PDA

View Full Version : Russell Westbrook is the best PG in basketball



2010splash
01-28-2015, 08:17 PM
Better than Stephen Curry.

- better attacker/finisher
- better transition player
- better midrange shooter
- much, much better defender
- better volume scorer (Curry benefits from low volume, couldn't handle the high volume Westbrook attempts)
- much, much better rebounder
- better clutch player
- better pick/roll player
- better shot blocker
- better passer
- better ball handler

About the only thing Curry does better is shoot the 3.

24-Inch_Chrome
01-28-2015, 08:18 PM
GOATbrook :bowdown:

navy
01-28-2015, 08:19 PM
Mods.

AnaheimLakers24
01-28-2015, 08:20 PM
If only being the best pg meant something.

LoneyROY7
01-28-2015, 08:22 PM
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/015/039/russell-westbrook.jpg

They Won
01-30-2015, 01:42 PM
:facepalm

russwest0
01-30-2015, 01:47 PM
Imagine Westbrook playing for a good coach :eek:

kells333
01-30-2015, 01:50 PM
Imagine Westbrook playing for a good coach :eek:

Imagine him playing with a good coach and shooters and or a team build around him.

swagga
01-30-2015, 02:02 PM
Imagine Westbrook playing for a good coach :eek:
http://media.npr.org/assets/blogs/health/images/2010/02/baddog-51a8cddf13a416174a4cbd504694b51ef0910d3e-s800-c15.jpg

Captvic
01-30-2015, 03:20 PM
:facepalm

wakencdukest
01-30-2015, 04:18 PM
Better than Stephen Curry.

- better attacker/finisher
- better transition player
- better midrange shooter
- much, much better defender
- better volume scorer (Curry benefits from low volume, couldn't handle the high volume Westbrook attempts)
- much, much better rebounder
- better clutch player
- better pick/roll player
- better shot blocker
- better passer
- better ball handler

About the only thing Curry does better is shoot the 3.






Bullshit. Curry shoots better from anywhere on the floor, except for dunks. Westbrook is not a better passer. The 2 things Westbrook is better at is Defense and rebounding. All this clutch, ball handling, attacking, transition, pick and roll, volume scoring crap, is all opinionated bullshit you can't measure. He's a better rebounder and defender, that's it.

strike
01-30-2015, 04:24 PM
Another x is the best y thread.

Shocker

Genaro
01-30-2015, 04:30 PM
I think that Curry and WB are about of the same level so it will come down to better fit when you are planning a team.

imdaman99
01-30-2015, 04:33 PM
I think that Curry and WB are about of the same level so it will come down to better fit when you are planning a team.
This.

It will also come down to the playoffs, especially if them 2 play each other in the 1st round.

http://sportsnaut.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/tumblr_m934hfztvH1r1ang0o1_400.gif

Jlamb47
01-30-2015, 04:56 PM
Its debatable but i got Westbrook > Curry as well

2010splash
02-04-2015, 11:25 PM
Monster.:applause:

Lebronxrings
02-04-2015, 11:27 PM
would westbrook on the warriors lose any games at all?

rezznor
02-04-2015, 11:32 PM
curry is the better team player

WWRWestbrookDo?
02-05-2015, 12:23 AM
this is a debate I have in my mind all the time. Not really sure who I go with as they are completely different players.

KNOW1EDGE
02-05-2015, 12:24 AM
Just imagine if he wasn't a retard.

Imagine if he took smart shots instead of, well, you know, Westbrook shots.

Imagine if he passed the ball and created opportunities for his teammates.

Imagine if he was Chris Paul.

Imagine if Westbrook really was the best pg in the league. Imagine.

Imagine.

2010splash
02-05-2015, 12:28 AM
Just imagine if he wasn't a retard.

Imagine if he took smart shots instead of, well, you know, Westbrook shots.

Imagine if he passed the ball and created opportunities for his teammates.

Imagine if he was Chris Paul.

Imagine if Westbrook really was the best pg in the league. Imagine.

Imagine.
Yes! Imagine if he was a not-dominant conservative PG who averages a measly 17 ppg because he wasn't physically capable of 35, 40 and 45+ point eruptions since nobody can guard him 1 on 1. That would be much better!


.....NOT!

2010splash
02-05-2015, 12:30 AM
Curry's definitely close but Chris Paul is out of this discussion. He is not a dominant player at all.

Thunderfan86
02-05-2015, 12:34 AM
Yes! Imagine if he was a not-dominant conservative PG who averages a measly 17 ppg because he wasn't physically capable of 35, 40 and 45+ point eruptions since nobody can guard him 1 on 1. That would be much better!


.....NOT!
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

That reminds me......I need to go watch Borat again. :cheers:

greatest-ever
02-05-2015, 01:00 AM
I'd still go with Curry, he's more consistent and more efficient.