View Full Version : Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
hawkfan
01-30-2015, 01:52 PM
Discuss.
Lexington Steel
01-30-2015, 01:56 PM
You've been melting down a lot lately. :oldlol:
What's wrong pal?
Practice?
01-30-2015, 02:06 PM
You've been melting down a lot lately. :oldlol:
What's wrong pal?
:lol
24-Inch_Chrome
01-30-2015, 02:15 PM
Worse, the Scott Brooks effect. Dude can't coach for shit, I don't see Teague faring any better than Westbrook if it's just iso after iso.
Genaro
01-30-2015, 02:19 PM
Is Durant still missing a lot of games and Teague breaking his hand and out for a month?
If that's the case, worse of course. WB is the best player by a mile.
Kungfro
01-30-2015, 02:51 PM
You've been melting down a lot lately. :oldlol:
What's wrong pal?
He seems to mistake peoples dislike of him as hating on the Hawks.
Real14
01-30-2015, 02:53 PM
Reported.
Captvic
01-30-2015, 02:59 PM
Thunder would be infinitely better and the hawks would be worse. Lets face it, Westbrook is a chucker
24-Inch_Chrome
01-30-2015, 03:16 PM
Thunder would be infinitely better and the hawks would be worse. Lets face it, Westbrook is a chucker
:hammerhead:
kshutts1
01-30-2015, 03:20 PM
OKC would be worse, assuming Teague plays the same games as Westbrook.
Hawks would also be worse with Russell than Teague.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.