PDA

View Full Version : Michael "Empty Stats" Jordan



Marchesk
01-10-2015, 04:25 PM
*Caveat: MJ is GOAT

86/87 Bulls 40-42
2013/14 Wolves 40-42

MJ: 29.8 PER
Love: 26.9 PER

MJ: 37.1/5.2/4.6 on 48.5%
Love: 26.1/12.5/4.4 on 50.2%

Both played in stacked conferences.

Someone explain to me why Love is empty.

VengefulAngel
01-10-2015, 04:29 PM
*Caveat: MJ is GOAT

86/87 Bulls 40-42
2013/14 Wolves 40-42

MJ: 29.8 PER
Love: 26.9 PER

MJ: 37.1/5.2/4.6 on 48.5%
Love: 26.1/12.5/4.4 on 50.2%

Both played in stacked conferences.

Someone explain to me why Love is empty.

FG% wasn't 50.2%, it was 45.7%...

Lebron23
01-10-2015, 04:31 PM
*Caveat: MJ is GOAT

86/87 Bulls 40-42
2013/14 Wolves 40-42

MJ: 29.8 PER
Love: 26.9 PER

MJ: 37.1/5.2/4.6 on 48.5%
Love: 26.1/12.5/4.4 on 50.2%

Both played in stacked conferences.

Someone explain to me why Love is empty.


http://i.imgur.com/V1Gg5Gw.gif

Marchesk
01-10-2015, 04:32 PM
FG% wasn't 50.2%, it was 45.7%...

You're right, was looking at 2P%. That's a lot of threes for a PF.

JimmyMcAdocious
01-10-2015, 04:33 PM
Didn't the Bulls make the playoffs that year?

Either way, that stuff is stripped once you are a proven winner. If Love starts winning championships, no one is going to call him empty stats.

Marchesk
01-10-2015, 04:36 PM
Didn't the Bulls make the playoffs that year?

Either way, that stuff is stripped once you are a proven winner. If Love starts winning championships, no one is going to call him empty stats.

They did make the playoffs. And you're right, although if the Cavs win titles, people will say that Love is just in a supporting role to Lebron.

Marchesk
01-10-2015, 04:38 PM
Both are overrated by their fans.. but to be fair in this comparison, this is 3rd year MJ vs 6th year Kevin Love. By MJ's 7th season he won it all and that was the start of the Bulls dynasty.

True, but nobody is going to argue that Love is better than MJ. The point is that if Jordan was in his third season today putting up those stats on a 40 win team that missed the playoffs, his detractors would be saying the same thing they say about Love.

Granted, MJ's game was different.

Nash
01-10-2015, 04:40 PM
inb4 op feels rage of 3ball

PieceOfFelt
01-10-2015, 04:41 PM
*Caveat: MJ is GOAT

86/87 Bulls 40-42
2013/14 Wolves 40-42

MJ: 29.8 PER
Love: 26.9 PER

MJ: 37.1/5.2/4.6 on 48.5%
Love: 26.1/12.5/4.4 on 50.2%

Both played in stacked conferences.

Someone explain to me why Love is empty.

Do you know who was on that Bulls team you stupid ****? The next best player on that team was a raw Charles Oakley in his second year.That team had next to no talent and they had to go against the likes of the Boston Celtics, Detroit Pistons and Milwaukee Bucks. That team winning 40 games is a miracle considering how worthless the roster was.

HOoopCityJones
01-10-2015, 04:41 PM
Worst thread on ISH.

Im so nba'd out
01-10-2015, 04:42 PM
What you gonna say next op that Jesus had "empty blessings".This may go down as the worst thread ever

Marchesk
01-10-2015, 04:51 PM
Do you know who was on that Bulls team you stupid ****? The next best player on that team was a raw Charles Oakley in his second year.That team had next to no talent and they had to go against the likes of the Boston Celtics, Detroit Pistons and Milwaukee Bucks. That team winning 40 games is a miracle considering how worthless the roster was.

So who did the Wolves have on their team that was so good last season? I'm not saying that Jordan's stats were empty. I'm questioning why Love's were considered empty.

Anyway, we can go back to Jordan's rookie season when he had a teammate in Woolridge who average nearly 23 ppg. They still only won 38 games. Again, I'm not saying Jordan's excellent rookie season was full of empty stats. I'm just questioning why that sort of thing is said about Love.

Marchesk
01-10-2015, 04:51 PM
What you gonna say next op that Jesus had "empty blessings".This may go down as the worst thread ever

Uh, yeah. Or do you think he actually raised the dead?

