Shariah Law Gets BANNED by Alabama

[9erempiree]

Folks in Alabama are smarter than I thought.

http://conservativetribune.com/shariah-law-banned-alabama/

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), took to Facebook to denounce the amendment, calling it “virulently racist” and motivated by “outright hostility towards Muslims.”

Alabama Statewide Amendment 1 reads:


“Called “The American and Alabama Laws for Alabama Courts Amendment,” Amendment 1 relates to the application of foreign law during the legal process involving an Alabama citizen. Foreign law refers to the laws of other countries or cultures. Currently, judges or other legal authorities discern whether foreign law is applied. Amendment 1 would create constitutional protection that foreign law is not applied if it violates the guaranteed rights of Alabama citizens.”

The liberal argument against the proposed amendment is mostly that it is a solution for a nonexistent problem. Oh, and it is racist and Islamophobic.

But that is precisely why such an amendment needed to be passed. Are American citizens supposed to wait until they find themselves being ruled over by a foreign set of laws before doing something about it? Of course not!

The voters of Alabama should be commended for taking the proactive step of ensuring that they will never be faced with Sharia Law, or any other foreign set of laws, in their state. It appears that this, along with the other amendment measures on their ballot, have passed with wide margins.


Go cry me a river Mussies.

[brownmamba00]

yeah 'cus muslims are waiting in a line to make alabama a sharia state

[RedBlackAttack]

It's certainly vital for Alabama to regulate their out of control Muslim populations. Sure, it may sound like a totally useless amendment only meant to get a rise out of xenophobic know-nothings, but the state has to ensure the safety of its often forgotten, neglected white Christians. Good move, state legislature and voters! :applause:

[DukeDelonte13]

government waste at its finest.

[Patrick Chewing]

Good Ol Alabama leading the way. Which way you ask? Why the America way!!



http://www.theseamericans.com/wp-content/gallery/american-lynching/t-lynching-jpg.jpg

http://hunniebrown.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/lynching.jpg

http://www.legendsofamerica.com/photos-americanhistory/Rubin-Stacy-7-19-1935-Miami-FL-2.jpg

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3932/2402/1600/lynch_1.jpg

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/120613122235-kkk-10-horizontal-gallery.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/130559913/cletus.gif


You're trying to trick the masses by posting pictures of atrocities in hopes of generating an emotional response to your cause.

But you look the biggest fool in the end.

Shariah Law actually approves of hangings, stonings, beheadings, and other types of cruel punishment and murder. So posting pictures of hangings actually enforces the thought that Shariah law should never even be a whisper or a thought in this country.


Thanks for playing the game, idiot.

[Patrick Chewing]

I know it does.:applause: :applause: Thats what the photos were for. To show people how American attitudes from less than 80 years ago were strikingly similar to Sharia's disgusting laws. Im just saying Sharia wouldnt have been out of place in Alabama at all. But Merica is land of the free or something. Which is why im so confused grrrrrr


http://replygif.net/i/263.gif

[Droid101]

Pointless feel good legislation.

I guess they can do whatever they want, but why waste taxpayer money with this stupid shit?

[imdaman99]

I think Jameer is the only Muslim in Alabama. He will probably move now.

[andgar923]

Good for Alabama.

Sharia law is very controversial within the Muslim community worldwide. Like everything related to religion, it comes down to interpretation and ones culture. Sharia law does have it's benefits, but sadly some extremists corrupt it and that's what we hear about.

[HitandRun Reggie]

Good Ol Alabama leading the way. Which way you ask? Why the America way!!



http://www.theseamericans.com/wp-content/gallery/american-lynching/t-lynching-jpg.jpg

http://hunniebrown.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/lynching.jpg

http://www.legendsofamerica.com/photos-americanhistory/Rubin-Stacy-7-19-1935-Miami-FL-2.jpg

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3932/2402/1600/lynch_1.jpg

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/120613122235-kkk-10-horizontal-gallery.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/130559913/cletus.gif


Unfortunately, our beloved capitol Washington DC is the new Alabama. Number one by far in racial hate crimes and top 5 in metro areas with the greatest racial neighborhood and school segregation.

[9erempiree]

It is a good thing and a good precedent to set because Islamic law is being incorporated in wills. By banning Sharia Law it is a good step forward in prevention.

