PDA

View Full Version : Rank these players



dubeta
12-02-2014, 05:46 PM
Player A: 27.5 ppg 7.2 rbs 6.9 asts 50% FG


Player B: 25.5ppg 5.3 rbs 4.8 assists 45% FG


Player C: 27.4 ppg 6.9 rbs 3.5 assists 48% FG

riseagainst
12-02-2014, 05:48 PM
B/C






Russell Westbrook












A

G0ATbe
12-02-2014, 05:48 PM
Currently

1a. Kobe
1b. Durant
3. LeBald

dubeta
12-02-2014, 05:51 PM
Currently

1a. Kobe
1b. Durant
3. LeBald

What do they have to do with this thread? I just posted numbers I didn't name anyone :facepalm


btw the eye test says otherwise

AnaheimLakers24
12-02-2014, 05:52 PM
5> 2

Jlamb47
12-02-2014, 05:53 PM
2/5

SouBeachTalents
12-02-2014, 05:53 PM
5> 2

Horry > Kobe

ThatCoolKid
12-02-2014, 05:58 PM
4 > 1
2 = 2

Beastmode88
12-02-2014, 06:18 PM
Horry > Kobe

Horry is the GOAT :bowdown:

Droid101
12-02-2014, 06:19 PM
Horry > Kobe
Who is arguing that? We know that.

hahaitme
12-02-2014, 06:19 PM
Kind of off-topic, but I just want to know why people keep referring to LeBron's finals record as 2/5 rather than 2-3?

Anywhere else I've seen it written, people usually go by W/L records by Wins/Losses, rather than Wins/NumberOfGamesPlayed.

So for example Jordan would be 6-0, LeBron 2-3, BR 11-1, etc.

I dunno, not like a huge deal or anything but just thought it was strange the way people word it on this forum.

:confusedshrug:

dubeta
12-02-2014, 06:45 PM
4 > 1
2 = 2

agreed

BuffaloBill
12-02-2014, 08:57 PM
Horry > Kobe



Yeah Horry is more clutch in the finals than Kobe and Lebron put together

L.Kizzle
12-02-2014, 09:04 PM
Kind of off-topic, but I just want to know why people keep referring to LeBron's finals record as 2/5 rather than 2-3?
:biggums:

Done_And_Done
12-02-2014, 10:15 PM
Kind of off-topic, but I just want to know why people keep referring to LeBron's finals record as 2/5 rather than 2-3?

Anywhere else I've seen it written, people usually go by W/L records by Wins/Losses, rather than Wins/NumberOfGamesPlayed.

So for example Jordan would be 6-0, LeBron 2-3, BR 11-1, etc.

I dunno, not like a huge deal or anything but just thought it was strange the way people word it on this forum.

:confusedshrug:

It all boils down to optics. 2/3 looks less damaging than 2/5...

L.Kizzle
12-02-2014, 10:20 PM
It all boils down to optics. 2/3 looks less damaging than 2/5...
If you shoot the ball five times and miss three shots you're 2/5 not 2/3.

If you shoot the ball three times and make two of them, you're 2/3.

dubeta
12-03-2014, 03:59 PM
Hard to differentiate between B-C tbh

riseagainst
12-03-2014, 04:01 PM
i'm a huge fan of player A. But objectively speaking, I gotta go with C/B.

j3lademaster
12-03-2014, 04:08 PM
I agree op, that Lebron's pretty much the goat fantasy player with his pretty stats.