VIP2000
01-10-2015, 05:09 PM
So who did the Wolves have on their team that was so good last season? I'm not saying that Jordan's stats were empty. I'm questioning why Love's were considered empty.

Anyway, we can go back to Jordan's rookie season when he had a teammate in Woolridge who average nearly 23 ppg. They still only won 38 games. Again, I'm not saying Jordan's excellent rookie season was full of empty stats. I'm just questioning why that sort of thing is said about Love.

Love had Kevin Martin and Pekovic. Granted, both are flawed players but if KG can bring a team with Szczerbiak as his #2 option into the playoffs, then Love should at least be able to do the same.

T_L_P
01-10-2015, 05:14 PM
Kevin Love was a top 5 player in the league last season.

Marchesk
01-10-2015, 05:22 PM
Love had Kevin Martin and Pekovic. Granted, both are flawed players but if KG can bring a team with Szczerbiak as his #2 option into the playoffs, then Love should at least be able to do the same.

But is it that his stats are deceptive, or that he lacks on the defensive end, unlike Garnett?

VIP2000
01-10-2015, 05:24 PM
But is it that his stats are deceptive, or that he lacks on the defensive end, unlike Garnett?

Probably the latter. We all know Love can score but he's barely average (if that) on the defensive end. He needs to be paired with someone like Asik or Tyson Chandler.

3ball
01-10-2015, 08:30 PM
And you're right, although if the Cavs win titles, people will say that Love is just in a supporting role to Lebron.


exactly...love could never win a championship in the leading role... whereas jordan was 6/6 - that's the best anyone has ever done in the leading role... :confusedshrug:

jzek
01-10-2015, 08:43 PM
Someone explain to me why Love is empty.

Love would purposely miss easy/wide open layups so he can get another rebound. Jordan never did anything of the sort. He always wanted to win, not pad his stats.

Spurs5Rings2014
01-10-2015, 08:44 PM
love could never win a championship in the leading role

:facepalm

mehyaM24
01-10-2015, 09:00 PM
op is right. he isn't comparing jordan to klove as PLAYERS, but off results. the only difference being that jordan's team made the postseason with a below .500 record

3ball
01-10-2015, 09:09 PM
the only difference being that jordan's team made the postseason with a below .500 record


and won 6 championships.

all these arguments to downgrade jordan are by guys that never saw him play - they simply can't believe the best player ever came along 25 years ago, instead of playing today.

that's why you have guys like flpiii, who have done some research on their lunch break, and voila!!!!... what do you know!!!!.. turns out we all missed something back then that's been flying over our heads for 20 years!!!!... jordan wasn't the best player in 1993 after all... who knew?... thank flpiii, we all owe you a solid for solving the mystery.

Straight_Ballin
01-10-2015, 09:16 PM
Why is anyone worrying about what Cleveland is going to do? Even the hometown fans know that they will never win a chip. That city lost hope a long time ago and they don't have any expectations because they don't want to be let down. Honestly at this juncture, Bron leaving CLE wouldn't even be much of a shock to them. You are talking about a city that freezes their asses off tailgating at BROWNS games who haven't done shit since Kevin Mack was snorting lines of coke, and even then they still didn't win it all.

Scal
01-10-2015, 09:16 PM
Back then people did feel that Jordan put up great stats that didn't impact the result of the game. It was definitely a common criticism. That's the short story. The novelisation would say he used those criticisms as fuel to prove them wrong, and obviously winning 6 championships (w/ Finals MVP) definitely helps that narrative.

Take Your Lumps
01-10-2015, 09:41 PM
Kevin Love holds the emptiest stat of all: playoff appearances.

MJistheGOAT
01-10-2015, 10:03 PM
I think OP doesnt consider DEFENSE, nor PLAYOFFS appearances in this. Awful analogy.

Also FG% of a SG > PF???

Flawed.

oarabbus
01-11-2015, 12:55 AM
and won 6 championships.

all these arguments to downgrade jordan are by guys that never saw him play - they simply can't believe the best player ever came along 25 years ago, instead of playing today.

that's why you have guys like flpiii, who have done some research on their lunch break, and voila!!!!... what do you know!!!!.. turns out we all missed something back then that's been flying over our heads for 20 years!!!!... jordan wasn't the best player in 1993 after all... who knew?... thank flpiii, we all owe you a solid for solving the mystery.

The first words Marchesk wrote in this topic is "Caveat: Jordan is GOAT" you down syndrome motherfu**er.

