View Full Version : LeBron led the league in playoff win shares 6 times
JebronLames
01-12-2015, 06:32 PM
2007
2009
2011
2012
2013
2014
GOAT
Kobe only led once in 2001.
SexSymbol
01-12-2015, 06:34 PM
Ban OP, save the earh
T_L_P
01-12-2015, 06:34 PM
Jordan did it 7 times, against real competition.
GOAT.
Lamar Odumbb
01-12-2015, 06:35 PM
Kobe 1 for 1 when leading win shares and winning titles same year. 100 % wow
Lebron 2 for 6 winning titles when leading win shares. .33 % clip.
Can You Dig It.
BigBoss
01-12-2015, 06:36 PM
OP spent his last pay check at the strip club now needs to borrow bus money from mom
TheMarkMadsen
01-12-2015, 06:36 PM
So the goat playoff team was led by Kobe?
Damn, thanks OP
T_L_P
01-12-2015, 06:37 PM
Kobe 1 for 1 when leading win shares and winning titles same year. 100 % wow
Lebron 2 for 6 winning titles when leading win shares. .33 % clip.
Can You Dig It.
My boy Pau is 1 for 1 too :bowdown:
Lamar Odumbb
01-12-2015, 06:52 PM
My boy Pau is 1 for 1 too :bowdown:
KObe is at home singingthe boys 2 men song its so hard to say goodbye to yesterday.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_zvhq9trr4gI/TQuRFXE2aeI/AAAAAAAABuI/4Wkk5W4oYJc/s1600/Kobe-Gasol.jpg
colts19
01-12-2015, 07:09 PM
Just shows some stats don't mean a thing.
Droid101
01-12-2015, 07:10 PM
So the goat playoff team was led by Kobe?
Damn, thanks OP
http://i.imgur.com/3ume9e8.gif
HurricaneKid
01-12-2015, 07:17 PM
LeBron 5x regular season + 6 times postseason = 11
Kobe Bryant 0x regular season. Since its so low lets go ahead and give him all the times he was second or third. Ok. Since we are still at zero lets add in the 1x postseason = 1
Evidence LeBron is 11x better than Kobe.
Wade's Rings
01-12-2015, 07:41 PM
Don't some people think Win Shares are Overrated like they do PER?
MP.Trey
01-12-2015, 07:47 PM
Don't some people think Win Shares are Overrated like they do PER?
Advanced stats are overrated overall. Give me all the raw stats and I'll draw my own conclusions from them.
Magic 32
01-12-2015, 07:50 PM
Kobe only led once in 2001.
All you need to know about WS.
Done_And_Done
01-12-2015, 07:54 PM
Cool
Wade's Rings
01-12-2015, 07:58 PM
Advanced stats are overrated overall. Give me all the raw stats and I'll draw my own conclusions from them.
Some Raw Stats give detail into the raw numbers. AI had a high Usage Rate which is why he averaged so much assists. True Shooting is fine to me and ast %, rbd %, etc are fine. I like PER but can see why some people see it's flawed. Stats like Gamescore are just stupid IMO.
MP.Trey
01-12-2015, 08:02 PM
Some Raw Stats give detail into the raw numbers. AI had a high Usage Rate which is why he averaged so much assists. True Shooting is fine to me and ast %, rbd %, etc are fine. I like PER but can see why some people see it's flawed. Stats like Gamescore are just stupid IMO.
I shouldn't say all advanced stats, you're right. I like usage rate and the percentages, but PER, win shares, gamescore and all that shit that requires a way too complicated formula I'm not a fan of.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.