PDA

View Full Version : Revised PG Comparison: 1997 vs 2014



3ball
09-27-2014, 04:12 AM
.
Starting PG's With at Least 15.0 PER


......1997..............................2014

Penny Hardaway................. Russell Westbrook
Gary Payton....................... Chris Paul
Tim Hardaway.................... Tony Parker
Jason Kidd......................... John Wall
John Stockton.................... Steph Curry
Allen Iverson...................... Monta Ellis
Nick Van Exel..................... Kyrie Irving
Kevin Johnson.................... Rajon Rondo
Sam Cassell....................... Goran Dragic
Stephon Marbury................ Damian Lillard
Terrell Brandon.................. Jeff Teague
Damon Stoudamire............. Ty Lawson
Mookie Blaylock.................. Kyle Lowry
Rod Strickland.................... Deron Williams
Kenny Anderson................. Eric Bledsoe
Darrick Martin.................... Mike Conley
Mark Price......................... Jrue Holiday
Greg Anthony..................... Isiah Thomas
David Wesley..................... Kemba Walker
.

Graviton
09-27-2014, 04:18 AM
Rose?

3ball
09-27-2014, 04:21 AM
Rose?
didn't do injured players because then it gets subjective in guessing how good they are when they come back.

Warfan
09-27-2014, 04:22 AM
Rondo?, Rubio?, Knight?, Jennings? (i think)

Graviton
09-27-2014, 04:24 AM
didn't do injured players because then it gets subjective in guessing how good they are when they come back.
But Rose isn't injured he will be playing this season. He just came back from the FIBA cup.

Warfan
09-27-2014, 04:42 AM
None had over a 16.0 PER.. I put Rondo in there for the hell of it though.

Did you just edit it to make it 16? I swore it was 15, that's why i listed those guys :coleman:

You're Sg and Sf comparison was 15 PER too....:coleman:

rhowen4
09-27-2014, 05:34 AM
I think 2014 murders

3ball
09-27-2014, 07:31 AM
I think 2014 murders
the bottom 5 on both lists proves that 2014 is deeper, but you could actually take 1997 at each spot above the bottom 5.

also, for the SG, SF and bigs positions, 1997 murders 2014.... i was just posting the PG comparison because it is the one position 2014 should win, and clearly it's a lot closer than you would think.

ralph_i_el
09-27-2014, 09:43 AM
the bottom 5 on both lists proves that 2014 is deeper, but you could actually take 1997 at each spot above the bottom 5.

also, for the SG, SF and bigs positions, 1997 murders 2014.... i was just posting the PG comparison because it is the one position 2014 should win, and clearly it's a lot closer than you would think.
:rolleyes:

ArbitraryWater
09-27-2014, 09:45 AM
2014 in a blowout

Bigsmoke
09-27-2014, 02:17 PM
PG now are better

Kvnzhangyay
09-27-2014, 02:19 PM
2014 definetely

Also why is Ellis a pg

G0ATbe
09-27-2014, 02:20 PM
This era >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>90s at every position.

3ball
09-28-2014, 12:13 AM
Starting PG's With at Least 16.0 PER


......1997..............................2014

Penny Hardaway............... Russell Westbrook
Gary Payton..................... Chris Paul
Jason Kidd....................... Tony Parker
Tim Hardaway.................. John Wall
Kevin Johnson.................... Steph Curry
Allen Iverson.................... Monta Ellis
Nick Van Exel..................... Kyrie Irving
John Stockton.................. Rajon Rondo
Sam Cassell..................... Goran Dragic
Stephon Marbury.............. Damian Lillard
Terrell Brandon................ Jeff Teague
Damon Stoudamire........... Ty Lawson
Mookie Blaylock.................. Kyle Lowry
Rod Strickland.................... Deron Williams
Kenny Anderson................. Eric Bledsoe
Darrick Martin.................... Mike Conley
Mark Price......................... Jrue Holiday
Greg Anthony..................... Isiah Thomas
David Wesley................... Kemba Walker


Superior players are bolded above... Looks pretty close to me... :confusedshrug:
.

Pushxx
09-28-2014, 12:19 AM
PER lol

Cold soul
09-28-2014, 12:21 AM
This is the golden era of PG. Just sit back and enjoy it. :cheers:

3ball
09-28-2014, 12:27 AM
This is the golden era of PG. Just sit back and enjoy it.


I posted the PG position FIRST, because it is the only position where 2014 has any edge at all, and as you can see from the lists, it's not much of an edge either..

2014 gets DESTROYED at all the other positions, especially SG, PF and Center...

I will post those at some point and it will be so obvious that 1997 has a massive edge, i'm predicting that you won't even bother post itt... if you do, you'll post something super-lame because 2014 gets destroyed so you will only be able to say some bs..
.

turnaroundJ
09-28-2014, 12:52 AM
I posted the PG position FIRST, because it is the only position where 2014 has any edge at all, and as you can see from the lists, it's not much of an edge either..

2014 gets DESTROYED at all the other positions, especially SG, PF and Center...

