PDA

View Full Version : Better passing team? 2002 Kings or 2014 Spurs?


NBAplayoffs2001
10-18-2014, 08:43 PM
I got the Spurs.
triangleoffense
10-18-2014, 09:31 PM
The Spurs since the Kings had no real defense or offensive center that could compete like the spurs do... Duncan is really more a PF/C than a true PF.
33teeth
10-19-2014, 11:47 AM
Most of the posters on this board were still wearing huggies in 2002 so I wouldn't expect many insightful responses.
tmacattack33
10-19-2014, 02:55 PM
Kings, come on now.
QuebecBaller
10-19-2014, 03:02 PM
http://threesecondviolation.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/kings.jpg
imdaman99
10-19-2014, 03:34 PM
The Spurs since the Kings had no real defense or offensive center that could compete like the spurs do... Duncan is really more a PF/C than a true PF.
Divac was a great passer :biggums:
Pearleojam
10-20-2014, 08:37 PM
Im Spurs fan, but i pick Kings
NBAplayoffs2001
10-20-2014, 08:43 PM
Divac was a great passer :biggums:

Was a nasty passer more like it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-q_sWdxBK8
TheReal Kendall
10-20-2014, 08:43 PM
Idk. I'm leaning towards the Spurs but I think that's because I just seen them play a few months ago.


@triangle have you ever seen Divac play?
Joyner82reload
10-20-2014, 11:19 PM
The Kings were a great passing team because they had elite passers at virtually every position. The only player on the team that wasn't an above average passer was Scott Pollard.

The Spurs on the other hand are great as a team, not individuals. Aside from Ginobili and Duncan that is.
stalkerforlife
10-20-2014, 11:20 PM
The team that won the title.
L.Kizzle
10-20-2014, 11:21 PM
Kings.

Spurs more comparable to the early 70s Knicks.
wakencdukest
10-20-2014, 11:43 PM
The Kings had better passers, but the Spurs in the finals last year had some of the best ball movement I've ever seen.