View Full Version : Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Encre92
09-07-2014, 01:04 PM
Fact.
Elaborate? Lakers didn't even win the title
fpliii
09-07-2014, 01:06 PM
How? The series was tied 2-2...
Nowitness
09-07-2014, 01:07 PM
people forget how crazy duncans shot was before it though
dubeta
09-07-2014, 01:08 PM
Good thread :applause:
There was still time after Ray's 3
Bosh wouldve gotten another rebound over 6'7 Kawhi since Duncan was sitting down, and LeBron wouldve made the next 3
Levity
09-07-2014, 01:09 PM
Go to bed, Encre. You're drunk
Encre92
09-07-2014, 01:12 PM
Without Fisher's gamewinner (which I consider the greatest LEGACY DEFINING shot in NBA history), the butterfly effect might result in Kobe having only 2 rings.
Edit: 3 rings.
Le Shaqtus
09-07-2014, 01:13 PM
Jesus Christ :roll:
HOoopCityJones
09-07-2014, 01:14 PM
Without Fisher's gamewinner (which I consider the greatest LEGACY DEFINING shot in NBA history), the butterfly effect might result in Kobe having only 2 rings.
Well, Ray's shot did result in one ring for LeCramp. :confusedshrug:
fpliii
09-07-2014, 01:14 PM
Without Fisher's gamewinner (which I consider the greatest LEGACY DEFINING shot in NBA history), the butterfly effect might result in Kobe having only 2 rings.
How so?
1) Second round.
2) Not an elimination game (tied 2-2).
3) Even if they lose then, they're blowing it up. They lost in the Finals, and blew it up anyway.
4) Kobe already had three rings at the time of that shot.
Encre92
09-07-2014, 01:15 PM
Well, Ray's shot did result in one ring for LeCramp. :confusedshrug:
Your use of the term "LeCramp" automatically makes you a troll in my eye and not worth having a discussion with. So GTFO of my thread.
Le Shaqtus
09-07-2014, 01:16 PM
How so?
1) Second round.
2) Not an elimination game (tied 2-2).
3) Even if they lose then, they're blowing it up. They lost in the Finals, and blew it up anyway.
4) Kobe already had three rings at the time of that shot.
uh oh
Encre92
09-07-2014, 01:17 PM
uh oh
4) Kobe already had three rings* at the time of that shot.
Any ring with prime Shaq warrants an asterisk.
Le Shaqtus
09-07-2014, 01:18 PM
4) Kobe already had three rings* at the time of that shot.
Any ring with prime Shaq warrants an asterisk.
Oh I'm sure it is.
Mr.Kite
09-07-2014, 01:25 PM
This thread backfired quick on the OP
Magic 32
09-07-2014, 01:30 PM
Good thread :applause:
There was still time after Ray's 3
Bosh wouldve gotten another rebound over 6'7 Kawhi since Duncan was sitting down, and LeBron wouldve made the next 3
http://m.memegen.com/tw0up8.jpg
This post is hidden because dubeta Encre92 and his 5 other sock accounts are on your ignore list
...
sportjames23
09-07-2014, 01:50 PM
Fact.
The desperation of this fakkit. :facepalm
Lakers lose the Finals that year.
Heat win the Finals that year.
Now, which shot had the bigger impact again? If you seriously try to argue this...
Smoke117
09-07-2014, 01:57 PM
people forget how crazy duncans shot was before it though
I actually think back to that great Duncan shot more than the Fisher shot. D's shot was pure luck and frankly shouldn't have even counted in the first place as the ball was clearly not out of his hands in time. Allen's shot was all skill and just a great shot in general. The circumstances are also a lot different...one shot put the Lakers up 3-2 in a series where neither team even ended up the eventual champions...where as Ray's shot basically saved the Heat season.
Encre92
09-07-2014, 02:04 PM
Do you have a link for the Duncan shot? If memory serves me well.. Duncan's shot was an off-balanced fluke at the end of a shot-clock.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSnAvhvfniw
0:38 onwards.
Mr. Jabbar
09-07-2014, 02:05 PM
it defined fishers legacy not kobes. lebron is the only player whos legacy is defined by other players shots :roll:
SCdac
09-07-2014, 02:10 PM
Judging both side by side, .4 will be harder to forget from Spurs fans and was imo much harder to swallow (the whole city thought it shouldn't have counted and thus left a stink in the air). Casual, general NBA fans will probably remember the Allen shot more because it's tied to a Lebron team and it's simply fresher.
Nowitness
09-07-2014, 02:11 PM
Thanks for the link. exactly what I suspected.
Got to give Kobe credit here. :applause: The rest... fluke as hell. :no:
not sure if serious ??
duncan lined up the shot perfectly. all he had to do was throw it at a 90 degree angle.
