PDA

View Full Version : Steph Curry: 50/40/90?



scm5
01-18-2015, 08:20 PM
Almost halfway through the season and he's on the verge of having a 50/40/90 season.

If he can keep it up through this season, it has to be one of the most efficient scoring seasons any guard has had considering the number of 3's he takes per game.

Joyner82reload
01-18-2015, 08:28 PM
Meh, kind of pointless now after Durant has basically averaged 50/40/90 for the last 4 seasons combined.

Well 50.6/40.1/88.6 close enough

MARK HENSON
01-18-2015, 08:32 PM
hes the best pont guard in the NBA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:coleman: :coleman: :coleman:

J Shuttlesworth
01-18-2015, 08:34 PM
Meh, kind of pointless now after Durant has basically averaged 50/40/90 for the last 4 seasons combined.

Well 50.6/40.1/88.6 close enough
no

GOBB
01-18-2015, 08:35 PM
Meh, kind of pointless now after Durant has basically averaged 50/40/90 for the last 4 seasons combined.

Well 50.6/40.1/88.6 close enough

88.6 is not 90. :roll:

J Shuttlesworth
01-18-2015, 08:38 PM
88.6 is not 90. :roll:
all those advanced stats... and joyner doesn't even know how rounding works

Uncle Drew
01-18-2015, 08:40 PM
88.6 is not 90. :roll:
''basically'', ''close enough''. read can you?

J Shuttlesworth
01-18-2015, 08:42 PM
''basically'', ''close enough''. read can you?
Except "Close enough" isn't good enough to say someone averaged 50/40/90 over 4 seasons.

Joyner82reload
01-18-2015, 08:43 PM
Jesus christ you kids are ignorant. I said close enough.

90-88.6=1.4/90 * 100=1.56%
30-29.6=.4/30 * 100=1.53%

I guess 29.6 isn't close to averaging 30 ppg, now is it? Idiots

J Shuttlesworth
01-18-2015, 08:45 PM
Jesus christ you kids are ignorant. I said close enough.

90-88.6=1.4/90 * 100=1.56%
30-29.6=.4/30 * 100=1.53%

I guess 29.6 isn't close to averaging 30 ppg, now is it? Idiots
29.6 is fair
28.6 is not

89.6 would be fair
88.6 is not

basically rules of rounding

Joyner82reload
01-18-2015, 08:48 PM
29.6 is fair
28.6 is not

89.6 would be fair
88.6 is not

basically rules of rounding

Wow. You don't even understand standard mathematics. How sad.

Graviton
01-18-2015, 08:48 PM
Meanwhile Kyle Korver is averaging 50/50/90. How great is our gawd? :bowdown:

J Shuttlesworth
01-18-2015, 08:49 PM
Wow. You don't even understand standard mathematics. How sad.
Says the guy who doesn't understand rounding :roll:

88.6 won't get you in the 50/40/90 club no matter how hard you try to defend this

GOBB
01-18-2015, 08:52 PM
Jesus christ you kids are ignorant. I said close enough.

90-88.6=1.4/90 * 100=1.56%
30-29.6=.4/30 * 100=1.53%

I guess 29.6 isn't close to averaging 30 ppg, now is it? Idiots

Let me guess under your photo in the year book it says "Most likely to get you an F copying off his test paper"


Says the guy who doesn't understand rounding :roll:

88.6 won't get you in the 50/40/90 club no matter how hard you try to defend this

He would have done himself a little bit of good not replying. Instead, he makes himself look even worse. Hilarious

Odinn
01-18-2015, 08:57 PM
Wow. You don't even understand standard mathematics. How sad.
The numbers aren't enough twistable so you can get away with this idiocy.

Nash managed to do this in 4 actual seasons. Tho, his volume wasn't this high.
Nowitzki, Durant and Bird are the only ones did it with great volume. (Nowitzki's volume wasn't that high tho, but still great)

Tho, I don't think Curry will give a sh!t about these stuff as stat-padding. He'll be more interested in getting the mvp award and will keep playing like an mvp.

Joyner82reload
01-18-2015, 08:58 PM
Says the guy who doesn't understand rounding :roll:

88.6 won't get you in the 50/40/90 club no matter how hard you try to defend this

You imbecile, the % difference from 29.6 ppg to 30.0 ppg is the same as going from 88.6 to 90.0 FT%

J Shuttlesworth
01-18-2015, 09:00 PM
You imbecile, the % difference from 29.6 ppg to 30.0 ppg is the same as going from 88.6 to 90.0 FT%
29.6 rounds up to 30

88.6 doesn't round up to 90

You really consider 88.6 to be part of the 50/40/90 club? :biggums:

I'm not even sure if rounded up numbers are viable for the 50/40/90 club anyway.

hawksdogsbraves
01-18-2015, 09:01 PM
29.6 rounds up to 30

88.6 doesn't round up to 90

You really consider 88.6 to be part of the 50/40/90 club? :biggums:

I'm not even sure if rounded up numbers are viable for the 50/40/90 club anyway.

