Log in

View Full Version : Westbrook is absolutely TERRIBLE.



ekosky
12-21-2014, 10:17 PM
holy smokes i have never seen a player unintentionally throw a game like that... dude chucked/missed like his last 5 shots to take his team out of the game completely. :lol

OKC will never win shit because of him.

navy
12-21-2014, 10:19 PM
Westbrook and Durant are too talent to never win. Plus they have a decent supporting cast.

imdaman99
12-21-2014, 10:22 PM
He missed 5 to take his team out of the game? Are you retarded? They were in the game up until the final miss, which allowed a putback. No surprise that another branstan is a well-known retard. That makes the % of branstans being retarded at a forum-high of 98.7%

hitmanyr2k
12-21-2014, 10:22 PM
I've been saying the last few years it's because Westbrook's dumbass coach enables him to play hero ball without holding him accountable. Someone made a thread not too long ago questioning if coaching was overrated. I say no and point right to Scott Brooks. A competent coach would have reined Westbrook in and had him playing disciplined ball a long time ago.

Young X
12-21-2014, 10:25 PM
People need to stop making threads like this after one game. It's one game. He was playing great in the 10 games before this.

Budadiiii
12-21-2014, 10:27 PM
People need to stop making threads like this after one game. It's one game. He was playing great in the 10 games before this.
Exactly. Rose plays worse than this every game

Let's put things in perspective here

Eric Cartman
12-21-2014, 11:01 PM
I've been saying the last few years it's because Westbrook's dumbass coach enables him to play hero ball without holding him accountable. Someone made a thread not too long ago questioning if coaching was overrated. I say no and point right to Scott Brooks. A competent coach would have reined Westbrook in and had him playing disciplined ball a long time ago.

What makes goatbrook awesome is his psychopath/savage tenacity that be plays with.

Let's not forget. OKC would have 2 titles by now without the injuries in the postseason.

ArbitraryWater
12-21-2014, 11:04 PM
What makes goatbrook awesome is his psychopath/savage tenacity that be plays with.

Let's not forget. OKC would have 2 titles by now without the injuries in the postseason.

huh

dontgetchoked
12-21-2014, 11:09 PM
dude, westbrook has been a straight up BEAST this season. and he's been consistent, putting up i think 7 25 point games in a row. Everyone has bad games. And this is from someone who never bought the westbrook is the best pg in the nba talk. but this season he kinda is, so far. that being said, he did have a kobe like performance tonight :facepalm


Exactly. Rose plays worse than this every game


ay, **** you nikka

yeaaaman
12-21-2014, 11:09 PM
I've been saying the last few years it's because Westbrook's dumbass coach enables him to play hero ball without holding him accountable. Someone made a thread not too long ago questioning if coaching was overrated. I say no and point right to Scott Brooks. A competent coach would have reined Westbrook in and had him playing disciplined ball a long time ago.

I didn't watch this game but overall, I've seen enough of Westbrook, I agree with this - he needs to be held accountable, because he hasn't shown he is able to adequately learn how to best manage a game. Some of his decisions are horrible straight up head scratchers. If a coach was on him more he'd be a lot better than he is now, which is pretty amazing.

The Red Viper
12-21-2014, 11:47 PM
Russ is awesome. Box-Office. No idea why anyone would dislike him. The guy is probably the most energetic and enigmatic player I have seen. His plays can range from ****ing awesome to ****ing rubbbish in one possession. Sure, he can frustrate you completely and lose you games with his solo approach but the guy is a superstar. Lets just enjoy this explosive duracell bunny while it lasts because we won't see this same explosive Russ forever. Once he grows older he will mature and may become a better player but definitely won't be as entertaining.

ekosky
12-22-2014, 12:14 AM
Russ is awesome. Box-Office. No idea why anyone would dislike him. The guy is probably the most energetic and enigmatic player I have seen. His plays can range from ****ing awesome to ****ing rubbbish in one possession. Sure, he can frustrate you completely and lose you games with his solo approach but the guy is a superstar. Lets just enjoy this explosive duracell bunny while it lasts because we won't see this same explosive Russ forever. Once he grows older he will mature and may become a better player but definitely won't be as entertaining.
And this is a bad thing how?

