Robert Sacre in the 60's

[Deuce Bigalow]

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Robert+Sacre+Los+Angeles+Lakers+v+San+Antonio+4XD_ wjkI3HZx.jpg

Would he go down as an NBA legend?

[HomieWeMajor]

Depends if he's got enough money to pay the NBA to fabricate stats in his favour like other players from that era.

[robert de niro]

depends how big he looks next to Conan O'Brien, we might need a graph on this

[SugarHill]

This dude really has Snoop tatted on himself? :biggums:

[SugarHill]

depends how big he looks next to Conan O'Brien, we might need a graph on this
:oldlol:

[Lebronxrings]

a stronger, more annoying rich mans wilt.

[JimmyMcAdocious]

Love how his belly button is the core of the earth in his tat.

[Deuce Bigalow]

a stronger, more annoying rich mans wilt.
He gives Wilt a run for his money and then some?

[dontgetchoked]

he has 3 different guys tatted on himself and one is snoop dogg... lmao.

[outbreak]

Wow he has some terrible tatts, the NBA needs to instigate some kind of tattoo education program.

He's mediocre now and he'd be mediocre then too. He wouldn't have those tattoos though so that would be a plus side for himself.

I couldn't tell is that was snoop dog or some kind of alien jedi on his chest

[Done_And_Done]

That Snoop tat is so wrong hahaha

[oarabbus]

depends how big he looks next to Conan O'Brien, we might need a graph on this

:roll:

[RoundMoundOfReb]

Odds are he wouldn't even play basketball since it was much less popular in the 60s and thus much less attractive as a career choice (which is why it was a weak era). But if he did? He would dominate 32/15/7 easily.

[AlphaWolf24]

is that mellow man Ace under Snoop???

[outbreak]

is that mellow man Ace under Snoop???

I think it's a burn victim.

[LAZERUSS]

Odds are he wouldn't even play basketball since it was much less popular in the 60s and thus much less attractive as a career choice (which is why it was a weak era). But if he did? He would dominate 32/15/7 easily.

No doubt he would dominate. How do I know that?

Take a look at his college career. He is one of the few that was so talented, he played FIVE years of college ball.

He played in the time frame in which the great Tyler Hansborough won CPOY. Yes, the same Hansborough who has proven in his NBA career that he can't shoot, rebound, dribble, pass, or defend (true, he can take a charge, but usually not by design.)

Playing in "the Hansborough-era", and against either "one-and-dones'", or players who had no hope of being drafted...Sacre put up a staggering stat-line of...drum roll please...

9.3 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 0.7 apg, and a .504 FG%.

Utter and pure domination...

[Deuce Bigalow]

No doubt he would dominate. How do I know that?

Take a look at his college career. He is one of the few that was so talented, he played FIVE years of college ball.

He played in the time frame in which the great Tyler Hansborough won CPOY. Yes, the same Hansborough who has proven in his NBA career that he can't shoot, rebound, dribble, pass, or defend (true, he can take a charge, but usually not by design.)

Playing in "the Hansborough-era", and against either "one-and-dones'", or players who had no hope of being drafted...Sacre put up a staggering stat-line of...drum roll please...

9.3 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 0.7 apg, and a .504 FG%.

Utter and pure domination...
Thats's in the modern era though...

[LAZERUSS]

Thats's in the modern era though...

Just watch two minutes of Hanborough, and with a straight face, tell us all here that he is better today, in terms of pure talent and skills, than guys like Reed, Bellamy, Thurmond, Lucas, Barry, Havlicek, and Wilt were in the 60's.

And BTW, KAJ played college ball in the 60's, and started his NBA career in the 60's. Better than KAJ, too?

[ImKobe]

No doubt he would dominate. How do I know that?

Take a look at his college career. He is one of the few that was so talented, he played FIVE years of college ball.

He played in the time frame in which the great Tyler Hansborough won CPOY. Yes, the same Hansborough who has proven in his NBA career that he can't shoot, rebound, dribble, pass, or defend (true, he can take a charge, but usually not by design.)

Playing in "the Hansborough-era", and against either "one-and-dones'", or players who had no hope of being drafted...Sacre put up a staggering stat-line of...drum roll please...

9.3 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 0.7 apg, and a .504 FG%.

Utter and pure domination...

A wilt stan calling someone out for not being able to shoot, how ironic.

[LAZERUSS]

A wilt stan calling someone out for not being able to shoot, how ironic.

I know...just seasons of .595, .649, .683, and .727 from the field.

Hmmm...how about 35 straight made FGAs? Or games of 15-15, 16-16, and 18-18 from the floor? Or a 66 point game on 29-35 from the field?

I guess Shaq couldn't shoot either, right?

[swagga]

No doubt he would dominate. How do I know that?

Take a look at his college career. He is one of the few that was so talented, he played FIVE years of college ball.

He played in the time frame in which the great Tyler Hansborough won CPOY. Yes, the same Hansborough who has proven in his NBA career that he can't shoot, rebound, dribble, pass, or defend (true, he can take a charge, but usually not by design.)

Playing in "the Hansborough-era", and against either "one-and-dones'", or players who had no hope of being drafted...Sacre put up a staggering stat-line of...drum roll please...

9.3 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 0.7 apg, and a .504 FG%.

Utter and pure domination...

doe it's hard to stay in the game with all these dudes attacking the rim. Back then wilt used to cherry pick half the game, he didn't lose any energy on defense. Matter of fact the entire league was like that except russell.

[LAZERUSS]

doe it's hard to stay in the game with all these dudes attacking the rim. Back then wilt used to cherry pick half the game, he didn't lose any energy on defense. Matter of fact the entire league was like that except russell.

Used to "cherry pick?" Like scoring 40+ ppg, grabbing 25+ rpg, handing out 5+ apg, blocking 8+ shots per game, and holding his opposing centers to a 10% drop in FG% efficiency?

[LAZERUSS]

Robert Sacre in the 60's...

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130710153514/mafiawars/images/c/c4/Huge_item_popcornvendor_01.png

[swagga]

Used to "cherry pick?" Like scoring 40+ ppg, grabbing 25+ rpg, handing out 5+ apg, blocking 8+ shots per game, and holding his opposing centers to a 10% drop in FG% efficiency?

kobe bryant is scoring 26today with 5rpg and 5ast ... yet his team is better off without him. Wilt is no different son, just another cherrypicker statpadder that choked chronically.

At least kobe has 5 rings, wilt barely got 2 as the 3rd option... like bosh.

[swagga]

Robert Sacre in the 60's...

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130710153514/mafiawars/images/c/c4/Huge_item_popcornvendor_01.png

you need to change that popcorn to taco son. That being said sacre's game would be so advanced, he'd have the same effect MJ had on basketball in the late 80s.

[RoundMoundOfReb]

No doubt he would dominate. How do I know that?

Take a look at his college career. He is one of the few that was so talented, he played FIVE years of college ball.

He played in the time frame in which the great Tyler Hansborough won CPOY. Yes, the same Hansborough who has proven in his NBA career that he can't shoot, rebound, dribble, pass, or defend (true, he can take a charge, but usually not by design.)

Playing in "the Hansborough-era", and against either "one-and-dones'", or players who had no hope of being drafted...Sacre put up a staggering stat-line of...drum roll please...

9.3 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 0.7 apg, and a .504 FG%.

Utter and pure domination...
That is from the modern era though where guys dont give up pro basketball careers to be tractor salesmen.

[deja vu]

Wilt would shat his pants seeing a white guy as big as Sacre.