks with mj guys like shaq and hakeem