SamuraiSWISH
01-11-2015, 01:23 AM
Never ... go ... full ... retard

SugarHill
01-11-2015, 01:24 AM
The first words Marchesk wrote in this topic is "Caveat: Jordan is GOAT" you down syndrome motherfu**er.
:roll:

Megabox!
01-11-2015, 01:36 AM
The first words Marchesk wrote in this topic is "Caveat: Jordan is GOAT" you down syndrome motherfu**er.
:lol

Spurs5Rings2014
01-11-2015, 01:41 AM
The first words Marchesk wrote in this topic is "Caveat: Jordan is GOAT" you down syndrome motherfu**er.

:lol

3ball
01-11-2015, 02:59 AM
The first words Marchesk wrote in this topic is "Caveat: Jordan is GOAT" you down syndrome motherfu**er.
was i responding to the OP or was i responding to mehyta?

i was responding to meyhta... so stfu

learn to read... just like most americans... no reading comprehension... just dumb dumb dumb

navy
01-11-2015, 03:04 AM
was i responding to the OP or was i responding to mehyta?

i was responding to meyhta... so stfu

learn to read... just like most americans... no reading comprehension... just dumb dumb dumb
Interesting. Where are you from?

mehyaM24
01-11-2015, 03:23 AM
and won 6 championships.

all these arguments to downgrade jordan are by guys that never saw him play - they simply can't believe the best player ever came along 25 years ago, instead of playing today.

that's why you have guys like flpiii, who have done some research on their lunch break, and voila!!!!... what do you know!!!!.. turns out we all missed something back then that's been flying over our heads for 20 years!!!!... jordan wasn't the best player in 1993 after all... who knew?... thank flpiii, we all owe you a solid for solving the mystery.
i dont care about any of this. just a bunch of fandom noise to me.

i was only referencing that particular season the OP mentioned. once again, similar results other than jordan's team making the playoffs with a MINUS .500 record.

TheMan
01-11-2015, 03:39 AM
OP needs a good skull fvcking

R.I.P.
01-11-2015, 09:45 AM
Typed Empty Stats into Google got picture of Kevin Love.

Typed Basketball GOAT into Google got four pictures of actuals goats and Michael Jordan.







http://www.peta.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/goat_2D00_list_2D00_4.jpg

Marchesk
01-11-2015, 11:09 AM
Back then people did feel that Jordan put up great stats that didn't impact the result of the game. It was definitely a common criticism. That's the short story. The novelisation would say he used those criticisms as fuel to prove them wrong, and obviously winning 6 championships (w/ Finals MVP) definitely helps that narrative.

Right, I recall pre-championship Jordan being considered the best individual talent, but not the same kind of team player and winner that Magic and Bird were. Of course they had better teammates and coaching, but that was the narrative.

Nikola_
01-11-2015, 11:14 AM
Why is Wilt stan talking about empty stats

Marchesk
01-11-2015, 11:17 AM
I think OP doesnt consider DEFENSE, nor PLAYOFFS appearances in this. Awful analogy.

Also FG% of a SG > PF???

Flawed.

Sometimes 40 wins gets you in, and sometimes it doesn't. Depends on the depth of the conference.

Anyway, I'm not comparing Love's sixth season to Jordan's third season. What I am saying is that even the GOAT scoring 37 a game only resulted in 40 wins when his team was bad. Wilt had a similar season. If you don't have the right team and coaching around you, then there is only so much one player can do for a team.

This is all about Love, man. MJ is just a means.

LAZERUSS
01-11-2015, 11:22 AM
Why is Wilt stan talking about empty stats

Same thing with "brick-job" Bird, who took stacked teams down in flames with HCA SEVEN times. Jerry "Mr. Klutz" West...NINE Finals...ONE ring. And how about the king of "empty stats", "Mr. First Round Exit" himself, Hakeem Olajuwon?

So, give us your definition of "empty stats." Is it MJ taking averaging 44 ppg in a series in which his team was swept by a 67-15 Celtic team? Is it West averaging 38 ppg in a Finals, and his team losing a game seven by two points? Is it Kareem's '77 WCF's, when he just obliterated Walton, but his team was swept?

Go ahead...educate all of his here.

Marchesk
01-11-2015, 11:23 AM
Why is Wilt stan talking about empty stats

Have Wilt play his entire career for Boston instead. Could have happened if Red had convinced him to go to a New England college so the Celtics would have owned the right to take him as a territorial pick.