:facepalm
GODbe
09-07-2014, 02:17 PM
Take out Ray and Joey and LeBalds 0-5 right now:facepalm . Take out Fisher and Kobe would've hit the gamewinner himself.
JT123
09-07-2014, 02:25 PM
OP makes a great point. That .4 shot by Fisher changed the course of history. If Fisher misses that shot Fisher is likely sent away and never allowed to return, as the Lakers always get rid of players once they stop bailing Kobe out. If Fisher isn't around to bail Kobe out in the 2009 and 2010 Finals Kobe likely never wins a ring without Shaq, and thus never cracks the top 20.
Shot in the Finals > Shot in the playoffs
fpliii
09-07-2014, 02:33 PM
Judging both side by side, .4 will be harder to forget from Spurs fans and was imo much harder to swallow (the whole city thought it shouldn't have counted and thus left a stink in the air). Casual, general NBA fans will probably remember the Allen shot more because it's tied to a Lebron team and it's simply fresher.
You guys were terrific that year (particularly on the defensive end). I think the Spurs and the TWolves (if Cassell's back doesn't give out) both might've had a better shot than we did vs. Detroit. ****ing Malone after the MCL sprain (though he was hurt in December, so really wasn't 100% after that anyway) and GP were useless. :facepalm
Brokenbeat
09-07-2014, 02:34 PM
This thread backfired quick on the OP
Don't they all? :oldlol:
SCdac
09-07-2014, 03:32 PM
If it wasn't fluke.. show me footage of him replicating that shot (or even coming close to it)? You're going to have to prove that it wasn't a fluke.. so far you got nothing.
Duncan has hit other running, fall-away (fade-away), one handed shots before. Game winner or not.
one-handed game winner over Emeka Okafor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlX18Ql9xGA
fall-away game winner over Karl Malone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWqwvE5KVW8
He's got a good shot and release and that's not new information. It's not like Dwight Howard hitting a midrange game-winner, which would be an absolute rarity. Duncan made a living on midrange game
Nowitness
09-07-2014, 03:53 PM
Both of those shots are clearly balanced/fundamental and he doesn't end up falling on his ass from leaning backwards and shooting ~ college 3pt line. Come on cuhh...
Not even close. Try again.
Slayed :oldlol:
SCdac
09-07-2014, 03:56 PM
Both of those shots are clearly balanced/fundamental and he doesn't end up falling on his ass from leaning backwards and shooting ~ college 3pt line. Come on cuhh...
Not even close. Try again.
Oh give me a break man... Duncan clearly got off a good shot against the Lakers... and since when do great shots have to be balanced to really count? :facepalm
game-winner against the Hawks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I26HaIvK-UY
game-winner against the Clippers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiQwwyHDIx8
lets not act like Duncan came into the league yesterday. Dude is hella clutch and the GOAT PF! He's been hitting fall away jumpers for over almost 20 years, but it's not his fault you weren't watching or need somebody to teach you about his game.
SCdac
09-07-2014, 03:58 PM
If you're not noticing similarities and patterns in his shooting, movement, and tendencies, that's on you. Again, Duncan has been around foreverrrr
Beastmode88
09-07-2014, 03:59 PM
Lol dragic shooting himself in the foot again. :roll: :roll: :roll:
rule1223
09-07-2014, 03:59 PM
troll thread but ray allens 3 has way bigger impact. Without fishers 0.4 shot, kobe is exactly the same on everyones GOAT list. Without ray allens 3, lebron is the laughing stock of the NBA world, top 20 at best, a one lockout ring wonder, and basically a ruined legacy
Haymaker
09-07-2014, 04:07 PM
Allen is fresher in our memory, but Fisher's shot was a stab in the heart. You'd have to be a Spurs fan back then. Lakers and Spurs had an on/off rivalry unlike Heat/Spurs. The Ray Allen shot was unexpected because of the ball falling back into Miami's hands but 0.4 seconds was not supposed to happen, period. The game was practically over and we were only waiting for the clock to run out. If his shot hadn't gone in, spurs would've been 3-1.
Eric Cartman
09-07-2014, 04:07 PM
The game after Ray's 3 (game 7) does so much for his legacy. It makes him stand out as one of the greatest game 7 performers in the history of the league.
All wouldn't have been possible without Ray's 3.
SCdac
09-07-2014, 04:15 PM
Allen is fresher in our memory, but Fisher's shot was a stab in the heart. You'd have to be a Spurs fan back then. Lakers and Spurs had an on/off rivalry unlike Heat/Spurs. The Ray Allen shot was unexpected because of the ball falling back into Miami's hands but 0.4 seconds was not supposed to happen, period. The game was practically over and we were only waiting for the clock to run out. If his shot hadn't gone in, spurs would've been 3-1.