They don't.

He can be at 51/42/89.9 and he's not in the club. Thems the rules.

Joyner82reload
01-18-2015, 09:03 PM
29.6 rounds up to 30

88.6 doesn't round up to 90

You really consider 88.6 to be part of the 50/40/90 club? :biggums:

I'm not even sure if rounded up numbers are viable for the 50/40/90 club anyway.

In what world did I say that Durant had done it for 4 straight years? I said he had basically done it, as in he was close.

But yes, Durant is in the 50/40/90 club from 2 seasons ago.

Since we're going on about what is basically and what is not.

Would you consider winning $985,000 basically winning $1,000,000?

J Shuttlesworth
01-18-2015, 09:06 PM
In what world did I say that Durant had done it for 4 straight years? I said he had basically done it, as in he was close.

But yes, Durant is in the 50/40/90 club from 2 seasons ago.

It's close, but no cigar. I just think it's stupid in general to say "close enough" to a club that's exclusively based on percentages. Durant being close to it doesn't make it "pointless" if Curry gets a legit 50/40/90 by the end of the season.

Joyner82reload
01-18-2015, 09:10 PM
It's close, but no cigar. I just think it's stupid in general to say "close enough" to a club that's exclusively based on percentages. Durant being close to it doesn't make it "pointless" if Curry gets a legit 50/40/90 by the end of the season.

Yes, I'm sure an announcer/analyst would never say that a player was basically a 90% free throw shooter if they were shooting 88.6% for the year. You're such an idiot. That is literally said in almost EVERY GAME that Durant plays in.

J Shuttlesworth
01-18-2015, 09:11 PM
Yes, I'm sure an announcer/analyst would never say that a player was basically a 90% free throw shooter if they were shooting 88.6% for the year. You're such an idiot. That literally happens in almost EVERY NBA GAME.
And I'm sure every announcer would say "It's pointless for Curry to get a 50/40/90 season because Durant has been close to it the last few years" :facepalm

KNOW1EDGE
01-18-2015, 09:12 PM
Dude.

Stop.

HurricaneKid
01-18-2015, 09:16 PM
I think the more salient point is that Korver is about to gain entrance to the 50/50/90 club. So 40/50/90 doesn't exactly move the needle.

SugarHill
01-18-2015, 09:18 PM
Says the guy who doesn't understand rounding :roll:

88.6 won't get you in the 50/40/90 club no matter how hard you try to defend this
:roll:

GOBB
01-18-2015, 09:59 PM
Watching joyner drown is funny to watch.

Suguru101
01-18-2015, 10:49 PM
You imbecile, the % difference from 29.6 ppg to 30.0 ppg is the same as going from 88.6 to 90.0 FT%


No, it's really not. :roll: :roll: :roll:

SHAQisGOAT
01-18-2015, 11:12 PM
Meh, kind of pointless now after Durant has basically averaged 50/40/90 for the last 4 seasons combined.

Well 50.6/40.1/88.6 close enough

If you combine Bird's 4 regular-seasons from 1984 to 1988:

28.1 PPG on 51.7/41.4/90.1

Actual 50/40/90 club, during 4 seasons combined.

Even adding 1983-84 he's at 51.2/40.0/89.9, which is the closest you can get, that's REALLY 'close enough'... For 5 combined seasons.

Larry also shot 50+/40+/90+ during the course of 18 games for the 1986 Playoffs (while leading the C's to a title)... Don't know if anyone has ever done it in the post-season while playing a considerable amount of games.

chocolatethunder
01-18-2015, 11:19 PM
Meh, kind of pointless now after Durant has basically averaged 50/40/90 for the last 4 seasons combined.

Well 50.6/40.1/88.6 close enough
And Nash averaged 49% 43% and 90% for his career

SHAQisGOAT
01-18-2015, 11:20 PM
Larry also shot 50+/40+/90+ during the course of 18 games for the 1986 Playoffs (while leading the C's to a title)... Don't know if anyone has ever done it in the post-season while playing a considerable amount of games.

For more than 15 games you only got these 4:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=single&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=Y&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=99&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=fg_pct&c1comp=gt&c1val=50&c2stat=fg3_pct&c2comp=gt&c2val=40&c3stat=ft_pct&c3comp=gt&c3val=90&c4stat=g&c4comp=gt&c4val=15&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws

Kevin Willis doesn't really count though, as he only shot 1 3pointer and 3 FT's, while only playing 91 min.

Armstrong and Eisley ain't really messing you Bird there, either.