bluechox2
12-22-2014, 12:15 AM
last 2 games westbrooks 20 for 60 lol

NZStreetBaller
12-22-2014, 12:46 AM
Been saying it forever. Durant > westbrook

Budadiiii
12-22-2014, 12:49 AM
Been saying it forever. Durant > westbrook
It's never really been debatable. Just trolling from jealous Durant haters

I'd troll too because Durant is the best player I've ever seen. If I was not on his side I would troll too.

imdaman99
12-22-2014, 01:19 AM
And this is a bad thing how?
Some people enjoyed #8 more than #24.

sportjames23
12-22-2014, 01:21 AM
holy smokes i have never seen a player unintentionally throw a game like that... dude chucked/missed like his last 5 shots to take his team out of the game completely. :lol

OKC will never win shit because of him.


Jun 2007 :facepalm

dontgetchoked
12-22-2014, 01:28 AM
Been saying it forever. Durant > westbrook
only dumbasses and lebron stans say westbrook is better than durant. Durant was the best player in the nba las year.

edrick
12-22-2014, 01:33 AM
only dumbasses and lebron stans say westbrook is better than durant. Durant was the best player in the nba las year.

Some Durant stans/OKC fans say that Westbrook is better than Lebron, there are morons on both sides.

russwest0
12-22-2014, 02:13 AM
Yes, Westbrook is absolutely terrible.

The Red Viper
12-22-2014, 04:58 AM
And this is a bad thing how?

Its not a bad thing. I just said, that he won't as entertaining.

IMObjective
12-22-2014, 05:34 AM
:oldlol:

Ship shitty chuckbrook to the Lakers where he can carry on chuckbe's legacy.

nathanjizzle
12-22-2014, 06:01 AM
Hes a dumbass. He has durant on his team and doesnt know how to utilize him. Straight dumbass. In a few years when his athleticism is gone, he will most likely be playing overseas.

Eric Cartman
12-22-2014, 06:15 AM
huh

Ibaka last year and Westbrook the year before.

dreamwarrior
12-22-2014, 07:41 AM
I thought it was a gutsy effort. You can't make every game winner

j3lademaster
12-22-2014, 01:32 PM
last 2 games westbrooks 20 for 60 lolOh no, a volume shooter has a massive sample size of 2 games with 33% shooting. Someone make the world right again.

DMAVS41
12-22-2014, 01:34 PM
Oh yes...just terrible.

Just 27/7/6 57% TS and a really solid defender...that happens to win a lot of games when he plays.

TylerOO
12-22-2014, 01:37 PM
Best player in the league this season

ninephive
12-22-2014, 02:07 PM
What makes goatbrook awesome is his psychopath/savage tenacity that be plays with.

Let's not forget. OKC would have 2 titles by now without the injuries in the postseason.
I would say they would have at least 3 to 4 titles if healthy every year. And the Spurs would have like 9 titles. And the Bulls would have a couple with a healthy Rose. There are like 5 teams a year that would have theoretically won if they were healthy.

ninephive
12-22-2014, 02:11 PM
Oh yes...just terrible.

Just 27/7/6 57% TS and a really solid defender...that happens to win a lot of games when he plays.
To be fair to Westbrook, he is shooting .462 from the field this season (the best he's ever shot in his career). To put that into perspective, Tony Parker has shot worse than that one time in his 14-year career (his rookie season). Westbriiiiiiiiiick!

chocolatethunder
12-22-2014, 02:13 PM
Oh yes...just terrible.

Just 27/7/6 57% TS and a really solid defender...that happens to win a lot of games when he plays.
Westbrook is confounding. It would be awful to have to coach him. He plays hard and does a lot of things right but he really has several possessions a game, even important possessions, that leave you scratching your head. I think he's exciting and great for the league but I don't think that he'll ever win a championship unless he changes his game and I wouldn't want him on my team. Exciting to watch for sure but he does too many boneheaded things for me.

Budadiiii
12-22-2014, 02:41 PM
I would say they would have at least 3 to 4 titles if healthy every year. And the Spurs would have like 9 titles. And the Bulls would have a couple with a healthy Rose. There are like 5 teams a year that would have theoretically won if they were healthy.
Name those 5 teams, and no the Bulls are not a realistic choice. Try again.

nathanjizzle
12-22-2014, 09:07 PM
Name those 5 teams, and no the Bulls are not a realistic choice. Try again.

bulls would have won atleast 1 if healthy
okc would still be at 0 if they were healthy and will still be.