Obama has sentenced whistleblowers to over 20x the jail time of all previous presiden

[russwest0]

...presidents... combined.

https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/leak-prosecutions-obama-takes-it-11-or-should-we-say-526

[MadeFromDust]

...presidents... combined.

https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/leak-prosecutions-obama-takes-it-11-or-should-we-say-526

Well, there goes the power of the Whistleblower Act, made null and void by Obomber the dictator.


"Looks like they (Moslems) have a legitimate reason for enslaving women"
-DonDadda59

[KevinNYC]

...presidents... combined.

https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/leak-prosecutions-obama-takes-it-11-or-should-we-say-526


A. You need to learn what a whistleblower is. Read this account and tell me exactly how this guy qualifies as a whistleblower (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ex-fbi-pleads-guilty-being-ap-source-sentenced)

B. You need to learn about our system of government. The president doesn't sentence anybody.

C. 80% of that jail time is from one case, Chelsea Manning's. That case was also the largest ever leak of classified material, so it's no surprise the sentence was so severe.

[nathanjizzle]

you lost all credibility when you said "all presidents combined". quit the semantics

[NumberSix]

A. You need to learn what a whistleblower is. Read this account and tell me exactly how this guy qualifies as a whistleblower (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ex-fbi-pleads-guilty-being-ap-source-sentenced)

B. You need to learn about our system of government. The president doesn't sentence anybody.

C. 80% of that jail time is from one case, Chelsea Manning's. That case was also the largest ever leak of classified material, so it's no surprise the sentence was so severe.
His name is Bradley. :facepalm:

[Nick Young]

Liberals are all about censorship these days, I see they are just following the path of their hero.:facepalm

[Nick Young]

Well, there goes the power of the Whistleblower Act, made null and void by Obomber the dictator.


"Looks like they (Moslems) have a legitimate reason for enslaving women"
-DonDadda59
LOL he didn't say that, did he?


Liberals in the western world these days have become little totalitarians.:lol

[Dresta]

A. You need to learn what a whistleblower is. Read this account and tell me exactly how this guy qualifies as a whistleblower (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ex-fbi-pleads-guilty-being-ap-source-sentenced)

B. You need to learn about our system of government. The president doesn't sentence anybody.

C. 80% of that jail time is from one case, Chelsea Manning's. That case was also the largest ever leak of classified material, so it's no surprise the sentence was so severe.
:roll:

Severe national security threat guiz..

Obamacunt is a disgusting hypocrite who thinks it's ok for him to smoke, but not for those living poorer and less privileged lives to, who should instead be forced to quit through an unconstitutional Federal tobacco tax. But, of course Obama would do that, because any minority he can extort and steal money from he will do so, as he has been doing his whole Presidency. Keep defending him though while he crushes the poor while pretending to care.

[KevinNYC]

:roll:

Severe national security threat guiz..

Obamacunt is a disgusting hypocrite who thinks it's ok for him to smoke, but not for those living poorer and less privileged lives to, who should instead be forced to quit through an unconstitutional Federal tobacco tax. But, of course Obama would do that, because any minority he can extort and steal money from he will do so, as he has been doing his whole Presidency. Keep defending him though while he crushes the poor while pretending to care.

Take your meds please.

[KevinNYC]

His name is Bradley. :facepalm:
Not since April, it ain't

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/convicted-leaker-bradley-manning-changes-legal-name-to-chelsea-elizabeth-manning/2014/04/23/e2a96546-cb1c-11e3-a75e-463587891b57_story.html


Convicted leaker Bradley Manning changes legal name to Chelsea Elizabeth Manning

An Army soldier convicted of leaking classified military and diplomatic records persuaded a Kansas judge Wednesday to legally change her name from Bradley Manning to Chelsea Elizabeth Manning.

[DukeDelonte13]

:roll:

Severe national security threat guiz..

Obamacunt is a disgusting hypocrite who thinks it's ok for him to smoke, but not for those living poorer and less privileged lives to, who should instead be forced to quit through an unconstitutional Federal tobacco tax. But, of course Obama would do that, because any minority he can extort and steal money from he will do so, as he has been doing his whole Presidency. Keep defending him though while he crushes the poor while pretending to care.


this is why nobody takes you seriously.

[Dresta]

this is why nobody takes you seriously.
You tell me why it's ok to extort minorities? Considering 'addiction' is now routinely classified as a mental illness, i'd like to know why you think it's ok to steal money from the mentally handicapped for the sake of their being handicapped?