I will post those at some point and it will be so obvious that 1997 has a massive edge, i'm predicting that you won't even bother post itt... if you do, you'll post something super-lame because 2014 gets destroyed so you will only be able to say some bs..
.

"My era is sooooooooo much better in everything, this era is so much weaker."

sundizz
09-28-2014, 01:39 AM
Starting PG's With at Least 16.0 PER


......1997..............................2014

Penny Hardaway............... Russell Westbrook
Gary Payton..................... Chris Paul
Jason Kidd....................... Tony Parker
Tim Hardaway.................. John Wall
Kevin Johnson.................... Steph Curry
Allen Iverson.................... Monta Ellis
Nick Van Exel..................... Kyrie Irving
John Stockton.................. Rajon Rondo
Sam Cassell..................... Goran Dragic
Stephon Marbury.............. Damian Lillard
Terrell Brandon................ Jeff Teague
Damon Stoudamire........... Ty Lawson
Mookie Blaylock.................. Kyle Lowry
Rod Strickland.................... Deron Williams
Kenny Anderson................. Eric Bledsoe
Darrick Martin.................... Mike Conley
Mark Price......................... Jrue Holiday
Greg Anthony..................... Isiah Thomas
David Wesley................... Kemba Walker


Superior players are bolded above... Looks pretty close to me... :confusedshrug:
.

This really just shows how little you know about actual basketball. Stockton was a 12 ppg, 8.5 apg player at that time. Still, I'd actually take him over a lot of pgs...but it just shows that you bolded players based on reputation as opposed to actual ability to help a team win games. Sam Cassell was so useless that he played on 4 different teams that year and averaged about 14 ppg and 5 apg. Mark Price as a 10 ppg, 5 apg on 43% player. Come on bro....if you are going to make these sort of posts be legitimate about it. Just embarrassing yourself.

Even the ones that were "good" like Starbury (17 & 9) were in fact not that good. He shot 41% fg, 31% tres, 73% ft. Basically just a chuckster that had star appeal but was a cancer.

Goran Dragic by himself was better than a reasonable amount of that bolded list (20 and 6 on 50%+)

Kvnzhangyay
09-28-2014, 02:07 AM
"My era is sooooooooo much better in everything, this era is so much weaker."

Probably wasn't even his era :confusedshrug:

ralph_i_el
09-28-2014, 09:39 AM
When you make these threads you're judging the 1997 players on their whole career/rep, whereas the 2014 players haven't completed their careers. Plus you're incredibly biased.

Again, your shtick is already stale AF. Stop watching basketball if you think this era sucks.

In reality, 97 wins at SG and C

ZMonkey11
09-28-2014, 10:12 AM
Starting PG's With at Least 16.0 PER


......1997..............................2014

Penny Hardaway............... Russell Westbrook
Gary Payton..................... Chris Paul
Jason Kidd....................... Tony Parker
Tim Hardaway.................. John Wall
Kevin Johnson.................... Steph Curry
Allen Iverson.................... Monta Ellis
Nick Van Exel..................... Kyrie Irving
John Stockton.................. Rajon Rondo
Sam Cassell..................... Goran Dragic
Stephon Marbury.............. Damian Lillard
Terrell Brandon................ Jeff Teague
Damon Stoudamire........... Ty Lawson
Mookie Blaylock.................. Kyle Lowry
Rod Strickland.................... Deron Williams
Kenny Anderson................. Eric Bledsoe
Darrick Martin.................... Mike Conley
Mark Price......................... Jrue Holiday
Greg Anthony..................... Isiah Thomas
David Wesley................... Kemba Walker


Superior players are bolded above... Looks pretty close to me... :confusedshrug:
.

Jrue Holiday superior to Mark Price eh....... yea.................. you might want to go watch some video.

MP.Trey
09-28-2014, 10:20 AM
Jrue Holiday superior to Mark Price eh....... yea.................. you might want to go watch some video.
Cavs fan and I agree with what you're trying to get at but Price was quite honestly a shell of his former self in 97 so Holiday probably was/is superior to that version of Price, but Holiday will probably never be able to hold a candle to Price in his prime.

Btw, PER is a retarded pre-requisite. What's with all these advanced stats warriors as of late? Stupidest trend going right now on basketball forums.

KobesFinger
09-28-2014, 10:22 AM
Are your lists in order?

Pointguard
09-28-2014, 01:53 PM
Cavs fan and I agree with what you're trying to get at but Price was quite honestly a shell of his former self in 97 so Holiday probably was/is superior to that version of Price, but Holiday will probably never be able to hold a candle to Price in his prime.

Btw, PER is a retarded pre-requisite. What's with all these advanced stats warriors as of late? Stupidest trend going right now on basketball forums.

Yeah PER is the anti point guard stat. The only guys outside of Chris Paul to get over 25 PER are AI, Tiny and Terrell Brandon. After that you begin seeing names like Westbrook, Arenas and Curry. Finally at 23.9 Stockton appears and Payton shortly thereafter. It's a stat that just doesn't work for pure point guards the most. Shooting PG's it kind of works.