Yea it was unexpected only because of the sequence of events and looked like SA might win... Ray Allen getting free for a three pointer in the middle of gameplay
SCdac
09-07-2014, 04:33 PM
The game after Ray's 3 (game 7) does so much for his legacy. It makes him stand out as one of the greatest game 7 performers in the history of the league.
All wouldn't have been possible without Ray's 3.
Lebron had a sick Game 7 as well. edit: I guess you were referring to Lebron already?
37 points... 5 threes made... 12 boards... 4 assists .. 8-8 FT ... in 45 minutes of action
and The Immortal, it's ironic, I was going to ask you the same shit lol
SCdac
09-07-2014, 04:38 PM
Just admit it was a fluke shot.. Duncan is still a top 5 center in my book regardless.
This reach/insecurity you're displaying is making the (by in large) rational Spurs fanbase look bad tbqh.
Except it wasn't a fluke, Duncan is clutch as a mofo and hit plenty of fall away shots..... agree to disagree my man
Smook A.
09-07-2014, 04:38 PM
You're easily the biggest dumb**** on this forum.
If Ray Allen's shot didn't go in, Miami wouldn't have won that championship in 2013. If Fisher missed that 0.4 shot, the Lakers would have been down 3-2 but they still would had a chance to win the series. So how THE HELL did that 0.4 shot have a bigger impact?
Eric Cartman
09-07-2014, 04:40 PM
Lebron had a sick Game 7 as well. edit: I guess you were referring to Lebron already?
37 points... 5 threes made... 12 boards... 4 assists .. 8-8 FT ... in 45 minutes of action
and The Immortal, it's ironic, I was going to ask you the same shit lol
Yes :bowdown:
Nowitness
09-07-2014, 04:42 PM
Just admit it was a fluke shot.. Duncan is still a top 5 center in my book regardless.
This reach/insecurity you're displaying is making the (by in large) rational Spurs fanbase look bad tbqh.
WHat is your top 10 ??
SCdac
09-07-2014, 05:01 PM
Even clutch players admit they've had fluke moments..
Hell, even Kobe - a guy that has taken and made some of the most ridiculous shots in NBA history said this shot here LINK (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRS8wmb64XE).. "was the luckiest(fluke) shot I've ever taken, by far," Bryant..
except you just added the word fluke... is Kobe of all players hitting a tough, clutch shot really a fluke in your mind? .. To me, it's not. Kobe IS clutch.. Maybe he saw it as lucky, but you got to put yourself in position to get lucky and every ball player knows that. Kobe said the shot "felt good" despite his doubt... Plus i think you're missing the point altogether.
Fisher's comment about that shot:
“If you want anybody to hit a shot like that you’d rather it be Kobe than anybody else, because that’s what he’s done in the past. Somebody else would’ve hit that shot, this locker room wouldn’t look this way.”
In other words, some people get more "lucky" than others because they're just sick players in general. Top-10 players being top-10 players isn't a revelation or anything.
dreamwarrior
09-07-2014, 05:55 PM
It's true. Fisher's game winner should have led to Malone's first ring if Malone hadn't gotten injured.
Ray's shot should have only been a pretty good moment for 30 seconds that would not have mattered in the end, as it was the non-foul call on Bosh's block on Green that truly cost SA the game. If Danny Green had gone to the line for 3 shots like he should have we wouldn't be talking about Ray's shot. Refs gifted the Heat that win
BoutPractice
09-07-2014, 05:59 PM
Fisher's was one of the greatest shots of all time... the only thing that's sad about it is that had it not happened, Duncan's shot right before would be remembered as one of the great clutch playoff moments instead.
mehyaM24
09-07-2014, 07:04 PM
Fisher's was one of the greatest shots of all time... the only thing that's sad about it is that had it not happened, Duncan's shot right before would be remembered as one of the great clutch playoff moments instead.
OT but are you european?
i've seen quality posts from you regarding the fiba tournament :cheers:
Smoke117
09-07-2014, 09:10 PM
It's true. Fisher's game winner should have led to Malone's first ring if Malone hadn't gotten injured.
So a 40 year old healthy Karl Malone was the difference between the 5 game beat down the Lakers got from the Pistons and them winning it all? :facepalm Laker fans.
L.A. Jazz
09-08-2014, 03:38 AM
Without this shot Detroit maybe wouldnt be champs. Because a healthy Spurs team could beat them. like a healthy (physically and mentally) Lakers "team".
BoutPractice
09-08-2014, 03:57 AM
OT but are you european?
i've seen quality posts from you regarding the fiba tournament :cheers:
French but I don't recall talking about the tournament tbh.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.