Log in

View Full Version : Replace Bibby with Lebron on the 2001 kings



Mr.Kite
07-27-2014, 10:37 PM
do they beat the lakers?

NBAplayoffs2001
07-27-2014, 10:38 PM
do they beat the lakers?

No they lose in 4 because LeBron will go LeBrick

Ca$H
07-27-2014, 10:41 PM
No. 2001 Kobe >> Bran.

Warfan
07-27-2014, 10:47 PM
Do you mean 02??
Pretty sure Bibby was on the Grizzlies in 01...

And yes they win with lebron on the 02 Kings

Genaro
07-27-2014, 10:55 PM
Lebron wouldn't be a good fit in those Kings' teams. That team was all about ball movement and Lebron needs the ball in his hands all the time in order to be affective.
Could they still be good anyway? Yes but it would take a change in style and maybe even in personnel.

buddha
07-27-2014, 10:58 PM
depends, is the series still rigged?

stalkerforlife
07-27-2014, 11:02 PM
Bibby wasn't afraid of the big moments and he thrived in them.

Lakers win easier.

hangintheair
07-27-2014, 11:02 PM
One flopper is enough no need to add another one

Kvnzhangyay
07-27-2014, 11:07 PM
Bibby wasn't afraid of the big moments and he thrived in them.

Lakers win easier.

Lebron has more game winners though in the playoffs :confusedshrug:

Lebron23
07-27-2014, 11:10 PM
Yes

The Kings should have won that series. And Lebron is 13-6 against Team Kobrick.

hangintheair
07-27-2014, 11:25 PM
Yes

The Kings should have won that series. And Lebron is 13-6 against Team Kobrick.

Lebrick 1+(Jesus Miracle)/5

TheMarkMadsen
07-27-2014, 11:35 PM
Lebron wouldn't be a good fit in those Kings' teams. That team was all about ball movement and Lebron needs the ball in his hands all the time in order to be affective.
Could they still be good anyway? Yes but it would take a change in style and maybe even in personnel.


Great knowledgable answer. Repped

ProfessorMurder
07-27-2014, 11:36 PM
Lebron wouldn't be a good fit in those Kings' teams. That team was all about ball movement and Lebron needs the ball in his hands all the time in order to be affective.
Could they still be good anyway? Yes but it would take a change in style and maybe even in personnel.

This. He'd take away the passing threat of the entire team.

Mr.Kite
07-27-2014, 11:39 PM
This. He'd take away the passing threat of the entire team.

wrong. lebron is all about making his team better with elite passing when low on the shot clock

AintNoSunshine
07-28-2014, 12:06 AM
:oldlol:
depends, is the series still rigged?



which version of Lebron tho, today's Lebron puts young Kobe in straight jacket.

SpecialQue
07-28-2014, 12:09 AM
depends, is the series still rigged?

Haters even getting their rigged series wrong. :facepalm

LBJFTW
07-28-2014, 12:09 AM
wrong. lebron is all about making his team better with elite passing when low on the shot clock

This may happen a few times per game,
but overall he would not fit into that 02
kings system at all, and they would lose.

ProfessorMurder
07-28-2014, 01:24 AM
wrong. lebron is all about making his team better with elite passing when low on the shot clock

Their team was moving the ball the entire shot clock you dummy. Bran would f*ck up the entire flow of the game, and they couldn't run with two bigs, or run the double high post offense.

Magic 32
07-28-2014, 09:41 AM
Yes

The Kings should have won that series. And Lebron is 13-6 against Team Kobrick.

Hugging those RS wins like a true 2/5. :roll:

rhowen4
07-28-2014, 02:40 PM
Lebrick 1+(Jesus Miracle)/5
Hmm. 1+(1)/5 huh? You were so close.

riseagainst
07-28-2014, 02:49 PM
wrong. lebron is all about making his team better with elite passing when low on the shot clock

you are confusing ball movement with play making.

inclinerator
07-28-2014, 03:37 PM
lebron divacs peja webber christie

JimmyMcAdocious
07-28-2014, 04:07 PM
How well does Webber shoot from 3?

Miles and Miles
07-28-2014, 05:49 PM
Lebron was still in High School so his studies might have gotten in the way of all the travel to LA and Sacramento.