Akrazotile
11-21-2014, 09:15 PM
It actually came from some guy in the comment section of an article, but the idea is that for players who've been with a certain team for x amount of years, be it 10, 12, whatever the case would be, basically allow them to receive a portion of salary that doesnt count against the cap.
Obviously guys like Duncan and Dirk take discounts to continue competing, but they end up sacrificing a significant amount of money despite having huge impacts on team revenue. On the other hand if a guy like Kobe goes for all he can get as someone who does generate huge profits for the organization, he ends up being criticized and also handicaps the team, making it difficult to compete.
So should players whove been the face of their team for a long time be able to eventually receive a portion of their salary off the salary cap books? Im trying to think of any potential drawbacks and Im curious if anyone out there knows any.
Obviously guys like Duncan and Dirk take discounts to continue competing, but they end up sacrificing a significant amount of money despite having huge impacts on team revenue. On the other hand if a guy like Kobe goes for all he can get as someone who does generate huge profits for the organization, he ends up being criticized and also handicaps the team, making it difficult to compete.
So should players whove been the face of their team for a long time be able to eventually receive a portion of their salary off the salary cap books? Im trying to think of any potential drawbacks and Im curious if anyone out there knows any.