[Noob Saibot]

muslims are always welcome in the netherrealm.

http://wiki.chronicles-of-blood.com/images/Location_headers-Infernal_planes.jpg

[MadeFromDust]

[QUOTE=9erempiree]Folks in Alabama are smarter than I thought.

http://conservativetribune.com/shariah-law-banned-alabama/

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), took to Facebook to denounce the amendment, calling it

[MadeFromDust]

yeah 'cus muslims are waiting in a line to make alabama a sharia state
If I'm not mistaken those backwards ass moslem inbreds have already tried to escape punishment in the U.S. by claiming the murder of their daughters was "honor killing" according to their homeland...and apparently some stupid ass judges have been symphathetic no doubt of some insane political "correctness" motive :rolleyes: Bravo, Alabama, BRAVO!

[Trollsmasher]

good for them:applause:

meanwhile in Sweden police outright admitted defeat in more than 50 Sharia controlled areas:lol

[RoundMoundOfReb]

:applause:

[iamgine]

I don't get why they need to ban anything. Foreign law already doesn't apply in the US right?

[2LeTTeRS]

I don't get why they need to ban anything. Foreign law already doesn't apply in the US right?

Yes and no. In situations where there is no clearcut US law; we lean on interpretation of foreign courts to make legal determinations. As you can imagine this doesn't happen very often.

[iamgine]

Yes and no. In situations where there is no clearcut US law; we lean on interpretation of foreign courts to make legal determinations. As you can imagine this doesn't happen very often.

I just don't see what this is preventing or any situation this can be applied to. Can you give an example?

[moaz]

(Village-idiocy, or at least idiocy, applies to anyone who applauded him in his thread)

I actually did not to reply to your rent free threads, since you never reply to any fact presented to you (not an easy copy and paste exercise), but I am hopeless.
You don't need to answer my question here either. Just go to your newly elected representative an help him draft a bill against Aztecan human sacrifices in Iowa.

Now to Sharia law in Alabama: maybe I've missed something but can anyone provide a link to a case where any of the following courts used Sharia low in their rulings:

The US Supreme Court or
Any of the 52 State Supreme Court (including Texas and Oklahoma additional 2 Supreme Courts)

Any of the 94 US District Courts

Any of the 13 US Appellate Courts

Any of the Special US federal courts:

United States Tax Court
United States Court of International Trade
United States Court of Federal Claims
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
United States bankruptcy courts
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review
United States Court of Military Commission Review


Any of about 110 States Appellate Courts

OR ANY OF THESE COURTS:
Alabama Circuit Courts (41 circuits)
Alabama District Courts (67 districts)
Alabama Municipal Courts (273 courts)
Alabama Probate Courts (68 courts)
Alabama Court of the Judiciary

Alaska Superior Court (40 judgeships)
Alaska District Court (21 judgeships)

Arizona Superior Courts, state trial courts and courts of general jurisdiction (15 courts)
Justices of the Peace (county courts) [43] and Arizona Municipal Courts, city trial courts and courts of limited jurisdiction

Arkansas Circuit Courts (23 judicial circuits)
Arkansas District Courts (formerly Arkansas Municipal Courts)
Arkansas City Courts

Superior Courts of California (58 courts)

Colorado District Courts (22 judicial districts)
Colorado County Courts (64 courts)

Connecticut Superior Court (13 districts)]
Connecticut Probate Courts (54 districts)

Delaware Court of Chancery
Delaware Superior Court (3 courts)
Delaware Family Court
Delaware Court of Common Pleas
Delaware Justice of the Peace Court
Delaware Alderman's Court

Florida Circuit Courts (20 judicial circuits)
Florida County Courts (67 courts)

Georgia Superior Courts (49 judicial circuits)
Georgia State Courts
Georgia Magistrate Courts]
Georgia Juvenile Courts
Georgia Probate Courts
Georgia Municipal Courts

Hawaii State Circuit Courts (4 circuits)
Hawaii State Family Courts (4 circuits)
Hawaii State District Courts (including Small Claims Court)
Hawai

[Droid101]

It's completely stupid, waste-of-time, "feel-good" legislation. Wasting tax payer dollars coming up with garbage legislation that panders to their base who think "the mulin's are comin' to git us!" and accomplishes absolutely nothing.

[Trollsmasher]

They asked the same in London:lol

[9erempiree]

This bill actually helps and protect Muslim Americans just as much as the country from preventing the use of Sharia Law.

Why? Big fortune 500 companies are using Sharia Law (foreign law) to win them cases against Muslims who have migrated over to the United States.

Like I said, stop getting your towels in a knot.

I have proof too but I like to use my ammo wisely. If the next idiot tries to challenge me. I have proof. All 600 pages.

