Log in

View Full Version : If Westbrook is a better defender than Rose, then how come



nathanjizzle
12-19-2014, 09:43 AM
Rose defended Curry better?

rose on curry 5/14, 19 points 7 assists
westbrook on curry 14/24 34 points 9 assists

Taller than CP3
12-19-2014, 09:59 AM
that's because Rose is ill

SyRyanYang
12-19-2014, 10:15 AM
lol one game

Also Curry uses screens a ton, it takes team effort to stop him.

I<3NBA
12-19-2014, 10:25 AM
Bulls have better defensive schemes than OKC.

only idiots think defending is a 1 on 1 thing.

fpliii
12-19-2014, 10:33 AM
Bulls have better defensive schemes than OKC.

only idiots think defending is a 1 on 1 thing.
/thread

Beastmode88
12-19-2014, 12:01 PM
Bulls have better defensive schemes than OKC.

only idiots think defending is a 1 on 1 thing.

Slayed.

imdaman99
12-19-2014, 01:55 PM
Do you watch basketball games? 1 on 1 Westbrook would lock Curry up, but the use of team basketball where they run him through 10 picks will give him space + he has to depend on the big man on his team jumping out on Curry to help. Out of those 34 points, I don't think he scored half of those on Westbrook.

How about offense? How did Rose do on offense against Curry? Since this is black and white to you.

scm5
12-19-2014, 03:13 PM
Just gonna leave this here....


http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=curryst01&p2=westbru01

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=curryst01&p2=rosede01

Solefade
12-19-2014, 03:30 PM
Bulls have better defensive schemes than OKC.

only idiots think defending is a 1 on 1 thing.

:eek:

SOD 21
12-19-2014, 03:47 PM
So far this season, Derek Rose has held opposing point guards to effective field-goal percentage of 38.7% and a player efficiency rating of 13.0. His defensive numbers are good.

By comparison, Russell Westbrook has held opposing point guards to an effective field-goal percentage of 33.3% and a player efficiency rating of 10.9%. But the numbers for Russell Westbrook on defense are better.

Take that for what it is worth.

I do think it speaks highly of Russell Westbrook that his numbers are better than Rose and he doesn't have a benefit for playing for a defensive minded coach like Thibs.

scm5
12-19-2014, 04:04 PM
So far this season, Derek Rose has held opposing point guards to effective field-goal percentage of 38.7% and a player efficiency rating of 13.0. His defensive numbers are good.

By comparison, Russell Westbrook has held opposing point guards to an effective field-goal percentage of 33.3% and a player efficiency rating of 10.9%. But the numbers for Russell Westbrook on defense are better.

Take that for what it is worth.

I do think it speaks highly of Russell Westbrook that his numbers are better than Rose and he doesn't have a benefit for playing for a defensive minded coach like Thibs.

Idk where you're getting your numbers from, but could you post Curry's defensive numbers?

I swear he's gotta be up there. Night after night, opposing PG's shoot poorly against him

SOD 21
12-19-2014, 04:09 PM
Idk where you're getting your numbers from, but could you post Curry's defensive numbers?

I swear he's gotta be up there. Night after night, opposing PG's shoot poorly against him

Sure, the defensive numbers for opposing point guards against Steph Curry is 40.5% effective field-goal percentage and a player efficiency rating of 11.7.

riseagainst
12-19-2014, 04:10 PM
Rose sucks, Westbrook is miles ahead of the guy. Deal wit it.

MastaKilla
12-19-2014, 04:15 PM
Rose is getting better

scm5
12-19-2014, 04:18 PM
Sure, the defensive numbers for opposing point guards against Steph Curry is 40.5% effective field-goal percentage and a player efficiency rating of 11.7.

Thanks! Looks like Curry has gotten pretty beast defensively.

Genaro
12-19-2014, 04:26 PM
Curry made most his damage last night against other guys. OKC kept trading on screens and Curry took advantaged of the other guys (specially Jackson) to score his points.

I really don't like those changes on screens but Brooks is a known idiot.