can this warriors team go 73-9?

[Rose'sACL]

if this team stays healthy, do they have any chance of doing it? they have no big weakness at least for the regular season.

[Fork]

Hell no

[Im so nba'd out]

Hell no
welcome back

[Ca$H]

if this team stays healthy, do they have any chance of doing it? they have no big weakness at least for the regular season.

They haven't been 100% healthy all season(Lee). :eek:

[LoneyROY7]

I hope GSW gets the #1 seed. I'd feel more comfortable with the Clips playing them without homecourt advantage than I would the Grizz or Spurs.

[Fawker]

62-65. they will not lose more than 20.

[Akrazotile]

Theres absolutely no way they go 73-9.


They goin 79-3.

[Collie]

74 wins
Championship

Curry MVP
Bogut DPOY
David Lee 6MOY
Klay FMVP
Draymond MIP
Kerr COY
Bob Myers Executive of the Year

[Warfan]

If they played in the East they probably would.

[SugarHill]

:biggums:

[LAZERUSS]

The odds are overwhelmingly against it,...but you never know. I never thought that the '96 Bulls would steamroll the NBA to the tune of a 72-10 record, either.

[Akrazotile]

74 wins
Championship

Curry MVP
Bogut DPOY
David Lee 6MOY
Klay FMVP
Draymond MIP
Kerr COY
Bob Myers Executive of the Year



They aint got this years ROY on the squad?

Season = failure

[ronnymac]

No

[sportjames23]

Every season a team gets off to a hot start this question is asked.

Understand this--the 1995-1996 Bulls only lost 3 games by February 1996. They lost 7 games the rest of the regular season.

It's a long season, fellas. If the Warriors have 3 losses or less by February, then we can talk.

[Megabox!]

Them Golden State boys straight clownin' the League right now :applause:

[Inferno]

I hope GSW gets the #1 seed. I'd feel more comfortable with the Clips playing them without homecourt advantage than I would the Grizz or Spurs.

:coleman:

[Smook A.]

Lol people said the exact same thing about the Pacers last year when they're record was something like 25-5. Everybody was saying Paul George was going to win MVP and Roy Hibbert was a lock for DPOY, and the Pacers were guaranteed to win at least 60 games. Look how that turned out.

I'm not saying Stephen Curry can't win MVP, he actually looks like has a good chance to, and the Warriors do have a nice possibility to get to the 60 win mark but some of you guys start saying crazy things way too early :lol

[LoneyROY7]

:coleman:

:confusedshrug:

I could be wrong, but I like the match-ups better. Memphis is a really bad match-up for us (and a lot of other teams). Spurs are iffy, I might actually prefer to play them rather than you guys.

But Memphis and OKC are the toughest match-ups for us out West.

[swagga]

real question: can they make it out the wcsf? they choke like mad in the PO.

[sportsfan76]

if this team stays healthy, do they have any chance of doing it? they have no big weakness at least for the regular season.


Why would ask something so silly?

[Done_And_Done]

Steep odds man. That's just such an incredibly difficult pace of winning to sustain.

[RoseCity07]

Not a chance in hell. I'll leave this forum forever if they do srs. I'm positive that doesn't happen. They barely beat the Blazers on some really lucky plays at the end when Portland was in control.

[andremiller07]

If they had a Eastern Conference like schedule anything is possible (but 99% chance no) but highly unlikely in the West...............no

[deja vu]

It would be funny if they break the Bulls record and then proceed to get dumped out of the playoffs.

[Papaya Petee]

If they had a Eastern Conference like schedule anything is possible (but 99% chance no) but highly unlikely in the West...............no
This "if they played in the East" garbage needs to stop.

The 2013 Miami Heat would destroy the Warriors from this year, if not sweep them, went on a historic 27 game winning streak, and only went 66-16.

0 chance Warriors do it anywhere except for D-League.

[Marchesk]

It would be funny if they break the Bulls record and then proceed to get dumped out of the playoffs.

By the 8th seeded Thunder ...

