PDA

View Full Version : Replace three-peat Kobe with 06 Wade



sportjames23
12-25-2014, 06:47 PM
Do the Shaq/Wade Lakers still win three in a row (or even more)? Does Wade take one of Shaq's FMVPs?

ImKobe
12-25-2014, 06:50 PM
What is the point of this thread? Replace 3 yrs of kobe with 1 yr of Wade? They wouldn't be able to win more than one then.

Foster5k
12-25-2014, 06:50 PM
Replace Kobe with any top 5 guard with three-peat Shaq and the Lakers still win.

ArbitraryWater
12-25-2014, 06:50 PM
Lol at OP trying to initiate a Kobe vs. Wade stan war

Dragonyeuw
12-25-2014, 06:52 PM
Do the Shaq/Wade Lakers still win three in a row (or even more)? Does Wade take one of Shaq's FMVPs?

Yes to first question, no to second. Shaq was too much a mismatch for basically any other center between 2000 and 2002, for another player to steal his thunder. Way too dominant...

ImKobe
12-25-2014, 06:52 PM
So it's 06 Wade all 3 seasons? IDK.. different rules but playing at 06 level for 3 straight years would be absurd. I think they still win it all, which is no shot at Kobe since Wade is a top 25 All-Time player.

And 01 Kobe is as good as 06 Wade. Let's not forget handchecking wasn't made illegal until the 04-05 season... Would Wade have gotten those calls before the rule change? Doubtful.

sportjames23
12-25-2014, 06:58 PM
Lol at OP trying to initiate a Kobe vs. Wade stan war


Hell you talkin bout, son?


ayyy lmao

sportjames23
12-25-2014, 07:01 PM
So it's 06 Wade all 3 seasons? IDK.. different rules but playing at 06 level for 3 straight years would be absurd. I think they still win it all, which is no shot at Kobe since Wade at his peak is almost GOAT level of play.


Wasn't that only Wade's third season? That's one reason why I made this comparison, because at the beginning of the Lakers three-peat years, Kobe was in his third season as well, IIRC. So they would be comparable.

Dragonyeuw
12-25-2014, 07:04 PM
Wasn't that only Wade's third season? That's one reason why I made this comparison, because at the beginning of the Lakers three-peat years, Kobe was in his third season as well, IIRC. So they would be comparable.
It was Kobe's 4th season in 2000....anyways Kobe wasn't at level of 06 Wade till 2001. 06 Wade replacing 00 Kobe, Lakers easily win. Doubt it would be different in 2001 and 2002....

Deuce Bigalow
12-25-2014, 08:55 PM
Someone getting FMVP over Shaq..

:lol

TheMarkMadsen
12-25-2014, 08:56 PM
Wade isn't durable enough to win 3 straight rings while playing at an elite level.

iTare
12-25-2014, 08:57 PM
Someone getting FMVP over Shaq..

:lol
Wade did it

imdaman99
12-25-2014, 08:58 PM
Tell me how anyone gets a Finals MVP over a 35-15 guy, MJ included.

You can't have 06 Wade all 3 years, didn't Wade break down in 07 and they got swept in the 1st round?

I know for a fact 08 Heat were one of the biggest busts in history, didn't they win 15 games that year?

Shih508
12-25-2014, 09:26 PM
three-peat Kobe was never the focal point on opponent's defense plan. So you cannot compare his stats to every other superstar by saying Kobe is better. Single coverage and more FT due to Shaq got them in penalty easily.

2nd fiddle is 2nd fiddle.

AI, Tmac, VC > Kobe by big margin

sportjames23
12-26-2014, 02:46 AM
Tell me how anyone gets a Finals MVP over a 35-15 guy, MJ included.

You can't have 06 Wade all 3 years, didn't Wade break down in 07 and they got swept in the 1st round?

I know for a fact 08 Heat were one of the biggest busts in history, didn't they win 15 games that year?


You never saw MJ play, I see.

Everybody talk about how MJ's game would change with Shaq, but what makes you think Shaq's game wouldn't change? No one upped his game more in the playoffs, Shaq included, than MJ.