Rebounding: Charles Barkley vs. Dennis Rodman

[Stringer Bell]

Taking all into account, who impressed you more as a rebounder?

Rodman of course had the better stats as a rebounder, but Barkley had to expend so much energy being his team's primary offensive weapon.

Led the league in rebounding while averaging 23 a game. Top 5 in rebounding numerous times, top 10 in scoring numerous times. Rodman also had a tendency to try too hard for the rebounds, cheating off defenders.

Then again, while Barkley expended a lot of energy scoring, Rodman expended a lot more than Barkley on the defensive end.

Also, how tall are these guys? Barkley is listed at 6'6. Some say he's 6'4 or 6'5.- mugshot isn't the most reliable measurement, but he looked 6'7, 6'8.

Rodman's been listed at 6'7, 6'8. Crazy that he was only 5'11 at age 18.

[GimmeThat]

Rodman's rebounding gives him the edge to lead his team in other ways. defense/physicality.

Rebounding was Barkley's way of leading his team. outside of his scoring.


comparing ones tangible against another's intangible.

[Round Mound]

Barkley: 6'4 5/8 ft or 1,95 mt but 255-260 lbs
Rodman 6'7 ft or 2.00 mt but 220 lbs tops.

The 2 Best Rebounders According to Height and Weight of All Time :bowdown: :bowdown:

[moe94]

How are you going to be 6'7, 210 lbs and average 18 boards a game and 13 for your career?

[Round Mound]

How are you going to be 6'7, 210 lbs and average 18 boards a game and 13 for your career?

Technique and Desire. But Barkley Did It All, While Also Rebounding. Much More Impressive and Was Shorter.

[inclinerator]

kenneth faried beats both of them