were the cowboys robbed?

[riseagainst]

Dez clearly made the catch yet they called it an incomplete catch. Cowboys would have won. They were robbed.

This is one of the greatest travesties in NFL history, arguably in all of sports.

[rezznor]

Dez clearly made the catch yet they called it an incomplete catch. Cowboys would have won. They were robbed.

This is one of the greatest travesties in NFL history, arguably in all of sports.
cowboys shouldnt have even been playing last sunday in the first place. karma.


Detroit Lions ✔ @Lions
Follow
Sorry @dallascowboys. We know the feeling: http://bit.ly/1yVP8qr . #CompletingTheProcess
3:03 PM - 11 Jan 2015

[BigBoss]

Yes. Thats a dumb zzz rule. He caught the ball. Whats the problem? Did a female make that rule and make it super complicated?

[Wavves]

How were they robbed?

The rule has been like that for years and has not changed. As dumb as the rule is, the correct call was made.

[~primetime~]

yes, they were

[~primetime~]

How were they robbed?

The rule has been like that for years and has not changed. As dumb as the rule is, the correct call was made.
this dumb ass rule popped up out of no where when it happened to Calvin 4 years ago...

before that it was "two steps with the ball" and that worked just fine



rule needs to be changed back

[~primetime~]

Lance Moore. Ruled a catch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlHyGAw4ffY

Calvin Johnson. Ruled no catch.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-h...own-overturned

Nate Burleson. Ruled a catch.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/detroit-li...urleson-scores

Dez Bryant. Ruled no catch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzmKun3XnB8

Victor Cruz. Ruled a catch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uag-ClYRMs

Calvin Johnson. Ruled no catch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wq2ohfX_AzI

[AlphaWolf24]

Lance Moore. Ruled a catch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlHyGAw4ffY

Calvin Johnson. Ruled no catch.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-h...own-overturned

Nate Burleson. Ruled a catch.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/detroit-li...urleson-scores

Dez Bryant. Ruled no catch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzmKun3XnB8

Victor Cruz. Ruled a catch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uag-ClYRMs

Calvin Johnson. Ruled no catch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wq2ohfX_AzI

the thing that's confusing IMO is....

Dez's right elbow lands on the ground BEFORE the ball touches....shouldn't he be down by contact??

He already secured the ball and took 2 steps...





I'm a Raider fan BTW......IT WASN'T A TUCK!!!!

[Attila]

100% correct call was made. I don't understand how Cowgirl fans expect the refs to hand you two playoff wins.

[~primetime~]

he took 3 steps and made a "football move" by stretching out to the endzone...

crap call IMO, hope that dumb rule changes from this



I thought the rule was fixed after the whole Calvin debacle, guess not

[They Won]

They Won.

[PieceOfFelt]

he took 3 steps and made a "football move" by stretching out to the endzone...

crap call IMO, hope that dumb rule changes from this



I thought the rule was fixed after the whole Calvin debacle, guess not

The call was correct, the rule is the problem. The referees called it correctly.

[Le Shaqtus]

The call was correct, the rule is the problem. The referees called it correctly.

I wouldn't bother if I were you.

[ace23]

The call was correct, the rule is the problem. The referees called it correctly.
What's the rule?

[navy]

He not only took steps, but he changed hands did he not? Seemed like a catch, but whatever man.

[DonD13]

he took 3 steps and made a "football move" by stretching out to the endzone...

crap call IMO, hope that dumb rule changes from this



I thought the rule was fixed after the whole Calvin debacle, guess not

if it was 'stretching out to the endzone', it was really half-assed

close call

but even if they had scored, Packers field goal they made would have been enough for the w

[the mesiah]

if it was 'stretching out to the endzone', it was really half-assed

close call

but even if they had scored, Packers field goal they made would have been enough for the w
Not necessarily , with that 6 they would have been up by 1 so an extra point is no big difference than lead by 2. I could see Garrett going for 2 in that situation to make it a 3 point game,late in the 4th.

[~primetime~]

It is a no brainer that Garrett goes for 2

[StephHamann]

if it was 'stretching out to the endzone', it was really half-assed

close call

but even if they had scored, Packers field goal they made would have been enough for the w

You know because of the incompletion they had great field position.

Anyway i think the Cowboys are a much better fit for the Seahawks. Even with healthy Rodgers Seattle blew them away in week 1, no way they can compete on sunday.

[~primetime~]

Yep Packers aren't that great on the road, Dallas is.

We will almost undoubtedly see Seattle in the SB again.