Put 2012 Bron on the 2002 Kings

[sportjames23]

Swap out Doug Christie for him.

Do they get past the Lakers?

[Hamtaro CP3KDKG]

obviously WTF kinda question is this:biggums: :biggums:
Kings were the best team in 2002 and got cheated out of a chip

[Prometheus]

They certainly do if you swap him for Tim Donaghy.

[TheReal Kendall]

Nope. They wouldn't even make the playoffs. :rolleyes: :hammerhead:

[sportjames23]

obviously WTF kinda question is this:biggums: :biggums:
Kings were the best team in 2002 and got cheated out of a chip


**** you mean WTF kinda question is this? :coleman:

Bron ain't never faced a squad like those early 2000s Lakers.

[inclinerator]

hamtaro is actually right for the first time

[G0ATbe]

Lakers would stomp them even worse than they did originally. We all know LeBald is a cancer that will instantly change even the centers to spot up shooters.

[Warfan]

**** you mean WTF kinda question is this? :coleman:

Bron ain't never faced a squad like those early 2000s Lakers.

True, I mean I doubt bron will impact the series more than Doug Christie.

[ArbitraryWater]

What the ****.... OP you tryna make it as WOAT poster??

[sportjames23]

What the ****.... OP you tryna make it as WOAT poster??


Nigguh, you gonna participate or am I gonna have to show you out the door? This MY house. You either comply or get bum rushed.

[ZeN]

This would be a better hypothetical if LBJ wasn't replacing a scrub. He should be replacing CWEB.

[oarabbus]

obviously WTF kinda question is this:biggums: :biggums:
Kings were the best team in 2002 and got cheated out of a chip



This... end thread. No discussion needed.

[kuniva_dAMiGhTy]

Dude, no offense, but these topics are no brainers. :oldlol:

Kobe replacing Starks - of course the Knicks win
Bron replacing Christie - Kings win easily

Both teams played the Bulls and Lakers to the brink of elimination - you replace one role player from each team with another Top 10 player, all time, and its not even a competitive series anymore.

[Smoke117]

Dude, no offense, but these topics are no brainers. :oldlol:

Kobe replacing Starks - of course the Knicks win
Bron replacing Christie - Kings win easily

Both teams played the Bulls and Lakers to the brink of elimination - you replace one role player from each team with another Top 10 player, all time, and its not even a competitive series anymore.

**** that. Offense meant: Stop making these stupid ass threads.

[CelticBaller]

Better question

is op on that kool aid?

[oarabbus]

**** that. Offense meant: Stop making these stupid ass threads.

Yeah this thread was a major fail.

[sportjames23]

Dude, no offense, but these topics are no brainers. :oldlol:

Kobe replacing Starks - of course the Knicks win
Bron replacing Christie - Kings win easily

Both teams played the Bulls and Lakers to the brink of elimination - you replace one role player from each team with another Top 10 player, all time, and its not even a competitive series anymore.


You believe that? You really believe Kobe is gonna take the Knicks to the win over the Bulls? That he's not gonna get caught up in trying to outplay MJ? That he can play the kinda defense that Knicks team played?

And then Bron's gonna provide the scoring and defense needed to overcome prime Shaq?

[sportjames23]

Yeah this thread was a major fail.


Then get the **** out.

[ThatCoolKid]

You believe that? You really believe Kobe is gonna take the Knicks to the win over the Bulls? That he's not gonna get caught up in trying to outplay MJ? That he can play the kinda defense that Knicks team played?

And then Bron's gonna provide the scoring and defense needed to overcome prime Shaq?

Yes, this whole concept that talent is somehow additive and that just putting a good player on a good team will automatically make the team better is absurd.

I mean, just look at the Gary Paton, Karl Malone, Shaq, Kobe Lakers, or even better, the Pau, Nash, Dwight, Kobe Lakers. You put a bunch of stars together, and for some unknown reason, the teams crash and burn. I mean, what could be the common factor? Such different scenarios with nothing in common, and yet the same general principle holds true.

Obviously you can't think Bron's gonna put the Kings over the top. Obviously.

[ArbitraryWater]

You believe that? You really believe Kobe is gonna take the Knicks to the win over the Bulls? That he's not gonna get caught up in trying to outplay MJ? That he can play the kinda defense that Knicks team played?

And then Bron's gonna provide the scoring and defense needed to overcome prime Shaq?

:biggums: :banghead:

You're ****ing retarded

It's one thing to have a controversial opinion, but you are ****ing ALONE on this subject... Even Hamtaro went biggums on you. Stahp.

[red1]

lol

[JT123]

Yes, this whole concept that talent is somehow additive and that just putting a good player on a good team will automatically make the team better is absurd.

I mean, just look at the Gary Paton, Karl Malone, Shaq, Kobe Lakers, or even better, the Pau, Nash, Dwight, Kobe Lakers. You put a bunch of stars together, and for some unknown reason, the teams crash and burn. I mean, what could be the common factor? Such different scenarios with nothing in common, and yet the same general principle holds true.

Obviously you can't think Bron's gonna put the Kings over the top. Obviously.
Nothing in common? :biggums: Both teams had a cancer at shooting guard in Kobe Bryant, who thought he was better then he actually was.

[aj1987]

You believe that? You really believe Kobe is gonna take the Knicks to the win over the Bulls? That he's not gonna get caught up in trying to outplay MJ? That he can play the kinda defense that Knicks team played?

And then Bron's gonna provide the scoring and defense needed to overcome prime Shaq?
You really need to get MJ's dick out of your ass or you should stick to your standard posts: ":roll: :roll: :roll: ". Idiot.

Kobe on the Knicks and MJ retires with 2-3 rings, while Kobe and Ewing win ~4 rings.

LeBron is a career 29 PPG scorer in the playoffs.

[Milbuck]

You believe that? You really believe Kobe is gonna take the Knicks to the win over the Bulls? That he's not gonna get caught up in trying to outplay MJ? That he can play the kinda defense that Knicks team played?

And then Bron's gonna provide the scoring and defense needed to overcome prime Shaq?
:biggums:

This is Kobe and Lebron we're talking about. Replacing John Starks and Doug Christie on what were already very close series. Are you serious?

Next thread...does replacing 2009 Wade for Ginobili on the 2013 Spurs put them over the Heat in the finals?

[c5terror]

You really need to get MJ's dick out of your ass or you should stick to your standard posts: ":roll: :roll: :roll: ". Idiot.

Kobe on the Knicks and MJ retires with 2-3 rings, while Kobe and Ewing win ~4 rings.
Well I think 91 is a toss up but 92 and 93 knicks with kobe will surely top the bulls but bulls top the knicks 96,97,98



LeBron is a career 29 PPG scorer in the playoffs.
90% of his attempt were open shot, open dunk, open layup, and open jumpshot.

MJ>Kobe>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lebron by the way.

[c5terror]

:biggums:

This is Kobe and Lebron we're talking about. Replacing John Starks and Doug Christie on what were already very close series. Are you serious?

Next thread...does replacing 2009 Wade for Ginobili on the 2013 Spurs put them over the Heat in the finals?


You don't know teamcheamistry and other factors.

Even if you place kwame brown with Lebron on lakers with kobe, still championship is not a sure thing as there so many variables to considered. To think otherwise is a LOL