Since 2003, has LeBron been the greatest player ever?

[ekosky]

I'd say so :confusedshrug:

Maybe Duncan comes close, but that's about it

[iamgine]

Trolling is not allowed now.

[Kblaze8855]

The word "ever" loses a lot of its significance when its limited to the last 11 years. Saying hes the best since 2003 would be at least...arguable. If you mean....hes the best ever..meaning all time....and has been that since 2003? Thats a far more ridiculous argument to be making.

Im gonna give you a moment to clarify though I suspect it only gets worse from here.

[Warfan]

Trolling is not allowed now.

Im guessing he means best player/career post 2003, which bron has a case. But it takes away significant parts of kobe & duncans careers...

[ekosky]

The word "ever" loses a lot of its significance when its limited to the last 11 years. Saying hes the best since 2003 would be at least...arguable. If you mean....hes the best ever..meaning all time....and has been that since 2003? Thats a far more ridiculous argument to be making.

Im gonna give you a moment to clarify though I suspect it only gets worse from here.
The latter

[Kblaze8855]

Well....

While the idea that Lebron is the GOAT has come up and been considered reasonable to discuss by real basketball people(Oscar Robertson...Scottie Pippen) I suspect you have no intention of explaining yourself in reasonable fashion or doing anything to promote anything positive. Im gonna give you as long as it takes to put my clothes in the washing machine to prove me wrong.

[nathanjizzle]

dwyane wade has been better than lebron for a few years. they both entered the nba the same time and wade has 3 rings over lebrons 2.

and dirk nowitzki was better than lebron in 2010 11.

and durant was better than lebron for most of 2012 -13 season and was better in 2013-14.

also, kobe still has the same amount of championships lebron has while lebron has been in the league.

[Dragic4Life]

Yes.

[Kblaze8855]

*returns*

I think we can all do without this no doubt about to be awful and repetitive topic for which no supporting evidence has been offered.