Why so cruel? Why so inhumane? It cannot be justified, and i'm yet to see anyone justify logically it on any grounds other than the forced regulation of personal habits and behaviour, which is of course, unconstitutional. Sad you know so little about your country's history and the principles it was founded on.

While Obama is extorting his mentally handicapped citizens, using petty moral justifications for making a cheap buck, the same citizens are forced to contribute tax towards the subsidising of tobacco farmers! As usual the consumer gets it up the arse from both directions! It really is quite farcical.

[SunsN07BookIt]

So many of these things people hated about Bush, they must REALLY hate about Obama, unless they carry around a sense of false pride just because they were conned into voting for him.

[NumberSix]

Not since April, it ain't

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/convicted-leaker-bradley-manning-changes-legal-name-to-chelsea-elizabeth-manning/2014/04/23/e2a96546-cb1c-11e3-a75e-463587891b57_story.html
I did not know that. Thank you for correcting me. :cheers:

[Droid101]

You tell me why it's ok to extort minorities? Considering 'addiction' is now routinely classified as a mental illness, i'd like to know why you think it's ok to steal money from the mentally handicapped for the sake of their being handicapped?

Why so cruel? Why so inhumane? It cannot be justified, and i'm yet to see anyone justify logically it on any grounds other than the forced regulation of personal habits and behaviour, which is of course, unconstitutional. Sad you know so little about your country's history and the principles it was founded on.

While Obama is extorting his mentally handicapped citizens, using petty moral justifications for making a cheap buck, the same citizens are forced to contribute tax towards the subsidising of tobacco farmers! As usual the consumer gets it up the arse from both directions! It really is quite farcical.Seek professional help.

[KevinNYC]

:cheers:
I did not know that. Thank you for correcting me. :cheers:

[Dresta]

Seek professional help.
Another cast-iron argument from Droid. :applause:

[gigantes]

Obama has sentenced whistleblowers to over 20x the jail time of all previous presidents... combined.
skimming the list, these are all ppl who compromised national security.


i couldn't say what's right or wrong, or whether the outings were justified, but it seems to me you better be DAMN sure you know what you're doing when you do something like that no matter the nation or era in history.

most of the time across history, ppl like that tended to suddenly disappear.

[Nick Young]

When did being liberal in the united states start to mean the same thing as supporting totalitarian fascism?:facepalm

[gigantes]

When did being liberal in the united states start to mean the same thing as supporting totalitarian fascism?:facepalm
er... the moment cheap political accusations turned in to ordinary horse feed?

[NumberSix]

When did being liberal in the united states start to mean the same thing as supporting totalitarian fascism?:facepalm
This is why I constantly say "they're not liberals. They're leftists".

[russwest0]

Seek professional help.

Come on man, I don't necessarily agree or disagree with the man but comments like these always make me :facepalm

[Nanners]

You tell me why it's ok to extort minorities? Considering 'addiction' is now routinely classified as a mental illness, i'd like to know why you think it's ok to steal money from the mentally handicapped for the sake of their being handicapped?

Why so cruel? Why so inhumane? It cannot be justified, and i'm yet to see anyone justify logically it on any grounds other than the forced regulation of personal habits and behaviour, which is of course, unconstitutional. Sad you know so little about your country's history and the principles it was founded on.

While Obama is extorting his mentally handicapped citizens, using petty moral justifications for making a cheap buck, the same citizens are forced to contribute tax towards the subsidising of tobacco farmers! As usual the consumer gets it up the arse from both directions! It really is quite farcical.


Perhaps you could show us where exactly in the constitution it says that the government is not allowed to regulate habits and behavior.

[Dresta]

Perhaps you could show us where exactly in the constitution it says that the government is not allowed to regulate habits and behavior.
Well, the 9th and 10th amendments would be a start.

'The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.'

The Constitutional protections are not limited to what is explicitly mentioned, which is the whole point of the 9th amendment: it is a 'presumption of liberty' (when restricting a right, the government has the burden of proving beyond all doubt that this infringement is necessary, otherwise it is not constitutional). Considering the spirit of the American experiment is captured in the Declaration, which founds the nation as a place where the citizenry can pursue 'life, liberty and happiness' without being fettered by the government, it is clear that the regulation of the personal life, of a man's life inside his home even, would be something utterly repugnant to the founders (or any sensible man, really). And in all the writings of the founders that i have read (which is a fair bit), there is not even a single implication that this kind of thing would be ok.

The desire to regulate all aspects of personal life had zero political backing all the way up until the emergence of the Populist and Progressive movements, which were imbued with a puritanical hatred of various things, and led at the same time to alcohol prohibition and the other drug prohibitions that our society still suffers from today.