PDA

View Full Version : Can someone please explain the world of high fashion to me? (contains NSFW link)



Real Men Wear Green
01-23-2015, 11:01 AM
I understand that for certain jobs and occasions I'm supposed to wear a suit, and comprehend that certain colors clash. Don't want to wear pants that are too tight but don't want to be sagging either. I guess that means my knowledge is too limited because I just don't get this. (http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2015/jan/22/-sp-*****-flashing-at-rick-owens-menswear-show) If you scroll down in that link you'll see stuff that you don't want your co-workers catching you looking at. Here's the PG pic:

http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-620/h--/q-95/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2015/1/22/1421945522344/d7cbba56-c35a-47f7-9135-efe4df4ec3fd-620x372.jpeg

Who is buying these clothes, and how does this kind of thing make these designers so wealthy?

KobesFinger
01-23-2015, 11:13 AM
I'm no expert but I always thought the point was to be different for the sake of being different. Its mostly the 1% who buy stuff like this, simply because they can and it separates them from us. And quite frankly, they can continue to do so because I wouldn't wear any of that shit. This guy's wearing a corset, a bustier or whatever you want to call it:

http://www.bsideblog.com/images/2008/06/mcqueen.jpg

Lebowsky
01-23-2015, 11:13 AM
The link is broken.

Real Men Wear Green
01-23-2015, 11:19 AM
The link is broken.
The auto-censor kills part of the link, sorry. Here's the site: http://www.theguardian.com/fashion The curious will just have to find it for themselves.

fiddy
01-23-2015, 11:20 AM
retarded industry, from retards to retards

Real Men Wear Green
01-23-2015, 11:20 AM
I'm no expert but I always thought the point was to be different for the sake of being different. Its mostly the 1% who buy stuff like this, simply because they can and it separates them from us.
I guess that's all there is to it. If I was a billionaire I still don't think that I would dress that way but whatever.

Lebowsky
01-23-2015, 11:25 AM
The auto-censor kills part of the link, sorry. Here's the site: http://www.theguardian.com/fashion The curious will just have to find it for themselves.
Found it, thanks. I wish I hadn't, though.

knickballer
01-23-2015, 11:35 AM
I guess it's become saturated to the point where the most outrageous and obnoxious designs are popular because they are new, "innovative" and "creative"..

LJJ
01-23-2015, 11:54 AM
Think of it as a concept car. Those clothes aren't meant to be worn and aren't for the consumer market, they are meant as a promotion for the brand and to explore design possibilities to an extreme, that will then be applied to consumer market clothing in a more functional way.

Real Men Wear Green
01-23-2015, 11:59 AM
Think of it as a concept car. Those clothes aren't meant to be worn and aren't for the consumer market, they are meant as a promotion for the brand and to explore design possibilities to an extreme, that will then be applied to consumer market clothing in a more functional way.
So what does the designer tell Gap the functional application of a hole for the balls is?

LJJ
01-23-2015, 12:02 PM
So what does the designer tell Gap the functional application of a hole for the balls is?

It's an extreme. The functional equivalent would be ***** cleavage a la the Rolling Stone Sticky Fingers album cover. I think fashion is wack too, I'm not defending it. You ask what the justification is, I told you.

Real Men Wear Green
01-23-2015, 12:06 PM
It's an extreme. The functional equivalent would be ***** cleavage a la the Rolling Stone Sticky Fingers album cover. I think fashion is wack too, I'm not defending it. You ask what the justification is, I told you.
True, I'm just asking the question.

KevinNYC
01-23-2015, 01:30 PM
It's an extreme. The functional equivalent would be ***** cleavage a la the Rolling Stone Sticky Fingers album cover. I think fashion is wack too, I'm not defending it. You ask what the justification is, I told you.

Cleavage?

~primetime~
01-23-2015, 01:35 PM
It's like going to an art show...actually it literally is an "art show"

it's not meant to be practical clothing

LJJ
01-23-2015, 01:43 PM
Cleavage?

That's why I gave the example to go with it, jackass.

Akrazotile
01-23-2015, 01:47 PM
C'mon OP, when are you gonna drop magnum on us??

dunksby
01-23-2015, 01:48 PM
Think of it as a concept car. Those clothes aren't meant to be worn and aren't for the consumer market, they are meant as a promotion for the brand and to explore design possibilities to an extreme, that will then be applied to consumer market clothing in a more functional way.
Except a team of scientists and brilliant engineers design concept cars while these outfits are designed by a bunch of retards putting up a front. There is a reason they are outrageous, it's because they are ****ing stupid.