[Marchesk]

The 2013 Miami Heat would destroy the Warriors from this year, if not sweep them, went on a historic 27 game winning streak, and only went 66-16.


Spurs had them beat in 6, doe.

[Al Thornton]

teams that start off this hot usually play average in the second half of the season.

[Dragic4Life]

I refuse to believe any team without Lebron has even the remote possibility of winning 73 games.:facepalm

[k0kakw0rld]

real question: can they make it out the wcsf? they choke like mad in the PO.
Last 2 playoffs series were against Spurs and Clippers. They choke? they were never favorite to win neither of those series. They brought the Spurs to 6 games and almost upset the Clippers pushing that stacked roster to 7 games.

[juju151111]

Last 2 playoffs series were against Spurs and Clippers. They choke? they were never favorite to win neither of those series. They brought the Spurs to 6 games and almost upset the Clippers pushing that stacked roster to 7 games.
Without Bogut too.

[kamil]

Every season a team gets off to a hot start this question is asked.

Understand this--the 1995-1996 Bulls only lost 3 games by February 1996. They lost 7 games the rest of the regular season.

It's a long season, fellas. If the Warriors have 3 losses or less by February, then we can talk.

Who's to say the reverse isn't possible; they lose a bunch now and keep the losses to a minimum near the end of the season?

[SexSymbol]

They'd destroy the Clipper or Thunder in the playoffs.
I think they have a good chance to get 65-68 wins

[sportjames23]

I refuse to believe any team without Lebron has even the remote possibility of winning 73 games.:facepalm


I bet you still believe in Santa Clause, too.

[sportjames23]

Who's to say the reverse isn't possible; they lose a bunch now and keep the losses to a minimum near the end of the season?


Ain't gonna happen, bruh.

[LoneyROY7]

They'd destroy the Clipper or Thunder in the playoffs.
I think they have a good chance to get 65-68 wins

:facepalm

[smoovegittar]

...and I was so hoping for 74 - 8.

[r0drig0lac]

no matter, spurs will destroy them

[DamnMixes]

No team can physically go that well in the stacked up western conference, it's impossible.

Plus warriors are not the team that always stay healthy, sadly.

[SexSymbol]

:facepalm
What?
Clippers would get oblitterated by this team.
If LAC won 1 game against them in the PO, I'd consider that a good outcome for the clippers.

[UK2K]

Every season a team gets off to a hot start this question is asked.

Understand this--the 1995-1996 Bulls only lost 3 games by February 1996. They lost 7 games the rest of the regular season.

It's a long season, fellas. If the Warriors have 3 losses or less by February, then we can talk.

Do we all remember the blazers last year?

[Lebronxrings]

i wish the cavs were that stacked :(

[LoneyROY7]

What?
Clippers would get oblitterated by this team.
If LAC won 1 game against them in the PO, I'd consider that a good outcome for the clippers.

Don't quit your day job.

[juju151111]

Do we all remember the blazers last year?
The difference is the warriors play defense way better then the Blazers and with the Pavers their offense was not too notch. Warriors have both those things and doesn't have the chemistry/locker room problems pacers had. The only thing that can impede them is health.

[imnew09]

74 wins
Championship

Curry MVP
Bogut DPOY
David Lee 6MOY
Klay FMVP
Draymond MIP
Kerr COY
Bob Myers Executive of the Year

Then you wake up

[sejoon101]

No more than 64. My Cs started 29-3 in 2007. Nowhere close to 70.

And isnt GSWs last 8 games or something, NONE of those teams had a winning record? Saw it on inside the NBA. Highest win percentage team they beat in the last few weeks were NOLA at 8-8 they 8-9 after the gsw game... honestly think theyll find a way to end the season with more than 20 losses

[Proctor]

This team is great but will go nowhere near 70.

I expect them to go on the inevitable short skid soon.

[Top Gun]

Probably end around 60-62 wins. Tough, tough conference.

[rmt]

Which team would want #1 seed in the West and get probably OKC (playing well) in the first round? OKC only has to make up 10 wins/losses to catch PHX (16 to catch DAL). No team these days is gonna chase 72-10. They'll rest their players once home court is secured.