[Patrick Chewing]

I don't get why they need to ban anything. Foreign law already doesn't apply in the US right?


What if I went to State Legislatures with the backing of certain Civil Rights groups like CAIR and the NAACP and positioned that the denial of Shariah Law infringes on my religious rights to practice it as is customary for Muslims across the world??


So when spineless, political hacks cave to my demands, I now have the government backing to decide and undertake the stoning of my wife if I deemed her unfaithful.

And if my son turns out gay, I can kill him.


So yeah. Shariah law is shit, created by shitty people.

[Droid101]

So when spineless, political hacks cave to my demands, I now have the government backing to decide and undertake the stoning of my wife if I deemed her unfaithful.

And if my son turns out gay, I can kill him.


So yeah. Shariah law is shit, created by shitty people.
But that stuff is already illegal in America.

And if someone made a law to make it legal, it would never pass constitutional muster.

So.... this law is pointless.

[Patrick Chewing]

But that stuff is already illegal in America.

And if someone made a law to make it legal, it would never pass constitutional muster.

So.... this law is pointless.


Honor killings and killings under Shariah Law can easily make its way into society, just as "crimes of passion" are considered somewhat excusable and can get some people off (as in freed).

It's not too far-fetched as some of you may think.

[nathanjizzle]

waste of time. id like these "productive politicians" to be lynched. i bet these idiots dont even know how to use a computer.
first its sharia law, next is Taoism

[9erempiree]

What if I went to State Legislatures with the backing of certain Civil Rights groups like CAIR and the NAACP and positioned that the denial of Shariah Law infringes on my religious rights to practice it as is customary for Muslims across the world??


So when spineless, political hacks cave to my demands, I now have the government backing to decide and undertake the stoning of my wife if I deemed her unfaithful.

And if my son turns out gay, I can kill him.


So yeah. Shariah law is shit, created by shitty people.

Preventative measures regardless of what people think about the law.

By passing this, it will set precedent for other states to do the same, hopefully in the near future, so we don't have to bend over backwards for people.

If CAIR is pissed about this, then there is a reason. If it is no big deal then I don't see why CAIR is all pissed about it.

[9erempiree]

Starts at page 56

http://shariahinamericancourts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Sharia_Law_And_American_State_Courts_1.4_06212011. pdf

[wakencdukest]

The day that anyone tried to impose sharia in the United States, there would be a muslim cleansing. It would never happen, so yes it was a huge waste of time for Alabama.

[MadeFromDust]

:roll: OP is the village idiot lmao Can't even spell the word right in his own topic how fcuking stupid can people get!


Fukkn mods combined threads. /smh This was for the OP of "To our village idoit: On Alabama baning Sharia Law", not the OP of "Shariah Law Gets BANNED by Alabama"

[sweggeh]

I have to say, that first post is complete ether.

[iamgine]

What if I went to State Legislatures with the backing of certain Civil Rights groups like CAIR and the NAACP and positioned that the denial of Shariah Law infringes on my religious rights to practice it as is customary for Muslims across the world??


So when spineless, political hacks cave to my demands, I now have the government backing to decide and undertake the stoning of my wife if I deemed her unfaithful.

And if my son turns out gay, I can kill him.


So yeah. Shariah law is shit, created by shitty people.
That scenario can't ever happen because there's already laws and constitution that prevent that scenario from ever being legal. Political hacks can't cave on that because they really don't have the power to.

[Dresta]

waste of time. id like these "productive politicians" to be lynched. i bet these idiots dont even know how to use a computer.
first its sharia law, next is Taoism
It's ok to come and live in a foreign country and not abide by the law of the land now?

Sharia courts are running in certain areas in the UK were particular communities live by their own laws, and the police don't want to touch them for 'culturally sensitive' reasons.

edit: and OP i'm sure there'll be some information for you here:

http://shariahinamericancourts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Sharia_Law_And_American_State_Courts_1.4_06212011. pdf

Anyway, that isn't even the main problem. The biggest problem is Islamic communities doling out their own form of justice unbeknownst to American law courts, and an unwillingness to investigate into this issue.

[DukeDelonte13]

I just don't see what this is preventing or any situation this can be applied to. Can you give an example?


a business contract that stipulates that sharia law be applied in any dispute over the terms.

[iamgine]

a business contract that stipulates that sharia law be applied in any dispute over the terms.
That's what I was saying. Those stipulations would not be legal anyway with or without the amendment.