PDA

View Full Version : NBA.com gives Cavs the only perfect offseason "A"; Lakers, Sixers, Pacers got a "D"


CavaliersFTW
09-15-2014, 07:26 PM
http://www.nba.com/reportcard/offseason/2014/indexMobile.html

What an offseason :eek: :rockon:
Meticode
09-15-2014, 07:28 PM
Spurs got an A+, Cavs got an A.
CavaliersFTW
09-15-2014, 07:30 PM
Spurs got an A+, Cavs got an A.
Wow missed that, makes sense :lol

Mods can modify title if they want. Just felt like sharing the link :rockon:
ArbitraryWater
09-15-2014, 07:32 PM
So? Isn't this obvious?

What are you trying to suggest this time?
Legends66NBA7
09-15-2014, 07:33 PM
Toronto should have been an A too.
Meticode
09-15-2014, 07:34 PM
Toronto should have been an A too.
B+ to me, but whatever. Just some imaginary grade that don't mean shit.
Doranku
09-15-2014, 07:35 PM
What a stupid grading system. Cavs just had the best off-season in NBA history yet somehow the Spurs who didn't do anything are graded higher?
Meticode
09-15-2014, 07:40 PM
What a stupid grading system. Cavs just had the best off-season in NBA history yet somehow the Spurs who didn't do anything are graded higher?
Kind of agree here. Spurs deserve like a B or B+. They kept everyone from that team, but brought no youth in at all really.
JimmyMcAdocious
09-15-2014, 07:48 PM
I don't get how it's offseason report cards. Their explanations are grading the teams... So it's more like team rankings.
Doranku
09-15-2014, 07:54 PM
I don't get how it's offseason report cards. Their explanations are grading the teams... So it's more like team rankings.

That's even worse. Charlotte Hornets > OKC? :roll:
TheMarkMadsen
09-15-2014, 07:57 PM
Cavs got two franchise players

no shiiiiiittt
Cold soul
09-15-2014, 08:34 PM
The Cavs had best off season by far but anyone can see that.
Megabox!
09-15-2014, 08:36 PM
What a stupid grading system. Cavs just had the best off-season in NBA history yet somehow the Spurs who didn't do anything are graded higher?
It's because the Spurs hired that chick
G-train
09-15-2014, 08:42 PM
That article is littered with garbage. Not one rating is correct. I am dumber for reading it.
Mgamer20o0
09-15-2014, 08:50 PM
That article is littered with garbage. Not one rating is correct. I am dumber for reading it.
i agree.... though i thought how can that be.... a D for the lakers seem about right until i read it.
ballup
09-15-2014, 08:58 PM
They grade not solely on what was acquired. It's more of a "grade the team as they are" instead of an offseason report.