[LAZERUSS]

Which team would want #1 seed in the West and get probably OKC (playing well) in the first round? OKC only has to make up 10 wins/losses to catch PHX (16 to catch DAL). No team these days is gonna chase 72-10. They'll rest their players once home court is secured.

Agreed 100%. A coach might even get fired if he were to lose a key player to a season-ending injury in a late season meaningless game.

[inclinerator]

74 wins first round exit

[Fork]

60-65 wins at best, even that would be a lot considering the competitive conference

[G0ATbe]

I honestly don't see a team ever going 73-9 no matter how stacked they are. We'll probably never see a team more stacked than the 90s Bulls, although the current Cavs and 2010-14 Heat came very close to that. And even if we do see a team more stacked, the era wont be weak enough for it to happen like it was in the 90s.

[NZStreetBaller]

I dont think anyone really marks gsw on their calender. They're known as a good team but not considered a championship contender just yet. They have the ability but teams are still underestimating them

[SamuraiSWISH]

Ok ... so let me get this straight, we have ISHiots saying:

- Steph Curry is MVP and it's still early December of the 2014 - 2015 season?

- Steph Curry this season is MAJESTICALLY on another level all together from D. Rose in 2011, eben though their raw stats are the exact same?

- And now, we have predictions, or even hypothesizing the 2015 Warrior will win more games than the '96 Bulls?

You fellas have gone full retard. The type of overzealous kids who pre nut their pants before even making out with a chick. My goodness.

[1987_Lakers]

Ok ... so let me get this straight, we have ISHiots saying:

- Steph Curry is MVP and it's still early December of the 2014 - 2015 season?

- Steph Curry this season is MAJESTICALLY on another level all together from D. Rose in 2011, eben though their raw stats are the exact same?

- And now, we have predictions, or even hypothesizing the 2015 Warrior will win more games than the '96 Bulls?

You fellas have gone full retard. The type of overzealous kids who pre nut their pants before even making out with a chick. My goodness.

U mad because Rose will never be elite again?:oldlol:

[sirkeelma]

if this team stays healthy, do they have any chance of doing it? they have no big weakness at least for the regular season.
The answer to your question is in your avy.

[SyRyanYang]

Ok ... so let me get this straight, we have ISHiots saying:

- Steph Curry is MVP and it's still early December of the 2014 - 2015 season?

- Steph Curry this season is MAJESTICALLY on another level all together from D. Rose in 2011, eben though their raw stats are the exact same?

- And now, we have predictions, or even hypothesizing the 2015 Warrior will win more games than the '96 Bulls?

You fellas have gone full retard. The type of overzealous kids who pre nut their pants before even making out with a chick. My goodness.

Apart from a few Rose stans, Bulls' fans are generally reasonable on this forum. well, except for you:facepalm

Judging an entire fanbase based on some poster named "bobcats2013"?:biggums:

Oh and Rose will never be the same again so stay mad.:lol

[SamuraiSWISH]

Judging an entire fanbase based on some poster named "bobcats2013"?
I didn't judge GSW fans, or Steph Curry fans ... WTF, I said over zealous idiots on ISH. Your dumb ass obviously can't read, or comprehend.


U mad because Rose will never be elite again?
Nah. I've been gearing up for over 2 years now, I'm well past the acceptance stage Derrick won't be the same on the trajectory he was on since he won MVP.

If he proves me wrong, that's great.

But I mean at the end of the day, I was privileged enough to watch the greatest player of all-time from '89 - '98 play for my favorite franchise. So any other great player that comes through Chi-Town is just icing on the cake.

[SouBeachTalents]

Seriously one of the dumbest threads I've ever seen on this board, which is really saying something. A team has one 70 games in a season ONCE in NBA history. Russell's Celtics never did it, same with all time great stacked teams like the '87 Lakers & '86 Celtics. You really think this Warriors team is going to accomplish something only one other team has EVER done, in their conference no less?