Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?

[hawkfan]

Discuss.

[Lexington Steel]

You've been melting down a lot lately. :oldlol:

What's wrong pal?

[Practice?]

You've been melting down a lot lately. :oldlol:

What's wrong pal?

:lol

[24-Inch_Chrome]

Worse, the Scott Brooks effect. Dude can't coach for shit, I don't see Teague faring any better than Westbrook if it's just iso after iso.

[Genaro]

Is Durant still missing a lot of games and Teague breaking his hand and out for a month?
If that's the case, worse of course. WB is the best player by a mile.

[Kungfro]

You've been melting down a lot lately. :oldlol:

What's wrong pal?

He seems to mistake peoples dislike of him as hating on the Hawks.

[Real14]

Reported.

[navy]

Worse

[Captvic]

Thunder would be infinitely better and the hawks would be worse. Lets face it, Westbrook is a chucker

[24-Inch_Chrome]

Thunder would be infinitely better and the hawks would be worse. Lets face it, Westbrook is a chucker

:hammerhead:

[kshutts1]

OKC would be worse, assuming Teague plays the same games as Westbrook.

Hawks would also be worse with Russell than Teague.